Design Group Meeting Full National Water Quality Monitoring Council Overview Presented yesterday Extended context to bring to today’s discussions Next.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Prioritized Sites for Amphipod TIE Study Identify 12 potentially toxic inter-tidal sites Sample four sites at a time to find two suitable sites for amphipod.
Advertisements

Information Needs for the Integrated F&W Program (ESA and Power Act) Jim Geiselman - BPA.
Massachusetts Water Resources Authority Proposed Revisions to MWRA’s Ambient Monitoring Plan: Introduction Andrea Rex Director Environmental Quality Dept.
Streamgaging Task Force Final Report Advisory Committee on Water Information Herndon, Virginia April 3, 2002.
Great Lakes Observing System GLRI Tributary Monitoring Project
Northwest Atlantic Coastal Indicators Workshop January 6-8, 2004 Durham, NH.
Nutrient Cycles Eutrophication Nitrogen –Chemical Forms in the Aquatic Environment –Chemical Transformations –Cycle f-ratio Carbon.
1 The Sustainable Water Resources Roundtable April 26, 2006 Needs for Indicators.
Design Workgroup National Monitoring Network. Introduction n Overview of Progress to Date n Al Korndoerfer, Chair of Design Workgroup.
Lake Status Indicator Selection David F. Staples Ray Valley.
Compare and Contrast What are some ways in which life in an aphotic zone might differ from life in a photic zone Apply Concepts What is a wetland and.
Lesson Overview 4.5 Aquatic Ecosystems.
Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Stephen.
Spatial and temporal trends in dissolved oxygen concentrations and dissolved oxygen depletion (hypoxia) in the Delaware River Basin Demonstration Area.
IOOS Application to Harmful Algal Blooms and Ecosystem Health Monitoring Josh Kohut Rutgers University, Institute of Marine & Coastal Science Bob Connell.
The Importance of Coastal Waters - Recent Reports National Coastal Condition Report National Coastal Condition Report Heinz Center’s State of the Nation’s.
Advisory Committee on Water Information 2005 Interim Status September 14, 2005 USGS National Center Auditorium.
Integrated Ecosystem Assessment for the Gulf of Mexico Becky Allee Gulf Coast Services Center.
Use of Remote Sensing for Routine Coastal Water Monitoring by a State Agency Bob Connell New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Marine.
AQUATIC BIODIVERSITY IMPACTS 13.1 & How much do we know? We have explored about 5% of the earth’s global ocean and the world’s interconnected oceans.
Aquatic Biodiversity Ocean 91% of all water Polar ice caps and glaciers 2.3% Lakes, streams, and rivers 2.8% Rest largely groundwater.
Coastal Water Quality Remote Sensing Welcome Dr. Jeff Payne Deputy Director NOAA Coastal Services Center October 7, 2003.
Kathleen A. Garland EIH Envirothon Teacher Workshop February 18, 2012.
Water for Virginia Master Naturalists: Estuaries & Coasts.
A methodology for defining homogeneous water bodies in transitional and coastal waters S.B. Bricker Gulf of Mexico Alliance Governors’
Public Participation and the Advisory Committee Process A Collaborative Partnership For Water Resources Toni M. Johnson, Chief Water Information Coordination.
Identify key features and characteristics of atmospheric, geological, hydrological, and biological systems as they relate to aquatic environments.[AQS.4A]
The Powerpoint file provides:
Currents of Change Workshop Currents of Change Environmental Status & Trends of the Narragansett Bay Region May 1, 2009.
AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS Determined by the salinity of water 2 types: Freshwater & Marine.
1 Reporting on the Health of the Gulf of Maine Christine Tilburg, EcoSystem Indicator Partnership, Gulf of Maine Council on the Marine Environment Heather.
Stormwater Status & Trends Monitoring Proposal for Freshwater Streams (wadeable) & Marine Nearshore Participants: Scott Collyard, Shayne Cothern, Jay Davis,
Extended Council Context for the NMN Design Management Questions Objectives Environments Resources of Primary Concern Stressors affecting resources Core.
The National Water Quality Monitoring Network for U.S. Coastal Waters and their Tributaries Presentation for _______ August 28, 2007.
Overview 1.Types of monitoring 2.Partnership monitoring needs 3.Current monitoring coordination efforts.
Design Workgroup Jeffrey L. ArmstrongOrange County Sanitation Distric Tyler BakerTVA Jerad BalesUSGS David BayneAuburn University Joe BoyerFlorida International.
PNAMP Habitat Status and Trends Monitoring Management Question: Are the Primary Habitat Factors Limiting the Status of the Salmon and Steelhead Populations.
Estuaries 101 A Brief Introduction to Natural and Human-Induced Processes in Estuaries Jonathan Pennock University of New Hampshire Marine Program, NH.
Overview of National Monitoring Network (NMN) Project Update for NWQMC April 12, 2005.
James C. Gibeaut Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies, Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi Presented to: Coastal Engineering Research.
Objectives: 1.Enhance the data archive for these estuaries with remotely sensed and time-series information 2.Exploit detailed knowledge of ecosystem structure.
Aquatic Ecology: Biodiversity in Aquatic Systems
NWQMC July 26, 2005 Developing A National Water Quality Monitoring Network Design.
A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE ON THE LINKAGE BETWEEN EUTROPHICATION AND HYPOXIA Robert Diaz College of William and Mary Virginia Institute of Marine Science
Ocean.US and Coastal Ocean Applications and Science Team (COAST) Larry Atkinson September 2004 Corvallis.
Wetland Wetland San Francisco Bay & Delta San Francisco Bay & Delta Wetland Wetland Steven Ortiz Per.1.
Water Quality Ru Morrison, NERACOOS Pixie Hamilton, USGS Water Quality John Haines, USGS, Pixie Hamilton, USGS, Ru Morrison, NERACOOS, Mario Tamburri,
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey The Rivers Component of the National Monitoring Network Jerad Bales National Monitoring Conference.
Aquatic Ecosystems Wednesday, November 1st Reminder: Problem Set due Friday!
National Water Quality Monitoring Network for U.S. Coastal Waters and Their Tributaries Briefing For IOOS EXCOM September 13, 2005.
The State of the Sound Scott Redman Puget Sound Action Team February 5, 2003 Marine Water and Nearshore Successes & Challenges.
A Pivotal Moment for Leaders Across the Gulf Coast States and Connected Communities Throughout the Country.
Estuaries: Chesapeake Bay By: Allen Kim, Harrison Kim, and Yeongmin Ko 11/6/13.
Aquatic Biodiversity Chapter 8. Core Case Study: Why Should We Care about Coral Reefs?  Biodiversity  Formation  Important ecological and economic.
The National Water Quality Monitoring Network for U.S. Coastal Waters and their Tributary Rivers
Freshwater Discharges to Central Coast Marine Protected Areas and the Nearshore Environment Karen R. Worcester David M. Paradies Central Coast Ambient.
State Agency Needs for Remote Sensing Data Related to Water Quality By Bob Van Dolah Marine Resources Research Institute South Carolina Department of Natural.
National Water Quality Monitoring Network Design Inventory Activities.
Aquatic Biodiversity G. Tyler Miller’s Living in the Environment 14 th Edition Chapter 7 G. Tyler Miller’s Living in the Environment 14 th Edition Chapter.
The State of Coral Reef Ecosystems of the United States and Pacific Freely Associated States: 2005 NOAA’s Coral Reef Conservation Program
A Collaborative Approach to Assessing Watershed Conditions in Coastal National Parks Kristen Keteles, Cliff McCreedy, Jim Tilmant and Mark Flora.
Water Quality Indicators and Monitoring Design to Support the Albemarle-Pamlico National Estuary Program: A Progress Report Dean E. Carpenter and William.
Estuary, Marine Waters and Nearshore Indicators Presented to the Governor’s Forum on Monitoring, October 5, 2005 Sarah Brace, Puget Sound Action Team,
Water Quality Monitoring in Michigan, : A Decade of Program Evolution By: Gerald Saalfeld, MI Department of Environmental Quality.
The National Monitoring Network: Monitoring & Management of Alabama Rivers Fred Leslie Alabama Dept of Environmental Management National Monitoring Conference.
Gulf of Maine Council’s EcoSystem Indicator Partnership June 2012.
Indicators for the Habitat Ecosystem Component Correigh Greene, NWFSC.
Aquatic Ecosystems Chapter
Lesson Overview 4.5 Aquatic Ecosystems.
Aquatic Ecosystems.
Presentation transcript:

Design Group Meeting Full National Water Quality Monitoring Council Overview Presented yesterday Extended context to bring to today’s discussions Next steps

Yesterday’s Overview of Progress

Design Workgroup Jeffrey L. ArmstrongOrange County Sanitation Distric Tyler BakerTVA Jerad BalesUSGS David BayneAuburn University Joe BoyerFlorida International University Charles DvorskyTexas Don DycusTennessee Valley Authority Art GarceauIndiana George HarmanMaryland Mike Hemsley Ocean.US Steven R. Johnston Galveston Bay Estuary Program Steve JordanEPA Ron KleinAlaska Chris KnoppU.S. Forest Service

Design Workgroup Alfred Korndoerfer, Jr.New Jersey Gail MallardFED-U.S. Geological Survey Thomas C. MaloneIOOS Dan McKenzieEPA Brian D. Melzian, Ph.D.EPA Tony OlsenEPA Steven G. Paulsen, Ph.D.EPA Robert P. SchreiberASCE Gene Lynn SiskAlabama GeneTurner & Eric SwensonLouisiana State University Robert WardColorado State University Dave Whitall, Ph.D.NOAA

Issues From Chapter 15 Oxygen depletion Nutrient enrichment Toxic contamination Sedimentation Harmful algal blooms Habitat degradation Invasions by exotic species Status of coastal habitats Sources and quantities of marine debris Coral communities

Conceptual models Can Help Structure Defined in some (often tacit) conceptual model Sources Causes Primary Effects Secondary Effects Issue

