SPAFOA OVERVIEW Kenneth O. Olsen Capitol Hill Briefing Oct 27, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ACCELERATOR STEWARDSHIP & OTHER DOE/INDUSTRY ACTIVITIES FRIB/SPAFOA MEETING May 1, 2014 Kenneth O. Olsen Superconducting Particle Accelerator Forum of.
Advertisements

DOE Office of Science Budget Overview
Kenneth O. Olsen Fermilab Meeting Nov. 4, “The SPAFOA provides a network for its members with business interests on US Government funded accelerator.
1 Performance Assessment An NSF Perspective MJ Suiter Budget, Finance and Awards NSF.
SUPERCONDUCTING PARTICLE ACCELERATOR FORUM OF AMERICA (SPAFOA) Update and Planned 2013 Activities April 3, 2013 MSU FRIB Ken Olsen
U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science Dr. Raymond Orbach February 25, 2003 Briefing for the Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee FY04 Budget.
Association for the Education of Adults EAEA European AE Research – Look towards the future ERDI General Assembly, 2004.
KEN OLSEN, BNL MEETING, 5/21/2015 DOE BUDGET & DISCUSSION TOPICS.
SPAFOA OVERVIEW Kenneth O. Olsen Brookhaven Lab Meeting May 21, 2015.
The Issue of Technology Readiness Level One of the current issues being discussed by the Department of Energy’s Technology Transfer Working Group is the.
Industrial Studies of ILC Cavities & Component Production in the Americas IPAC 11 – Kyoto, Japan May 23, 2010 Science Projects Homeland Security Medical.
SRS Data and the SciSIP Initiative National Science Foundation Division of Science Resources Statistics Lynda T. Carlson Division Director SBE Advisory.
SCRF ACCELERATOR INDUSTRY STEWARDSHIP OUTLOOK Ken Olsen SPAFOA Fermilab Meeting Nov. 13, 2012.
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2012 ID-05 Resource Mobilization for Capacity Building (individual, institutional & infrastructure)
1 Albrecht Wagner, Snowmass 0805 Albrecht Wagner DESY and Hamburg University Challenges for Realising the ILC.
1 Directorate of Industry Relations, Analysis and Policy (DIRAP) Paul Herring, Director “CASE FOR CANADIAN DEFENCE INDUSTRIAL POLICY” 27 February 2012.
Partnerships and Broadening Participation Dr. Nathaniel G. Pitts Director, Office of Integrative Activities May 18, 2004 Center.
From Foresight to Innovation - An Approach from Australia in the Building Construction Industry From Foresight to Innovation – Bridging The Gap German.
Advanced Research Projects Agency – Energy Overview Sven C. Mumme Technology to Market Advisor, ARPA-E
Illinois Accelerator Research Center (IARC) Bob Kephart IARC Usage.
CAPITOL HILL BRIEFING DEC 11, 2013 SUPERCONDUCTING PARTICLE ACCELERATOR FORUM OF AMERICA KENNETH O. OLSEN.
National Tank Truck Carriers Tank Truck Safety & Security Council President’s Report June 5, 2014.
Department of Energy Advanced Research Projects Agency – Energy (ARPA-E) Basic Energy Science Advisory Committee July 10, 2009.
DOE OFFICE OF SCIENCE ACCELERATOR STEWARDSHIP PROGRAM KEN OLSEN SPAFOA FRIB MEETING APRIL 3, 2013 (Includes slides prepared by Mark Zisman, DOE) IBT Workshop.
CHAPTER 6 Business-to-Business Markets: How and Why Organizations Buy M A R K E T I N G Real People, Real Choices Fourth Edition.
24 April 2015 FY 2016 Budget Request to Congress for DOE’s Office of Science Dr. Patricia M. Dehmer Acting Director, Office of Science
ESTIC 4Bahrain, 1-2 April th Meeting of ESCWA-ESTIC ESCWA TECHNOLOGY CENTRE DETAILED ASSESSMENT OF REGIONAL NEEDS & PRIORITIES AND IDENTIFICATION.
E.Elsen European LC Workshop, Cockcroft, UK, Jan 2007 Perspectives for European LC R&D.
ILC ACCELERATOR AND DETECTOR TECHNOLOGY IN INDUSTRY SUPERCONDUCTING PARTICLE ACCELERATOR FORUM OF AMERICA KENNETH O. OLSEN June 12, 2013.
Keith O. Hodgson SSRL Director Brief Update on the Linac Coherent Light Source - LCLS February 26, 2002 Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee Undulator.
Global Navigation Satellite Systems Progress through Cooperation 5 March 2009 Michael Shaw, Director U.S. National Coordination Office.
M. Ross, N. Walker, A. Yamamoto ILC Cost Review, (updated for TB) and Cost Drivers  Future R & D ILC Cost Review (M. Ross,
