The Nation’s Report Card 4th-Grade Reading 2000. SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP),

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Kalispell’s 4 th Grade Reading International Comparison On the th grade PIRLS international Reading assessment, Florida’s performance was compared.

Advertisements

Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics May 10, 2012.

NCLB Basics From “What Parents of Students with Disabilities Need to Know & Do” National Center on Educational Outcomes University of Minnesota

Dr. Elena Izquierdo UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO

Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics June 27, 2013 #NAEP.

NYC ACHIEVEMENT GAINS COMPARED TO OTHER LARGE CITIES SINCE 2003 Changes in NAEP scores Leonie Haimson & Elli Marcus Class Size Matters January.

Stuart Kerachsky Deputy Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics March 24, 2010.

Dianne Chadwick Iowa NAEP Coordinator Iowa Department of Education November 8, 2011.

Academic Literacy Nov. 13 and 16, 2006 Kathi Swanson, Jack Decker, Deb Keeler.

Highlights from TIMSS 2011 Jack Buckley National Center for Education Statistics Washington, DC December 11, 2012.

1 NAEP th Grade Economics Assessment. 2 ► First NAEP assessment of economics ► Content areas: market economy, national economy, and international.

NAEP 2008 Trends in Academic Progress in Reading and Mathematics.

Reliability and Linking of Assessments. Figure 1 Differences Between Percentages Proficient or Above on State Assessments and on NAEP: Grade 8 Mathematics,

The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics National Assessment of Educational Progress 1.

Office of Assessment October 22, PSAT/SAT/NAEP  PSAT – Pre-Scholastic Aptitude Test  SAT – Scholastic Aptitude Test  NAEP – National Assessment.

Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator

NAEP 1998 Civics Assessment National Center for Education Statistics Gary W. Phillips Acting Commissioner 18 November 1999.

Shannon Kewin EFD The Basics a. Terra Nova (TN) Test Score Results b. Wilson School Annual Report Card 2. Breakdown of scores (Reading) 3. Breakdown.

SOUTHEAST READING IMPROVEMENT Jessica Morgan Intervention Specialist.

Montana’s statewide longitudinal data system Project Montana’s Statewide Longitudinal Data System (SLDS)

1 Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics June 2011.

NYC ACHIEVEMENT GAINS COMPARED TO OTHER LARGE CITIES SINCE 2003 Changes in NAEP scores Class Size Matters August

Achieve Data Profile: Washington January AMERICAN DIPLOMA PROJECT NETWORK The Big Picture n To be successful in today’s economy, all students.

Overview of the USA Health, Social problems and education.

Highlights from PIRLS and TIMSS 2011 Jack Buckley National Center for Education Statistics Washington, DC December 11, 2012.

Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics January 25, 2011.

School Improvement, Title I and Focus Parent Meeting

1 The Nation’s Report Card: 2007 Writing. 2 Overview of the 2007 Writing Assessment Given January – March 2007 – 139,900 eighth-graders – 27,900 twelfth-graders.

Stuart Kerachsky Deputy Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics December 8, 2009.

Projected Racial/ethnic Minorities in the U.S. Workforce Richard Fry Senior Economist Hispanic Trends Project.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Results of the 2005 National Assessment of Educational Progress.

0 Michele Sonnenfeld NAEP State Coordinator Florida Department of Education October 2006 Florida Association of Science Supervisors.

What can we learn from 5+ years of ISTAR-KR? Michael Conn-Powers Early Childhood Center IIDC/Indiana University.

LIVE INTERACTIVE YOUR DESKTOP June 20, 2012 Science in Action: Understanding what students know and can do in the classroom, in the lab, and.

Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator

NAEP 2011 Mathematics and Reading Results Challis Breithaupt November 1, 2011.

NAEP 2011 Mathematics and Reading Results NAEP State Coordinator Mark DeCandia.

Rose Tree Media Introductory Session SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics.

Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education Board Challenge to Lead 2020 Joan Lord October 19, 2012 Atlanta Renaissance Concourse Hotel Challenge to.

The Nation’s Report Card: U.S. History National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

The Nation’s Report Card Science National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

United to Make a Difference: Improving the Achievement of Young Men of Color Council of the Great City Schools Fall 2014.

THE 2005 NAEP HIGH SCHOOL TRANSCRIPT STUDY. THE 2005 HIGH SCHOOL TRANSCRIPT STUDY Today ’ s Presentations.

United to Make a Difference: Improving the Achievement of Young Men of Color Council of the Great City Schools Fall 2014.

1. 2 Overview of the 2006 NAEP Assessments Administered in January–March 2006 National results for grades 4, 8, and 12 Results by scale scores and achievement.