Exclusive Economic Zones

National Estuary Programs

NERR: small blue in Delaware Bay

NCA Estuary and Marine

NPS: Assateague Island (pink)

HUC Regions

HUC Subregions (4-digit): coastal

HUC 6-digit: coastal

HUC 8-digit: Gulf Coast

HUC 8-digit: rivers in one

Swenson Matrix Coverage Exclusive Economic Zone Estuaries Ocean- State & Territorial Rivers –Level 1 –Level 2 –Level 3 –Level 4 S. Jordan’s Parameter List

NATIONAL MONITORING NETWORK DESIGN MATRIX E. M. Swenson 4/8/2005 ResourceParameterFrequencySpatial Density Vertical resolutionComments Estuaries Water temp.ContinuousDefine longitudinal and transverse gradients Surface, mid- depth, bottom. May only need short term checks for vertical startification then change to single depth if possible Fixed buoys or platfroms. Spatial gradients measured using monthly discrete data at dense sampling grid compared to fixed stations which define the backbone gradient SalinityContinuousDefine longitudinal and transverse gradients Surface, mid- depth, bottom. May only need short term checks for vertical startification then change to single depth if possible Fixed buoys or platfroms. Spatial gradients measured using monthly discrete data at dense sampling grid compared to fixed stations which define the backbone gradient DOContinuous with probe? There are calibratuion issues Define longitudinal and transverse gradients Surface, mid- depth, bottom. May only need short term checks for vertical startification then change to single depth if possible Fixed buoys or platfroms. Spatial gradients measured using monthly discrete data at dense sampling grid compared to fixed stations which define the backbone gradient

ResourceParameterFrequencySpatial Density Vertical resolutionComments Contaminants Define longitudinal and transverse gradients Benthos Define longitudinal and transverse gradients Probabilistic Chlorophyll aContinuous with probe? There are calibratuion issues Define longitudinal and transverse gradients Surface, mid- depth, bottom. May only need short term checks for vertical startification then change to single depth if possible Fixed buoys or platfroms. Satellite sensors (calibration issues). Spatial gradients measured using monthly discrete data at dense sampling grid compared to fixed stations which define the backbone gradient Phytoplankton Zooplankton

ResourceParameterFrequencySpatial Density Vertical resolutionComments Shellfish Target harvest areas Fish community Pathogens Recreational areas Invasive species CurrentsContinuousDefine longitudinal and transverse gradients, major flow routes Upward looking ADCP or side looking ADCP in channels Fixed buoys or platfroms. Water levelContinuous Fixed buoys or platforms. Met station, winds, precipitation, pressure, PAR ContinuousFill in gaps in existing networks. Provide better data for model boundary conditions Fixed buoys or platfroms.

Conclusion We have Large, diverse group Concurrence on objectives Stuctures are evolving –Swenson Matrix –Parameter list –GIS coverages

Extended Council Context for the NMN Design Management Questions Objectives Environments Resources of Primary Concern Stressors affecting resources Core Indicators List Specific locations for measurement of core indicators

Management Questions 1.What is the condition of the Nation’s surface, ground, estuarine, and coastal waters? 2.Where, how, and why are water-quality conditions changing over time? 3.Where are the problems related to water quality? What is causing the problems? 4.Are programs to prevent or remediate problems working effectively? 5.Are water-quality goals and standards being met? 6.What research activities are needed to support these important resources?

Objectives of the National Monitoring Network 1. Define status and trends of key water quality parameters and conditions on a nationwide basis. 2. Provide data relevant to determining whether goals, standards, and resource management objectives are being met, thus contributing to sustainable and beneficial use of coastal and inland water resources. 3. Provide data to identify and rank existing and emerging problems to help target more intensive monitoring, preventive actions, or remediation. 4. Provide data to support and define coastal oceanographic and hydrologic research, including influences of freshwater inflows. 5. Provide quality-assured data for use in the preparation of interpretive reports and educational materials.

The Five Environments (Recognition that we cannot measure the entire resource) Major river systems and major tributaries of those primary drainages (HUC 8?) Estuaries Outlets of major estuaries and bays Near-shore coastal zone Regional aquifers

Resources of Primary Concern Aquatic life in each of the components we have identified Human use of water (recognize that a national monitoring network will not address drinking water at the tap)

Stressors Affecting Resources Oxygen depletion Nutrient enrichment Toxic contamination Sedimentation Harmful algal blooms Habitat degradation Invasions by exotic species

Core Indicator List Indicators appropriate to each of the: resources, waterbody types, objectives, and management questions

Continuing Coordination 1.Inventory Workgroup needs to confirm your approach to plan its work 2.Methods and Comparability is now established, and seeks liaison

Next Steps 1.Discuss and link Management questions to the reporting envisioned in the 5 objectives 2.Focusing on indicators for: –Resources of Primary Concern –The Five Environments –The Stressors Affecting Resources

More Next Steps 3. Summarize progress for the May 12 th SWAQ progress report 4. Prepare for the July Council Meeting