Scientific Research and Experimental Development (SR&ED) Program: Should You Take Part? Douglas Clay SR&ED Program Calgary, Alberta.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Presentation to the NASA Goddard Academy National Aeronautics and Space Administration 3. Commerce Space.
Theme 1: Understanding Science and Innovation Summary December 4, 2008.
11 Welcome to All! October 26-28, 2009 Washington, D.C. Welcome to All! Accelerators for America’s Future Symposium and Workshop October 26-28, 2009 Washington,
NATO UNCLASSIFIED NATO Consultation, Command and Control Agency Acquisition Overview Mr. John D. Edell Director of Acquisition 15 June 2006.
1 SPAFOA Capitol Hill Briefing December 2013 Harry Weerts International Linear Collider - progress & status SPAFOA meeting, Dec 11, 2013, H.Weerts.
Status Report on ILC Project in Japan Seiichi SHIMASAKI Director, Office for Particle and Nuclear Research Promotion June 19, 2015.
Office of Science (SC) Overview John Yates Office of Operations Program Management, SC-33 Office of Science Briefing for DOE FIMS Training at ANL – May.
Status of the International Linear Collider and Importance of Industrialization B Barish Fermilab 21-Sept-05.
The Berkeley Center for Magnet Technology Superconducting Particle Accelerator Forum of America Member’s Meeting September 23, 2015 Steve Gourlay Director,
E u r o p e a n C o m m i s s i o nCommunity Research Global Change and Ecosystems EU environmental research : Part B Policy objectives  Lisbon strategy.
SPAFOA OVERVIEW Kenneth O. Olsen SLAC and LBL meetings Sept 22/23, 2015.
Congressional and Capitol Hill Issues and Update Dr. Jack Dugan SPAFOA May 1, 2014.
Department of Energy Office of Science  FY 2007 Request for Office of Science is 14% above FY 2006 Appropriation  FY 2007 Request for HEP is 8% above.
What’s Happening at Internet2 Renee Woodten Frost Associate Director Middleware and Security 8 March 2005.
Industrial Participation & SRF Infrastructure at Fermilab Phil Pfund with input from Harry Carter, Rich Stanek, Mike Foley, Dan Olis, and others.
New Framework for Strategic Goal Assessment NSF Advisory Committee for Business and Operations November 8-9, 2006 Tom Cooley, Director, BFA.
U.S. Plan for Cavity Production Bob Kephart ALCPG09/GDE Sep 30, 2009.
Linear Collider Forum of America ILC Technology Applications Workshop Ken Olsen LCFOA President May 15,
1 Eric R. Colby DOE Office of High Energy Physics IPAC 2015 Richmond, VA May 6, 2015 Engagement with Industry: “A funding agent’s viewpoint”
E.Elsen GDE Meeting, Beijing, Feb 2007 Perspectives and Planning for European LC R&D.
ILC 2007 Global Design Effort 1 Planning Damping Rings Activities in the Engineering Design Phase Andy Wolski Cockcroft Institute/University of Liverpool.
DESY. Status and Perspectives in Particle Physics Albrecht Wagner Chair of the DESY Directorate.
UK X-FEL National Laboratory Perspective Susan Smith STFC ASTeC IoP PAB/STFC Workshop Towards a UK XFEL 16 th February 2016.
TECHNOPOLIS OYJ Access to Customers, Capital and Partners Development Services.
APICS Board Update April APICS Mission APICS builds and validates knowledge in supply chain and operations management. We enable our community of.
HPRF Faraday Partnership Industrial Activities in support of Accelerator Science David Wilcox Doug Clunie HPRF Faraday Partnership 26 September 2006.
ILC MAC April 07 Global Design Effort 1 European Regional R&D plan Brian Foster (Oxford & GDE) MAC Meeting.
Lucio Rossi The High Luminosity LHC Project Distinguished Lecturer 2013.
Image courtesy of Oak Ridge National Laboratory Eric R. Colby † Office of High Energy Physics Office of Science U. S. Department of Energy Office of Science-Led.
Economic Drivers : Government, construction, and related finance sectors hardest hit by global recession Persistently high unemployment and weak recovery.
FNAL SCRF Review R. Kephart. What is this Review? FNAL has argued that SCRF technology is an “enabling” accelerator technology (much like superconducting.
Innovation Development Strategy
Ways to industry participation in CLIC 24th October, 2017
Introduction to Jefferson Lab
International Strategy
SOLID Collaboration Meeting
OUR HISTORY & MISSION ABOUT US. OUR HISTORY & MISSION ABOUT US.
Presentation transcript:

