Doing It Differently in Science - An Evaluation of the Process Sharon Fraser and Elizabeth Deane University of Western Sydney, Nepean April, 28th 2000.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Christopher Graham Garnet Education UK. I dont do rhetorical questions !
Advertisements

Progress Towards Reading Success: The Reading First Evaluation Prepared by: Amy Kemp, Ph.D. Research Associate and Patricia A. Muller, Ph.D. Associate.
Organising Accessible Events Information – before/on/after the day Venue Other Assistance.
LBSS Faculty of Law Business and Social Sciences Law Accountancy Business and Management Central and East European Studies Economics Economic and Social.
K-6 Science and Technology Consistent teaching – Assessing K-6 Science and Technology © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and.
Peer assessment and group work event and practical workshop RSC WM Stimulating and supporting innovation in learning.
Embedding information literacy in the science curriculum: a collaborative approach Karen Lycett and Pam Thornton Edith Cowan University Library Lecturer,
College of Engineering and Built Environment Teaching Fellowship Report Gavin Duffy School of Electrical Engineering Systems May 19, 2010.
Foundation Competencies New CSWE procedures
Problem-Based Learning for Laboratory & Professional Skills Teaching Kevin Wells SCEPTrE Fellow Dept of Electronic Engineering, FEPS University of Surrey.
Six Outcomes – One (BIG) Assignment: A Problem-Based Learning Approach to Improving Information Fluency Dr. Karen Ann Tarnoff Assistant Dean for Assurance.
Information Literacy and Inquiry-based learning Pamela McKinney Learning Development and Research Associate (Information Literacy) at CILASS CILASS identifies.
School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Edinburgh Preparing students for University: Recent initiatives in The School of Biomedical Sciences (SBMS)
Making Sense of Assessments in HE Modules (Demystifying Module Specification) Jan Anderson University Teaching Fellow L&T Coordinator SSSL
Careers Skills (L12350) Introduction School of Economics.
Welcome to LT1H02N Studying Service Sector Management.
PPA Advisory Board Meeting, May 12, 2006 Assessment Summary.
Competencies Training and Interactive Teaching Methods in Social Sciences Elena Belokurova Center for European Studies European University at St. Petersburg.
In-service Certificate in English Language Teaching
The role of the undergraduate work placement in developing employment competences Matthew Hall and Nicola Bullivant Presentation to DECOWE conference,
UNDERGRADUATE CLINICAL COMMITTEE SPRING 2011 Clinical Evaluation.
15 th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training Foundation Software Engineering Practices for Capstone Projects and Beyond Annegret Goold.
LECTURER OF THE 2010 FIRST-YEAR STUDENT: How can the lecturer help? February 2010.
INTRODUCTION TO THE MINISTRY OF EDUCATION’s ACHIEVEMENT CHART Bedford Park PS September 2013.
Application of the Tuning Approach in the Georgian Higher Education System Tbilisi 28 February 2009 Degree Programmes in Physics Applying the Tuning methodology.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Problem Based Learning (PBL) David W. Dillard Arcadia Valley CTC.
Mentor Workshop: Assessing Learners Facilitated by a Practice Education Facilitator.
ITEW Evaluation of Teacher Learning Experience 2015 Oulu UAS, Kotkantie Campus, Engineering, Natural Resources, Media and Performing Arts Bastian Fähnrich.
Differentiated Supervision
Chemical Engineering curriculum renewal for the twenty first century: a work in progress Peter Holt, Jose Romagnoli and Ali Abbas.
Introducing Unit Specifications and Unit Assessment Support Packs Art & Design National 3, 4 & 5.
Developing Business Practice – 302LON The Context and Practice of Successful Learning Unit: 1 Knowledgecast: 1.
End of Course Evaluation Taimi Olsen, Ph.D., Director, Tennessee Teaching and Learning Center Jennifer Ann Morrow, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Evaluation,
Marek Frankowicz.  Top-down  We have an idea of a new program  We formulate program learning outcomes  We divide the program into modules  We develop.
B Nurse 2011 Curriculum. Programme Management Team Programme Director Programme Director: Geraldine Lyte Deputy Programme Director: Elizabeth Lee Woolf.
TUTORIAL ON CROSS- CURRICULAR TEACHING I. BACKGROUND.
BA (Hons) WAR STUDIES Undergraduate programme (Specialist and Joint Options) University of Wolverhampton School of Humanities, Languages and Social Sciences.
Information Literacy and Inquiry-based learning Pamela McKinney Learning Development and Research Associate (Information Literacy) at CILASS
CPLA Video Case Studies Making Media Nursing. Making Media - Background First year, semester long 20 credit core module Involved 200 students with 4 staff.
Setting up a Course and using the Course Tutor Guide Workshop A Kim Tree.
Graduate studies - Master of Pharmacy (MPharm) 1 st and 2 nd cycle integrated, 5 yrs, 10 semesters, 300 ECTS-credits 1 Integrated master's degrees qualifications.
` Implementation of PBL in Kabul Medical University Assistant prof. Dr Zaman member of Physiology department Assistant Prof. Dr Nejrabi member.
Effective Assignments: Facilitating Learning. Higher Education’s Dark secrets  Despite our rhetoric about teaching higher order skills—critical thinking.
ONE UNIVERSITY. MANY FUTURES. IP Planning for IPE Will the PIPES system help us to enhance IPE? IPE faculty development January 11, 2012.
Tutoring Groups School of Electrical Engineering Systems.
Introducing Unit Specifications and Unit Assessment Support Packs Philosophy National 5.
How does the definition match your thoughts? How does the definition differ from your thoughts? Assessment Definition Assessment is the ongoing process.
1 Commissioned by PAMSA and German Technical Co-Operation National Certificate in Paper & Pulp Manufacturing NQF Level 4 Use communication skills to handle.
C ENTRE FOR E XCELLENCE IN T EACHING & L EARNING A SSESSMENT FOR L EARNING Assessment for Learning in Practice: case studies from Northumbria's CETL Gill.
King Saud University, College of Science Workshop: Programme accreditation and quality assurance Riyadh, June 13-14, 2009 II.4 Exercise: Assessment of.
Case Based Learning (CBL) Training Slides
Developing Common Course Syllabi November 20, 2010 Heather Sass, Education Consultant Preview.
Reading Take-Aways 1.Which of the four C’s do you think is most critical for student preparation for PJL? Why? 2.How does a driving question facilitate.
Doctor of Physical Therapy Writing and Using Objectives in Clinical Education Harriet Lewis, PT, MS Co Academic Coordinator of Clinical Education Assistant.
King Saud University, College of Science Workshop: Programme accreditation and quality assurance Riyadh, June 13-14, 2009 III.1 The accreditation report:
FALL 2015 MIRAMAR COLLEGE LAURA MURPHY COLLEGE- WIDE OUTCOMES AND ASSESSMENT FACILITATOR ISLO Assessment Summary.
Classical Studies Meeting the literacy and language demands of the curriculum level and NCEA.
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Montgomery College Fall 2011 Orientation.
I ntegrating our research into BSc Diagnostic Radiography curriculum Health Sciences Research Centre 15 th December 2015 Robert Higgins, Peter Hogg, Leslie.
Competencies and consequences … choices to make April
Company LOGO Using Informal Podcasts to Enhance Students’ Collaborative Learning Dr Ming Nie, University of Leicester, UK Libby Rothwell, Kingston University,
Task Design in Undergraduate Mathematics Leigh Wood Chair, Standing Committee on Mathematics Education Australian Mathematical Society Associated Dean,
Modernisation of study programme
Initial Findings about Graduate Teaching Assistants’ Training Needs to Foster Active Learning in Statistics Kristen E. Roland and Jennifer J. Kaplan.
EPQ Learner Outcomes identify, design, plan and complete an individual project, applying a range of organisational skills and strategies to meet.
Cooperative Learning Concepts
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
Case Based Learning (CBL) Training Slides Dr Nana Sartania
Presentation transcript:

