An Overview March 2015. Wh y Wh at Ho w Wh ere Wh en Wh o ?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

From Managing Instruction to Ensuring Learning By Susan Beck Ellen Oderman Phyllis Veith Student.
Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
Progress Towards Reading Success: The Reading First Evaluation Prepared by: Amy Kemp, Ph.D. Research Associate and Patricia A. Muller, Ph.D. Associate.
Instructional Decision Making
Purpose of Instruction
Parents as Partners in Education
General Universal Level Targeted Level Intensive Level Bonus
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
Response to Intervention: Multi- Tiered Systems for Student Success Janet Graden, PhD University of Cincinnati October, 2011.
January 2010IDEA Partnership1 Response to Intervention: Basics for families and community members.
Statewide Expectations Presenter: Christine Spear Alabama Department of Education.
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Response to Intervention (RTI) Presented by Ashley Adamo and Brian Mitchell January 6, 2012.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What is RTI?
Revised Illinois Professional Teaching Standards Rori R. Carson Western Illinois University.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION AND INTERVENTION (RtII) Adapted from School District of Philadelphia Rtii Materials.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
RtII for Middle School Bethann M. McCain; RtII Consultant
The Instructional Decision-Making Process 1 hour presentation.
Gifted Education (GATE) and Response to Intervention (RtI)
Support for Personalized Learning Presented by Dr. Sarah Lee RESA 4 Technical Assistance Specialist A recorded version of this presentation will be posted.
D62 Response to Intervention
FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
High Plains Education Cooperative.  A Multi-Tier System of Supports (MTSS) is a term used in Kansas to describe how schools go about providing supports.
Progress Monitoring for All Student Adapted from the Kentucky Systems of Interventions Guidance Document.
Winston/Salem Forsyth County Schools RESPONSIVENESS TO INSTRUCTION (RTI)
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
PLCS & THE CONNECTION TO RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Essentials for Administrators Sept. 27, 2012.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
What does an effective secondary school look like and sound like?
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Annie McLaughlin, M.T. Carol Davis, Ed.D. University of Washington
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Office of Service Quality
1 CECV Intervention Framework Module 5A Learning & Teaching EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION.
Response to Intervention: The Georgia Student Achievement Pyramid of Interventions October 22, 2008.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
Revisiting SPL/IIT/SAT/SLD AND OTHER ALPHABETIC ANOMOLIES!
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Response to Intervention Instruction. Agenda Ultimate Purpose Components of RtI Expectations Break Problem Solving Teams Homework.
Long Range Technology Plan, Student Device Standards Secondary Device Recommendation.
An Overview Allen Sexton Neely Harvey. Historical Overview.
Tier 1 Positive Behavior Support Response to Intervention for Behavior Faculty Overview.
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model Oakland Schools 3 Tier Literacy Leadership Team Training November
Comprehensive Planning
Today you will receive an overview of the Support for Personalized Learning framework with emphasis on components that could benefit from school counselor.
Gifted Education Integrated in RtI Instruction Systems
Support for Personalized Learning
An Overview April 2012.
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Presentation transcript:

An Overview March 2015

Wh y Wh at Ho w Wh ere Wh en Wh o ?

WHY – Federal and State Policies ESEA/ IDEA 2004 Improv ed Studen t Outco mes Policy 2510 Policy 2512 Policy 2419 Policy 4373 Policy 5310

WHY – WVDE Policies

WHY – Purpose of SPL The West Virginia Support for Personalized Learning (SPL) framework is a state-wide initiative that suggests flexible use of resources to provide relevant academic, social/emotional and/or behavioral support to enhance learning for ALL students. SPL is designed to improve outcomes for students with a variety of academic and behavioral needs.

Principles of SPL Effective leadership at all levels is crucial for the implementation of SPL. Positive school culture provides the foundation on which all instruction occurs and all students are engaged in learning. Collaboration among educators and families is the foundation of effective problem-solving and instructional decision-making. Ongoing and meaningful involvement of families increases student success. Student results are improved when ongoing academic and behavioral performance data are used to inform instructional decisions.

ALL Students can learn and achieve high standards as a result of effective teaching. ALL students must have access to a rigorous standards-based curriculum and research-based instruction. Intervening at the earliest indication of need is necessary for student success (Prek-12). A comprehensive system of multi-level instruction is essential for addressing the full range of student needs. ALL members of the school community must continue to gain knowledge and develop expertise in order to build capacity and sustainability. Principles of SPL

WHAT – Six Essential Components of SPL Leader ship Improve d Student Outcom es School Climate and Culture Teams and Proces ses Family and Commu nity Partner ships Assess ments Curricul um and Instructi on

Practice Profile Emerging Developing

State –Guidance Document –Self-assessment tools –Website providing professional development materials and resources RESA –Providing Professional Development –Facilitating sharing and building consensus –Forming Regional Leadership Team District –Developing leadership roles –Defining and communicating criteria used to make decisions –Providing professional development –Acquiring and disseminating relevant resources School –Supporting team problem-solving –Developing a plan to strengthen essential components of SPL –Managing time and schedules to focus on identified needs Leadership

School Climate and Culture Positive school climate consists of three primary domains: Engagement Safety Environment A positive school culture exists when key elements of a positive school climate are in place.

