Standard 1- Leadership & Vision Sara Saffell Amy Blackwell Marilyn McDonald 1. Leadership and Vision-Educational leaders inspire a shared vision for comprehensive.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Definitions Innovation Reform Improvement Change.
Advertisements

ALAMEDA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Superintendent Search.
AdvancEd District Wide Accreditation
What is District Wide Accreditation? Ensure Desired Results Improve Teaching & Learning Foster a Culture of Improvement A powerful systems approach to.
2007 – 2008 Academic/Business Plan …a strategic initiative School District of Palm Beach County New Horizons for Student Success.
Roles and Responsibilities. Collaborative Efforts to Improve Student Achievement Guidelines for developing integrated planning and decision making processes.
Clover Park School District Board of Directors 1.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
Dr. Eddie R. Johnson Deputy State Superintendent of Education
Campus Improvement Plans
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Project Team MSBA – local school board members MASA – local school superintendents and other stakeholders MSBA/MASA.
Change Initiative Common Curriculum Review. Change Initiative Portfolio
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
STANDARDS FOR SCHOOL LEADERS DR. Robert Buchanan Southeast Missouri State University.
Revised Illinois Professional Teaching Standards Rori R. Carson Western Illinois University.
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
Superintendent & Principal Evaluation Resources Developed by: American Association of School Administrators Chittenden South and Addison Central Supervisory.
STRATEGIES AND SUGGESTIONS FOR BEGINNING SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS BY MACARTHUR JONES ROSANNA LOYA MICHAEL SAENZ FALL 2011 A Leader’s First 100 Days.
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Bibb County Schools Standard 1: Vision and Purpose Standard: The system establishes and communicates a shared purpose and direction for improving.
WASC Visiting Committee Final Presentation for Overseas Schools International School Eastern Seaboard March , 2011.
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
Technology Leadership
PAULDING COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT AdvancED EXTERNAL REVIEW REPORT.
1 PI 34 and RtI Connecting the Dots Linda Helf Teacher, Manitowoc Public School District Chairperson, Professional Standards Council for Teachers.
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
The Method to My Madness Rapid City Area Schools Administrative Retreat August 9, 2010.
Segment 5: Sample Activities Federal Accountability Requirements School Leadership Instructional Supervision 1.
June 5, Use of the district’s financial resources is key to the ongoing operations : Facilities Transportation Food Service Staff Development.
Headwaters Communities in Action Building A Better Quality of Life Together.
Effective Coaching for Success Presenter: Dr. Wendy Perry 2015.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
GARDEN CITY DISTRICT LEADERSHIP November 6, 2012.
Monitoring Student Performance with Access, Excel, and Tinkerplots Michael Marassa Assistant Director for Instructional Technology, Champaign Unit 4 Schools.
ISLLC Standard #2 Supporting Teacher Learning Name Workshop Facilitator.
Virginia WebEx Program Division Support for Substantial School Improvement 1.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
ATHEA BRUSIN EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO, BOISE SPRING 2013 Educational Leadership Portfolio.
Leadership & Vision: The Administrator’s Role Susan Brooks-Young
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Positive School Climate Dr. Shanda C. Crowder Clinical Assistant Professor and Director The Positive Schools Center University of Maryland, School of Social.
Accreditation (AdvancED) STANDARD #2: GOVERNANCE & LEADERSHIP
Technology Action Plan By: Kaitlyn Sassone. What is Systemic Change? "Systemic change is a cyclical process in which the impact of change on all parts.
21 st Century Skills for Education Leaders: How do we prepare our students for the new global economy? Partnership for 21 st Century Skills Teaching &
Building Strong Library Associations | Sustaining Your Library Association BSLA Stakeholders Workshop Yaounde, Cameroon, April 2012 Managing Relationships.
Superintendent’s Entry & Learning Plan Jeremy Ray.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Office of Service Quality
Office of Service Quality
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.
Excellence for Each Student Utah State Board of Education Strategic Plan.
Exploring the National Educational Technology Standards for Administrators, Teachers, and Students Presented by: Jana Bowling.
A System of Instructional Effectiveness: Connecting the Dots The District Accountability Plan (DAP) Bloomfield Public Schools Every Student,
SIX PLUS ONE COLUMBUS CITY SCHOOLS IMPLEMENTATION MODEL OF PARENT ENGAGEMENT = 7.
OVERVIEW of the ISTE NETS for Administrators Presented by Kevin Brady and Alison Fricke.
Building Awareness of Teacher Leadership. Why Teacher Leadership?
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Administrators Leadership and Vision.
Competency Reflections
Presentation transcript:

Standard 1- Leadership & Vision Sara Saffell Amy Blackwell Marilyn McDonald 1. Leadership and Vision-Educational leaders inspire a shared vision for comprehensive integration of technology and foster an environment and culture conducive to the realization of that vision.

