Tennessee Center for Performance Excellence Section 2 – Process Evaluation Factors.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Using Baldrige to Create Organizational Alignment & Integration
Advertisements

EVALUATOR TIPS FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT WRITING The following slides were excerpted from an evaluator training session presented as part of the June 2011.
Welcome, Panel of Examiner and Process Development Members! Washington State Quality Award PEPD #1 Training 2008.
Personal Finance Chapter 1: Personal Financial Planning
Foundations of Excellence ® in the First College Year (4-year institutions) Salisbury University Project Description of Review Process of First College.
2015 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | 2015 Baldrige Excellence Framework (Health.
[Title of meeting] [Name of sponsor] [Date] For guidance on working with PowerPoint and reformatting slides, click on Help, then Microsoft PowerPoint Help,
2010 AHCA/NCAL National Quality Award Program - Gold Overview - Jeri Reinhardt Ed McMahon Tim Case.
Tennessee Center for Performance Excellence Section 3 – Evaluating Results.
Applicant Name RMPEx Site Visit Opening Meeting Team Leader - Team Members –
Do You Know ???.
“LEADS”: Leadership Enhancement And Development System.
Challenge Question: How would I like my performance on the job to be evaluated ? Self-Test Questions: 1.Why are some types of skills better assessed through.
JUDGES MEETING 1. Judges Meeting The Judges Meeting –Each Team will be assigned a date and time. Each Senior Examiner will be expected to present their.
Leadership and Strategic Planning
1 Assuring the Quality of your COSF Data. 2 What factors work to improve the quality of your data? What factors work to lessen the quality of your data?
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
Requirements Engineering Process – 1
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A
Procurement Transformation State of North Carolina
DEFINING JOB PERFORMANCE AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO ASSESSMENTS.
Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI)
Quality and Accreditation (1/3) Certification of Kingdom Tower for “ FIT for PURPOSE ” Series of tests of “Fitness” of sub-systems: Foundation Sub-Systems.
Unit 1 Outline Module 1: Innovations and Entrepreneurs Module 2: Small Business Module 3: Marketing Module 4: Accounting.
Training for Improved Performance
Performance Appraisal Notes & Concept Main features Applications of results of appraisal Potential benefits/advantages Potential complications.
Creating a Learning Organization Through the AHCA/NCAL Quality Award Program Demi Haffenreffer, RN, MBA President Haffenreffer & Associates, Inc.
Integrated Capability Maturity Model (CMMI)
University of Nevada, Reno Data-Driven Organization Governance 1 Governing a data-driven organization (4/24/2014)  Define governance within organizations.
Michigan Quality Leadership Award New Examiner Training 2014.
Scoring 1. Scoring Categories 1 – 6 (Process Categories) Examiners select a score (0-100) to summarize their observed strengths and opportunities for.
Missouri Integrated Model Mid-Year Meeting – January 14, 2009 Topical Discussion: Teams and Teaming Dr. Doug HatridgeDonna Alexander School Resource SpecialistReading.
A Florida Natural Resource: The Sterling Approach to Performance Excellence A workshop at The Florida Conference on Aging 2001 Doris Reeves-Lipscomb Groups-That-Work.
Implementation of the Essential Standards The Australian Quality Framework (AQTF) is the national set of standards which assures nationally consistent,
2015 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | 2015 Introduction to the Baldrige Excellence.
Software Engineering Lecture # 17
Including Quality Assurance Within The Theory of Action Presented to: CCSSO 2012 National Conference on Student Assessment June 27, 2012.
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Judgments. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.
Assessment in Education Patricia O’Sullivan Office of Educational Development UAMS.
Campus Quality Survey 1998, 1999, & 2001 Comparison Office of Institutional Research & Planning July 5, 2001.
Applicant Name RMPEx Site Visit Opening Meeting Team Leader - Team Members –
The Balanced Score Card
2010 AHCA/NCAL National Quality Award Program - Silver Overview - Session One Lance Reynolds Kevin Warren Tim Case.
Software Engineering - I
Overview of Portfolio Process Maturity
+ Chapter 9: Management of Business Intelligence © Sabherwal & Becerra-Fernandez.
 Knowledge management is managing the organization’s knowledge by means of systematic and organized processes.  For acquiring, organizing, sustaining,
Data Provenance Community Meeting November 6, 2014.
Factor0–5%10–25%30–45%50–65%70–85%90–100% Approach No systematic approach to Item requirements is evident; information is anecdotal. The beginning of a.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
1 The project is financed from the European Union funds within the framework of Erasmus+, Key Action 2: Cooperation for innovation and the exchange of.
No Teacher Left Behind Creating Professional Development for Transfer to Classroom Practice Defining and Evaluating.
Quality Review August 30, 2010 Office of Academic Quality Division of Performance & Accountability.
Process Improvement Plan-Do-Study-Act Cycle. “Problems breed problems, and the lack of a disciplined method of openly attacking them breeds more problems.”
IT Leading the Way to Institutional Effectiveness Presenter: Kendell Rice, Ph.D. July 11, 2007.
Welcome, Examiners! Washington State Quality Award Return Examiner Training 2009.
(2) Organize information processing centers environment, the various functions and details Information technology audit: An information technology audit,
Albemarle County’s Departmental Assessment Process Who, What, When and How? Lori Allshouse, County Executive Department John Freeman, Department of Social.
Managing Corporate Reputation Sarah Williams Senior Examiner December 2013 / March 2014 Assignment Brief.
Category 3: Do you listen? MidwayUSA Jeff Larkin, Vice President of Marketing Adam Ray, Vice President of Customer Support.
Chapter 23: Overview of the Occupational Therapy Process and Outcomes
MKT 498 EDU The learning interface/mkt498edudotcom.
MKT 498 ASSIST Education Expert/mkt498assist.com FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
Data You Can Use for Accreditation
Chapter 8: Performance-Based Strategies
Sustaining Continuous Improvement
Applicant Name RMPEx Site Visit Opening Meeting
Introduction to CPD Quality Assurance
Conducting a Self Assessment and Developing Your CQI Plan
Conducting a Self Assessment and Developing Your CQI Plan
Presentation transcript:

Tennessee Center for Performance Excellence Section 2 – Process Evaluation Factors

2 How do I evaluate process Items? Process Items are evaluated using four factors: Approach Deployment Learning Integration

3 Approach “Approach” refers to Appropriateness of methods Effectiveness of the methods The degree to which the approach is repeatable and based on reliable data and information (i.e., systematic)

4 Item 3.1 – Approach

5 Park Place Lexus - Approach 3.1a(2) Determine needs of customers Lexus is our primary source of formal information about clients and their needs and expectations. They utilize the Gallup CE11 survey based on a scientific model of factors that provide the greatest influence on clients’ purchasing behavior. Our Listening and Learning process shown in Figure 3.1A was designed to formalize our activities in receiving input from clients…This process begins with providing a variety of access points to collect feedback from our various customer segments as shown in Figure 3.1B…As new features, such as upgraded technology in vehicles, service offerings and new financing options are added to our products, the Listening and Learning process is used to collect feedback on these new features…

6 Deployment “Deployment” refers to the extent to which the approach applied in addressing the Item requirements is relevant and important to the organization the approach is applied consistently the approach is used by all appropriate work units

7 Park Place Lexus – Deployment 3.1a(2) Determine needs of customers …We validate the results of the Lexus survey for our specific clients and ensure that we get information from former, current, and potential clients about how we run our business…Focus groups...are conducted to help us understand the impressions that clients have of our dealerships, products, and services…We ensure that these groups contain former, existing, and potential clients…

8 Learning Learning refers to Refining the approach through cycles of evaluation and improvement Encouraging breakthrough change to the approach through innovation Sharing refinements and innovations with other work units and processes in your organization

9 Park Place Lexus – Learning Keeping listening and learning current Our Listening and Learning process includes a step to evaluate its own effectiveness. We use this evaluation step each month to ensure we continue to use the most effective approaches to listen to our clients.

10 Integration Integration refers to the extent to which The approach is aligned with the organizational needs identified in the Organizational Profile and other Process Items Measures, information, and improvement systems are complementary across processes and work units Plans, processes, results, analyses, learning, and actions, are harmonized across processes and work units to support organization-wide goals.

11 Alignment Consistency of plans, processes, information, resource decisions, actions, results, and analysis supporting key organization-wide goals.

12 Additional Vocabulary Process Key

13 Scoring System and Guidelines Each Category and Item is assigned a maximum point value (see page 3) Scoring Guidelines describe percentage ranges of the point value based on the Evaluation Factors (see page 64) The Examiner selects a scoring range that is “most descriptive of the organization’s achievement level” for each item Within the range, the Examiner will assign the appropriate score

14 Scoring Guidelines Process items are evaluated using four factors: A-D-L-I Assessed to make determinations regarding the effectiveness and maturity of the processes Scoring ranges provide gradations of maturity for an applicant's processes

End of Section 2