Nuts and Bolts Session David Campbell Program Director Division of Research on Learning Discovery Research K-12 Principal Investigators.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
This Power Point Presentation is designed to: To learn/review how to create/complete and submit an eGrants VISTA Grants Continuation Application based.
Advertisements

PAINLESS PERIODIC REVIEW Cynthia Steinhoff Anne Arundel Community College Arnold, Maryland.
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
1 of 61 EHBs v2.0 Overview Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Presented To: Grantees EHBs version 2.0 – Overview for Grantees.
New Awardees Session Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Conference May 23-25, 2012 Washington, DC.
New Awardees Session Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Conference May 29-31, 2013 Washington, DC.
How to Submit an ADED Conference Proposal. Objectives Identify the necessary steps for submitting a conference proposal Identify information required.
Merit Review and Proposal Preparation Mark Courtney Division of Environmental Biology
NSF Merit Review and Proposal Preparation Mark Courtney, Ph.D Adjunct, Department of Biology New Mexico State University 24 September 2008.
2015 Workshop Permanent Status and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview.
FastLane Project Reports System 101 For Faculty and Staff Submitting Annual, Final or Interim Reports on National Science Foundation Projects May 1999.
Columbia University IRB IRB 101 September 21, 2005 George Gasparis, Executive Director, CU IRB Asst. V.P. and Sr. Asst. Dean for Research Ethics.
1 CCLI Proposal Writing Strategies Tim Fossum Program Director Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation Vermont.
National Science Foundation: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES)
Experimental Psychology PSY 433
National Science Foundation FastLane: An eGovernment Success Story BS
NSF Proposal Writing Guidelines Overview Components Other Important Factors Tips for Success
Social and Behavioral Context for Academic Learning Program Meeting Emily Doolittle Program Officer Sunday, June 7, 2009.
Submitting a Proposal: Best Practices By: Anu Singh Science Assistant
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Integrating Diversity into.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WORKSHOP. What is the Professional Development Plan? The Professional Development Plan is a directed planning and evaluation.
Getting Started Workshop David Campbell Program Director Division of Research on Learning in Formal and Informal Settings Matt Lettrich Science Assistant.
Math Department Proposal Guidance Fiscal Year 2016.
Outcome Based Evaluation for Digital Library Projects and Services
1 Fostering Networks for academic sharing Prof. Muhammad Aslam Adeeb The Islamia University of Bahawalpur
Writing More Effective NSF Proposals Jeanne R. Small Oklahoma City, Oklahoma March 2, 2006 Division of Undergraduate Education (DUE) National Science Foundation.
Technology and Innovation Development Award (TIDA) Presenter Dr Michael Ryan SFI.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
Introduction to The Grant Center Grant Center, Fitchburg State College.
San Joaquin Delta College Flex Calendar Program General Flex at Delta Types of Activities Administration of Program Process Filling Out the Flex Contract.
Introduction to The Grant Center Fitchburg State University.
Webinar on Reporting and Evaluation for Museums for America Grantees January 6-8, 2009.
IES Statistical and Research Methodology in Education Grant Program (84.305D) 2010 Program Meeting.
1 QEM/BIO Workshop October 21, 2005 Award Administration.
Social Innovation Fund Creating an Application in eGrants Technical Assistance Call 1 – 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, March 19, ;
How to Successfully Apply to the IRB Richard Gordin, IRB Chair True Rubal, Administrator / Director For the Protection of Human Participants in Research.
Getting Started With Your ATE Evaluation ATE PI Conference October 24, 2012 This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation.
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Broadening Participation.
GRANTS FOR GREAT IDEAS FALL WORKSHOP OBJECTIVES To provide a format for writing grant proposals. To offer insights for creating effective grant.
The Facts About Schoolsite Councils The Roles and Responsibilities of a Schoolsite Council.
Western Oregon University INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD.
FRYSC Advisory Councils Partners in Progress
Proposal Preparation NSF Regional Grants Conference October 4 - 5, 2004 St. Louis, MO Hosted by: Washington University.
Research Administration Forum Changes to NSF & NIH Proposal Submission and Award Documents December 8, 2015.
1Mobile Computing Systems © 2001 Carnegie Mellon University Writing a Successful NSF Proposal November 4, 2003 Website: nsf.gov.
Inter-American Institute (IAI) Proposal Evaluation Paul E. Filmer National Science Foundation Second IAI Summer Institute, July 2000 University of Miami.
NSF policies and requirements for Implementation of the America COMPETES Act. America COMPETES Act contains a number of new requirements for all those.
NSF Core Documents and Online Resources for Proposal Preparation and Post-Award Activities Jeffrey G. Ryan School of Geosciences Former NSF Program Director.
How to Obtain NSF Grants Review of Proposal Pieces A workshop providing information on the process of applying for external research awards. Sponsored.
Introduction to NSF’s new PAPPG Tammy Custer Kim Holloway Office of Sponsored Programs.
Professional Career Ladder System Guidelines Promotion Packet County Extension Agents District 2 Career Ladder Training April 29, 2016 Ronda Alexander.
Abstract  An abstract is a concise summary of a larger project (a thesis, research report, performance, service project, etc.) that concisely describes.
PERSONNEL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Webinar for 325D and 325K Grantees Completing the ED Grant Performance Report (ED 524B) for the Annual Performance.
AUDIT STAFF TRAINING WORKSHOP 13 TH – 14 TH NOVEMBER 2014, HILTON HOTEL NAIROBI AUDIT PLANNING 1.
Professional Career Ladder System Guidelines Promotion Packet County Extension Agents Revised – April, 2017.
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Support of Scholarly Activities (SOSA)

North Carolina Council on Developmental Disabilities
COCE Institutional Review Board Academic Spotlight
Iowa 21st CCLC Local Evaluation Form Training for Local evaluators
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
New STEP PI Workshop.
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
Grant Writing Workshop
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORTS
North Carolina Council on Developmental Disabilities
Supporting SEACs across the Province:
TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
Presentation transcript:

Nuts and Bolts Session David Campbell Program Director Division of Research on Learning Discovery Research K-12 Principal Investigators Webinar October 24, 2011

2 Evaluation and Reporting Annual reports  Due 90 days before the anniversary of your award  Standard vs. continuing awards  Your CGI depends on approval of annual report  Delinquent annual reports in other divisions of NSF will affect timely funding of your DR K-12 award! Final reports  Due no later than 90 days after the end date of your award  Overdue final reports will affect timely funding of awards elsewhere in the foundation  A final report is more than a last annual report!

3 Evaluation and Reporting Fastlane has a report template  For subsequent submissions, the last report you submitted will come up when you start to prepare the new report  Delete? Edit? or add annual sections? You can attach.pdf files  Charts, news articles, photographs; external evaluation report; etc.  Don’t go berserk! If you must attach 200+ pages worth of material, send an to the PI indicating the most important 20 pages or so to read! (After submitting, check your report for spelling, cut- and-paste errors, etc.)

4 Evaluation and Reporting Annual reports Part I. Project Participants:  Include in this section only those people and organizations that have made major contributions to the project or spent significant time on the project. What people have worked on your project?  Don’t leave “Contribution to project” blank! Parts II & III. Organizational Partners, Other Collaborators or Contacts  What other organizations have been involved as partners? Have you had other collaborators or contacts? A list is sufficient.

5 Part IV. Activities and Findings Section 1: Research and Education Activities Describe what was proposed to be done during the reporting period and explain any differences (e.g., changes in schedule, small modifications in the project). In particular, describe enhancement and development activities for college faculty and secondary school teachers; processes used for developing, testing, and validating materials; processes used for recruiting students, including those from underserved populations; activities and classes for students; and involvement of industry in your project. Section 2: Findings Describe the accomplishments and findings for items you described in Section 1, Part 2, including results of evaluations. Describe awards that your project or investigators have received, special contributions, major innovations, news articles about your project, and any other recognition of achievements of the project or the investigators. Describe additional support from non-NSF sources (industry, academic, government).

6 Part IV. Activities and Findings Section 3: Training and Development: Describe the opportunities for training and development for college faculty and K-12 teachers and their impact and effectiveness. How many faculty and teachers participated? How did faculty and teachers improve programs and student achievement as a result of these activities? Section 4: Outreach Activities List project related presentations to professional societies, community organizations, and other relevant groups. List outreach activities to students, educators, parents, administrators, and others in schools, colleges, and community organizations. Describe work with industry, businesses, etc.

7 Parts V- X Parts V- VIII: Journal Publications, Books or other one-time Publications, Web/Internet site, Other Specific Products Include here dissemination activities such as books, articles, videos, software, and web sites. Provide your web site's URL. Part IX: Contributions Many of you may not have anything additional to report here, but you have the opportunity to discuss unique contributions, major accomplishments, innovations, and successes relative to your discipline, human resource development, resources for research & education, and other aspects of public welfare beyond science and engineering. Part X: Conference Proceedings

8 Part XI: Special Requirements Respond to the items in this section if they are applicable. Mention any requests submitted to FastLane Notifications and Requests. For example, you may have submitted a request for significant modifications to the scope of work or reallocation of funds originally budgeted for participant support. You can see the web site for a complete list of notifications and requests. (NOTE: NOTIFICATIONS AND REQUESTS ARE A SEPARATE FastLane action. Merely including this information in your annual report is not sufficient).

9 Attachments You must put relevant information into the appropriate text boxes and ONLY attach PDF files as backup documentation. Among the things that are appropriate to send as PDF attachments are: Evaluation information such as reports from your Advisory Committee and evaluators. These are often confidential or preliminary and not appropriate to be broadly shared. Charts, graphs, data tables, pictures, news articles, and similar material that cannot be represented in text-only format. Documents that are too long to be included in the text boxes, such as modules or short publications.

10 Interim Annual Reports Returned Annual Reports

Project Outcomes Report for the General Public Within 90 days following expiration of the grant, a project outcomes report for the general public must be submitted electronically via Research.gov. This report serves as a brief summary, prepared specifically for the public, of the nature and outcomes of the project. This report will be posted on the NSF website exactly as it is submitted and will be accompanied by the following disclaimer: “This Project Outcomes Report for the General Public is displayed verbatim as submitted by the Principal Investigator (PI) for this award. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this Report are those of the PI and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation; NSF has not approved or endorsed its content.” 11

12 Advisory Boards Advisory boards  Often a good idea for a project to have one  If you have one, USE IT!!!  Annual visits  A group of experts who provide advice, assess the plans and progress of the project, and enhance dissemination  4-10 members

13 Site Visits A Program Officer will try to visit your project at least once Reverse Site Visits Needs to be more than a dog and pony show: What works, what isn’t working, where you could use help, where you could help others Site visit reports become part of the award’s official record

14 Accountability  You need to report and document the impact and effectiveness of your project to NSF  NSF takes your information to document the impact and effectiveness of the DR K-12 program to Congress  What else can you do?

15 Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)  All projects involving human subjects must either (1) have approval from the organization's Institutional Review Board (IRB) before issuance of an NSF award or, (2) must affirm that the IRB or an appropriate knowledgeable authority previously designated by the organization (not the Principal Investigator) has declared the research exempt from IRB review, in accordance with the applicable subsection, as established in section 101(b) of the Common Rule.

16 Working with NSF DR K-12 Program Officers Communicate with Program Officers and Keep them informed of Progress Not just when things are going wrong! Tell us about the good stuff, too. Newspaper clippings, television, radio, campus news NSF Highlights – might be featured in NSF’s budget request to Congress Tell us when something is going to happen; e.g., a professional development workshop might be good time for a site visit by a Program Officer s are usually the best way Please put your award number in the subject line of the !

17 Crediting NSF Acknowledgment of Support "This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. (NSF grant number).“ (Oral acknowledgment if appropriate.) Disclaimer "Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation." Copies The grantee is responsible for assuring that the cognizant NSF Program Officer is provided access to, either electronically or in paper form, a copy of every publication of material based on or developed under this award, clearly labeled with the award number and other appropriate identifying information, promptly after publication. Logos

18 Who’s my Program Officer?

19 nsf

20 nsf

21 Notifications and Requests Examples: Change in objectives, scope, or methodology Budget changes Time lines Principal Investigator changes Participant Support No-cost extensions It’s best to discuss these with a Program Officer before you make official requests in FastlaneExamples: Change in objectives, scope, or methodology Budget changes Time lines Principal Investigator changes Participant Support No-cost extensions It’s best to discuss these with a Program Officer before you make official requests in Fastlane

22 Notifications and Requests

23 Notifications and Requests

NSF’s Fastlane Notifications and Requests Annual and Final Reports Financial (Business Office) Transactions Proposal submission Reviewing – including procedures for Preliminary and Formal proposals

Supplemental Support In unusual circumstances, small amounts of supplemental funding and up to six months of additional support may be requested to assure adequate completion of the original scope of work. Such requests for supplemental funding support should be submitted to the cognizant NSF Program Officer at least two months prior to the need for the additional funds and must be adequately justified. Program officers may make decisions regarding whether or not to recommend a small supplement without merit review of the supplemental request. Requests for larger supplements may require external merit review. 25