Overall Key Points Main objective should be to incorporate technology into your schools program whenever it is appropriate and helpful to students. No extreme technology uses, but rather a well balanced approach to it’ s use.

1A Performance Indicator 1.A – Educational leaders facilitate the shared development by all stakeholders of a vision for technology use and widely communicate that vision. Define all groups that need representation Develop mission and vision statements that “describe an instructional program in which technology is present and regularly used as a teaching and learning tool”. (Brooks- Young, 15) Communicate mission and vision statements to the educational community.

Performance Indicator 1.B – Educational leaders maintain an inclusive and cohesive process to develop, implement, and monitor a dynamic, long-range, and systemic technology plan to achieve the vision. Strategic planning is dynamic and must remain responsive to change. A plan must be in place and it must keep the big picture in mind and requires constant re-evaluation to ensure the goals are being met 1B

1C – Foster and Nurture a Culture of Responsible Risk Taking and Advocate Policies Promoting Continuous Innovation with Technology Develop strategies for students not performing well or standard level Reform is a process of trial and error, so plan reforms, such as technology integration, and then allow for a reasonable time to monitor and evaluate the success of the integration program Create an environment using strategies where educators are willing to take risks – Create trust, and realize that it may take 2 – 3 years before change and innovation is realizes

– Educate and inform stakeholders along the way. Make sure they are aware of the mission and the vision. – Coordinate efforts with other schools and share data. Make sure meetings are kept to a minimum and don’t have each grade level or school work in isolation. – Guarantee some small success and celebrate them. – Provide ample time for planning implementation. This creates respect among teachers and administrators. 1C – Foster and Nurture a Culture of Responsible Risk Taking and Advocate Policies Promoting Continuous Innovation with Technology - continued

1D – Use Data in Making Leadership Decisions The new demands of instructional leadership need to realized and respected – we can’t keep doing things the old way Collect information that will give you the complete picture of the overall organization Student achievement data and performance data is important, but many other data factors also help to illustrate the whole picture.

Data will help you to focus your instruction program, technology needs, and other scholastic tools Find artifacts that help support the culture and the current situation Look for patterns and trends – such as high areas of attendance issues at certain times of years, or teacher committees and their impact need within the school 1D – Use Data in Making Leadership Decisions - continued

1E- Research and Best Practices Research is being done on the effects of the use of technology in the classroom. There are many organizations were your can find more about the research they are Mid-Continent Research for Education and Learning, Network of Regional Technology in Education, and Consortia & North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.

1E- Research and Best Practices Research shows: – Technology can have positive effect on students. However it is dependent upon the teacher’s comfort level in using it as an instructional tool. – Effects of technology use cannot be measured through standardized test. – Positive results of technology were found in terms of increases of student attendance, self-esteem, or even in more difficult to measure ways such as the ability to work collaboratively and to problem solve. Finding research based models of best practices is hard because teachers are still learning about the technology they are working with.

1E- Research and Best Practices Explains the steps that must be taken by educational leaders to implement research based effective practices.

1E- Research and Best Practices Explains the steps that must be taken by educational leaders to implement research based effective practices.

Administrators- may lead in helping to develop state, federal polices, programs, and funding opportunities that support implementation of district technology plan. Educational leaders should: – Explore district polices regarding advocacy. – Explore work done by professional organizations. – Explore past practices in your area. 1F- Advocating on State & National Level Mostly the responsibility of the district superintendent, cabinet members, and school board.

Questions to consider for your vision:

Key Question Does your school have a vision and mission statement that includes technology and school community? Who is included in the process of ensuring the goals are met?

Reference Brooks-Young, S. (2009). Making technology standards work for you: A guide to the NETS-A for school administrators with self-assessment activities.