The Nation’s Report Card: Geography National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

James A. Farley School Report Card Presentation May 19, 2008 High Achieving School.

Future Ready Schools National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) in North Carolina Wednesday, February 13, 2008 Auditorium III 8:30 – 9:30 a.m.

N ATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS BPS 2015 NAEP RESULTS Office of Data and Accountability OCTOBER 26, 2015.

Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics May 4, 2011.

NAEP Questions Tool Bobbie Bable Georgia Department of Education NAEP State Coordinator.

The Nation’s Report Card: Trial Urban District Assessment: Science 2005.

The Nation’s Report Card: 2005 Reading and Mathematics Trial Urban District Assessments.

1 WHY WE NEED INCREASED STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT. 2 Decrease (-) / Increase (+) in Jobs by Education Level, Source: Employment Policy Foundation.

Kentucky Department of Education, Office of Assessment and Accountability, July 2012 Questions: or

NAEP 2005 Reading and Mathematics Results. Overview of the 2005 Reading and Mathematics Assessment 1.

NAEP 2007: Reading and Mathematics, Grades 4 and 8 New Jersey State Board of Education Work Session Assistant Commissioner Jay Doolan Assessment Director.

A Closer Look at CRCT Data Comparing LaBelle, Cobb County School District, and State Data LaBelle Elementary (544 students enrolled) Intended use for.

December 2015 STATE OF SCHOOL REVIEW Everett Public Schools Compiled by the Center for Educational Effectiveness.

Two Samples z-test We know how to deal with one sample z-test. Now we look at two independent samples.

1. 2 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Survey of academic achievement for the nation and the states Assesses various subjects at grades.

NAEP Grade 12 Results.

Gloria Ladson-Billings University of Wisconsin

Connecticut Enhanced Assessment Grant

Using NAEP Results to Examine State Trends in Mathematics Achievement

2017 TUDA NAEP Results for Miami-Dade

2017 NAEP RESULTS: DC PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS

Achieve American Council on Education

NAEP in Tennessee.

Why We Should be Skeptical about the Common Core

Presentation transcript:

The Nation’s Report Card 4th-Grade Reading 2000

SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2000 Reading Assessment. Features of the 2000 Reading Assessment

Content of the 2000 Reading Assessment SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2000 Reading Assessment.

Results Reported from the 2000 Reading Assessment SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2000 Reading Assessment.

Average Reading Score Results for the Nation SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1992–2000 Reading Assessments.

Reading Score Percentiles SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1992–2000 Reading Assessments. Significantly different from 2000.

Profiles of Good and Poor Readers Good Readers = Top 10% of Students Poor Readers = Bottom 10% of Students

Achievement Level Results for the Nation SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1992–2000 Reading Assessments. Significantly different from 2000.

SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1992–2000 Reading Assessments. Significantly different from Average Reading Scores by Race/Ethnicity

Percentage Reading at or above Proficient by Race/Ethnicity SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1992–2000 Reading Assessments. Significantly different from 2000.

Percentage of Students by Race/Ethnicity SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1992–2000 Reading Assessments. Significantly different from 2000.

Trends in Racial/Ethnic Gaps in Reading SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1992–2000 Reading Assessments.

Average Reading Scores by Gender SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1992–2000 Reading Assessments.

Trends in Gender Gaps in Reading SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1992–2000 Reading Assessments. Significantly different from 2000.

Percentage Reading at or above Proficient by Gender SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1992–2000 Reading Assessments. Significantly different from 2000.

Average Reading Score by Type of School SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1992–2000 Reading Assessments.

Pages Read Daily for School and Homework SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1992–2000 Reading Assessments. Significantly different from 2000.

Time Spent on Homework SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1992–2000 Reading Assessments. Significantly different from 2000.

Reading for Fun SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1992–2000 Reading Assessments. Significantly different from 2000.

Number of Different Types of Reading Materials in the Home SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1992–2000 Reading Assessments. Significantly different from 2000.

Time Spent Watching TV Daily SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1992–2000 Reading Assessments. Significantly different from 2000.

Accommodations Permitted in the NAEP Reading Assessment SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1998–2000 Reading Assessments.

Students with Disabilities SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1992–2000 Reading Assessments. Based on sample with accommodations permitted.

Students with Limited English Proficiency SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1992–2000 Reading Assessments. Based on sample with accommodations permitted.

Average Scores by Type of Sample: 2000 SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2000 Reading Assessment. Significantly different from the sample where accommodations were not permitted.

Average Scores by Race/Ethnicity and Type of Sample: 2000 SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2000 Reading Assessment. Significantly different from the sample where accommodations were not permitted.

End Page