1. PD-360 Impact for Title 1 Schools Steven H. Shaha, PhD, DBA July 2011

2. Overarching Research Question: Does engagement in PD 360 significantly affect student success in Title I schools? Does engagement in PD 360 significantly affect student success in Title I schools?

3. Methods Design: Quasi-experimental, retrospective, pre-post, normalized treatment-control / participation vs. non-participation (2009-10, 2010-11) Goal: Multi-State, large n with comparable student populations (matched, controlled) Student Change: * Metric was percent students classified as Proficient or Advanced in respective States. Change was computed as net change year-over-year, divided by Year 1 baseline * Improvement is percent change: [(Year2-Year1)/Year1] * Comparative change: [School change/District change] 3

4. Sample Description High Video Utilizers – 422 Schools Metrics: – Percent of users viewing – Student Success Note: High video utilizers was defined as minimum average of 90.0 minutes of participation in PD 360 per academic year per teacher for any school collectively. Percent of users viewing was the percentage of teachers within any school verified as participating in any module within PD 360 Student success was quantified as the sum of percent students classified as either Proficient or Advanced on the respective standardized state test.

5. School-wide Title 1 Findings Title 1 PD-360 Schools significantly outperformed their respective Districts Math: – 13.2% Advantage for Combined Pct Prof and Adv (p<.001) Reading: – 4.6% Advantage for Combined Pct Prof and Adv (p<.001) NOTES: Results reflect comparative percent change year-over-year: (Year 2 – Year 1)/Year 1. A 0.0% change would indicate same scores for Year 1 and Year 2 – no gain or loss. Advantage reflects the net difference in percent change for School vs. Districts: (Pct Sch-Pct Dist). A 0.0% advantage would indicate no difference between Schools and Districts in the percent change year-over-year.

6. Math Advantages The Districts fell 5.9%, while PD-360 Schools gained 7.3% for a 13.2% advantage (p<.001) The Districts fell 5.9%, while PD-360 Schools gained 7.3% for a 13.2% advantage (p<.001) NOTES: Results reflect comparative percent change year-over-year: (Year 2 – Year 1)/Year 1. A 0.0% change would indicate same scores for Year 1 and Year 2 – no gain or loss. Advantage reflects the net difference in percent change for School vs. Districts: (Pct Sch-Pct Dist). A 0.0% advantage would indicate no difference between Schools and Districts in the percent change year-over-year.

7. Math Advantages The Districts fell 5.9%, while PD-360 Schools gained 7.3% for a 13.2% advantage (p<.001) The Districts fell 5.9%, while PD-360 Schools gained 7.3% for a 13.2% advantage (p<.001) NOTES: Results reflect comparative percent change year-over-year: (Year 2 – Year 1)/Year 1. A 0.0% change would indicate same scores for Year 1 and Year 2 – no gain or loss. Advantage reflects the net difference in percent change for School vs. Districts: (Pct Sch-Pct Dist). A 0.0% advantage would indicate no difference between Schools and Districts in the percent change year-over-year. 59.7 60.2 64.1 56.6

8. Math Advantages The Districts fell 5.9%, while PD-360 Schools gained 7.3% for a 13.2% advantage (p<.001) The Districts fell 5.9%, while PD-360 Schools gained 7.3% for a 13.2% advantage (p<.001) NOTES: Results reflect comparative percent change year-over-year: (Year 2 – Year 1)/Year 1. A 0.0% change would indicate same scores for Year 1 and Year 2 – no gain or loss. Advantage reflects the net difference in percent change for School vs. Districts: (Pct Sch-Pct Dist). A 0.0% advantage would indicate no difference between Schools and Districts in the percent change year-over-year.

9. Reading Advantages The Districts rose 0.1%, while PD-360 Schools gained 4.8% for a 4.6% advantage* (p<.001) The Districts rose 0.1%, while PD-360 Schools gained 4.8% for a 4.6% advantage* (p<.001) * Figures do not sum perfectly due to rounding NOTES: Results reflect comparative percent change year-over-year: (Year 2 – Year 1)/Year 1. A 0.0% change would indicate same scores for Year 1 and Year 2 – no gain or loss. Advantage reflects the net difference in percent change for School vs. Districts: (Pct Sch-Pct Dist). A 0.0% advantage would indicate no difference between Schools and Districts in the percent change year-over-year.

10. Reading Advantages * Figures do not sum perfectly due to rounding NOTES: Results reflect comparative percent change year-over-year: (Year 2 – Year 1)/Year 1. A 0.0% change would indicate same scores for Year 1 and Year 2 – no gain or loss. Advantage reflects the net difference in percent change for School vs. Districts: (Pct Sch-Pct Dist). A 0.0% advantage would indicate no difference between Schools and Districts in the percent change year-over-year. The Districts rose 0.1%, while PD-360 Schools gained 4.8% for a 4.6% advantage* (p<.001) The Districts rose 0.1%, while PD-360 Schools gained 4.8% for a 4.6% advantage* (p<.001)

11. Reading Advantages The Districts rose 0.1%, while PD-360 Schools gained 4.8% for a 4.6% advantage* (p<.001) The Districts rose 0.1%, while PD-360 Schools gained 4.8% for a 4.6% advantage* (p<.001) * Figures do not sum perfectly due to rounding NOTES: Results reflect comparative percent change year-over-year: (Year 2 – Year 1)/Year 1. A 0.0% change would indicate same scores for Year 1 and Year 2 – no gain or loss. Advantage reflects the net difference in percent change for School vs. Districts: (Pct Sch-Pct Dist). A 0.0% advantage would indicate no difference between Schools and Districts in the percent change year-over-year.

12. Predictors of Change in PD-360 Title 1 Schools Math: – #1 predictor – Percent of Users Viewing Reading – #1 predictor – Percent of Users Viewing *Statistically significant predictors from the regression model NOTES: Results reflect comparative percent change year-over-year: (Year 2 – Year 1)/Year 1. A 0.0% change would indicate same scores for Year 1 and Year 2 – no gain or loss.

13. Predictors of Change in PD-360 Title I Schools: – Math predictors: 1 – Percent of Users Viewing 2 – Average Minutes Viewed 3 – Total Users – Reading predictors: 1 – Percent of Users Viewing 2 – Registered Users Viewing 3 – Average Minutes Viewed *Statistically significant predictors from the regression model NOTES: Results reflect comparative percent change year-over-year: (Year 2 – Year 1)/Year 1. A 0.0% change would indicate same scores for Year 1 and Year 2 – no gain or loss.

14. Math Advantages – Approx. 13.2% growth advantage per 100 students than their respective district counterparts Reading Advantages – Approx. 4.6% performance advantage per 100 students than their respective district counterparts Summary of School Impacts NOTES: Results reflect comparative percent change year-over-year: (Year 2 – Year 1)/Year 1. A 0.0% change would indicate same scores for Year 1 and Year 2 – no gain or loss. Advantage reflects the net difference in percent change for School vs. Districts: (Pct Sch-Pct Dist). A 0.0% advantage would indicate no difference between Schools and Districts in the percent change year-over-year.