June 17, 2004 / Collab Meeting Strategy to reduce uncertainty on a  to < 0.25 ppm David Hertzog University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign n Present data.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 MICE Beamline: Plans for initial commissioning. Kevin Tilley, 16 th November. - 75days until commissioning Target, detectors, particle production Upstream.
Advertisements

Muon g-2 Inflector AEM Meeting 11/25/2013 Chris Polly Muon g-2 Project Manager.
Beam-plug and shielding studies related to HCAL and M2 Robert Paluch, Burkhard Schmidt November 25,
Hertzog / Experiment DOE Intensity Frontier Review The g-2 Experimental Essentials David Hertzog University of Illinois  University of Washington Beam.
June 9, Tetsuro Sekiguchi, KEK BNL-E949 Collaboration The E949 experiment The analysis The results Conclusions BNL, FNAL, UNM, Stony Brook Univ.
(g – 2)  B. Lee Roberts e + e - collisions  to  : Novosibirsk 1 March p. 1/30 Muon (g-2) to 0.2 ppm B. Lee Roberts Department of Physics Boston.
Muon g-2 and SLAC Detector Test T-519 Momentu m Spin e David Hertzog University of Washington.
MINERvA Overview MINERvA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: – Study.
Some beam tuning musings from Fall 2004 runs David Hertzog.
Yury CHESNOKOV Crystal Collimation workshop, March 7, 2005 CALIBRATION of CMS CALORIMETERS with LHC PROTON BEAM DEFLECTED BY CRYSTAL CALIBRATION of CMS.
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 1/36 Muon (g-2) Past, Present and Future B. Lee Roberts Department of Physics Boston University
Muon g-2 experimental results & theoretical developments
Zachary Wolf Undulator Tuning June 17, 2008 Undulator Tuning Status Z. Wolf, S. Anderson, R. Colon, S. Jansson, S.Kaplunenko,
Measurement of the muon anomaly to high and even higher precision David Hertzog* University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign * Representing the E821 Collaboration:
Basic Measurements: What do we want to measure? Prof. Robin D. Erbacher University of California, Davis References: R. Fernow, Introduction to Experimental.
B. Lee Roberts, BNL PAC 9 September p. 1/29 Muon (g-2) to 0.20 ppm P969 B. Lee Roberts Representing the new g-2 collaboration: Boston, BNL, BINP,
Status of  b Scan Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing L b scanners CLEO Meeting 05/11/02.
B. Lee Roberts, PANIC05, Santa Fe, 27 October, p. 1/35 Muon (g-2) Status and Plans for the Future B. Lee Roberts Department of Physics Boston University.
A new method of measuring the muon g-2 Francis J.M. Farley Trinity College Dublin.
1 g-2 phase study from GEANT simulation Qinzeng Peng Advisor: James Miller Boston University Sep 28, 2004 Muon g-2 collaboration at BU: Lee Roberts, Rober.
Measurement of the Positive Muon Lifetime to 1 ppm David Webber Preliminary Examination March 31, 2005.
25/07/2002G.Unal, ICHEP02 Amsterdam1 Final measurement of  ’/  by NA48 Direct CP violation in neutral kaon decays History of the  ’/  measurement by.
NA48-2 new results on Charged Semileptonic decays Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University Kaon 2005 Workshop 14 June 2005.
Muon g-2 Experiment at Fermilab, Liang Li, SPCS 2013 June 5 th, Shanghai Particle Physics and Cosmology Symposium - SPCS2013 The (new) muon g-2.
Energy calibration at LHC J. Wenninger. Motivation In general there is not much interest for accurate knowledge of the momentum in hadron machines. 
1 Flux concentrator for SuperKEKB Kamitani Takuya IWLC October.20.
October 14, 2004 Single Spin Asymmetries 1 Single Spin Asymmetries for charged pions. Overview  One physics slide  What is measured, kinematic variables.
Extraction from the Delivery Ring November 19, 2013 J. Morgan.
G-2 accelerator and cryo needs Mary Convery Muon Campus Review 1/23/13.
Neutral Current Deep Inelastic Scattering in ZEUS The HERA collider NC Deep Inelastic Scattering at HERA The ZEUS detector Neutral current cross section.
D0 Status: 01/14-01/28 u Integrated luminosity s delivered luminosity –week of 01/ pb-1 –week of 01/ pb-1 –luminosity to tape: 40% s major.
