Connecticut Department of Correction Parole & Community Services Division Assessments Overview.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evidence Based Practices Lars Olsen, Director of Treatment and Intervention Programs Maine Department of Corrections September 4, 2008.
Advertisements

Key Challenges in the Field of Violence Against Women with Disabilities and Deaf Women Overview Overarching Challenges Barriers to Services Barriers to.
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS Helping children achieve their best. In school. At home. In life. National Association of School Psychologists.
What is the term that defines the men and women we supervise? Parolee Probationer Offender Supervised Releasee Restored Citizen Returning Citizen Client.
Community based child protection with Palestinian refugees: Increasing safety and hope ISSWA – Stockholm Professor Patrick O ’ Leary Griffith University.
Presented by Cedric R. Hendricks, Associate Director Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency.
Pathways to care in the absence of a local specialist Forensic Service, what we do in York. By Bekki Whisker.
Working with adolescent girls who display harmful sexual behaviour Denise Moultrie.
Assessing for Key Child Welfare Issues Version 1.0 | 2014.
May 1, Division of Parole and Probation Tony DeCrona, Interim Chief Kim Madris, Deputy Chief Tony DeCrona, Interim Chief Kim Madris, Deputy Chief.
State Administrative Agency (SAA) 2007 Re-Entry Grant Training Workshop The Governor’s Crime Commission Re-Entry Grants and Federal Resource Support Programs.
PROJECT FUNDING PROVIDED BY R e-entering O ffenders A chieving R ecovery ROAR offers reintegration and recovery services to male adult offenders transitioning.
Providers of Intensive Transitional Support Pre and Post Release for Men Leaving the Prison System in Southern Tasmania.
Bridgeport Safe Start Initiative Update Meeting September 23, 2004 Bridgeport Holiday Inn.
1 Module 3 Understanding Mental Disorders, Treatment, and Recovery.
DOC REENTRY SERVICES TEAM Reentry Services Director Gary Johnson Reentry Program Manager Tim Lanz Community Reentry Coordinator Farris Bell Facilities.
Second Chances: Housing and Services for Re-entering Prisoners National Alliance to End Homelessness Annual Conference Nikki Delgado Program Manager Corporation.
Implementing Evidence Based Principles into Supervision March 20,2013 Mack Jenkins, Chief Probation Officer County of San Diego.
Reentry Services Project Shelley Ford, MN Department of Corrections Sally Dandurand, Reentry Services Project June 2008, Connecting Youth to Success 1.
THE COALITION OF COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS PROVIDERS OF NEW JERSEY The Role of Community Resource Centers in Offender Re-entry.
Overview of Adult Community Corrections. Outline Organizational Structure Organizational Structure Probation population breakdown Probation population.
What is the Fathering Court? A program that offer non-custodial parents who have not been making child support payments in the District of Columbia, for.
A Probation perspective for International women’s day events, March 2013.
Setting the Stage for Change Drafting Maine’s State Plan for Individuals with ASD Nancy Cronin, MA ASD Systems Change Initiative Coordinator.
Carlos Morales Behavioral Health & Recovery Services of San Mateo County Marissa King Human Services Agency of San Mateo County.
CRISIS INTERVENTION TEAM. Advanced Juvenile CIT BJA Grant funded (Feb 2010) NAMI – Greater Chicago Chicago Public Schools Crisis Unit Primary focus :
Presented by: Leann Bertsch, Director, North Dakota DOCR.
CJPAC Cross-Training August 2010 State of Connecticut Department of Correction.
The JPET program is funded by the Australian Government Department of Employment and Workplace Relations, DEWR. Our Location for JPET Bonnyrigg. Community.
Presentation Outline Why we need a prisoner reentry program What is happening with MPRI statewide What is happening locally How you can help Questions.
Alvis House Urban Youth Works Program OJACC Conference September 30, 2010 Lois Hochstetler Alvis House Vice President Agency Programs.
NAMI Conference February 10, 2015 “Changing Lives: Changing Futures” Operating Rehabilitative Detention Facilities NAMI Conference February 10, 2015 “Changing.
Offender Rehabilitation
BREAKING GROUND : PRELIMINARY REPORT OF BUTTE COUNTY SHERIFF’S ALTERNATIVE CUSTODY SUPERVISION PROGRAM.
Bridgeport Reentry Initiative Program Model for Creating Change Presented by Marcia Hughes, Ph.D. Center for Social Research, University of Hartford September.
Assessment of Risk and Protective Factors. What assessment tools is your SBHC using???
NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES OFFICE OF PROBATION AND CORRECTIONAL ALTERNATIVES OFFICE OF PROBATION AND CORRECTIONAL ALTERNATIVES.
2 in 5 prison and jail inmates lack a high school diploma or its equivalent. Employment rates and earnings histories of people in prisons and jails are.
The Coalition of Community Corrections Providers of New Jersey A Partnership Responding to Prisoner Re-entry.
Classification and Supervision in Probation and Parole
Evaluations of CDCR Substance Abuse Programs: Lessons Learned Michael L. Prendergast, Ph.D. Criminal Justice Research Group UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse.
Shaping the Future of Transition Office of Transition Services NC Department of Correction May 2007.
TREATMENT OF THE JUVENILE OFFENDER CONCLUSIONS FROM THEORY AND RESEARCH DR. ROBERT D. HOGE DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY CARLETON UNIVERSITY OTTAWA, ONTARIO.
Introduction Overview of the ASUS-R  The Adult Substance Use Survey - Revised (ASUS-R; Wanberg, 2004) is a self-report screening tool intended to:  identify.
Salient Factor Score CTSFS99. What it is How to use it.
Probation vs. Parole Communities perception of both. Main differences between Probation and Parole Changes from Law Enforcement to Rehabilitation.
Missouri Reentry… It’s a Process! George A. Lombardi, Director Missouri Department of Corrections.
Strictly adhere to the FTC model and all of ACS’s requirements for General Preventive services Maintain caseload of 45 families Conduct 2 face-to-face.
OFFENDER REENTRY: A PUBLIC SAFETY STRATEGY Court Support Services Division.
Children grow up in a safe and supportive environment Families are stronger and healthier, leading to greater success and personal development for children.
Loudoun County Public Schools 2010 Communities That Care Survey.
SEXUAL TRAUMA RECOVERY IS NEEDED TO HELP WOMEN SUCCESSFULLY REINTEGRATE AFTER INCARCERATION Proposal for mental health intervention by Portal Houston in.
ACCELERATED COMMUNITY ENTRY United States District Court Western District of Michigan Robert Holmes Bell Chief Judge.
CLASSIFICATION Risk Institutional violence/misconduct Institutional violence/misconduct Suicide Suicide Recidivism Recidivism A standardized assessment.
MARIN COUNTY PROBATION Michael Daly, Chief Probation Officer.
The Caledonian System An integrated approach to address men's domestic abuse and to improve the lives of women, children and men. Developed for the Effective.
Reentry: A Successful Return Home TDCJ Reentry and Integration Division.
To Learn & Develop Christine Johnson Lead Nurse Safeguarding (named nurse) - STFT Health Visitors Roles and Responsibilities in Domestic Abuse.
RMA CONFERENCE Topic – Adolescents - Risk and Management Workshop leaders – Margaret MacKinnon Educational/Forensic Chartered Psychologist Accredited Trauma.
2015 Creating Gender-Responsive and Trauma-Informed Reentry Services for Women Christine Brown-Taylor, MSW Reentry Services Manager San Diego Sheriff’s.
Sex Offender Reentry Amy Bess Offender Rehabilitation – Spring 2015.
A web presentation for RSAT - T&TA by Deana Evens, MA Corrections Transitions Programs Administrator Gender-Responsiveness in the Correctional Setting.
Evidence Based Practices in Napa County Probation
Department of Juvenile Justice
Why Does Housing Matter with the Justice Involved Population?
DCF Initiatives to Prevent and Intervene in Youth Homelessness
Offender Risk Management Correctional Strategy
Transitional Housing for Offender Reentry
Becki Ney, Principal Center for Effective Public Policy
Bio & Conflict of Interest Statement
Presentation transcript:

Connecticut Department of Correction Parole & Community Services Division Assessments Overview

Where We Were Where We Are Where We Are Going?

Where We Were Through collaboration with CSSD all parole staff were trained in the LSI-R and ASUS-R in the summer-2008 Parole and Community Service Assessment Policy established 9/19/08 By the end of 2008 all parole staff were completing assessments

Where We Are LSI-R, ASUS-R and Case Management Plan completed on transitional supervision offenders and parolees. Level of Supervision based on subject’s risk and need level from the results of the assessments. All offenders (except GPS) released under supervision are on maximum supervision until assessments are completed.

Levels of Supervision Established by policy based on offender’s risk and needs assessment. Can change throughout supervision based on program participation and compliance Maximum LSI-R score Medium LSI-R score Minimum LSI-R score 0-18

Program Referrals Results from the assessments are used to develop a case management plan for the offender while referring offenders to the appropriate programs – Substance abuse – Domestic Violence – Mental Health – Anger Management

Where We Are Going

Gender Responsive Assessment Acknowledgements Evaluation of Correctional Programs – Gender Responsiveness Funded by the Office of Policy and Management Grant No. 09AG652DOC1

What is “Gender Responsive?” Acknowledges the realities of women’s lives and how they may differ from men, including the pathways to offending and how relationships shape their lives. Practices address issues like violence, abuse, family relationships, substance abuse, trauma, parenting, intimate relationships, poverty, and mental health.

Gender Responsive Assessments Women’s Risk/Needs Assessment (WRNA) (The Trailer) Authored by Krista Gehring and Valerie Bell University of Cincinnati New Haven, Bridgeport, Norwich Staff trained on WRNA May 2010 by Dr. Cynthia Hirbour, staff psychologist Summer-2010 sample testing of assessments in community on female offenders

Gender-Neutral Risk/Needs Factors Remember – Employment/Educational/Job Skills – Substance Abuse – Dysfunctional Family – Antisocial Attitudes, Values & Beliefs – Antisocial Associates – Antisocial Personality or Low Self-Control – Criminal History

Gender-Responsive Risk/Needs Factors Relationship dysfunction Family conflict Child abuse Adult Victimization Parental involvement Parental stress Housing safety Depression/anxiety (symptoms) Psychosis (symptoms) And strengths (Self efficacy, family support, parental involvement, and educational assets)

Goals Create a seamless system (dynamic factors) – Classification (York CI) – Pre-Release – Community Supervision

Final Review Currently using LSI-R and ASUS-R Testing WRNA in community pending implementation phase of grant which will involve further training and evaluation by trained experts from the University of Cincinnati Goal is to incorporate the current assessment tools with gender-responsive assessment to effectively supervise female offenders