Current Status, New Directions

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cathy Beahm Technical Assistance Specialist NH DES, Air Resources
Advertisements

September 17, 2003 Workshop WEBCAST Hank Naour ILLINOIS EPA MACT Standards and Section 112f Residual Risk.
The Wonderful World of HAP Regulations
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency April 13, 2011 Final Rules to Reduce Air Toxics from Boilers.
EPA’s Clean Power Plan Proposed Rules for Reducing GHG Emissions from Power Plants Presentation to ACPAC June 16,
EPA Air Toxics Programs Ruben R. Casso Toxics Coordinator EPA Region 6 Phone
Improving Air Quality in Greenville County, SC Ground Level Ozone (O 3 ) Particulate Matter 2.5 (PM 2.5 ) The Challenge: Air Pollution.
Recent EPA Regulation Development Presented by Bill Luthans to the 56 th Meeting of the Joint Advisory Committee Meeting for the Improvement of Air Quality.
Overview of the Clean Air Act and the Proposed Petroleum Refinery Sector Risk and Technology Review and New Source Performance Standards Public Outreach.
Division of Air Quality Update on EPA Boiler MACT Rules Steve Schliesser Environmental Engineer March 2012.
April 15, 2015 Betty Gatano, P.E. Permitting Section North Carolina Division of Air Quality, Raleigh, NC (919)
A History and Status of CEMS Applications in USEPA Regulations Dale Evarts US EPA December 16, 2002 Better Air Quality in Asian Cities 2002
Solutions: Preventing and Reducing Air Pollution
Laws to Prevent and Reduce Air Pollution Unit 4. Human Input of Pollutants into Troposphere Nitrogen and Sulfur compounds released by burning fossil fuels.
Classification of Air Pollutants
Solvent Emissions and Air Quality Defining the Air Quality Challenge John Stark, R.S. City of Wichita Air Quality/HazMat Program Supervisor.
Air Quality Beyond Ozone and PM2.5 Sheila Holman North Carolina Division of Air Quality 6 th Annual Unifour Air Quality Conference June 15, 2012.
Air Toxics in Region 4 A&WMA Annual Conference August 6, 2008 Lee Page Air Toxics Assessment and Implementation Section EPA, Region 4 Atlanta, Georgia.
National Clean Diesel Campaign Clean Diesel Programs: Overview Halida Hatic U.S. EPA New England April 7, 2008.
Update on EPA Oil and Gas Activities Greg Green, Outreach and Information Division, OAQPS.
Actions to Reduce Mercury Air Emissions and Related Exposure Risks in the United States Ben Gibson Office of Air Quality and Planning and Standards U.S.
ACTIVITIES, NEEDS, AND FUTURE ACTIONS ON INDOOR AIR QUALITY April 26, 2001 Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency.
Office of Air and Radiation Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities July 2006.
Regulatory Controls PBT Strategy Team Great Lakes Regional Collaboration February 22, 2005.
0 Office of Transportation and Air Quality Update for Air Directors: Transportation and Air Quality Christopher Grundler Deputy Director NACAA Spring Meeting.
Air Toxics Update Lee Page U.S. EPA Region 4 Atlanta, Georgia.
1 EPA’s Proposal for Nonroad Diesel Engines & Fuel May 2003 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Transportation and Air Quality Informal document.
MERCURY POLICIES: A VIEW FROM THE ELECTRIC POWER SECTOR Michael T. Rossler Indiana Energy Conference September 16, 2004.
” Particulates „ Characterisation of Exhaust Particulate Emissions from Road Vehicles Key Action KA2:Sustainable Mobility and Intermodality Task 2.2:Infrastructures.
Overview of the Air Toxics Program Jeff Whitlow U.S. EPA May 15-18, 2007.
1 Public Hearing to Consider Proposed Amendments to the Emission Inventory Criteria and Guidelines Regulation for the AB 2588 Air Toxics “Hot Spots” Program.
TITLE III UPDATE Joel Leon Air Quality Evaluation Section Bureau of Technical Services 1.
