Introduction to... Teacher Evaluation System Teacher Effectiveness 12/6/2015 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introducing Instructional Expectations
Advertisements

Danielson Framework: Review and Card Sort Activity
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness A
Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.
Charlotte Danielson’s The Four Domains of Teaching Responsibility
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Overarching Question Who does the thinking? Therefore, who does the learning and growing?
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements 4/14/2015PBevan, D.ED.
Conewago Valley School District Teacher Evaluation Tool Training Please sit at your “building” table. 2. Complete a nameplate – first name only.
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Activity: Introducing Staff to Danielson’s Framework for Teaching
An Overview of TPGES: The Framework for Teaching Jenny Ray, Facilitator Kentucky Department of Education & NKCES July 26, 2013.
August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.
The Framework for Teaching An Overview of the Danielson Model.
Evaluating Teacher Performance: Getting it Right CPRE Annual Conference November 21-23, 2002 Charlotte Danielson
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Differentiated Supervision
The Framework for Teaching Introduction to the Concepts Charlotte Danielson
The Framework for Teaching
The Framework for Teaching: Overview of the Concepts Charlotte Danielson
Teacher Evaluation Ashley Greene 10/29/13.
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements Day 2: Evidence 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED.
The Card Sort Does this help? Do you need to make a change?
Teachscape Overview John Monahan, Instructional Supervisor
Multi Measure Educator Effectiveness
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements 9/9/2015PBevan, D.ED.
The Danielson Framework and Your Evaluation AK Teaching Standard DP_8c: Engages in Instructional Development Activities Danielson Domain 4e: Growing and.
Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our staff and those in school districts,
From Compliance to Quality TEACHER EFFECTIVENESS IN PA: PIL Institute 2012 Tracy Hinish, Sunny Minelli Weiland and Cristine Wagner-Deitch.
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Ronald Tomalis, Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa.us Measuring Educator Effectiveness May 3, 2012 revision, modified.
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 10/12/2015pbevan 1.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for Teachers.
The Danielson Framework Emmanuel Andre Owings Mills High School Fall 2013.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
1 Introducing Danielson’s Framework for Teaching NYCDOE | November
Introduction to Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System and Framework for Teaching.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our teachers and those in school districts,
YEAR 1 INDUCTION Day One Workshop Pennsbury School District.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson Danielson’s Framework for Teaching Domain 3: Instruction Communicating Clearly and Accurately Using Questioning.
A Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson’s Model SHS – Professional Development 14 November 2012 ( Brenda Baker/Marnie Malone)
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness B. Examining the Framework
DPASII Criterion Rubrics for Teachers. Component 1: Planning and Preparation Criterion 1a: Selecting Instructional Goals ELEMENT Value, sequence and alignment.
Assessing Teacher Effectiveness Charlotte Danielson
Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements: Evidence.
FOUR DOMAINS Domain 4: Domain 1: Professional Planning & Responsibilities Preparation Domain 3: Domain 2: Instruction Classroom Environment.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
 Pre-Observation Conference  Priority component: 1e (Designing Coherent Instruction)  Observation  Priority components: 3c, 3d (Engaging Students in.
Educator Effectiveness: The Danielson Framework Collecting Evidence.
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
 Teacher completes Step #1: Lesson Plan in advance and sends to evaluator two days in advance of planning conference  Teacher and Evaluator meet to discuss.
NM Teacher Evaluation Planning & Preparation Creating an Environment of Learning Professionalism Teaching for Learning Evaluation.
From Compliance to Quality TEACHER EFFECTIVENESS IN PA: SAS Institute 2011 Debra Dendas Eric Rosendale Cristine Wagner-Deitch,
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 7/8/2016pbevan 1.
Welcome Learning Targets for Today I will build schema for Danielson’s Framework for Teaching. I will connect Framework principles to powerful planning.
Cohort Training, Phase II November 29 – 30, 2012.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Framework For Teaching (FFT)
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Changes to the Educator Evaluation System
Introduction to Core Professionalism
The Unannounced observation
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to... Teacher Evaluation System Teacher Effectiveness 12/6/2015 1

Wisdom of Practice What are the qualities of teaching most tightly tied to student learning? 12/6/2015 2

A Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson 12/6/ National Board for Professional Teaching Standards Praxis III Teaching Performance Assessments State Teaching Standards

The Domains 1.Planning and Preparation 1.The Classroom Environment 2.Instruction 3.Professional Responsibilities 12/6/2015 4

pbevan 5 12/6/2015 A Framework for Teaching: Components of Professional Practice Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities a. Reflecting on Teaching b. Maintaining Accurate Records c. Communicating with Families d. Participating in a Professional Community e. Growing and Developing Professionally f. Showing Professionalism Domain 3: Instruction a. Communicating with Students b. Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques c. Engaging Students in Learning d. Using Assessment in Instruction e. Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness Domain 1: Planning and Preparation a. Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy b. Demonstrating Knowledge of Students c. Setting Instructional Outcomes d. Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources e. Designing Coherent Instruction f. Designing Student Assessments Domain 2: The Classroom Environment a. Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport b. Establishing a Culture for Learning c. Managing Classroom Procedures d. Managing Student Behavior e. Organizing Physical Space Off Stage On Stage 12/6/20155

pbevan 6 12/6/2015 Features of A Framework for Teaching Generic: applies to all grade levels, content areas Not a checklist Not prescriptive: tells the “what” of teaching, not “how” Comprehensive: not just what we can see Inclusive: Novice to Master teacher 12/6/20156

pbevan 7 12/6/2015 Domain 1: Planning and Preparation 1a: Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy 1b: Demonstrating Knowledge of Students 1c: Setting Instructional Outcomes 1d: Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources 1e: Designing Coherent Instruction 1f: Designing Student Assessments 12/6/20157

Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities 4a: Reflecting on Teaching 4b: Maintaining Accurate Records 4c: Communicating with Families 4d: Participating in a Professional Community 4e: Growing and Developing Professionally 4f: Showing Professionalism 12/6/2015 8

pbevan 9 12/6/2015 Domain 2:The Classroom Environment 2a: Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport 2b: Establishing a Culture for Learning 2c: Managing Classroom Procedures 2d: Managing Student Behavior 2e: Organizing the Physical Space 12/6/20159

3a: Communicating with Students 3b: Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques 3c: Engaging Students in Learning 3d: Using Assessment During Instruction 3e: Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness 12/6/ Domain 3: Instruction

pbevan 11 12/6/2015 A Framework for Teaching: Components of Professional Practice Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities a. Reflecting on Teaching b. Maintaining Accurate Records c. Communicating with Families d. Participating in a Professional Community e. Growing and Developing Professionally f. Showing Professionalism Domain 3: Instruction a. Communicating with Students b. Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques c. Engaging Students in Learning d. Using Assessment in Instruction e. Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness Domain 1: Planning and Preparation a. Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy b. Demonstrating Knowledge of Students c. Setting Instructional Outcomes d. Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources e. Designing Coherent Instruction f. Designing Student Assessments Domain 2: The Classroom Environment a. Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport b. Establishing a Culture for Learning c. Managing Classroom Procedures d. Managing Student Behavior e. Organizing Physical Space 12/6/201511

The Card Sort Identify –Domain –Component

pbevan 13 12/6/ Domain 2: Classroom Environment

pbevan 14 12/6/2015 Conclusions About the Levels of Performance Failing: Potential for harm Needs Improvement: Inconsistent, novice Proficient: Consistent, competent Distinguished: Unusually excellent, no one “lives” here permanently in all components 12/6/201514

Benefits of Using a Framework for Teaching Common Language Similarity of vision for teaching that improves teaching: the qualities of the distinguished level Greater validity and reliability potential for teacher evaluation Changes in novice thinking Opportunities for collaboration 12/6/201515

 Teacher completes Step #1: Lesson Plan in advance and sends to evaluator two days in advance of planning conference  Teacher and Evaluator meet to discuss the upcoming lesson framed around question stems. Step # 1: Pre-Observation (Focused on Domains 1 & 4) Before Observation Before Observation

 Evaluator arrives 5 minutes prior to beginning of lesson to ‘walk the walls’ (D2)  Types of Observation Evidence:  Scripting of Teacher or Student comments  Descriptions of Teacher and Student behaviors  Numeric information  Environment Remember:  Collect evidence from Students – “What are you learning?; Is what you’re doing hard in a good way?  Non-negotiable - Record observation on standard form  Optional – May use T-charts, seating charts, or similar templates to record relative numeric data (tally marks)  Evaluator does NOT retype observation Step # 2: Observation (Focused on Domains 1,2, & 3) During Observation During Observation

 Teacher and Evaluator do not need to meet in Step #3.  With prerequisite training, the Teacher can engage in Step #3 independently or with the support of a coach.  Evaluator provides Teacher with completed observation form from Step #2.  Teacher is provided with an opportunity to add evidence to the observation form that may have been overlooked by Evaluator  Teacher returns the observation form to Evaluator with their additions  Teacher completes the self-assessment rubric (he/she may highlight phrases in multiple levels of the same component) and returns back to Evaluator prior to the post-teaching conference  Evaluator highlights or checks ONLY the areas on the self-assessment with which he/she agrees Step # 3: Preparing for the Post-Conference (Focused on Domains 1,2, 3, & 4) After Observation After Observation

 Teacher meets with Evaluator to reflect on lesson - Evidence not required for each D4 component for this one lesson  Evaluator notes components of agreement and then invites teacher to take the lead in discussing the other components.  Components are collaboratively rated. Evaluator is the “rater of record” in the event of non- agreement. Evidence is the basis. Conversation Stems:  Comment on the evidence for...  Let’s look at the rubric for...  Tell me more about ….  What’s the backstory for...  Let’s look at the language that was highlighted here…talk about the evidence for that in this lesson Step # 4: Post-Teaching Collaborative Assessment (Focused on Domains 1,2, 3, & 4) After Observation After Observation

During the Post Observation Conference – an area of focus is determined Plan of action determined Walkthrough is conducted to monitor and provide feedback on the actions being taken to reach goals. Teacher given a copy of the evidence by the end of the day Step # 5: Walk-Through (Focused on agreed upon area of concentration) After Observation After Observation

12/6/201521

12/6/ The Wisdom of Practice reflects “good teaching”. The Danielson Framework defines “good teaching”. Research supports the Danielson Framework. Practicing the Danielson Framework is “good teaching” Do you demonstrate “good teaching”? Remember…. The Wisdom of Practice