Cognitive Engineering Perspective of ASAS Amy Pritchett Cognitive Engineering Center School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Tech Atlanta, GA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Page 1 CARE/ASAS Activity 3: ASM workshop Brétigny, 19 December 2001 CARE-ASAS Activity 3: ASM Estimating safe separations.
Advertisements

International Coordinating Council of Aerospace Industries Associations Preventing Runway Excursions Technical solutions From the Design and Manufacturing.
Air Traffic Management
Can Teamwork Enhance Patient Safety?.  Teamwork is a set of interrelated behaviors, cognitions and attitudes that combine to facilitate coordinated,
Modeling Conflicts of Multiple Independent Alerting Systems Lixia Song James K. Kuchar Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 3 Presentation 1.
Episode 3 1 Episode 3 EX-COM D Final Report and Recommendations Operational and Processes Feasibility Pablo Sánchez-Escalonilla CNS/ATM Simulation.
M I T I n t e r n a t i o n a l C e n t e r f o r A i r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n Influence of Structure on Complexity Management Strategies of Air Traffic.
1 ICAO Runway Safety ICAO/ASPA Regional Seminar on Safety Management Systems (SMS) Mexico March 2006 Gustavo De León Technical Officer, ATM ICAO-Montreal.
Traffic Processing Sequence — Tactical and Strategic Investigation of all the facts pertaining to the Air Traffic Services tactical and strategic traffic.
Confidential This document contains trade secrets, financial, commercial, scientific, technical or other confidential information, the further disclosure.
Applications from packages I to III
Understanding what it means to be PIC Some ways to teach it.
Mary (Missy) Cummings Humans & Automation Lab
AIRCRAFT Electronic Instrument Systems
ICAO/ASPA Safety Management System Seminar Air Traffic Management Occurrence Reporting Mexico City, Mexico, 14 – 16 March 2006 Jeremy Jackson – Civil Aviation.
Data Processing Equipment
Executive Briefing This briefing is designed as a stand alone briefing for Airline Senior Executives / CEOs. Minor text amendments following review at.
Authors: Amy R. Pritchett, Scottie-Beth Fleming Presented by: Rachel A. Haga Cognitive Engineering Center, Georgia Tech 32 nd DASC, Oct. 9, 2013 Pilot.
Examining Operations Coupling Autoflight To ADS-B Targets In High Traffic Density Rachel Haga Amy Pritchett, Ph.D. DASC 2014.
Sequence of Flight The reconstruction of ATS surveillance system data may bring to light items of importance in the Operations investigation in relation.
Using Situational awareness and decision making
Page 1 CARE/ASAS Activity 3: ASM workshop Brétigny, 19 December 2001 Time-Based Sequencing OHA CARE-ASAS Activity 3: ASM Time-Based Sequencing OHA.
Interoperability of Airborne Collision Avoidance Systems Lixia Song James K. Kuchar Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
NASA Self-Separation from the Air and Ground Perspective Margaret-Anne Mackintosh, Melisa Dunbar, Sandra Lozito, Patricia Cashion, Alison McGann, Victoria.
1/14 Development and Evaluation of Prototype Flight Deck Systems for Distributed Air-Ground Traffic Management ASAS Thematic Network - Workshop 3 Toulouse,
Joint University Program 5 April 2001 Steven Aab, Graduate Research Associate Avionics Engineering Center Ohio University Advisor: Dr. Michael F. DiBenedetto,
© 2003 The MITRE Corporation. All Rights Reserved. Cockpit Display of Traffic Information (CDTI) Enhanced Flight Rules (CEFR) Randall Bone October 7, 2003.
Advanced Speed Guidance for Merging and Sequencing Techniques Chris Sweeney,
Human-Centered Information Visualization Jiajie Zhang, Kathy Johnson, Jack Smith University of Texas at Houston Jane Malin NASA Johnson Space Center July.
The Field Guide to Human Error Investigations- The Old View (Chapters 1 – 6) By Dekker AST 425.
MIT ICAT MIT ICAT. MIT ICAT MIT ICAT Motivation Adverse Weather Significantly Impacts Flight Operations Safety % All US Accidents Efficiency --
Transportation Human Factors Chapter 17. Automotive Human Factors Importance – over 40,000 fatalities per year in the US with 90% attributable to human.
ASSTAR User Forum #1 Rome 4th April 2006 ASAS-TN2 Second Workshop ASSTAR Safety Approach and Preliminary Issues Dr Giuseppe GRANIERO, SICTA
ComplexWorld PhD Project: Modeling Interlevel Relations within ATM Nataliya M. Mogles VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
CRISTAL ATSAW Project Sep 2007 ASAS TN Christelle Pianetti, DSNA Simona Canu-Chiesa, Airbus.