SPAFOA OVERVIEW Kenneth O. Olsen Capitol Hill Briefing Oct 27, 2015

Outline SPAFOA mission and history Snapshot of the accelerator market Key issue for US manufacturers

SPAFOA Mission “The SPAFOA provides a network for its members with business interests on US Government funded accelerator R&D and siting of large accelerator projects” Member meetings at major SC labs and project sites Monthly Newsletters, bulletins, issue papers Capitol Hill liaison and briefings The SPAFOA is an industry advocacy group fostering open communications between industry and Government, we do no market or consult for individual members

SPAFOA Evolution Our 10 year anniversary! Chartered in 2005 as a 501 (c) 6 not-for-profit DC corporation titled the “Linear Collider Forum of the Americas” (LCFOA). Ten original companies. In response to the changes in the ILC program, reorganized in 2008 to the Superconducting Particle Accelerator Forum of the Americas (SPAFOA) Renamed in 2012 to the Superconducting Particle Accelerator Forum of America to reflect 100% US industry membership

SPAFOA Meetings Fermilab Nov, 4, 2014 Brookhaven May 21, 2015 SLAC Sept 22, 2015 LBL Sept 23, 2015 All meetings are open, agendas and presentations posted on Average attendance 18 members

SPAFOA at SLAC Sept 22, 2015

SPAFOA MEMBERSHIP June 2015 COMPANYCITYSTATE Advanced Energy SystemsMedfordNY Air LiquideNewarkDE Amuneal manufacturing Corp.PhiladelphiaPA C. F. Roark Welding and Manufacturing BrownsvilleIN Communication Power Corp.HauppaugeNY Communications Power IndustriesBeverlyMA Diversified TechnologiesBedfordMA Everson TeslaNazarethPA Fermi Research AssociatesBataviaIL General AtomicsSan DiegoCA

SPAFOA MEMBERSHIP June 2015 CompanyCityState Keller TechnologyBuffaloNY Lakeshore CryotronicsWestervilleOH Linde CryogenicsTulsaOK Meyer ToolOak LawnIL Micro Communications, Inc.MerrimackNH Muons Inc.BataviaIL NiowaveLansingMI Parsons BrinkerhoffVirginia BeachVA Precision Boring Co.Clinton TownshipMI PHPK TechnologiesColumbusOH Scientific InstrumentsWest Palm BeachFL

SPAFOA Industry Diversity Forum represents a cross section of hi-tech accelerator industry SCRF accelerator components and systems Superconducting and high performance magnets Power electronics and instrumentation Materials science Precision manufacturing Civil engineering and construction management R&D lab and project management

SPAFOA BOD Oct 2015 Board of Directors is responsible for approving annual budget, meeting locations and agendas, and issue papers. Communications Power Industries Linde Cryogenics Meyer Tool

ACCELERATOR MARKETPLACE Accelerators for America’s Future (2009) identified 5 market categories: Energy and the Environment, Medicine, Industry, Security and Defense, and Discovery Science Report states there are about 30,000 accelerators in use today outside of Discovery Science SPAFOA activities are focused on Discovery Science, most member’s business interests go beyond this area Discovery Science accelerators in the US is a Government (one customer) market. The DOE market represent the leading edge technology used in several SC user facilities that require ultra high energy (GeV) machines

