1 Response to Intervention Lou Danielson, Ph.D. Director, Research to Practice Division Office of Special Education Programs June 21, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION
Advertisements

RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Policy & Practice Institute June 25, 2008 Mike Stetter and Lori Duerr Delaware Department of Education.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION _______District Presentation ______, 2008.
Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
Response to Intervention: What is it?. RtI is… A process for achieving higher levels of academic and behavioral success for all students through: High.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Secondary Model for Intervention This ppt is an adaptation of a specific PISD Training on RTI, The Educational Testing and.
Mike W. Olson RTI. RTI is… 2 the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time.
Introduction to Response to Intervention: A comprehensive School Support Perspective Gary L. Cates Illinois State University.
North East School Division An Introduction to Response to Intervention (RTI)2009.
Response to Intervention and SLD Identification. July 2007 IDEA Partnership 2 The IDEA Partnership wishes to acknowledge the work of Lou Danielson, Ph.D.,
Response to Intervention (RtI) A Basic Overview. Illinois IDEA 2004 Part Rules Requires: use of a process that determines how the child responds.
General Universal Level Targeted Level Intensive Level Bonus
Eugene, OR Brown Bag Presentation: November 19, 2007
Response to Intervention: The new Road to Ensuring Student Success January, 2011 PISD.
July 2007 IDEA Partnership 1 RTI Process What is it?
RtI Response to Intervention April 2, 2008 Board Presentation.
RtI An Overview of Response to Intervention. The Roots of RtI  RtI is a component of the IDEA 2004, Part B regulations.  It represents a process which.
Today’s Objectives What is RtI and why it is here – Consensus-building Preparation for 2010 Implementation: – Three Tiers of Services – Data Analysis.
C4K – Building an efficient and effective delivery system to impact critical outcomes for kids Our initial focus as we build this system is early literacy.
A Look at RTI in Early Childhood
May Dr. Schultz, Dr. Owen, Dr. Ryan, Dr. Stephens.
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
Response to Intervention (RTI) Presented by Ashley Adamo and Brian Mitchell January 6, 2012.
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What is RTI?
Response to Intervention A quick review to guide the work of NH’s RtI Task Force Sandy Plocharczyk Raina Chick Co Chairs, NH RtI Task Force October 24,
Considerations in Determining Primary Disability Speech Language Impairment or Specific Learning Disability.
RtI 101 Part A: The Basics of Assessment and Tiered Instruction.
1 Progress Monitoring in a Response to Intervention World: Helping Classrooms to Implement Best Practices Jacki Bootel Rebecca Holland-Coviello Silvia.
Response to Intervention. Background Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004 Changes to align with No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Allows districts.
Response to Intervention USING RTI FOR NONACADEMIC INTERVENTIONS: PART II.
CENTENNIAL PUBLIC SCHOOL RtI 101 Slides adapted from the NE RtI Consortium.
Specific Learning Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
Response to Intervention
University of Rhode Island EDC 452. A process of:  Providing high-quality instruction and intervention matched to student needs and  Using learning.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
Evaluating Student Response to Instruction Using a 3-Tier RtI Progress Monitoring System John M. Hintze, Ph.D. University of Massachusetts National Center.
D62 Response to Intervention
Winston/Salem Forsyth County Schools RESPONSIVENESS TO INSTRUCTION (RTI)
Response to Intervention (RtI) Secondary Model for Intervention.
Response to Intervention in KPS Linda Campbell
RTI in Tigard-Tualatin School District: Effective Behavior & Instructional Support (EBIS) National SEA Conference on SLD Determination April 20, 2006 Erin.
Educable Mental Retardation as a Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
2006 OSEP Project Directors Meeting 1 Screening and Progress Monitoring for Identification of Reading Disabilities within an RTI Model Screening and Progress.
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
Victoria White, PhD Ann George, EdD Associate Professor Assistant Professor Director of KC Metro Center SSLS.
OSEP UPDATE 2006 Lou Danielson Director Research to Practice Division U.S. Office of Special Education Programs August 2, 2006.
PLCS & THE CONNECTION TO RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Essentials for Administrators Sept. 27, 2012.
1 Response to Intervention Lou Danielson, Ph.D. Director, Research to Practice Division Office of Special Education Programs June 21, 2006.
Response to Intervention: Implementation Considerations Jennifer Doolittle, Ph.D. Office of Special Education Programs December 17, 2007.
Response to Intervention Newton Public Schools Professional Development Keith S. Lockwood, Ph.D. NJDOE.
 Response to Intervention ◦ Most often associated with a new and effective special education model for identifying and servicing students ◦ In PA, and.
Effective Behavior & Instructional Support. Implementing RTI through Effective Behavior & Instructional Support.
Part 2: Assisting Students Struggling with Reading: Multi-Tier System of Supports H325A
Severe Discrepancy vs. Response to Intervention. Severe Discrepancy Model of Eligibility Determination (1974 – present) This method is used for students.
Response to Intervention SPED 461. Basic Principles of RTI Response to intervention integrates assessment and intervention within a multi-level prevention.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
1 Responsiveness to Intervention (RTI): Identifying Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD) for State Educational Agencies National Research Center on Learning.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Essential Component: Schoolwide, Multi-Level Prevention System Katie Klingler Tackett National Center on.
 RtII is a comprehensive multi-tiered prevention model that provides services and interventions as early as possible to meet the instructional needs.
Specific Learning Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
Douglas Fuchs, Lynn Fuchs, Donald Compton and Joan Bryant
Response to Intervention R. E. A. C. H
RTI Response to Intervention (RTI) is a multi-tier approach to the early identification and support of students with learning and behavior needs. Struggling.
Response to Intervention
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Presentation transcript:

1 Response to Intervention Lou Danielson, Ph.D. Director, Research to Practice Division Office of Special Education Programs June 21, 2006

2 What is Responsiveness to Intervention (RTI)? 1. Implementation of a differentiated curriculum with different instructional methods 2. Two or more tiers of increasingly intense scientific, research-based interventions 3. Instructional intensity addressed through duration, frequency and time of interventions, group size, and instructor skill level 4. Individual problem-solving model or standardized intervention protocol for intervention tiers

3 What is Responsiveness to Intervention (RTI)? (continued) 5. Screening and progress monitoring to assess entire class progress and individual student progress 6. Explicit decision rules for assessing learners’ progress (e.g., level and/or rate) 7. Fidelity measures to assess consistency of instructional methods and curriculum

4 Advantages of RTI Approach Provides instructional assistance in a timely fashion (e.g., NOT a wait-to-fail model) Helps ensure a student’s poor academic performance is not due to poor instruction or inappropriate curriculum Informs teacher and improves instruction because assessment data are collected and closely linked to interventions

5 Primary Instruction (~80%) School-/Classroom-wide Systems for All Students, Staff and Settings Secondary Intervention (~15%) Specialized Group Systems for Students with At Risk Performance Tertiary Intervention (~5%) Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with Intensive Needs ~80% of Students ~15% ~5% Continuum of School-Wide Instruction Adapted from”What is School-Wide PBS?”

6 EIS Provides an Assessment /Intervention Framework within General Education Early intervening services (EIS) is a process for ensuring students receive “appropriate learning experiences” in general education The student’s response to EIS is very informative if a disability is considered as an explanation of the child’s difficulties RTI can be used as a component of SLD determination to assure the child’s difficulties are adequately addressed

7 Using RTI to Define Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD) in Terms of Severe Low Achievement RTI eliminates poor instructional quality as a possible explanation for learning difficulty SLD designation is used only for nonresponders who have received validated instruction. The assumption: If a child does not respond to instruction that is effective for the vast majority of children, then there is something different about the child causing the nonresponse

8 Using RTI as Part of SLD Identification Process Tier 2 intervention is viewed as the ‘test’ to which at-risk students respond for determining disability Using an appropriate measurement tool, response to Tier 2 intervention needs to be measured and categorized as either Responsive to intervention (not SLD) Unresponsive to intervention (evaluate for SLD)

9 Resource

10 Implementing an RTI Approach: 5 Dimensions (continued) 4. How ‘response’ is defined Final status on norm-referenced test or using a benchmark Improvement from pretest to posttest CBM slope and final status 5. What happens to nonresponders Comprehensive multidisciplinary evaluation to distinguish: specific learning disability (SLD) behavioral disability (BD) mental retardation (MR) speech-language impairment (SLI)

11 Implementing an RTI Approach: 5 Dimensions 1. Number of tiers (2-5; this example uses 3) 2. Nature of preventive intervention Individualized (e.g., problem solving) Standardized scientific research-based protocol 3. How at-risk students are identified Percentile cut on norm-referenced test (screening) Cut-point on curriculum-based measurement (CBM) with 5 weeks of CBM progress monitoring

12 Advantages of Using RTI Approach (continued) In some RTI models, nonresponders are not labeled to avoid stigma to avoid disability categories (e.g., learning disability, behavioral disability, mental retardation) that have little instructional validity

13 Simplified RTI Procedure: Four Parts 1. All children in a class, school, or district are tested once in the fall to identify those students at risk for long-term difficulties 2. The responsiveness of at-risk students to general education instruction (Tier 1) is monitored to determine those whose needs are not being met and therefore require a more intensive intervention (Tier 2: Small Group)

14 Simplified RTI Procedure: Four Parts (continued) 3. For at-risk students, a research-validated Tier 2 intervention is implemented; student progress is monitored throughout; and students are re-tested after the intervention 4. Those students who do not respond to validated intervention are identified for multi-disciplinary team evaluation for possible disability determination and special education placement

15 Overview Presentation topics Define RTI RTI and SLD Four Parts of RTI Sequence Advantages of RTI Key Questions for RTI Implementation Vanderbilt Reading Study NRCLD