Practices Defining and consistently teaching expectations of behavior for students, parents and educators Acknowledging and recognizing students and adults consistently for appropriate behaviors Monitoring, correcting or reteaching behavioral errors Engaging teachers in a collaborative team problem- solving process that uses data to guide instruction Including families in culturally-sensitive, solution- focused approach to supporting student learning School Climate and Culture

Problem-Solving Team Composed of teachers (general and special educators), specialists, parents and school level administrator Plans intensive instruction for students Promotes shared responsibility for student learning Collects and reviews data Evaluates responsiveness to intense instruction Teams and Processes

Problem-Solving Process

Teams and Processes Team MembersSteps in the Process 1.School Level Administrator 2.Meeting Facilitator 3.Recorder 4.Time Keeper 5.Parent 6.Persons with Expertise in: Data Customized Instruction — Academic/ Behavioral Community Resources Progress Monitoring 1.Identify and Define Needs What is the Problem? 2.Analyze the Problem Why is the Problem Occurring? 3.Develop a Plan What are we going to do about it? 4.Implement and Monitor the Plan How will we monitor progress? 5.Evaluate and Adjust the Plan Did it work?

Effective partnerships include: – Parents – Families – Students – Community Members – Educators Indicators of effective partnerships: – Sharing information – Problem-solving – Celebrating student successes Central to effective partnerships is the recognition of shared responsibility and ownership of student challenges and successes. Family and Community Partnerships

Key Roles Collaborate with teachers regarding identified need Share information about child and family as appropriate Support student learning at home Attend Problem-Solving Team meeting Partner in instructional planning and progress monitoring Family and Community Partnerships

Purpose of Assessment Identify strengths and needs of individual students Inform problem-solving process Inform instruction and necessary adjustments Evaluate the effectiveness of instruction at different levels of the system (e.g. classrooms, school, district) Inform educational decisions Assessment

Screening/Interim Purpose: Inform determination of risk status and indicate need for additional support and/or assessment Formative/Classroom Purpose: Determine response to instruction and indicate direction for most appropriate instructional adjustments Progress Monitoring Purpose: Determine if students are making progress toward specific skills, processes and understandings and to inform school-wide action plans Diagnostic Purpose: Assists teachers in adjusting the type and degree of scaffolding and in differentiating instruction and to pick up patterns of strengths and weaknesses Summative Purpose: Inform the system and provides a longitudinal view of curricular strengths and weaknesses Assessment Types

Curriculum and Instruction

CORE Provides foundation of curriculum and school organization that has a high probability (80% of students responding) of bringing students to a high level of achievement in all areas of development/content Choose curricula that has evidence of producing optimal levels of achievement (evidence-based curriculum) TARGETED Supplemental curriculum aligned with CORE and designed to meet the specific needs of targeted group (15%) INTENSIVE Focused curriculum designed to meet the specific needs of the targeted group and/or individual (5%) Curriculum and Instruction

CORE Instruction Utilizes differentiated and scaffolded instruction to meet students’ needs Incorporates small group activities Focuses on the most critical standards and objectives Utilizes evidence from summative and ongoing formative assessment to make instructional decisions Maximizes instructional time Emphasizes 24/7 learning

Curriculum and Instruction TARGETED Support SPL endorses the value of instructional supports at the TARGETED level including: –Differentiating, scaffolding and using multi-modal strategies to engage students –Providing explicit instruction that emphasizes skill building as well as contextualized instruction that emphasizes application of skills –Peer interaction to scaffold student understanding –Teacher use of learning progressions within the standards and objectives as guidance for constructing scaffolding –Accommodations that affect how a student learns, not what they are expected to learn

HOW-WHEN-WHERE-WHO – Putting It All Together CORE Improv ed Stude nt Outco mes TARGET ED INTENSI VE Screenin g Problem -Solving Progress Monitorin g

FOCUS: all students INSTRUCTION: WV Next Generation Content Standards and Objectives and instructional practices that are evidence-based and incorporate differentiated instruction and scaffolding LOCATION: general education classroom ASSESSMENT: screening/interim, formative/ classroom; screening all-beginning, some-middle, end CORE Level – SUGGESTED

BEHAVIOR SUPPORT: effective school- wide behavior supports GROUP SIZE: flexible grouping-students move to groups as appropriate TIME: sufficient time for mastery of content and behavioral expectations GOAL: demonstrated learning of grade- level standards or above

TARGETED Level – SUGGESTED FOCUS: students identified through screening as at-risk or as exceeding grade-level standards INSTRUCTION: targeted, supplemental instruction delivered to small groups LOCATION: general education classroom or other general education location within the school; before, during, after school, interim, summer ASSESSMENT: progress monitoring every 2-3 weeks; diagnostic

TARGETED Level – SUGGESTED BEHAVIOR SUPPORT: specialized positive behavior plans provided/monitored by teacher, specialists, parents GROUP SIZE: small groups of students with similar skills and needs TIME: minutes per session, 3-5 sessions per week LENGTH: 9 weeks minimum prior to INTENSIVE GOAL: eliminate gap between present achievement and grade-level expectations and the gap between instruction and what students need

INTENSIVE Level – SUGGESTED FOCUS: students who have not responded to CORE and TARGETED level instruction INSTRUCTION: intensive, supplemental instruction delivered to small groups or individually LOCATION: general education location within the school; may be pull-out; before, during, after school, interim, summer ASSESSMENT: progress monitoring every 1-2 weeks; diagnostic

BEHAVIOR SUPPORT: assessment of student behaviors (FBA) and development of specialized behavior plans with teacher, specialist, parents GROUP SIZE: individual or very small groups of students with similar skills and needs TIME: minutes per session, 3-5 sessions per week LENGTH: 9 weeks minimum prior to referral GOAL: eliminate or narrow gap between present achievement and grade-level expectations and gap between instruction and what students need INTENSIVE Level – SUGGESTED

SPL FRAMEWORK: A Quick Reference Guide

Susan Beck Assistant Director Office of Special Programs