CREW RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
AVAT11001: Course Outline 1.Aircraft and Terminology 2.Radio Communications 3.Structure, Propulsion, Fuel Systems 4.Electrical, Hydraulic Systems and Instruments.
Slide 1 July 2004 – FALBALA/WP5/FOR3/D – CENA, DFS, EEC, NATS, Sofréavia & UoG WP2 Current situation analysis – Aircraft perspective Philippe Louyot (CENA)
NextGen Current System Primary Radar – Creates blip on Radar Screen Secondary Radar – Aircraft encodes identifier and telemetry data VHF Radio – Voice.
Survey of Traffic and Radar Controller Communication and Workload
Situational Awareness Numerous aircraft and operational displays, when combined with effective and efficient communications and facilities, provide Air.
1 Airborne spacing in the terminal area: A study of non-nominal situations EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre European Organisation for the Safety of Air.
1 IE 590D Applied Ergonomics Lecture 26 – Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Automation Vincent G. Duffy Associate Prof. School of IE and ABE Thursday April.
Missed-Approach or Go-around: A Maneuver conducted by pilot when instrument or visual approach cannot be completed to a landing..
RECITE A PRAYER…(15 SECONDS). ATM TOPIC 1. INTRODUCTION TO AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT,TYPE OF CONTROL AREAS & FLIGHT PLAN 2. AERODROME CONTROL 3. AREA CONTROL.
Situation Awareness & Levels of Automation David Kaber and Kheng-Wooi Tan Mississippi State University.
Advanced Speed Guidance for Merging and Sequencing Techniques Chris Sweeney Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology MITRE Corporation Center.
Ecological Interface Design in Aviation Domains Improving Pilot Trust in Automated Collision Detection and Avoidance Advanced Interface Design Laboratory.
KLM - Operations at Schiphol: how does ASAS fit? ASAS TN2: final seminar, April, Paris E. Kleiboer Sr. Manager Strategy ATM.
Computational Evaluation of the Allocation of Authority and Responsibility in NextGen Concepts of Operation Thesis Proposal for MS in Aerospace Engineering.
Advanced Speed Guidance for Merging and Sequencing Techniques Chris Sweeney Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology MITRE Corporation Center.
LECTURE 4: ICAO CHART requirements
A Cockpit Display Designed to Enable Limited Flight Deck Separation Responsibility Walter W. Johnson & Vernol Battiste NASA Ames Research Center Sheila.
1 Airborne Separation Assistance Systems (ASAS) - Summary of simulations Joint ASAS-TN2/IATA/AEA workshop NLR, Amsterdam, 8 th October 2007 Chris Shaw.
Computational Simulation of Authority-Responsibility Mismatches in Air-Ground Function Allocation Raunak Bhattacharyya (Georgia Tech) Martijn IJtsma (TU.
The Analytic Blunder Risk Model (ABRM) A computer model for predicting collision risk Kenneth Geisinger Operations Research Analyst Federal Aviation Administration.
ISO CONCEPTS Is a management standard, it is not performance or product standard. The underlying purpose of ISO 1400 is that companies will improve.
USE OF INTENT INFORMATION IN AIRCRAFT CONFORMANCE MONITORING
1 Controller feedback from the CoSpace / NUP II TMA experiment ASAS-TN, April 2004, Toulouse Liz Jordan, NATS, U.K. Gatwick approach controller.
Lecture 11: Flight Management System (FMS)
ASAS Crossing and Passing Applications in Radar Airspace (operational concept and operational procedure) Jean-Marc Loscos, Bernard Hasquenoph, Claude Chamayou.
1 Roma, 3-5 April 2006 – ASAS TN2, 2 nd Workshop, Session 1 – When ASAS meets ACAS When ASAS meets ACAS Thierry Arino (Sofréavia, IAPA Project Manager)
The air traffic controller’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 1.
COMMUNICATION MEDIA, AND . PRESENTERS: CHOGO,M,D (092SIS10). :AKPADE, YAYRA EDNA (092SIS1).
M I T I n t e r n a t i o n a l C e n t e r f o r A i r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n Impact of Operating Context on the Use of Structure in Air Traffic.
Zuliana-July Lecture 1: INTRODUCTION AIRCRAFT MASS (WEIGHT) & PERFORMANCE By: Zuliana Ismail, 2010.
Airbus training support & services Erroneous ILS Indications.
Karim Zeghal EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre
Sybert Stroeve, Henk Blom, Marco van der Park
Presentation transcript:

Cognitive Engineering Perspective of ASAS Amy Pritchett Cognitive Engineering Center School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Tech Atlanta, GA

Our View of ‘the System’ human & physical environment & procedural environment& social/organization environment

Behaviours of Interest Alerting ComponentCommand Component Comprehension of Occurrence Comprehension of Directions of Alert Given By Command Base Reaction TimeAbility to Follow Command Perception of Alert CorrectnessPerception of Command Correctness Willingness to Act Upon AlertWillingness to Follow Command Propensity to Follow AlertPropensity to Follow Command In Operational ContextIn Operational Context Impact on Monitoring Impact on Decision Making Behaviour Behaviour Impact of False AlarmsImpact of Erroneous Commands on Pilot Behaviouron Pilot Behaviour Impact of False AlarmsImpact of Erroneous Commands on System Performance on System Performance Operational Impact Controllability During Testing

Simultaneous, Closely Spaced Parallel Runway Operations  Motivation: The Ability to Land Aircraft Simultaneously on Closely-Spaced Runways During Instrument Meteorological Conditions Could Substantially Reduce Flight Delays  Problem: Aircraft are Closer Together Than During Any Other Phase of Flight

Parallel Runway Operations Experiment - Effects of Displays on Performance 0% 10% 20% 30% BaselinePFDEHSICombo Approaches % Under 500' % Under 1000' Display

Parallel Runway Operations Experiment - Non-Conformance Rate By Displays 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Baseline EHSI Enhanced EHSI PFD & Baseline EHSI PFD & Enhanced EHSI

Parallel Runway Operations Experiment - Effects of Non-Conformance Matches Displayed Maneuver Does Not Match Matches Displayed Maneuver Does Not Match No Alert or Maneuver ShownAlert & Maneuver Is Shown

Comparing Experiment Results NTZ AlertMIT AlertNo AlertNTZ AlertMIT AlertNo AlertNTZ AlertMIT Alert Best Reaction Time ExperimentBest Judgement Experiment Basic DisplayNTZ DisplayMIT Display Similar Differences Found Between Operational Studies!

Implications for Situation Awareness  Situation awareness OF WHAT?  Good traffic information and hope they will arrive at the same conclusions as the ASAS?  Would like to communicate the alerting/maneuver logic  Requires it to be COMMUNICABLE

Baseline Display

Display with Speed

Display with Speed and Autopilot Targets

Detail From a ‘Baseline STAR’, Showing Waypoints and Altitudes

Detail From a ‘STAR with Speed’, Showing Waypoints, Altitudes, and Expected Speeds

‘STAR with Speed and Merging Path’, Showing the Addition of Merging Paths

Achieved Separation Distance Significant display/procedure interactions (F=2.91, p<.04)

Percentage of Total Speed Changes Made Within 8 Seconds of STAR Chart Reference Marginal effects due to displays (F=3.06, p<.06) Marginal effects due to procedures (F=2.83, p<.07)

Marginally significant display effects (F=3.05, p=.10) (Error Bars Represent  ) Deviant Scenario Average Separation Values

Implications for Procedures  Procedures can be as rigorously designed as technology  Includes procedures for using the system, for crew interaction, and for ATC/ATM  Procedures provide a baseline for behavior  And as such are often the basis for: Expectation Monitoring Planning etc

Modeling the Role of Alerting Systems  Do machine-driven definitions of role define everyway that pilots will use alerting systems?  They direct attention to signals or hazards and that’s it? NO!  Pilot-determined roles?  How alerting system is used, and what it is useful for, is: Context sensitive Opportunistic by the pilot Idiosyncratic

Attention Director Environment DisplaysControls Computer Human Nominal Task Alerted Task X Look!

Task Management Aid Environment DisplaysControls Computer Human Nominal Task 1 Nominal Task 2

Trusted Monitor Environment DisplaysControls Computer Human Nominal Task Alerted Task X Look!

Nuisance Environment DisplaysControls Computer Human Nominal Task Alerted Task

Overload Environment DisplaysControls Computer Human Nominal Task Alerted Task

Final Authority of Problem Environment DisplaysControls Computer Human Nominal Task Alerted Task It’s OK, blame it on me

Resolution Assessor Environment DisplaysControls Computer Human Nominal Task Alerted Task

Desired Cue Environment DisplaysControls Computer Human Nominal Task

Initiator of Procedures Environment DisplaysControls Computer Human Nominal Task Alerted Task

Command Device Environment DisplaysControls Computer Human Nominal Task Alerted Task

Take-Aways  How ASAS will be used, and how well, needs to consider behavior in context  Understanding of the logic relative to the needs of the situation  Operating procedures  ‘Roles’ of the ASAS  Difficult to predict – but it can be done!

Thank You! Questions?