Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through 2009. Washington, DC: Federal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Class Name, Instructor Name Date, Semester Chapter 2 The Crime Picture Criminal Justice Today.
Advertisements

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Graphs from Chapter 6: Juvenile Offenders in.
Crime and Its Consequences
Measuring Delinquency
Chapter One: Crime Trends in Pennsylvania PENNSYLVANIA'S CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM Copyright © Carolina Academic Press, All rights reserved.
Research and Evaluation Center Juvenile Incarceration Trends Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D. John Jay College of Criminal Justice City University of New York Webinar.
Racial Disparities in Criminal Justice in Wisconsin Pamela Oliver.
The Nature and Measurement of Crime
OUTLINE Why are measures of crime important? Crime Rates v. Amounts
Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Graphs from Chapter 5: Law Enforcement and Juvenile.
Uniform Crime Report (UCR) FBI Compiles data from the nation’s law enforcement agencies on crime for: Numbers of arrests Reports of crimes This is the.
Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Graphs from Chapter 3: Juvenile Offenders Copyright.
Research and Evaluation Center National Trends in Youth Crime Jeffrey A. Butts, Director Research and Evaluation Center John Jay College of Criminal Justice.
Chapter 2 Crime and Criminals Irwin/McGraw-Hill
Counting Crime Methods for Counting Crime?
Theory n An explanation that systematically organizes the facts n Five criteria for a good theory u Consistent with the known facts u Logical, internally.
Just how much delinquency is going on?
Crime Victims: An Introduction to Victimology Seventh Edition
Bureau of Justice Statistics. Conducting Victimization and Community Safety Surveys: Using Web-based Technology U.N. Meeting on Crime Statistics Geneva.
Chapter 2 – The Nature and Extent of Crime
WHY THE DROP IN CRIME? Executive Issues Seminar Series 1997 Law Enforcement Management Institute of Texas Sam Houston State University.
CRIME AND JUSTICE IN AMERICA
Bobby Renaud SOC December 4,  When looking at violent crime and motor vehicle theft, do we see a relationship? If so how significantly ?
Chapter 1: Crime in California Georgia Spiropoulos Copyright © 2014 Carolina Academic Press. All rights reserved.
Introduction to Criminal Justice
Sociology: Your Compass for a New World Robert J. Brym and John Lie Wadsworth Group/Thomson Learning © 2003.
Juvenile Crime and Punishment. Causes of Youth Violence Complex interplay of factors Correlations, not predictions Accumulation of risk Number of resources.
Chapter 2 © 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. Patterns of Crime © 2004 Pearson Education, Inc.
Criminal Justice Today Twelfth Edition CHAPTER Criminal Justice Today: An Introductory Text for the 21st Century, 12e Frank Schmalleger Copyright © 2014.
1 Methods of Measuring Crime Uniform Crime Reports Self- Report Surveys Victim Surveys.
© 2003 Wadsworth Publishing Co. Chapter 3 The Nature and Extent of Crime Criminology 8 th Edition Larry J. Siegel.
Chapter 2 Adapted from: Frank Schmalleger’s CRIMINAL JUSTICE TODAY, 9E.PRENTICE HALL, Education Inc. ©2007 Pearson Education, Inc.
Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Graphs from Chapter 2: Juvenile Victims Copyright.
Measuring Crime Mr. Romero University of California, Los Angeles.
Copyright © 2012 Carolina Academic Press Chapter 1: Crime in California Georgia Spiropoulos.
Chapter Four An Introduction to Alternative Data-Gathering Strategies and the Special Case of Uniform Crime Reports.
Facts to Consider: Presentation to the Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Howard N. Snyder National Center for Juvenile.
1 Arrest to Arraignment Chapter Ten 2 UCR Reports The FBI publishes the Uniform Crime Reports. Uniform Crime Reports divide criminal offenses into two.
IT IS ALL ABOUT THE CRIME UCR/NIBRS/NCVS Dr. Joe Ciccone.
Chapter Two Measurement of Crime and Its Effects.
Aim: How much crime is there in the United States?
Muskie School of Public Service 2008 Maine Crime and Justice Data Book March, 2009.
“People’s fear of crime doesn’t come from looking over their shoulders. It comes from looking at their television screens.” Robert Lichter, director of.
CJ 102 Unit 2. Primary Sources of Crime Data Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) National Crime Victimization.
Mapping for the Next Millennium How CrimeRisk™ scores are formed.
Number of Offenses NationalMaricopa County Violent Crimes Property Crimes -0.2% -4.3% -3.8% -5.5% Violent crimes: murder, rape, robbery, aggravated assault.
Chapter Two CRIME AWARENESS Uniform Crime Reporting System (UCRS) The FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting System began in U.S. Attorney General authorized.
