Adem.alabama.gov ADEM’s Monitoring Summary Reports Alabama – Tombigbee CWP Stakeholders Meeting Montgomery, Alabama 3 February 2010 Lisa Huff – ADEM Field.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cypress Creek Basin Clean Rivers Program Nutrient Special Study Update Report – May 16, 2007 Roy Darville.
Advertisements

TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Louisville, KY August 30, 2011.
Approach for Including Nutrient Limitations within NDPDES Permits Dallas Grossman Division of Water Quality
Glenda L. Dean Water Division Chief Alabama Department of Environmental Management November 7, 2012 Manufacture Alabama Environmental Conference Prattville,
Water Resources Monitoring Strategy for Wisconsin: Building on Experience Mike Staggs, WDNR Bureau of Fisheries Management and Habitat Protection Acknowledgements:
EPA’s Guidance on Nutrient Criteria Development
The Lake Allegan/Kalamazoo River Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Plan Implementation by Jeff Spoelstra, Coordinator, Kalamazoo River Watershed Council.
Nelly Smith EPA Region 6. - Develop or revise bacteria reduction program for consistency with new TMDL requirements and allocations - Develop or revise.
Nutrient Trading Framework in the Coosa Basin Alabama Water Resources Conference September 6, 2012 A Feasibility Study of Nutrient Trading in Support of.
Stream Monitoring in Loudoun County David Ward, Water Resources Engineer Department of Building and Development, Department of Building and Development,
Cahaba River Watershed
Nutrient Fluxes in Rivers of the Mobile – Alabama River System Using WRTDS Alex Maestre Amy Ward Derek Williamson.
Questions to answer What is the overall modeling approach (after calibration and background scenarios)? What are the WLA assumptions? How will Avista’s.
Imperial River: Water Quality Status and Basin Management Action Plan.
Lec 12: Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBP’s)
Summary of Biological Assessment Programs and Biocriteria Development for States, Tribes, Territories, and Interstate Commissions: Streams and Wadeable.
1 State Water Quality Assessments Under the Clean Water Act Charles Spooner Assessment and Watershed Protection Division Monitoring Branch National Water.
Adem.alabama.gov Incorporating NPS Intensive Surveys into ADEM’s Monitoring Strategy Southeastern Water Pollution Biologists’ Association Meeting Lake.
Nutrient Standards – Where will they lead? OWEA / WEF Webinar February 24, 2011 Dan Dudley, Ohio EPA Division of Surface Water.
Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Stephen.
Alabama’s Water Quality Assessment and Listing Methodology ADEM QA Workshop February 13, 2006.
Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary US Army Corps of Engineers Environmental Resources Section.
Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in Lake Conway Point Remove Watershed and L’Anguille River Watershed Presented by: Dan DeVun, Equilibrium.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Watershed Assessment 2015 Strategic Monitoring in the Florida Keys DEAR- Water Quality Assessment Program.
Compliance Monitoring─Ensuring Effective Results Jim Younk Idaho Power Company.
ORD’s Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP) Sound Science for Measuring Ecological Condition
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Item No. 13 Recommendation to the State Water Resources Control Board Regarding the Section 303(d) List Lahontan Water Board June 19, 2014 Carly Nilson.
Department of the Environment Overview of Water Quality Data Used by MDE and Water Quality Parameters Timothy Fox MDE, Science Service Administration Wednesday.
Lake Erie HABs Workshop Bill Fischbein Supervising Attorney Water Programs March 16, 2012 – Toledo March 30, Columbus.
The Cahaba River Watershed Nutrient TMDL 2006 National Monitoring Conference San Jose, CA 2006 National Monitoring Conference San Jose, CA Presented by:
1 ATTAINS: A Gateway to State-Reported Water Quality Information Webcast Sponsored by EPA’s Watershed Academy June 18, 2008, 11:30am-1:30pm EST Shera Bender,
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program (SWQM)
Alabama’s Nutrient Criteria Development 2012 Annual Meeting of the SWPBA November 16, 2012.
Water Quality Standards, TMDLs and Bioassessment Tom Porta, P.E. Nevada Division of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Quality Planning.
The Non-tidal Water Quality Monitoring Network: past, present and future opportunities Katie Foreman Water Quality Analyst, UMCES-CBPO MASC Non-tidal Water.
San Francisco Estuary Institute Annual Meeting October 7, 2008 Water Quality Science and Management in the Delaware Estuary Thomas J. Fikslin, Ph.D.
National Aquatic Resource Surveys Wadeable Streams Assessment Overview November, 2007.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
STORET 1001 and the State of Utah Monitoring Strategy Today you will see: –What kind of attributes are available in STORET –How results, stations, and.
Response of benthic algae communities to nutrient enrichment in agricultural streams: Implications for establishing nutrient criteria R.W. Black 1, P.W.
Deep River-Portage Burns Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting March 13, 2013.
Chesapeake Bay Program’s Baywide and Basinwide Monitoring Networks: Options for Adapting Monitoring Networks and Realigning Resources to Address Partner.
Water Quality in Tryon Creek Initial Results from Portland’s Revised Watershed Monitoring Approach.
Nutrient and Sediment Loading in Sougahatchee Creek and the Impacts on Aquatic Biota Report submitted to West Point Stevens and the Cities of Auburn and.
Maryland Association of Counties Conference August 12, 2009 Bob Koroncai USEPA Region III The Chesapeake Bay TMDL.
District of Columbia TMDL Schedule and Update D.C. Department of Health Water Quality Division March 2004.
Lower Truckee River Bioassessment Symposium Kathy Sertic Bureau of Water Quality Planning Nevada Division of Environmental Protection January 5, 2009.
Overview of the Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
STREAM MONITORING CASE STUDY. Agenda  Monitoring Requirements  TMDL Requirements  OCEA Initial Monitoring Program  Selection of Parameters  Data.
Protecting Alabama’s Water Resources “It’s A Data Driven Process” Presented by: Chris Johnson Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM) 2006.
ORSANCO’s FY16 Technical Program. WQ Monitoring Programs Bimonthly & Clean Metals Sampling – Metals & traditional 15 mainstem, 14 tribs,
Water Quality Monitoring in Michigan, : A Decade of Program Evolution By: Gerald Saalfeld, MI Department of Environmental Quality.
Development of Nutrient Water Quality Standards for Rivers and Streams in Ohio Ohio EPA ORSANCO, October 20, 2009 George Elmaraghy, P.E., Chief.
The National Monitoring Network: Monitoring & Management of Alabama Rivers Fred Leslie Alabama Dept of Environmental Management National Monitoring Conference.
Think about answering the questions: Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? Before your volunteers begin collecting data.
Commonwealth of Virginia TMDL Program Update Citizen for Water Quality Annual Summit September 22, 2001.
Aquatic Resource Monitoring Overview Anthony (Tony) R. Olsen USEPA NHEERL Western Ecology Division Corvallis, Oregon (541)
Texas Surface Water Quality Standards Update Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader.
Presented to: Forest and Watershed Health Coordinating Group/Drought Task Force Watershed Management Subcommittee April 15, 2016 Heidi Henderson TMDL and.
Arkansas Dept. of Environmental Quality Regulation No
GREAT BAY and NEW HAMPSHIRE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Emily Saad EAS 4480 Oral Presentation 27 April 2010
Des Plaines River Watershed Workgroup Midwest Biodiversity Institute
Debra S. Baker and Donald G. Huggins
TOWARDS THE GOAL OF SETTING NUTRIENT CRITERIA FOR THE DELAWARE ESTUARY
High Rock Lake TMDL Development
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Presentation transcript:

adem.alabama.gov ADEM’s Monitoring Summary Reports Alabama – Tombigbee CWP Stakeholders Meeting Montgomery, Alabama 3 February 2010 Lisa Huff – ADEM Field Operations Division

Monitoring Strategy: Basin Rotation o2005 – Alabama, Coosa, Tallapoosa o2006 – Escatawpa, Mobile, Tombigbee o2007 – Black Warrior, Cahaba o2008 – SE AL R Basins o2009 – Tennessee R ADEM’s Monitoring Summary Reports Presentation Outline Rivers and Streams Monitoring Program and Reports (RSMP) Alabama R. Basin 2006 – Tombigbee R. Basin Rivers and Reservoirs Monitoring Program and Reports (RRMP) 2005 – Alabama R. Basin 2006 – Tombigbee R. Basin Monitoring data and reports in the assessment process Monitoring Strategy Cycle 2010 ACT Basin Monitoring Alabama R. Basin Sampling Locations 2011 EMT Basin Monitoring Sampling Requests

Monitoring Strategy Objectives 1. Estimate overall water quality 2. Estimate water quality trends 3. Assess water quality 4. Support Management Decisions 5. Assess Criteria Compliance 6. Evaluate program effectiveness 7. Develop, adopt, or revise WQS 8. Develop criteria & indicators Rivers and Streams Monitoring Program:

ADEM Monitoring Strategy:  Data collected at majority of wadeable, flowing rivers and streams locations: 1X habitat and macroinvertebrate assessments Monthly in situ parameters and water samples, March-Oct Semi-monthly total and dissolved metals, March-Oct Macroinvertebrate Assessments Periphyton Assessments Fish Community Assessments

RSMP Summary Reports: What they are

 Summarize all monitoring data collected at each location  Interpret results of biological assessments using ADEM’s Macroinvertebrate Bioassessment Indices  Communicate this information RSMP Summary Reports: Purpose of the reports

 Sampling location  Why the site was sampled  Watershed condition and characteristics  Reach characteristics  Habitat assessment results  Macroinvertebrate bioassessment results  Summary of 8 monthly water samples  Contact information RSMP Summary Reports: Information in the reports

2005 RSMP Summary Reports: Results from the ACT Total # of stations: Coosa: 49 Tallapoosa: 31 Alabama: 32

2006 RSMP Summary Reports: Results from the EMT Bioassessment Sampling Locations 61 total stations scheduled 21 could not be conducted Completion date of Bioassessments March 2010

2007 RSMP Summary Reports: Results from the EMT EMT Bioassessment Sampling Locations Revisited 10 “Drought” Locations 7 Sampled reports prioritized by project 1st priority: Reports completed Nov monitoring requested for: Use support, NPS watershed studies, CWP requests Report status list: Others?

RSMP Summary Reports and Supporting Documents CD

Rivers and Reservoirs Monitoring Program Goals Establish long-term trends in lake trophic status Satisfy §314(a) of the Water Quality Act of 1987 Provide data to categorize waters in the integrated assessment report Establish lake-specific nutrient criteria Determine nutrient compliance Provide data to develop and monitor implemented TMDLs Build a robust database for departmental use, public data requests, and to flow data to EPA via WQX

Rivers and Reservoirs Monitoring Program  5-year basin rotation  Monitoring locations Mainstem, Tributary Embayment, and Riverine  Monthly/algal growing season (Apr-Oct)  Indicators Vertical profiles Nutrient samples Chlorophyll a Secchi/Photic Zone Total suspended sediments Bacteriological AGPT

 Summarize all monitoring data collected within each reservoir during 2005 and 2006  Compare these data to ADEM’s historical data and established criteria  Evaluate trends in mean lake trophic status using ADEM’s entire RRMP dataset  Communicate this information 2005 RRMP Summary Reports: Purpose of the reports

 Sampling locations Mainstem Stations Tributary Embayment Riverine Stations  Background information Program history CWA §303(d)/TMDL status  Results Monthly (April-October) concentrations Mean, median, minimum, and maximum concentrations Indicators  Total nitrogen  Total phosphorus  Chlorophyll a  Total suspended solids  Dissolved oxygen  Temperature  Algal growth potential tests  Trophic state index  Contact information 2005 RRMP Summary Reports: Information in the reports

Figure 6. Mean chlorophyll a concentrations of mainstem Dannelly Reservoir stations, Chlorophyll a criteria applies to the growing season mean of the lower station only.

2005 RRMP Summary Reports: Information in the reports Figure 4. Total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), chlorophyll a (Chl a), and total suspended solids (TSS) of the mid station in Woodruff Reservoir, April-October Each bar graph depicts monthly changes in the variables at the mid-reservoir station. The historic mean and min/max range are also displayed for comparison. Nutrients and TSS were plotted vs. discharge (USACE Mobile District gauge data, Woodruff/Jones Bluff Reservoir).

Monitoring Summaries How and when completed 2005 RRMP Reports: Alabama R. Basin Completed March 2010 Claiborne Dannelly Woodruff 2006 RRMP Reports: Tombigbee R. Basin Completed March 2010 Aliceville Coffeeville Demopolis Gainesville

Assessment Process Monitoring Assessment Remediation (BMPs,TMDLs) 303d List Summary Reports: Part 1 of the assessment process Categories  1: fully meeting all use classifications  5: not meeting one or all use classifications (303d list)  2: Insufficient data  2a: available data indicate impairment  2b: available data do not indicate impairment  3: No data available  4: Waterbody impaired but remediation plan in place  4a: Approved TMDL  4b: Other action expected to result in attainment  4c: impairment not caused by pollutant

2010 Monitoring Plan: – Focused in the Alabama, Coosa, Tallapoosa R. Basins – Finalized Feb. 17 th 2011 Monitoring Plan: – Focused in the Escatawpa, Tombigbee, and Mobile R. Basins – Gathering sampling requests, Nov Jan. 14, 2011 – Final Date: Jan. 14, Monitoring Cycle

Comment or questions? Lisa Huff