Doing It Differently in Science - An Evaluation of the Process Sharon Fraser and Elizabeth Deane University of Western Sydney, Nepean April, 28th 2000

Background - CUTSD Grant An integrated programme supporting the development of key learning competencies in undergraduate science students: group leadership and membership oral and written communication critical analysis problem solving reflective skills independent learning

Subject Format - structure Co-operative learning Students assigned to core teams of 4 One 2-hour workshop per week One 3-hour practical session per week 5 weeks - laboratory skills development 3 weeks - team learning & problem task analysis & planning A weekend practical session Problem solution undertaken

Subject format - assessment QuizzesFormative Mid-semester test25% End of semester test25% Cooperative learning assignment15% Lab. problem: cooperative learning15% Oral presentation - laboratory problem10% Poster 10%

What is there to Evaluate? The programme The learning environment –The instructor(s) lecturer and/or tutor –Support services technical assistance Learning outcomes The future of the programme

Evaluating the Evaluation - the person and the process “Independent Observer” or “Independent Facilitator”? Summative assessment outcomes –Including Team Collage and Poster Video footage Student Questionnaires Follow-up Student Focus Groups Staff Reflection - documented Staff Focus Groups - academic / technical

The “Independent Facilitator ” Independent of –Teaching and Support staff –Assessment - acceptance by students –Vested interests Attributes –Content knowledge & understanding of the learning process –Interpersonal skills –Ability to reflect, analyse, solve problems, identify needs –Flexibility –Doesn’t impose ideas & opinions or make value judgements

The Value of an “ Independent Facilitator ” A person other than the academic – Different viewpoint, focus – With the time Has an holistic involvement, with… – No vested interests – A concern for students, staff, learning outcomes trust established, opens lines of communication – The programme and its future

Evaluation: informing the future The programme The learning environment –The instructor(s) - lecturer and tutor –Support services - technical assistance Learning outcomes Its future………?