Kootenay Lake Forest District Post FSP approval -experiences from a tenures perspective 1 A presentation at the PFIT Post FSP Workshop by Curt Nixon/Rob.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Evaluation at NRCan: Information for Program Managers Strategic Evaluation Division Science & Policy Integration July 2012.

Advertisements

Designing School Level Professional Development. Overview Assessing prior knowledge of professional development Defining professional development Designing.

The Individual Health Plan Essential to achieve educational equality for students with health management needs Ensures access to an education for students.

Effective Contract Management Planning

Creating a Culture of Assessment in Financial Aid Erika M. Cox Associate Director, Student Financial Aid and Enrollment Services University of Texas at.

PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track

Professional Reliance in the Williams Lake TSA “Empowering Trust” 2011.

FRPA Data Collection, Management and Reporting Defining the Business Requirements RSM Pilot Review Workshop February 2005.

CIP Overview 1. Purposes of the CIP What Does CIP Success Look Like? Identifying the Team Roles of LEA, Principal, and CIP Team CIP Timeline 2.

Stephanie M. Glyptis April 5, 2014 Let’s Meet: The Essentials of Great Meetings.

RMS – a collaborative approach Presentation Lyn Dare & Stephen Larmour Authorisation & Audit Comcare.

Implementation: SLA & SOP Processes Purpose Strategy Foundation We Deliver Competitive Advantage to our Customer's Global Supply Chain.

Listen UP! The Pitfalls of Failed Conversations A Workshop for the Public Risk Management Association September 12,

Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.

FSP REVIEW PLANNING BENEFITS CONCERNS IMPROVEMENTS A presentation at the PFIT Post FSP Workshop by Cam Leitch on Pope and Talbot’s experience implementing.

ORIENTATION PRESENTED BY DR. DAVID PEAK ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT FOR HUMAN RESOURCES ADMINISTRATORS (NON-SCHOOL BASED) EVALUATION.

CHANGING ROLES OF THE DIAGNOSTICIAN Consultants to being part of an Early Intervention Team.

FEMA Disaster Workforce Transformation FEMA Disaster Workforce Transformation February 2012.

1 Forest and Range Practices Act: Forest Stewardship Plans.

Continuous Improvement Objectives Pillar Workshop 2009.

Understanding Boards Building Connections: Community Leadership Program.

Putting It all Together Facilitating Learning and Project Groups.

Kootenay Spatial Data Partnership An Initiative for Forest Stewardship Data Management Per Magnus Wallenius Land Information Specialist Integrated Land.

Forest Practices Code Transition Larry Pedersen Chief Forester, MOF.

THE JAMAICAN SCHOOL COUNSELLOR

February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.

District Operational Monitoring Initiative By the DOMI Team A presentation at the PFIT Post FSP Workshop by Brian Westgate on the MoFR’s DOMI monitoring.

PLANNING FOR SUCCESS: IMPLEMENTING INFINITYHR. Katie Cuthriell Implementation Services Manager IntroductionPlanningDesigningBuilding Testing & Training.

Welcome To the Objectives Pillar Workshop Introduction Business need Target Audience - technical and professional staff who support decision maker.

© 2011 J.D. Power and Associates, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. J.D. Power and Associates Proprietary and Confidential—For Internal.

Streamlining Project July 7, 2005 Susan Elo, EDGE -- Consultant to the Project Update to the Kootenay Spatial Data Partnership: Summary of recommendations.

Demystifying the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge Central Iowa IIBA Chapter December 7, 2005.

1 FSP Tracking System Overview Bill Beard / John Gallimore March 8, 2007 A presentation at the PFIT Post FSP Workshop by Bill Beard/John Gallimore on the.

Working Definition of Program Evaluation

Results of Implementation and Testing Soils and Riparian – What Did We Learn?

Provincial FRPA Implementation Team Post Forest Stewardship Plan Workshop BC Timber Sales Strait of Georgia Presentation March 7, 2007 A presentation at.

PFIT WORKSHOP Post-FSP Learning's BCTS – Okanagan Columbia March 7 th, 2007 A presentation at the PFIT Post FSP Workshop by Dave Gill on BCTS’s experience.

Toolkit #3: Effectively Teaching and Leading Implementation of the Oklahoma C 3 Standards, Including the Common Core.

Elements of Effective Behavior Based Safety Programs

Post-FSP World Making it work between Tenures, C&E, Stewardship (Larry Badowski) (Tenures Officer – PGFD) A presentation at the PFIT Post FSP Workshop.

Key Stakeholder Interviews Assessing Effectiveness of Washington State Board of Education Communications with Key Stakeholders.

1 Co-operation in Implementing Internal and External Audit in the Republic of Moldova Gh. Cojocari Court of Accounts (CoA) Chisinau, June 2007.

1 Ministry of Forests and Range C&E and FRPA Cassandra Mann Legislation & Policy Forester Compliance & Enforcement Branch Ministry of Forests & Range A.

Quesnel Forest District Sharing of experiences and learning's Gord Wall, Tenure Supervisor ESF Implementation Team Member.

1 PFIT Post FSP Workshop Mar. 7-8, 2007 Session Review Larry Hanlon Harry Jennings.

1 SHARED LEADERSHIP: Parents as Partners Presented by the Partnership for Family Success Training & TA Center January 14, 2009.

Orientation to Scoring Process for VPNPP Feedback Tools Self Report, Manager and Peer Feedback Tools.

Child Welfare in Ontario: Implementing a Collaborative Intervention Model for Child Protection Services Finding the Key to Success Phase II September 2006.

Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Developing Multisector Task Forces or Action Committees for the Initiative.

H&PE New Curriculum, New Approach Health & Physical Education Department - TCDSB.

@theEIFoundation | eif.org.uk Early Intervention to prevent gang and youth violence: ‘Maturity Matrix’ Early intervention (‘EI’) is about getting extra.

Chapter 3: The Leisure Service Programmer Four Elements Related to Program Leadership 1.Program Planning and Implementation: involves managing the planning,

©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

Company LOGO Revised and Presented by Rob Coffman, CGMP and Patty Barron, CGMP Welcome To the 2015 Chapter Presidents’ Training Minneapolis – April 28,

Why Have a KSDP MOU? New shared stewardship model for results based Forest Stewardship Plans This will allow greater variability in content and approach.

Effective Communication skills Prepared by Dr. Ali Issa Al Zahrani Leadership & Management Skills Training, Lusaka- Zambia 17 th -23 rd January, 2015.

FRPA Data Management/Reporting System (Data Collection and Reporting) Building Your New System: Business Requirements Suggestions and Questions RSM Pilot.

 Continue the role of our Bullying Prevention Coordinating Committee and program coordinator  Maintain an ongoing relationship with your certified Olweus.

Stage 1 Integrated learning Coffee Shop. LEARNING REQUIREMENTS The learning requirements summarise the knowledge, skills, and understanding that students.

Girfec Origins What is Girfec? Getting it right for every child is the national approach to improving outcomes for all children by placing the child.

Elements of Volunteer Management Volunteer Onslow Presented by: Lauren Welch, Director The Jacksonville-Onslow Volunteer & Nonprofit Resource Center.

Thematic priorities Life sciences, genomics and biotechnology for health Nanotechnology Aeronautics Food quality and safety Sustainable development, global.

Coaching model for Person Centred Care “Person to Partner model”

OCLC Online Computer Library Center 1 Building & Sustaining Library Partnerships.

IT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK Pertemuan 3-4

School Community Council Roles and Responsibilities

Our Vision Our vision is to be recognised nationally and internationally as a leader in qualification, assessment and verification.

Using the Checklist for SDMX Data Providers

Effective Meeting.

District Operational Monitoring Initiative

Presentation transcript:

Kootenay Lake Forest District Post FSP approval -experiences from a tenures perspective 1 A presentation at the PFIT Post FSP Workshop by Curt Nixon/Rob McRory on MoFR’s experience implementing FSPs.

Now that we have some FSPs approved, how can we be successful…? 1. What is working well? 2. What are the ongoing challenges? 3. What do we see moving forward? 2

1. What is working well? Better understanding of how it all works: -licensees are getting more comfortable with the process of plan design, seeking out info, and building internal processes to support the commitments made in the plan -increasing professional reliance- licensees are making those critical decisions themselves and not relying so much on DM input / agreement -Field Services has improved confidence- we understand and accept that risk management is required. Relinquishing the control…. -Field Services internal FSP reviews working more efficiently…focus key points Multi-district post approvals- one district takes the lead: -based on AAC -intra-district discussions on plan wording, -one consistent contact for the licensee and field services 3

What is working well, continued Professional discussions….always keeping the goal in mind: -face to face meetings with licensee reps and FS to review concepts- with “professional regard” ie: riparian, visuals A whole New perspective: nice change from “control by process” - to focusing discussions on how to achieve the objective or practise requirement - keying in on making sure those R/S/M are measurable, verifiable, appropriate Spirit of Cooperation: ……coming to an agreement- -on what we mutually think the legislation means.(as Bob says-we’re not lawyers) 4

2. What are the on-going challenges? Interpreting that Legislation: still learning the various pathways through the rules and how to apply them –Great Fun!! ie: FHF impacting VQOs Implementing those R/S/M : “where the rubber hits the road”- instead of controlling the process, we await the result ; quite a change in tradition… Professional reliance/information gathering: staying in the loop; expecting the plan preparer to keep up with change, where to find the info…. District delegations: for overlapping linework RBI: being part of the results based inspection process; feed back to developing updated R/S/M. Using those RBI products: in the future as a basis to improve the FSP 5

3.What do we see moving forward? CP approvals: a consistent approach to address legislative requirements - satisfying our own professional curiosity, or - should we, as a business practise be looking at things more thoroughly? - have we lost the benefit of a peer review? Using the legislation: ie: Exemption provisions – applying them in practise Reporting requirements of s.86: getting up to speed on using the reports… - ESF, FTA 4.0, FRMA, RESULTS FSP Tracking System: getting familiar with it, document control, linework issues 6

What do we see moving forward.. SNRFLs: building workable relationships with the Majors - overlapping FDUs and using multiple R/S/M Forest Practises Board: - fallout from their May 1, 2006 early report - where are you logging?, what are you saying? what are you measuring? how do we enforce it? Keeping current on Effectiveness Evaluation feedback: -how do we keep in the loop? how does it all feedback in a timely manner? Compliance +Enforcement : will start asking those tough questions - DoH! - workload, coaching and some training needs for all FS staff - what are the most likely questions and how can we prepare for them? 7

What do we see moving forward.. Licensee’s sharing: LU level objective requirements -Are licensees ready to cooperate and manage this with volume based tenures- new DFAM model needed? -How to be fair…adjudication of disagreements? -How to influence keeping updated databases? Participating on RBIs: seeing the results…. -how do we measure LU objectives- whose databases do we use? -roles and responsibilities? Local Public and First Nation’s Acceptance: the real test -how is the results based approach working? Ie: community watersheds 8

? Thanks, and do you have any questions/comments? 9