7.5 Crime and Punishment Crime: acts committed in violation of the law. How are crime statistics collected? The FBI’s Uniform Crime Reports (UCR). Statistics.
URBAN INSTITUTE WASHINGTON, DC YOUTH VIOLENCE Perception vs. Reality Prepared by Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D. THE URBAN INSTITUTE Program on Law & Behavior.
CJ 102 Criminology. Chapter Two: The Nature and Extent of Crime.
2 MYTHBUSTERS! The Myths and Truths of the National Fire Incident Reporting System (NFIRS)
August 2 nd,  Increases in violent crime:  Shooting victims up 15% from last year (109) ▪ 14 more shooting victims than last year ▪ 38% above.
Chapter 2: Extent of Crime and Victimization Race and Crime, 3e © SAGE Publications 2012.
Criminal Justice Today CHAPTER 2 Criminal Justice Today, 13th Edition Frank Schmalleger Copyright © 2015, © 2013 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights.
Chapter 3 Juvenile Crime, Criminals, and Victims Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
CRIME AWARENESS.
Crime Data.
PART 1 UNIFORM CRIME REPORT
BCPD Statistics Crimes Against Persons Property Crimes
Understanding the Criminal Justice System
Criminal Violence Riedel and Welsh, Ch. 2 “Measures of Violence”
How is Crime Measured Uniform Crime Report (UCR)
Warm Up (use 5.1) 1. What is deviance?
Chapter 2 The Incidence of Crime
Methods of Measuring Crime
Toledo City Council District Analysis
Chapter 7 Section 5: Crime and Punishment
Methods of Measuring Crime
OUTLINE Why are measures of crime important? Crime Rates v. Amounts
Presentation transcript:

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D. Juvenile Arrest Rates National Arrest Estimates Calculated with Data from the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting Program October 25, 2010 Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D. John Jay College of Criminal Justice City University of New York

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D. The FBI calculates just one national estimate for each major offense. It does not calculate national estimates for different age groups. To present national arrest estimates for various groups and to calculate per capita arrest rates for those groups, this presentation relies on the FBI’s estimate of total arrests for each major offense. It uses the data reported by UCR-participating jurisdictions to determine the proportion of arrests for each offense that involved individuals of various ages. That proportion is then applied to the FBI’s national estimate for each offense. Arrest rates are determined by dividing each national arrest estimate over the appropriate population data from the U.S. Bureau of the Census. These estimation procedures were first developed by Dr. Howard Snyder, now with the Bureau of Justice Statistics at the U.S. Department of Justice. Data Source and Methods The national arrest estimates presented here (as well as the per capita rates based upon those estimates) were calculated by the Justice Research and Evaluation Center at John Jay College of Criminal Justice using data released in 2010 by the Uniform Crime Reporting Program (UCR) of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). The FBI collects annual information on arrests made by law enforcement agencies throughout the United States. Data are collected from jurisdictions containing a majority of the U.S. population, typically between 70 and 80 percent of residents nationwide. The primary publication of UCR data, Crime in the United States, is based upon data from those police agencies able to participate fully in the UCR program each year. Full participation requires that agencies submit their data to the FBI on time and their data must cover all arrests for a minimum number of months during the year. For 2009, the jurisdictions that participated fully in the UCR program represented 78 percent of the national population. Nearly all of the arrest statistics generated by the FBI are based on this sample.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D. Juvenile Arrests for Key Offenses Violent Index Offenses Murder Robbery Aggravated Assault Forcible Rape Property Index Offenses Burglary Larceny-Theft Motor Vehicle Theft Arson Other Offenses Weapon Offenses Drug Law Violations This presentation concentrates on the major crime categories, including the 8 offenses in the Violent and Property Crime Indices, and 2 other key offenses, weapons and drugs.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D Total Arrests2,745,0002,202,0002,219,6001,923,500 Violent Index147,70091,100100,70086,300 Murder3,3001,1001,3001,200 Robbery55,50025,30035,00031,800 Aggravated Assault83,50060,40060,80050,200 Forcible Rape5,5004,2003,6003,100 Property Index737,400452,300404,700421,800 Burglary135,80081,60083,90075,600 Larceny-Theft510,600323,500278,100320,700 Motor Vehicle Theft80,50039,30034,60020,000 Arson10,5007,8008,1005,400 Weapons Offenses56,30040,50047,20034,100 Drug Offenses189,800193,900196,700171,600 High Point Low Point Juvenile Arrests Nationwide Historic Decline Note: Detail may not add to totals due to rounding. ReboundRecovery The national estimate for total number of juvenile arrests (i.e., all arrests involving youth under age 18 nationwide) fell below 2 million in 2009; the first time this has happened since 1984.