Module Four: Resources for Learning A Collaboration between NCSA, NDE, and ESUs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fostering A Positive School Culture Through Collaborative Administrative Practices A Framework for Excellence: The Role of Administration.
Advertisements

Characteristics of Improving School Districts Themes from Research October 2004 G. Sue Shannon and Pete Bylsma Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
Quality teaching requires strong professional learning communities. Collegial interchange, not isolation, must become the norm for teachers. Communities.
A GUIDE TO CREATING QUALITY ONLINE LEARNING DOING DISTANCE EDUCATION WELL.
Balanced Leadership: District- Level Leadership and Student Achievement Leadership Team April 3, 2008.
School Leadership that Works
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
RTI as a Lever for School Change School Partnerships for Change in Teacher Education Tom Bellamy—February 2, 2011.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
1 The Nebraska Leadership Initiative Overview of Rationale and Research A Collaboration between NCSA, NDE, and ESUs.
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
Professional Learning Communities at Work
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
Forward Moving Districts Information Summarized by Iowa Support Team as they Study Identified Buildings and Districts Actions in those Buildings and Districts.
Linda Bragg Office of Title II, III and System Support Division of Educator Quality and System Support.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
The Professional Learning Community Presented by Tom Jennings.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
SAU #53 Serving the School Districts of Allenstown, Chichester, Deerfield, Epsom, and Pembroke Action Plan
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Session Materials  Wiki
Session Materials Wireless Wiki
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Technology Leadership
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.
AWCPA PLC Facilitator’s Training AWCPA Leadership Team.
Northern Humboldt Union High School District Performance-Based Compensation William J. Slotnik Executive Director Community Training and Assistance Center.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
Module Two: Culture for Learning A Collaboration between NCSA, NDE, and ESUs.
Module Three: Instructional Leadership for Learning A Collaboration between NCSA, NDE, and ESUs.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
Bringing About Change Using Professional Learning Communities OSPI Winter Conference 2006 Dave Colombini – Principal, South Kitsap High School Dan Whitford.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Blueprints for RtI Implementation Coaches/Principals 10/8/09.
Transforming the Learning, Teaching, and Leadership Environment Summer Institutes 2001 Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction/Association of Washington.
Professional Development: Finding the Keys to Unlocking the Door to School Improvement Catherine Stickney February 26, 2011.
Accreditation (AdvancED) STANDARD #2: GOVERNANCE & LEADERSHIP
A HANDBOOK FOR PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES AT WORK CHAPTERS 1-3 Learning by Doing.
Learning-Centered Leadership Joseph Murphy Peabody College, Vanderbilt University.
Module One: Governance for Learning A Collaboration between NCSA, NDE, and ESUs.
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
Leading Learning in a School & District Dr. Brad Balch, Indiana State University Mrs. Leslie Ballard, AdvancED Indiana
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Stage 3 Plan: Develop School Improvement Plan.
Office of Service Quality
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
Magnitude of Change.
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Professional Learning Communities Creating powerful and effective learning for teachers and students.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
A Roadmap to Vistas, Historical Sites, and Hot Spots on Your Journey to Becoming a PLC Janel Keating and Robert Eaker.
Professional Learning Communities
February 21-22, 2018.
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Presentation transcript:

Module Four: Resources for Learning A Collaboration between NCSA, NDE, and ESUs

2 Resources for Learning o Allocation of Resources o Support o Professional Development

3 ComponentLevel ILevel IILevel IIILevel IVRating/Evidence Resources Rubric Allocation of Resources  The school allocates resources based on past practice or individualized requests.  The school addresses the need to re-allocate existing resources or engages in systematic planning.  The school effectively allocates resources to meet the goals for achievement and instruction.  The school maximizes student achievement through effective and efficient allocation of resources. Rubric Level: Evidence: Support  Support for student learning is left to chance by individual actors.  Time and support are constant, learning is variable.  Support for student learning is addressed and plans are initiated to develop an institutional response.  Time and support are constant, learning is variable.  Systems for support of student learning, and an institutional response are implemented.  Time and support are variable, learning is constant.  Systems of support are routinely used to improve learning for all students.  Time and support are variable, learning is constant. Rubric Level: Evidence: Professional Development  Professional development is left to chance by individual actors based on personal preference and is rarely job embedded.  There is no evidence the new learning will be applied to the classroom.  Links to improved student achievement are low.  Professional development is negotiated between teachers and administration and is job embedded in isolated pockets.  The new learning could potentially be used in the classroom.  Links to improved student achievement are low.  Professional development is aligned to clear learning goals and is purposely job embedded.  The new learning is utilized in the classroom by pockets of teachers.  Links to improved student achievement are high.  Professional development provides job embedded skills for improvement.  The new learning is consistently used by most staff.  Links to improved student achievement are high. Rubric Level: Evidence:

4 Administrative Leadership: Allocation and Support o Traditional Model for Most Schools: Time and support have been the constant. Learning has been the variable. o New Paradigm: Learning is the constant. Time and support are the variables. DuFour, DuFour & Eaker (2004)

5 Administrative Leadership: Allocation and Support o Superintendents in High Performing Schools ensure that… Time, money, personnel and materials are allocated to accomplish the district’s goals. Initiatives not aligned to the goals may be dropped. Waters and Marzano, (2006); NSSE (2007)

6 Administrative Leadership: Allocation and Support Five Organizational Conditions for Improving School Systems Quality teachers o The recruitment, placement, and professional development of quality teachers. Effective Leadership o The leader’s decisions and practices support the vision of student learning. Quality Information o The collection, management and use of information enables the school district to make informed decisions, take specific actions and assess the results of improvement efforts related to student learning.