California Experience in Converting Vehicles to Alternative Fuels New Delhi, India May 2001 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Air Resources Board.
Bill Harnett March 30, 2010 WESTAR Spring Meeting.
Mississippi Air Quality Update Mississippi Dept. of Environmental Quality Air Division August 6, 2010.
Health Impacts of Air Pollution on Communities Source Category Regulations Dan Donohoue Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency.
Inventory Needs and Legal Requirements Martin Johnson Emission Inventory Workshop Air Resources Board March 13, 2006.
Blue Skies Delaware; Clean Air for Life NESHAPs Jim Snead October 8, 2008.
Proposed Regulatory Framework Kentucky Air Toxic Program (KATP) Presentation to: Kentucky Chemical Industry Council November 10, 2005 Environmental & Public.
MACT Residual Risk Experience Presented to: Air &Waste Management Association, Southern Section 2007 Annual Meeting & Technical Conference August 8,2006.
Diesel Risk Reduction Plan California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board.
URBAN AIR TOXICS – AREA SOURCE PROGRAM SALLY SHAVER, DIRECTOR EMISSION STANDARDS DIVISION October 5, 2004.
1 EPA’s Climate Change Strategy Robert J. Meyers Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator U.S. EPA, Office of Air and Radiation December 3, 2007.
Clean Air Act and New Source Review Permits EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park NC March
Presumptive MACT For Municipal Solid Waste Landfills July 1999 Emission Standards Division US Environmental Protection Agency.
National Clean Diesel Campaign Upcoming Funding Opportunities Rosalva Tapia June 3, 2009 National Tribal Forum on Air Quality Management Conference 2009.
Air Toxics. 2 What are Air Toxics? Toxic chemicals Cause serious health effects such as cancer.
Pollution Prevention in Air Quality A Government Perspective H. Patrick Wong, Chief Air Quality Management Division Miami-Dade County Department of Environmental.
Reducing Emissions From Diesel Engines Robert Cross Chief, Mobile Source Control Division California Environmental Protection Agency AIR RESOURCES BOARD.
California’s Efforts to Address Air Quality Impacts Related to Goods Movement Activities.
NAAQS and Criteria Pollutant Trends Update US EPA Region 10.
Diesel Retrofit Projects: An Introduction National Tribal Forum on Air Quality April 19, 2007 Ken Cronin.
1 Update on Efforts to Reduce Emissions and Risks at High Risk Railyards February 25, 2010 BNSF San Bernardino California Environmental Protection Agency.
Clean Air Act Section 111 WESTAR Meeting Presented by Lisa Conner U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Radiation November 6, 2013.
Proposed Carbon Pollution Standard For New Power Plants Presented by Kevin Culligan Office of Air Quality Planning And Standards Office of Air and Radiation.
Pulp & Paper Sector Strategy & New Source Performance Standards Strategy Peter Tsirigotis, Director Sector Policies & Programs Division National Association.
Office of Transportation and Air Quality, USEPA National Association of Clean Air Agencies Fall Membership Meeting October 20, 2008.
Smog/Ground level ozone
Steve Page Office Director, OAQPS NACAA Spring Meeting 2010
Environmental Protection Agency
Reducing Air Pollution
Clean Air Act Glossary.
Our Vision – Healthy Kansans living in safe and sustainable environments.
Environmental Protection AGENCY: EPA
Hazardous Air Pollutants under the Clean Air Act
EPA’s Current Air Toxics Activities
Air Toxics Program Laura McKelvey.
Overview of Canada’s Air Quality Activities
Highlights on Statewide Strategies Benefitting Communities
Hazardous Air Pollutants under the Clean Air Act
Presentation transcript:

Current Status, New Directions Air Toxics: Current Status, New Directions Kenneth L. Mitchell, Ph.D.; Chief Air Toxics Assessment & Implementation U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Atlanta, Georgia

Good Afternoon! What are Air Toxics? Program Overview Current Status Future Directions

What do we mean by “Air Toxics?” Six“Criteria” Pollutants O3, NO2, SO2, Pb CO, PM The Federal Clean Air Act Mobile Source Pollutants 21 Chemicals & Mixtures Hazardous Air Pollutants (Air Toxics) 187 Chemicals & Compounds

Why are air toxics a problem? Millions of Sources Cancer Kidney, Liver Damage Skin Rashes Birth Defects, Miscarriages Nervous System Damage Developmental Problems in Children Cough, Throat Irritation Asthma, Chronic Bronchitis Many are Highly Toxic Some Persist & Bioaccumulate Sources/Populations Colocated

EVAPORATION/ REENTRAINMENT OTHER NON-CANCER ENDPOINTS WIND DIRECTION WIND DIRECTION B A TRANSFORMATION WET DEPOSITION DISPERSION DRY DEPOSITION EVAPORATION/ REENTRAINMENT IN AIR BIOACCUMULATION IN FOOD CANCER TARGET ORGAN/TISSUE INGESTION INHALATION DERMAL OTHER NON-CANCER ENDPOINTS EXCRETION INTAKE/UPTAKE

There Are Sources Everywhere! _________________________________________________________________ Courtesy of Sustaining the Environment and Resources for Canadians

Types of Sources Major Sources Area Sources 10 TPY or more of one HAP _________________________________________________________________ Major Sources 10 TPY or more of one HAP Or 25 TPY or more of a combination of HAPS Area Sources Less than 10 TPY of one HAP Or Less than 25 TPY of a combination of HAPS

Engines, fuels, and operation all contribute to pollution; Types of Sources Outdoor Air _________________________________________________________________ Indoor Sources Not regulated but pose (on average) 3-5 times the concentrations of outdoor air Mobile Sources On- and Off-road; Engines, fuels, and operation all contribute to pollution; 21 MSATs

THE NATIONAL AIR TOXICS PROGRAM (Stationary, Mobile, and Indoor Air Sources) Regulatory Approaches Risk Assessment Methods for Facility Specific & Community-Scale Risk Decision Criteria for Facilities and Communities Voluntary Reduction Options Education and Outreach SLT Program Structure Design _________________________________________________________________ Achieve Meaningful Reductions At The Local Level

Residual Risk – Mandate from Congress Assess risks from stationary sources that emit air toxics after technology-based (MACT) standards are in place Set additional standards if MACT does not protect public health with an “ample margin of safety” Set additional standards if necessary to prevent adverse environmental effects

Residual Risk – Status Coke ovens – April 2005 March 2006 Industrial cooling towers Magnetic tape Ethylene oxide sterilizers Gasoline distribution Dry cleaning – July 2006 HON – December 2006 Halogenated Solvents – December 2006

Residual Risk – New Directions Develop “total facility low-risk demonstration (TFLRD)” rule Develop comprehensive or generic residual risk rule (GRRR)

Area Sources – Current Status The Integrated Urban Strategy was published July 19, 1999 Identified chemicals of concern Identified initial list of area source categories 70 source categories have been listed Listing completed in November 2002 Source categories required to be “subject to regulation” 16 rules completed 4 under court order 20 of the 70 Standards

Area Sources – Recent Additional Court Ordered Schedule Dec. 15, 2006 4 categories June 15, 2007 6 categories Dec. 15 2007* 10 categories June 15, 2008 10 categories Dec. 15, 2008 10 categories June 15, 2009 10 categories 50 Categories *3 area source standards subject to CAA 112(c)(6) (related to PBT chemicals) must be promulgated by this date.

Area Sources – Future Directions National Rulemaking Approach Establish national standards for source categories that have a national level of concern Flexible Rulemaking Approach Enact a rule, covering a set of categories, that will regulate how categories are controlled at the local level based on local needs EPA will provide guidance on control approaches

Mobile Source Air Toxics (MSATs) – Current Status In March 2001, EPA published first MSAT rule Toxics emissions performance standard for gasoline Refinery-specific baselines to ensure no backsliding from 1998-2000 performance No additional standards for fuels or vehicles Identified data gaps and committed to additional research Committed to additional rulemaking to evaluate the need for and feasibility of additional controls

Mobile Source Air Toxics – Future Directions Proposed Rule signed on February 28, 2006 Public hearing on April 12 60-day comment period (through May 30th) Final rule by February 9, 2007

Mobile Source Air Toxics – Future Directions Benzene content standard for gasoline Vehicle standards Exhaust emissions Evaporative emissions Gas can standards

Diesel Exhaust – Current and Future Directions Building on the successes of EPA’s regulatory and voluntary efforts to reduce emissions from diesel engines, EPA has created the National Clean Diesel Campaign (NCDC) Successful implementation of the 2007 Highway Engine Rule and the Clean Air Nonroad Diesel Rule Develop new emissions standards for locomotive and marine diesel engines Promote reduction of emissions for existing diesel engines through cost-effective and innovative strategies, including use of cleaner fuels, retrofitting and repairing existing fleets, idling reduction among others

Thanks for your attention! Dr. Ken Mitchell U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (404) 562-9065 mitchell.ken@epa.gov http://www.epa.gov/region4/air/airtoxic/index.htm