Oct 6, 2008Amaresh Datta (UMass) 1 Double-Longitudinal Spin Asymmetry in Non-identified Charged Hadron Production at pp Collision at √s = 62.4 GeV at Amaresh.
Transverse Momentum Dependence of Semi-Inclusive Pion and Kaon Production E : Spokespersons Peter Bosted, Rolf Ent, Hamlet Mkrtchyan 25.5 days.
IDS-NF Accelerator Baseline The Neutrino Factory [1, 2] based on the muon storage ring will be a precision tool to study the neutrino oscillations.It may.
 B. Lee Roberts, KEK – 21 March p. 1/27 The Magnetic and Electric Dipole Moments of the Muon Lee Roberts for the muon g-2 collaboration Department.
Chunhui Chen, University of Pennsylvania 1 Heavy Flavor Production and Cross Sections at the Tevatron Heavy Flavor Production and Cross Sections at the.
Muon absolute flux measurement in anti-neutrino mode A.Ariga 1, C. Pistillo 1, S. Aoki 2 1 University of Bern, 2 Kobe University.
COMET and DeeMe. Mu-e conversion search at J-PARC COMET Target sensitivity 10 C.L. using aluminum target – SINDRUM II 7x – MEG 2.4x
Yannis K. Semertzidis Brookhaven National Laboratory Fundamental Interactions Trento/Italy, June 2004 Theoretical and Experimental Considerations.
HLAB meeting paper 2011/1/18 T.Gogami CLAS ( CEBAF Large Acceptance Spectrometer ) Clam shell is open.
Brian Plimley Physics 129 November Outline  What is the anomalous magnetic moment?  Why does it matter?  Measurements of a µ  : CERN.
Huaizhang Deng Yale University Precise measurement of (g-2)  University of Pennsylvania.
Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment --a harbinger of new physics Chang Liu Physics 564.
More beam (muons) from the AGS AGS RHIC Users Group Meeting EDM Workshop Brookhaven National Laboratory 7 June 2006 Phil Pile.
T2K Status Report. The Accelerator Complex a Beamline Performance 3 First T2K run completed January to June x protons accumulated.
LHCf Detectors Sampling Calorimeter W 44 r.l, 1.6λ I Scintilator x 16 Layers Position Detector Scifi x 4 (Arm#1) Scilicon Tracker x 4(Arm#2) Detector size.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
Ibrahim H. Albayrak, Hampton University Group Meeting Experiment Rosen07: Measurement of R =  L /  T on Deuterium in the Nucleon Resonance Region. 
Calibration of energies at the photon collider Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk TILC09, Tsukuba April 18, 2009.
(g – 2)  James Miller CERN Workshop October p. 1/27 Muon (g-2) to 0.25 ppm James Miller (For the new Muon (g-2) Collaboration, E969) Department.
First results from CMD-3 detector at VEPP-2000 collider Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia September 2011 E.Solodov (for.
The Muon g-2 Experiment – Investigating how the spin of a muon is affected as it moves through a magnetic field Astrid Rodrigues.
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
G0 Backward Angle Request: Q 2 = 0.23, 0.48 GeV 2 Main points G0 goal is to measure G E s, G M s and G A e over range of momentum transfers with best possible.
COMET Task Force 16/Oct/2008 J-PARC PAC meeting Satoshi MIHARA.
Yannis K. Semertzidis Brookhaven National Laboratory HEP Seminar SLAC, 27 April 2004 Muon g-2: Powerful Probe of Physics Beyond the SM. Present Status.
E989 Muon (g-2) EMG Lee Roberts for the E989 Collaboration B. Lee Roberts - EMG- 13 February
A N DY Status Commissioning with colliding beams (p  +p  at  s=500 GeV) L.C.Bland, for AnDY 19 April 2011 Time Meeting, BNL.
MINERνA Overview  MINERνA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei  Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: t Study.
Geant4 in the FNAL g-2 Experiment Kevin Lynch Boston University August 2009 g-2 Collaboration Meeting.
The Anomalous Magnetic Dipole Moment of the Muon
J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting
Luminosity Monitor Status
Coupling Correction at the Australian Synchrotron
Current Status of the T2K Experiment
Special Considerations for SIDIS
KEK, 阪大RCNPA, 阪大理B, 京大理C, 原研先端研D,
J. Rutherfoord & P. Schacht 17 May 2004
Compton Data Analysis Jing Feng China Atomic Institute Liping Gan
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Presentation transcript:

June 17, 2004 / Collab Meeting Strategy to reduce uncertainty on a  to < 0.25 ppm David Hertzog University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign n Present data rates n How to achieve higher rates n Statistical and systematic targets n Timescales and Support 1 ppm contours

June 17, 2004 / Collab Meeting How to achieve a factor of > 2 reduction in world-average a  uncertainty [ ppm] Final uncertainty from E systematic from  a systematic from  p 0.17 Target statistical uncertainty 0.20 Target systematic from  a 0.10 Target systematic from  p 0.10 Target E969 overall uncertainty 0.25 Final BNL Goal(E821 + E969)0.22 Implications Data increase necessary compared to 2001  - run x  12 Reduction of systematic uncertainties by factor of 2 More muons are necessary Q (integrated) method probable main mode Goal

June 17, 2004 / Collab Meeting My rate calculation – standard conditions B counts; A = 0.4 → 0.2 ppm statistical (my sim/fit) 2. AGS Intensity = 50 Tp (avg) 3. AGS Rep rate = 2.7 s 4. AGS fill structure = 12; 5. 10,000  + /fill/50 Tp 6. Acceptance E  > 1.8 GeV = 0.12 ItemValue Counts needed3.4 E10 Correct for T0 (30  s) 5.4 E10 Correct for acceptance4.5E11 10k/fill4.5E7 Hours required (1600/h)2812 h Run-time “uptime” = h 100 h/week40 weeks Setup3-4 weeks Total44 weeks Reduce by More Muon Factor

June 17, 2004 / Collab Meeting Conservative changes yield factor of 2.6 ItemCommentFactor Replace traceback with calorimeter Vacuum chamber change (  $50 k) 24 / 23 = 1.04 Use positive muons  + cross section is higher1.2 Add 4 th 270º (see plot below) Increased stored muon fraction Fabrication and tracking studies are necessary (  $250 k) ????? Open up inflector ends (design report) Task looks reasonable but work must begin ASAP (  $750 k ) 1.75 Total2.2 + ?? Present: CLOSED End Proposed: OPEN End

June 17, 2004 / Collab Meeting BNL Storage Ring incoming muons Quads KICK ns 100 kV 4 th Kicker 3 Kickers Present Inflector Proposed Inflector

June 17, 2004 / Collab Meeting Next big idea: Double quads in FODO section Hugh & Paul n This gives a reliable factor of 4 more muons n Even more quads under consideration now n Questions of momentum acceptance need to be addressed New Beamline Transport

June 17, 2004 / Collab Meeting Next REALLY big idea: Use backward pion decays Peter (Kammel) & Paul n Gain: Another factor of 2 n NO FLASH (no pions, no protons into ring) n Double checking kinematics n Some significant changes to upstream beamline 5.22 GeV  GeV  5.22 GeV   GeV  The “Quad” section This needs work to go to 5.2 GeV

June 17, 2004 / Collab Meeting Summary of possibilities that will be considered Conservative = 2 Quad double=2 Backward Decay=4 Net=16 (!)  all of this can’t be right Basic conclusion: We can find a factor of at least 5 among this set of topics Basic reality: Some of them won’t work out

June 17, 2004 / Collab Meeting Maintenance and conventional upgrade tasks should begin soon on conventional systems e+e+ TIME Counts New detectors and hodoscopes? New WFDsNew DAQ Plan B refrigerator a must Kicker #1 repair Quad maintenance Ring de-rusting Probe replacements Trolley external calibration

June 17, 2004 / Collab Meeting Systematic Error Evolution n Field improvements will involve special trolley external calibrations, temperature stability of room, replacement of many fixed probes n Precession improvements will involve new scraping scheme, lower thresholds, more complete digitization periods, better energy calibration Systematic uncertainty (ppm) X Goal Magnetic field –  p Anomalous precession –  a

June 17, 2004 / Collab Meeting Running hours, schedule and costs Time required for  - running to 0.66 ppm (statistical) u  1000 h (+ setup) = 1250 h n Time required to achieve 0.20 ppm with factor of 5 increase in data rate u  2200 h + setup = 2500 h (25 w) n Ready 2 years after funding for shot on demand beam tuning and 2 weeks physics commissioning run n Following year, take 20+ weeks (time depends on factors) ActivityYear Proposal / PAC2004 Obtain $$ / start R&D2005 R&D and Construction2006 Construction Commissioning 2007 Full run2008