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D Total Arrests2,745,0002,202,0002,219,6001,923,500 Violent Index147,70091,100100,70086,300 Murder3,3001,1001,3001,200 Robbery55,50025,30035,00031,800 Aggravated Assault83,50060,40060,80050,200 Forcible Rape5,5004,2003,6003,100 Property Index737,400452,300404,700421,800 Burglary135,80081,60083,90075,600 Larceny-Theft510,600323,500278,100320,700 Motor Vehicle Theft80,50039,30034,60020,000 Arson10,5007,8008,1005,400 Weapons Offenses56,30040,50047,20034,100 Drug Offenses189,800193,900196,700171,600 High Point Low Point Juvenile Arrests Nationwide Historic Decline Note: Detail may not add to totals due to rounding. ReboundRecovery The national estimate for the number of juvenile arrests in the Violent Crime Index (i.e., murder, robbery, forcible rape, and aggravated assault) fell in 2009 to the lowest level since 1987.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D Total Arrests2,745,0002,202,0002,219,6001,923,500 Violent Index147,70091,100100,70086,300 Murder3,3001,1001,3001,200 Robbery55,50025,30035,00031,800 Aggravated Assault83,50060,40060,80050,200 Forcible Rape5,5004,2003,6003,100 Property Index737,400452,300404,700421,800 Burglary135,80081,60083,90075,600 Larceny-Theft510,600323,500278,100320,700 Motor Vehicle Theft80,50039,30034,60020,000 Arson10,5007,8008,1005,400 Weapons Offenses56,30040,50047,20034,100 Drug Offenses189,800193,900196,700171,600 High Point Low Point Juvenile Arrests Nationwide Historic Decline Note: Detail may not add to totals due to rounding. ReboundRecovery The estimated number of juvenile murder arrests nationwide in 2009 nearly matched the 30-year low seen in 2004.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D. The growth in violent crime arrest rates now appears to have been a modest fluctuation in a relatively stable pattern.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D. Viewed over the long term, the rate of juvenile arrests for murder between 2000 and 2009 should be described as relatively stable.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D. Juvenile arrest rates for robbery are worrisome compared with the low point of 2004, but the rate fell between 2008 and 2009.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D. Aggravated assault arrests among juveniles flattened out between 2004 and 2006, then continued to decline through 2009.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D. Juvenile arrest rates for forcible rape have been falling since 1991.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D. Juvenile arrest rates for the four offenses included in the Property Crime Index increased after 2006, but dropped from 2008 to 2009.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D. Burglary arrest rates among juveniles may have started to stabilize after nearly three decades of decline.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D. Juvenile arrest rates for larceny-theft began to grow after 2006, but were relatively unchanged between 2008 and 2009.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D. Motor vehicle theft arrests among juveniles continued the stunning rate of decline that started in the late 1980s.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D. Arson arrests among juveniles fell sharply from 2006 to 2009.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D. After disturbing increases between 2002 and 2006, juvenile arrests for weapon offenses returned to their 2002 level.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D. Juvenile drug arrests generally dropped after 1997, but arrest rates in the 2000s were substantially higher than those of the 1980s.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D. Arrests by Age Juveniles Adults Under Age 15 (Ages 10-14) Ages Ages Age 25 and Older Arrests of juveniles are often compared with those of adults, but it is informative to break these age groups into four categories.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D. Viewed in this way, juveniles under age 18 appear to be responsible for much of the increases in violent crime.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D. When arrests are divided into four age groups, it is easier to see what really happened during the rise and fall of violent crime.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D. The changing pattern of violent crime arrests involved juveniles under age 18 and young adults ages 18 to 24.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D. As was apparent in the changing rate of arrests, robbery shows a different pattern, one which deserves more attention.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D. The changes in robbery arrest rates are more pronounced among year-olds than among year-olds.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D. Summary of National Trends Juvenile arrest rates are trending downward, according to the most recent national data. After the historic decline in violent crime from 1995 through 2004, arrest rates in some offenses grew slightly for one or two years. Juvenile arrest rates then generally began to fall again after When all four offenses in the Violent Crime Index are considered together, arrest rates in 2009 were at their lowest point since The small increase in juvenile murder arrests after 2004 appears to have stopped and murder arrests now appear to be stabilizing. The juvenile arrest rate for robbery grew sharply from 2004 to 2006, but it too may have begun to stabilize, although at a level still higher than the historic lows reached during the early 2000s. The rate of juvenile arrests for aggravated assault continued its 15-year decline, reaching a level not been seen since the mid 1980s. The juvenile arrest rate for weapon offenses also fell between 2006 and 2009, reaching the previous low point of 2002.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (see ). Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D. Executive Director Research and Evaluation Center John Jay College of Criminal Justice City University of New York 555 West 57 th Street New York, NY (212) For more information: