U.S. Department of Education Mathematics and Science Program State Coordinators’ Meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Science Action Research Team Kennedy High School.
Advertisements

Writing Assessment Plans for Secondary Education / Foundations of Educations Department 9 th Annual Assessment Presentation December 3, 2013 Junko Yamamoto.
MSP Program Evaluation
Designs to Estimate Impacts of MSP Projects with Confidence. Ellen Bobronnikov March 29, 2010.
PD-360 Impact for Title 1 Schools Steven H. Shaha, PhD, DBA July 2011.
ESTEEMS (ESTablishing Excellence in Education of Mathematics and Science) Project Overview and Evaluation Dr. Deborah H. Cook, Director, NJ SSI MSP Regional.
MSP Evaluation Rubric and Working Definitions Xiaodong Zhang, PhD, Westat Annual State Coordinators Meeting Washington, DC, June 10-12, 2008.
A few of the Achievement Outcomes for San Francisco Unified School District’s California Math and Science Partnership Grant- Working together to Improve.
Reliability and Linking of Assessments. Figure 1 Differences Between Percentages Proficient or Above on State Assessments and on NAEP: Grade 8 Mathematics,
WHAT DO SMARTER QUESTIONS LOOK LIKE? COMPUTER ADAPTIVE TEST: ENGLISH.
KEDC Project for Special Educator Effectiveness (Project SEE) KEDC Special Education.
Evaluating Professional Development Debbie Junk, Coordinator for Mathematics Initiatives Mathematics Project Directors’ Meeting Tuesday, October 9th Austin,
Evaluation of Math-Science Partnership Projects (or how to find out if you’re really getting your money’s worth)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2009 Results Stuart Kerachsky Deputy Commissioner December 7, 2010.
Promoting Learning & Understanding for Students MSP project meeting  January 9, 2014 MathPLUS 1 and 2.
Mathematics/Science Partnerships U.S. Department of Education: New Program Grantees.
Overview of MSP Evaluation Rubric Gary Silverstein, Westat MSP Regional Conference San Francisco, February 13-15, 2008.
Measuring Changes in Teachers’ Mathematics Content Knowledge Dr. Amy Germuth Compass Consulting Group, LLC.
Measuring Changes in Teachers’ Science Content Knowledge Dr. Anne D’Agostino Compass Consulting Group, LLC.
September 11,  Measurements of Student Progress (MSP) ◦ Reading and math were tested every year in grades 3 through 8. ◦ Writing was tested in.
Quasi-Experimental Designs For Evaluating MSP Projects: Processes & Some Results Dr. George N. Bratton Project Evaluator in Arkansas.
MATH/SCIENCE PARTNERSHIP BASICS The U.S. Department of Education´s Mathematics and Science Partnerships (MSP) program is administered by the Academic Improvement.
Spring 2015 Smarter Balanced (SBA) and Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) update September
MSP PROJECT EVALUATION Lessons Learned Margaret Phelps & Kenneth W. Hunter, Sr. January 8, 2008 Millard Oakley STEM Center.
Mathematics and Science Partnership (MSP) Programs U.S. Department of Education: Baltimore Regional Meeting February 14-16, 2011.
Office of English Language Acquisition, Language Enhancement, and Academic Achievement for Limited English Proficient Students (OELA) Presented by:Margarita.
Council of State Science Supervisors Secretary’s Math and Science Initiative NCLB M/S Partnerships Philadelphia, PA March, 2003 Presented by: Triangle.
Accessing and Reporting State Student Achievement Data for GPRA Purposes Amy A. Germuth, Ph.D. Compass Consulting Group, LLC.
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
U.S. Department of Education Mathematics and Science Partnerships: FY 2005 Summary.
Assisting GPRA Report for MSP Xiaodong Zhang, Westat MSP Regional Conference Miami, January 7-9, 2008.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: An Introduction for New State Coordinators February /2013.
Program Evaluation Update. Program Impact Campuses Served by TRC.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships, Title II, Part B, NCLB.
CaMSP Database and APR Webinar Public Works, Inc. CaMSP Database and October 15, 2011 APR Update April 4, 2011 CaMSP Network Meeting Patty O’Driscoll Albert.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Louisiana Math and Science Partnership State Coordinator Meeting Washington, DC June 2008.
Using SEC Data for Program Evaluation Report on SEC Data Analysis for a State MSP.
Mathematics and Science Partnership (MSP) Programs U.S. Department of Education: San Diego Regional Meeting February 22, 2010.
Classifying Designs of MSP Evaluations Lessons Learned and Recommendations Barbara E. Lovitts June 11, 2008.
Evaluating Impacts of MSP Grants Hilary Rhodes, PhD Ellen Bobronnikov February 22, 2010 Common Issues and Recommendations.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships program U.S. Department of Education Regional Conferences February - March, 2006.
Research and Evaluation Team Lines of Work Andy Porter, Director Building a Partnership – Susan Millar District Case Studies – William Clune Targeted Studies.
Petraine Johnson, Moderator, Presenters: Millie Bentley-Memon, Fengju Zhang, Elizabeth Judd Office of English Language Acquisition Language Enhancement.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the FY2006 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Welcome to the San Francisco Mathematics and Science Partnerships Regional Meeting March 21-23, 2011.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
U.S. Department of Education Mathematics and Science Program State Coordinators Meeting.
Evaluating Impacts of MSP Grants Ellen Bobronnikov January 6, 2009 Common Issues and Potential Solutions.
Online MSP APR System U. S. Department of Education.
Evaluation Requirements for MSP and Characteristics of Designs to Estimate Impacts with Confidence Ellen Bobronnikov February 16, 2011.
Mathematics and Science Partnership APR Updates apr.ed-msp.net.
Title III Native American and Alaska Native Children in School Program Grantee Performance Reporting June 19, 2014 Prepared under the Data Quality Initiative.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships Grant RFP Informational Session April 5, 2010.
Program Evaluation and Impact Assessment: Internet-delivered, On-Demand Professional Development Participating Schools versus Their Respective Districts.
Texas Regional Collaboratives for Excellence in Science and Mathematics Teaching TRC Advisory Board March 4, 2008 Austin, Texas TRC Professional Development.
Spring 2015 OMSP Request For Proposal. Important Dates Intent to Submit: March 21, 2015 Applications: 4:30 p.m., Friday, May 15, 2015 Announcement of.
Colorado Academic Standards Colorado English Language Proficiency (CELP) Standards There are now five English language development standards: Standard.
Ohio’s Mathematics Science Partnership All New OMSP Programs must use the Survey of Enacted Curriculum.
Connecticut Mastery Test Fourth Generation Grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 Connecticut Academic Performance Test Third Generation Grade 10 Presented to the.
Nevada Mathematics and Science (MSP) Program Grants Technical Assistance Meeting November 2014.
EVALUATING A MIDDLE SCHOOL MATH M.ED. PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM. Knowledge, Pedagogy, Practice or Student Achievement:
MSP Summary of First Year Annual Report FY 2004 Projects.
Evaluation Requirements for MSP and Characteristics of Designs to Estimate Impacts with Confidence Ellen Bobronnikov March 23, 2011.
Evaluation of An Urban Natural Science Initiative
PISA • PIRLS • TIMSS Program for International Student Assessment
PRMSP/AlACiMa Project
Reflective Problem Solving Collaborative Problem Solving
Report on SEC Data Analysis
Florence Howard Elementary
Presentation transcript:

U.S. Department of Education Mathematics and Science Program State Coordinators’ Meeting

GPRA Indicators (1) The Percent of Teachers who Significantly Increase their Content Knowledge, as reflected on pre/post test assessments.

GPRA Indicators (baseline) Total AssessedTotal Sig. GainsPercent Math11,6638, % Science 6,6895, %

GPRA Indicator (2) The Percent of Students in classrooms of MSP teachers who Score at the Basic level or above in State Assessments of Mathematics or Science.

GPRA Indicator (new form) MATH # of students with assessment data558,129 # of Students scoring basic/above358,349 Percent scoring basic/above64% SCIENCE # of students with assessment data123,162 # of students scoring basic/above50,408 Percent scoring basic/above41%

GPRA Indicator (3) The Percent of Students in Classrooms of MSP teachers who Score at the Proficient level or above in State Assessments of Mathematics or Science.

GPRA Indicator MATH # of students with assessment data558,129 # scoring proficient/above260,195 Percent proficient 47% SCIENCE # of students with assessment data123,162 # scoring proficient 36,201 Percent proficient 29%

GPRA Indicator MATH AND SCIENCE (OLD FORM) Percent proficient 68% Percent change 7%

GPRA Indicator (4) The percent of MSP projects that report using experimental or quasi-experimental designs for their evaluations.

GPRA Indicator Experimental1% Quasi-Experimental36% No control/comparison12% Other (e.g.case studies, formative)49% Did not Report2%

GPRA Indicator (5) The percent of MSP projects that use experimental or quasi-experimental designs for their evaluations that are conducted successfully and that yield scientifically valid results. Results not available.

GPRA Indicator (6) The percent of SEAs that submit complete and accurate data on MSP performance measures in a timely manner. 100% (!)

Other Data 1,767,035 Students Served by MSP-trained teachers. 54,662 Participating teachers. 493 projects funded. Content of PD: --Math: 43% --Science 25% --M/S30% --Not Report 2%