Industrial Accelerator Applications Survey of beam energy and beam power of industrial accelerators in use at present. Well known medical applications of accelerators shown as reference (Workshop on Energy and Environmental Applications of Accelerators DOE OHEP June 24-16, 2015)

Major Accelerator Application Areas

Two Facets of the Accelerator Market “Low” Energy (Commercial Customers) Evolutionary market 10% annual growth >10,000 in 1992; >30,000 now >6,000 in medical applications Multiple suppliers for major market segments “High” Energy (Government Customers) Each facility different design Gov’t, university and industry users SC technology showing dominance Leading edge technology No near term significant commercial market A few companies are in both facets

Accelerator Stewardship Program The mission of U.S. Dept. of Energy’s Office of High Energy Physics (DOE-HEP) is to broaden its accelerator R&D activities beyond its support of only discovery science to include medicine, energy and environment, defense and security, and industry Basic Research Needs workshops and reports are available applications for: 1. Medical 2. Lasers 3. Energy and Environment SPAFOA supportive, a few of our companies have received R&D funding from recent FOAs Detail overview of plans and progress to be presented by Eric Colby, DOE OHEP, later in this program

Discovery Science Market The SPAFOA strongly supports the accelerator stewardship program’s efforts to identify and fund research for markets outside of the Office of Science However while the stewardship program has identified several promising accelerator applications, the R&D funding projections are not adequate to pursue many of them in a reasonable timeframe The DOE Discovery Science market is the major source of near term funding for many high tech accelerator industries and is the foundation for growth and stability for the next 5 years However the appears the majority of this market is being lost to US industries through DOE’s current procurement policies Key question is how essential is a domestic supplier base for current and future DOE SC major science facilities?

Discovery Science Market Facts 840 XFEL cavities were manufactured in European companies, US was essentially excluded from bidding, all tooling was provided to the winning companies by DESY TRIUMF in Canada produced the newly operable SCRF accelerator based ARIEL using, as they proudly stated, 100% Canadian industry FRIB at Michigan State and the LCLS-II at SLAC have made major competitive awards to off-shore suppliers in Europe and China It has been very difficult to get substantive feedback for the procurement authorities in the field ISSUE: While highly qualified to produce limited quantities; US does not have an existing industrialization capability to supply several high tech components for future major SC projects and the ILC

Summary US industry lacks the manufacturing infrastructure to be competitive with foreign manufacturers for many hi tech components for discovery science facilities DOE SC is the sole customer for these components DOE market has major fluctuations US suppliers add significant value to major DOE science projects: Increased domestic capability and stability Foundation to implement stewardship program priorities Ease of life cycle support during facility operations Eliminate the risk of currency fluctuations ROI to taxpayers: jobs and corporate and personal income taxes

Recommendation DOE SC has invested approximately $250M for advanced accelerator component R&D with US industry over the past 10 years, several procurements were within the SBIR/STTR program Feedback from SPAFOA members indicate in the last 12 months over 50% of high tech procurement dollars for major projects for LCLS-II, FRIB and at Fermilab they bid on have been awarded to international companies SPAFOA members represent a subset of all bidders so the above statement may not be a valid statistic for all industry. SPAFOA requests that DOE SC collect and aggregate procurement data on individual purchases of high tech hardware over $50K and summarize by awards by hardware category and country SPAFOA BOD volunteers to assist DOE SC in the design of survey

Recommendation (Cont.) The SPAFOA, other industries, and DOE should jointly review the results of the survey to define the issues DOE SC should determine if an “industrialization initiative” is needed to strengthen US industries capability to serve their future discovery science needs If yes, DOE should explore possible options such as its National Network for Manufacturing Innovation (NNMI), SBIR/STTR advanced manufacturing tasks, competitive SC funded RFPs for tooling, CRADAs with labs, Small Business Voucher program etc. to achieve this capability SPAFOA and other members of industry are willing to engage with DOE for this “industrialization initiative”

Recommendation (Cont.) DOE SC should include an industrialization plan which maximizes the value added for US industry participation for all new programs as part of the DOE Order CD-1 report