Company Confidential Registration Management Committee 1 Lessons Learned from Accreditation Assessments - ANAB Perspective July 19, 2012 Steve Holladay.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 Roles & Responsibilities San Diego, California January 20, 2011 R. Darrell Taylor Raytheon.
Advertisements

Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) :2009 Revision Workshop Tony Marino The Boeing Company Other Party (OP) Assessor Workshop.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee AS9104/1 Impacts to CB’s & Organizations Bob Cruse, ANAB Vince May, ANAB Tim Lee, The Boeing Company.
Registration Management Committee (RMC) Other Party (OP) Assessor AS9104/2 - Oversight Training January 24, 2008 – Phoenix, Arizona Roles and Responsibilities.
ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation Board. Accredited Certification Bodies (CBs)  37 AS9100  11 AS9110  27 AS9120 Applicant CBs  4 AS9110  1 AS9120 Increased.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 Other Party Management Team (OPMT) Resolutions Stanley Faust Spirit AeroSystems Other Party.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 Auditing Customer Requirements Atlanta, Georgia July 22-23, 2010 Roger Ritterbeck, QMI-SAI.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 Lessons Learned from Accreditation Assessments - ANAB Perspective Boston, MA July 21, 2011.
Company Confidential AS 9101E Documentation and Execution Brian Geer (Lockheed Martin) Paul Dionne (ABS QE) 9101 Revision Team 1 AAQG Auditor Workshop.
Prepared by: Tim Lee – Chair IAQG OPMT The Boeing Company October 10, 2013 International Aerospace Quality Group (IAQG) Other Party Management Team (OPMT)
Boston, MA July 21-22, 2011 Tony Marino, Tom Gallagher, Larry Beck
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) Other Party (OP) Assessor Workshop San Diego, CA January 20, /9110/9120:2009 AQMS.
Registration Management Committee Body of Knowledge (BoK) for Other Party (OP) Assessors David Day GE Aviation.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) The OP Assessor Process San Diego, CA January 19, 2012 Melvin L. Jeppson ATK Propulsion Systems.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) OP Assessor Process: Office and Witness Oversight San Diego, CA January 17, 2013 Melvin L.
Registration Management Committee (RMC) Other Party (OP) Assessor Workshop January 16, 2009 – Orlando FL Roles & Responsibilities Pre- and Post- Assessment.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 CB and Auditor Performance Expectations Boston, MA July 22, 2011 R. Darrell Taylor Raytheon.
ANAB AQMS Accreditation Activity 2009
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 AQMS Accreditation Programs ANAB Findings Atlanta, GA July 22, 2010 Steve Holladay ANAB,
ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation Board FQS Accreditation for forensic testing agencies Bob Cruse RMC Denver Co., September
ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation Board FQS Accreditation for forensic testing agencies Lori Gillespie RMC ~ 18 July 2012.
The OP Assessor Process
Registration Management Committee (RMC) Other Party (OP) Assessor AS9104/2 - Oversight Training January 16, 2009 – Orlando, Florida Roles and Responsibilities.
Company Confidential 1 Revisiting CB Use of AS9101 Rev D Tim Lee 12 March 2012.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee 1 AS9104/1 Certification Structures - Client and CB Agreement July 17, 2014 Tim Lee Chair - IAQG.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) What’s Next for Oversight? 1 Other Party (OP) Assessor Workshop Palm Beach Gardens, Florida.
Company Confidential Improvement Opportunities for Audit Reporting Tony Marino and Rick Downs July 19-20, 2012 Registration Management Committee RMC Workshop.
ISO 9001: 2000 Certified Audit Process What to do.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee 1 Completing Independent Assessments Robert Flaharty & John Horan January 17, 2013 OP Assessor Workshop.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee OP Assessor Workshop, San Diego, CA - 17 January 2013 Body Of Knowledge for OP Assessors Will S.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee 1 Industry Controlled Other Party (ICOP) Oversight Market Surveillance AS9104/2A Supplemental Oversight.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) Audit Calc Program Palm Beach, Florida January 16, 2014 Tim Lee The Boeing Company.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) :2009 Revision Workshop Tony Marino The Boeing Company Other Party (OP) Assessor Workshop.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) AS9104/2A Presentation San Diego, CA January 17, 2013 Tim Lee The Boeing Company 1 Other Party.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee RMC Auditor Workshop Charleston, SC July Supplemental Oversight AS9104/2A & Special.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) OASIS Enhancements San Diego, CA January 19, 2012 Bryan Blunt IAQG OASIS Administrator 1 Other.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee RMC Auditor Workshop Charleston, SC July 2015 The OASIS Feedback Process Empowering Communication.
ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation Board. Accredited Certification Bodies (CBs)  36 AS9100  12 AS9110  27 AS9120 Applicant CBs  4 AS9110 Increased Surveillance.
Company Confidential 1 AAQG RMC 9101:2009 Revision Workshop Prepared by IAQG 9101 Team 19 July, 2010 Atlanta Ga. “It’s All About Performing” Quality Management.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee 1 AS9104/1 Certification Structures July 22, 2015 Tim Lee Chair - IAQG OPMT The Boeing Company RMC.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) Audit Calc Program San Diego, CA January 17, 2013 Tim Lee The Boeing Company Bill.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 Sanctioned Training – The Training Provider Approval Body Perspective Atlanta, GA July 23,
Registration Management Committee (RMC) Other Party Assessor Workshop January 16, 2009 – Orlando, Florida AS/EN/SJAC Oversight Process Tim Lee The.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee 1 July 17, 2014 Bryan Blunt IAQG OASIS Administrator OASIS Tools for Continuous Improvement / Next-Gen.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee 1 Audit Outcomes & Appropriate Conclusions July 16, 2014 Bob Cruse ANAB, Aerospace Program Manager.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) Independent Oversight Assessments 1 Other Party (OP) Assessor Workshop Palm Beach Gardens,
Company Confidential IAQG Workshop October 21, IAQG Workshop 9100 Certification Scheme Certification status – Changes implemented Tim Lee The Boeing.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee 1 Certification Body Scorecard Process Database Committee Report R. Darrell Taylor July 17, 2012.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) CB Report Cards – Auditor Influence July 2015 Charleston, SC R. Darrell Taylor RMC Chair 1.
ANAB AQMS Accreditation Programs Overall AQMS Accreditations  37 AS9100  6 AS9110  23 AS9120 AQMS Applicants  2 AS9100  8 AS9110  1 AS9120.
ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation Board. Accredited Certification Bodies (CBs)  36 AS9100  12 AS9110  28 AS9120 Applicant CBs  2 AS9100 (US & Israel)
Registration Management Committee (RMC) January 22-23, 2008 Phoenix, Arizona AAQG RMC Surveillance Team Report 2007 Prepared by: Susie Neal Goodrich Corporation.
Bob Cruse RMC Ft. Lauderdale, FL. March
ISO 9001:2015 Auditor / Registration Decision Lessons Learned
Communication Sub-team Report
ANAB AQMS Activity 2011 ~ January - March April 2011
Other Party (OP) Assessor Workshop
Determining Effectiveness of Internal Audits Presented by: Tony Gutierrez R. Darrell Taylor Minneapolis, MN July 19 & 20, 2012.
Witness Assessment AS9104/2A
ANAB AQMS Activity 2011 ~ Year so far January 2011
Lessons Learned from Accreditation Assessments - ANAB Perspective
Americas Aerospace Quality Group
AAQG Member AS/JISQ Supplemental Oversight
OP Assessor Training An Overview.
Determining Effectiveness of Internal Audits Presented by: Tony Gutierrez R. Darrell Taylor Minneapolis, MN July 19 & 20, 2012.
Tim Lee The Boeing Company Chair IAQG OPMT October 22, 2010
Registration Management Committee (RMC) Workshop
ANAB AQMS Activity 2011 ~ to date July 2011
Presentation transcript:

