Problem Solving December 17, 2012 Aubrey Tardy Michelle Urbanek.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.
Advertisements

Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Tier III Meeting Outline. Roles of Team Members Coordinator –Set up meetings, contact parents, inform members of team about agenda, inform teachers about.
Problem Analysis: Diagnostic Assessment What do we know and need to know about the problem? What are some of the possible causes for the problem and what.
Connecting Classrooms to Systems of School-wide PBS
What is RTI? RTI is a general education initiative aimed at improving student performance through the use of effective scientific research-based instructional.
Dr. Denise P. Gibbs, Director Alabama Scottish Rite Foundation Learning Centers PST RtI STUDENT SUCCESS Christine R. Spear, Education Administrator Alabama.
Mike W. Olson RTI. RTI is… 2 the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time.
Novice Webinar 2 Overview of the Four Types and Purposes of Assessment.
Response to Intervention (RtI) A Basic Overview. Illinois IDEA 2004 Part Rules Requires: use of a process that determines how the child responds.
RtI Day 2 EXCEED Trainer of Trainers SDUSD October 2011 Linda Trousdale Michelle Crisci Several slides were adapted from: Washoe County School District,
Hudson RTI Response to Intervention. Understanding the Process This presentation is a general guide to understanding the RTI process.
Response to Intervention RTI – SLD Eligibility. What is RTI? Early intervention – General Education Frequent progress measurement Increasingly intensive.
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What is RTI?
OBSERVATIONS For SLD Eligibility Make sure you sit with your school’s team.
Problem Solving Model Problem Solving Model NC DPI Summer Preparation Preparation & Implementation Implementation North Carolina.
Power Pack Click to begin. Click to advance Congratulations! The RtI process has just become much easier. This team member notebook contains all the information.
Assessing the Curriculum Gary L. Cates, Ph.D., N.C.S.P.
(Teaching & Learning) RtI January 28-30, 2014.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
(Teaching & Learning) RtI Fall RtI IS… IS NOT…
U SING THE IPST F ORMS TO S UPPORT THE P ROBLEM S OLVING P ROCESS Shelly Dickinson Janet Stephenson.
Response to Intervention USING RTI FOR NONACADEMIC INTERVENTIONS: PART II.
What do you think of when you hear RtI? RtI Psychological Test.
Specific Learning Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
RTI: How do we make all the pieces fit into the puzzle? Lynn Wallasky and Marnie Zabel.
MI draft of IDEIA 2004 (Nov 2009) WHAT HAS CHANGED? How LD is identified:  Discrepancy model strongly discouraged  Response To Instruction/Intervention.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
Coaches Training Introduction Data Systems and Fidelity.
Interventions ARC Chairperson Training Special Education Regulation 1997 Special Education Regulations …providing incentives for whole-school.
D62 Response to Intervention
Progress Monitoring Intensive Behavior Supports, 2008 December, 2008.
Response to Instruction Training Wednesday, October 30, 2013.
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
FloridaRtI.usf.edu A collaborative project between the Florida Department of Education and the University of South Florida Intervention Mapping.
Progress Monitoring for All Student Adapted from the Kentucky Systems of Interventions Guidance Document.
4- Step Middletown’s Response to Intervention process.
The Role of the Teacher. Basically, the state believes that teachers, along with the school district, are responsible for students that fail. If a student.
1 Responsiveness to Instruction (RtI) Problem-Solving Model Tier II North Carolina Department of Public Instruction
Response to Instruction & Problem Solving Teams Summer 2010.
Parent Leadership Team Meeting Intro to RtI.  RtI Overview  Problem Solving Process  What papers do I fill out?  A3 documenting the story.
Response to Intervention in KPS Linda Campbell
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Report Oregon RTI Project Sustaining Districts Trainings
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
Responsiveness to Instruction RtI Tier III. Before beginning Tier III Review Tier I & Tier II for … oClear beginning & ending dates oIntervention design.
EIP SUBGROUP — ASSESSMENT Tony D’Angelo Ruth Kirsch Regina Oliver.
By: Brevard Public School’s “Most Awesome” Certified Behavior Analysts.
Tier III Implementation. Define the Problem  In general - Identify initial concern General description of problem Prioritize and select target behavior.
Climbing the Ladder Special Education OVERVIEW Niles North High School, District 219.
Effective Behavior & Instructional Support. Implementing RTI through Effective Behavior & Instructional Support.
Response to Intervention in a Nutshell August 26, 2009.
Interventions Identifying and Implementing. What is the purpose of providing interventions? To verify that the students difficulties are not due to a.
FEBRUARY MTSS FACILITATOR MEETING SHELLY DICKINSON, MTSS TRAINER.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Tier 3 Intervention The Most Intense Level of Intervention!!!
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
Addressing Learning Problems in Elementary School Ellen Hampshire.
1 Average Range Fall. 2 Average Range Winter 3 Average Range Spring.
CASE STUDY - MATH PROBLEM SOLVING TO DESIGN & IMPLEMENT INTERVENTIONS.
Revisiting SPL/IIT/SAT/SLD AND OTHER ALPHABETIC ANOMOLIES!
RTI Response to Intervention Connecting the Pieces.
Specific Learning Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
Tier III Preparing for First Meeting. Making the Decision  When making the decision to move to Tier III, all those involve with the implementation of.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
Summative Evaluation Shasta Davis. Dimension: Preparation (Score- 4) Plans for instructional strategies that encourage the development of critical thinking,
Middle School Training: Ensuring a Strong Foundation of Supports
Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) Overview
Response to Intervention (RtI) What is a Teacher’s Role?
Student Support Team (SST) Training
Problem Solving Training Module
Presentation transcript:

Problem Solving December 17, 2012 Aubrey Tardy Michelle Urbanek

1.To learn the Problem Solving process 2.To become familiar with the 4- & 8-Step Problem Solving Worksheets 3.To be able to participate on the Problem Solving Team (PST) or provide support to the PST 4.To understand and recognize the critical components of the PST process 5.To understand the need and the uses for strong problem solving teams GOALS:

 Purpose  Address educational concerns using current data to determine which research-based strategies/interventions increase student outcomes  Contents  4-Step processes and worksheets Overview of Facilitator’s Guide

 PST Coordinator  Meeting Facilitator  Recorder  Time Keeper PST Role Expectations

 Decision making teams should include parents whenever appropriate  Consistent with state and federal special education regulations, parents should be provided documentation of repeated assessment of student’s response to intervention at regular intervals and be kept informed of changes in intervention procedures Parental Involvement

4-Step Problem Solving Process Do & Review Response to Intervention (RtI) Do & Review Response to Intervention (RtI) Problem Analysis Validating Problem ID Variables that Contribute to Problem Develop Plan Problem Analysis Validating Problem ID Variables that Contribute to Problem Develop Plan Problem Identification Defining Problem/Directly Measuring Behavior Problem Identification Defining Problem/Directly Measuring Behavior Plan Implement As Intended Progress Monitor Modify as Necessary Plan Implement As Intended Progress Monitor Modify as Necessary

4-Step Problem Solving Process

 What is the problem?  Define the problem in concrete, descriptive behavioral terms  NO: “Johnny’s reading below grade level” “Ben acts out a lot in class.”  YES: “On an oral reading fluency probe, Johnny reads 12 wcpm with 7 errors.” “ Ben averages 1 ODR per week.” STEP I: Problem Identification

 What is the expected/benchmark level of performance for building level/grade level/student level?  Example: We expect 7 th graders to have one or fewer ODR’s per year.  What is the peer level of performance at the building level/grade level/classroom/student level?  Example: Ben’s 7 th grade male and female peers average 2 ODR’s per year.  What is the peer subgroup level of performance?  Example: 7 th grade male students average 2 ODR’s per month. Academic and/or Behavior GAP Analysis

 What is the discrepancy between current performance and expected performance?  NO: Our 7 th graders have more ODR’s than others.  YES: We expect 7 th graders to receive one or fewer office discipline referrals per year during class, and our data shows the average 7 th grade male is receiving 2 per month. GAP Statement

How? Where? What?Who?

RIOT by ICEL DOMAINS R Review I Interview O Observe T Test I Instruction Permanent products, e.g., written pieces, tests, worksheets projects Teachers’ thoughts about their use of effective teaching and evaluation practices, e.g., checklists Effective teaching practices, teacher expectations, antecedent conditions, consequences Classroom environment scales, checklists and questionnaires; Student opinions about instruction and teacher C Curriculum Permanent products, e.g., books, worksheets, materials, curriculum guides, scope & sequence Teacher & relevant personnel regarding philosophy (e.g., generative vs. supplantive), district implementation and expectations Classroom work, alignment of assignments (curriculum materials) with goals and objectives (curriculum). Alignment of teacher talk with curriculum Level of assignment and curriculum material difficulty; Opportunity to learn; A student’s opinions about what is taught E Environment School rules and policies. Ask relevant personnel, students & parents about behavior management plans, class rules, class routines Student, peers, and instruction; Interactions and causal relationships; Distractions and health/safety violations Classroom environment scales, checklists and questionnaires; Student opinions about instruction, peers, and teacher L Learner District records, health records, error analysis, Records for: educational history, onset & duration of problem, teacher perceptions of the problem, pattern of behavior problems, etc. Relevant personnel, parents, peers & students (what do they think they are supposed to do; how do they perceive the problem? Target behaviors – dimensions and nature of the problem Student performance; find the discrepancy between setting demands (instruction, curriculum, environment) and student performance

 Is this a systems or curriculum issue?  If this is a systems issue, this is the point where you would move to the 8-Step Process (more on that later…)  Is this a skill or performance deficit?  Do we need more data?  Continue or Discontinue? After completion of the ICEL/RIOT Matrix, the following questions should be addressed:

 Hypotheses and Prediction Statement  NO: James will stop blurting out if he gets something for better behavior.  YES: A positive reinforcement intervention for James targeting raising his hand before speaking will reduce his blurting during classroom instruction. STEP II: Problem Analysis

 Create a replacement behavior or target skill SMART goal statement  Specific, Measureable, Attainable, Realistic, Timely  NO: By the next marking period the student will improve her reading skills.  YES: By the target date of April 21, 2012 the student will read 43 correct letter sounds and 10 whole words read on DIBELS Next Nonsense Word Fluency probes. STEP III: Plan

 The intervention plan includes:  Goal Statement  The intervention or instructional strategies  Implementation  Fidelity  Progress Monitoring  Next Meeting Date Intervention Plan

 Response to instruction/intervention: Is the plan working?  Review the implementation fidelity  Determine the response  Positive, Inconsistent, Not Responding  Adjust the plan accordingly STEP IV: Do & Review