7 Administrative Leadership: Allocation and Support Five Organizational Conditions for Improving School Systems Policies and Practices that Foster and Sustain Improvement o The district’s development and implementation of policies and practices support improvement efforts. Resources and Support Systems to Sustain Improvement o The district provides support through resources and assistance. Assistance is vital to sustaining improvement efforts. o The district must allocate and deploy the necessary human, technical, and material resources in order to live up to its promises. This may include mentors, tutors and role models. National Study of School Evaluation (NSSE, 2007) 0

8 Administrative Leadership: Allocation and Support Correlates of Effective Schools: Opportunity to Learn & Time on Task First Generation: Teachers allocate significant amount of time to instruction on important curriculum. Second Generation: Problems will arise from the scarcity of time for all of the content. o Organized abandonment. o Successful schools will declare that some things are more important than others. Lezotte, L. (1991)

9 Perceptions that can cause change to be viewed as: First-order Change When a change is perceived as: Second-order Change When a change is perceived as: An extension of the pastA break from the past Within existing paradigmsOutside of existing paradigms Consistent with prevailing values and norms Conflicted with prevailing values and norms Implemented with existing knowledge & skills Requiring new knowledge & skills to implement Lezotte, L. (1991)

10 As a District Team, briefly discuss: Think about “allocation and support”. o What strengths does your district demonstrate related to them? o What challenges exist and how will you address them?

11 ComponentLevel ILevel IILevel IIILevel IVRating/Evidence Resources Rubric Allocation of Resources  The school allocates resources based on past practice or individualized requests.  The school addresses the need to re-allocate existing resources or engages in systematic planning.  The school effectively allocates resources to meet the goals for achievement and instruction.  The school maximizes student achievement through effective and efficient allocation of resources. Rubric Level: Evidence: Support  Support for student learning is left to chance by individual actors.  Time and support are constant, learning is variable.  Support for student learning is addressed and plans are initiated to develop an institutional response.  Time and support are constant, learning is variable.  Systems for support of student learning, and an institutional response are implemented.  Time and support are variable, learning is constant.  Systems of support are routinely used to improve learning for all students.  Time and support are variable, learning is constant. Rubric Level: Evidence: Where would you place your school on the Resources for Learning Rubric?

12 Administrative Leadership: Professional Development Components of effective professional development o It is based on improving student learning. o It changes teacher practice. o It changes teacher attitudes and beliefs. o It is job embedded. o It provides ongoing long-term support. o The building principal is a key supporter and actively involved. Guskey, T. R. (2000)

13 Administrative Leadership: Professional Development The initial training is not as critical, as is support through the implementation stage. Professional development should be judged by the following: o Clear focus on learning and learners. o Emphasis on individual and organizational change. o Small changes guided by grand vision. o Ongoing professional development that is procedurally embedded. Guskey, T. R. (2000)

14 Administrative Leadership: Professional Development o A meaningful commitment of funding must be dedicated to professional development for teachers and principals. o The professional development must be in line with the district goals. o The resources must be: deployed at the school level. utilized in a manner that aligns with the district goals. Waters & Marzano (2006)

15 Perceptions that can cause change to be viewed as: First-order Change When a change is perceived as: Second-order Change When a change is perceived as: An extension of the pastA break from the past Within existing paradigmsOutside of existing paradigms Consistent with prevailing values and norms Conflicted with prevailing values and norms Implemented with existing knowledge & skills Requiring new knowledge & skills to implement Lezotte, L. (1991)

16 Administrative Leadership: Professional Development Professional Learning Community Models o Learning Teams Rick Stiggins o Professional Learning Communities DuFour, DuFour & Eaker o Whole Faculty Study Groups Carlene Murphy

17 As a District Team, briefly discuss: Think about “Professional Development”. o What might your district need to do to create an environment of job-embedded professional development? o Based on that plan, how will you implement on-going, professional development at the district level?

18 ComponentLevel ILevel IILevel IIILevel IVRating/Evidence Resources Rubric Professional Development  Professional development is left to chance by individual actors based on personal preference and is rarely job embedded.  There is no evidence the new learning will be applied to the classroom.  Links to improved student achievement are low.  Professional development is negotiated between teachers and administration and is job embedded in isolated pockets.  The new learning could potentially be used in the classroom.  Links to improved student achievement are low.  Professional development is aligned to clear learning goals and is purposely job embedded.  The new learning is utilized in the classroom by pockets of teachers.  Links to improved student achievement are high.  Professional development provides job embedded skills for improvement.  The new learning is consistently used by most staff.  Links to improved student achievement are high. Rubric Level: Evidence: Where would you place your school on the Resources for Learning Rubric?

19 Discussion and Wrap-Up o What are the implications for leadership? o What are the implications for change?

20 Thank You! o We hope that this session will be meaningful for your schools and students.