Company Confidential Registration Management Committee 1 Lessons Learned from Accreditation Assessments - ANAB Perspective July 19, 2012 Steve Holladay ANAB, Accreditation Assessor

RMC Workshop Minneapolis, MN 19 – 20 July 2012 Registration Management Committee Objectives Provide a summary of the NCR’s identified from the witness audits Provide a summary of the NCR’s identified from the office audit in Discuss four examples of the most common NCR’s. Rules of engagement. 2

RMC Workshop Minneapolis, MN 19 – 20 July 2012 Registration Management Committee Goal Provide knowledge/information to the AQMS auditor pool –with the goal to improve auditor/CB performance –that will reduce repeat NCR’s –which will, in turn, add value to the assessment process and the industry as a whole. 3

RMC Workshop Minneapolis, MN 19 – 20 July 2012 Registration Management Committee 4 Overall NCR’s in 40 Witnessed Audits (WA) –1.5 Average per WA –22 Major NCR’s 162 NCR’s in approx 42 Office Assessments (OA) –3.85 Average per OA –21 Major NCRs –22 AS requirements NCR’s in 53 Witnessed Audits (WA) –26 to AQMS requirements –23 Major NCR’s (11 AQMS) 238 NCR’s in approx 46 Office Assessments (OA) –52 to AQMS –37 Major NCRs (13 AQMS)

RMC Workshop Minneapolis, MN 19 – 20 July 2012 Registration Management Committee 5 Audit team competency, Scope/objectives, stage 1 objectives, others. 1 NCR each. CA Process with Client, Min onsite activity. 2 NCR’s each. OASIS Issues, Audit Planning and OER issues. 3 NCR’s each Witness Audit NCR’s

RMC Workshop Minneapolis, MN 19 – 20 July 2012 Registration Management Committee 6 Reaching correct conclusion. 6 NCR’s. Audit Time, Certificate issues and Nonconformance Process. 8 NCR’s each. Collecting and verifying evidence. 9 NCR’s. Witness Audit NCR’s

RMC Workshop Minneapolis, MN 19 – 20 July 2012 Registration Management Committee 7 Surv/recert issues– 1 NCR. Nonconformance Process – 3 NCR’s. Right of Access instructions – 5 NCR’s. Multisite issues and Cert Issues - 4 NCR’s each. No satellite Office issues -5 NCR’s. Conclusion/Reporting consistency issues – 9 NCR’s. Office Audit NCR’s (9104; 32 total)

RMC Workshop Minneapolis, MN 19 – 20 July 2012 Registration Management Committee 8 Pre Audit Planning issues – 3 NCR’s. Nonconforming Reporting issues – 3 NCR’s. Audit report, appendix – 14 NCR’s. Office Audit NCR’s (9101; 20 total)

RMC Workshop Minneapolis, MN 19 – 20 July 2012 Registration Management Committee 9 Four Examples of actual audit trails that have been sanitized. Focused the case studies on the requirements of AS9101D and AS9104/1. Will present the scenario then present some choices the auditor could make. Discuss the choices and select the BEST option. Time management is KEY in this exercise. Lunch will be waiting. Case Study Examples

RMC Workshop Minneapolis, MN 19 – 20 July 2012 Registration Management Committee 10 While preparing for an audit you review the ASD information provided in the pre-audit package. Aerospace: 70% (3 customers) Space: 10% (1 customer) Defense: 20% ( 1 customer) What are your next steps? Example 1

RMC Workshop Minneapolis, MN 19 – 20 July 2012 Registration Management Committee 11 A.Don’t use it. This is a surv audit and doesn’t apply. B. Consider the information during the on-site audit for the audit trail selection. C. Ask what the breakdown of the 3 aerospace customers are to better plan the audit time. D. Plan the time based on the information provided then determine what customers to review once on site. Example 1

RMC Workshop Minneapolis, MN 19 – 20 July 2012 Registration Management Committee 12 You are preparing for an AS9100C audit and have all the required information from the client. You start working on appendix D (Process Matrix Report) and appendix C (PEAR). Which of the following options are acceptable? Example 2

RMC Workshop Minneapolis, MN 19 – 20 July 2012 Registration Management Committee 13 A.Review the previous audit (appendix D) to see what processes were defined then. B.Forward the (appendix D) to the customer and ask them to have it completed before the audit begins. C.Ensure all process (D) that are marked with a section 7 clause has a corresponding PEAR. D.Review the clients Quality Manual to ensure the processes listed in (D) are consistent. Example 2

RMC Workshop Minneapolis, MN 19 – 20 July 2012 Registration Management Committee 14 You are starting a review of the corrective action response to a NCR that was raised at the clients last audit. The NCR summary is: Test equipment (TE) was observed being used in a required inspection process. The TE was found to be out of calibration. Which of the following responses would be acceptable as presented? Example 3

RMC Workshop Minneapolis, MN 19 – 20 July 2012 Registration Management Committee 15 A.Correction: TE was calibrated. B.Root Cause: The TE was new. C.Correction: None needed, the TE was remarked as for reference only. D.Root cause: None needed, investigation found that this was the only TE out of calibration. E.Correction: Told TE manager not to do it again. F.Root Cause: The TE was out of calibration. Example 3

RMC Workshop Minneapolis, MN 19 – 20 July 2012 Registration Management Committee 16 You have just completed an AS9120 audit and are revisiting the certification scope to ensure the audit can support the scope. In your audit you observe the following: The org purchases used aircraft parts and disassembles them and sends some parts out for repair and when returned, stock them for re-sale. They select the repair station based on the repair station FAA designated capabilities. What is your next step? Example 4

RMC Workshop Minneapolis, MN 19 – 20 July 2012 Registration Management Committee 17 A.The activities are acceptable for AS9120. B.Its Questionable since they select the supplier. C.Not suitable for AS9120 since they disassemble. D.Other scenarios. Example 4

RMC Workshop Minneapolis, MN 19 – 20 July 2012 Registration Management Committee 18 Be critical of the review of CA responses. Ensure the records clearly show ASD pre- audit information was utilized in all audits. Ensure the process identified in the 9101 are consistent with the clients manual/process definitions. If the 9120 client does anything other that stocking/distributing…..ask the questions. Example Take Away

RMC Workshop Minneapolis, MN 19 – 20 July 2012 Registration Management Committee Other Take away Points Make sure decision making person/people are competent in 9101D. Make sure required 9101 documentation is fully completed. Always consider product containment while reviewing NCRs. 19

RMC Workshop Minneapolis, MN 19 – 20 July 2012 Registration Management Committee 20 Questions