1 2008 Grade 3-8 English Language Arts and Math Results.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jamesville-DeWitt School Report Card Presented to the Board of Education May 10, 2010.
Advertisements

o Nearly all 50 states have adopted the Common Core State Standards and Essential Standards. o State-led and developed Common Core Standards for K-12.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
NCLB Basics From “What Parents of Students with Disabilities Need to Know & Do” National Center on Educational Outcomes University of Minnesota
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Franklin Public Schools MCAS Presentation November 27, 2012 Joyce Edwards Director of Instructional Services.
NYC ACHIEVEMENT GAINS COMPARED TO OTHER LARGE CITIES SINCE 2003 Changes in NAEP scores Leonie Haimson & Elli Marcus Class Size Matters January.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009.
School Report Cards 2004– The Bottom Line More schools are making Adequate Yearly Progress. Fewer students show serious academic problems (Level.
Presentation by Rebecca H. Cort, Deputy Commissioner Office of Vocational and Educational Services for Individuals with Disabilities Statewide Briefing,
School Report Cards For 2003–2004
1 Performance of English Language Learners on the 2008 Grades 3-8 ELA Tests David Abrams Assistant Commissioner for Standards, Assessment, and Reporting.
1 Academic Performance of English Language Learners on Grades 3-8 ELA Tests (2007 to 2009) David Abrams Assistant Commissioner Office of Standards, Assessment.
Rutland High School Technical Review Visit Looking At Results Planning Next Steps Learning About Resources.
Grade 3-8 Mathematics Test Results. 2 The Bottom Line This is the first year in which students took State tests in Grades 3,4,5,6,7, and 8. With.
Grade 3-8 English. 2 The Bottom Line This is the first year in which students took State tests in Grades 3,4,5,6,7, and 8. With the new individual.
11 Assessing College & Career Readiness July 17, 2012.
1 Graduation and Other Results: Students Who Began 9 th Grade in 2000 and 2001.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
Grade 3-8 English Language Arts and Mathematics Results August 8, 2011.
Instructional Materials for English Language Learners in Urban Public Schools, Council of the Great City Schools.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008.
Our Children Are Our Future: No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind Accountability and AYP A Archived Information.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
SAVING AND CREATING JOBS AND REFORMING EDUCATION U.S. Department of Education June 12, 2009.
1 Highly Qualified Teachers New Results for
1 Executive Limitation 12: Curriculum and Instruction Darlene Westbrook Chief Academic Officer Denise Collier Executive Director for Curriculum Monitoring.
Eagle Ridge Elementary Data Presentation. Eagle Ridge: CRCT Data Review (3-5) Subject Gains/Losses Reading86%87%+1 Language Arts86%82%-4 Math81%69%-12.
Instruction, Assessment & Student Achievement Presented: September 23, 2013 Bessie Weller Elementary School.
Lansing Central School District District Assessment Results Presentation January 24, 2011 Dr. Stephen L. Grimm, Superintendent District Leadership Team.
Fall Testing Update David Abrams Assistant Commissioner for Standards, Assessment, & Reporting Middle Level Liaisons & Support Schools Network November.
1 Student Assessment Report One Goal: Support Student Success West Hempstead UFSD Board of Education Presentation August 20, 2013.
1 Results for Students and Individuals with Disabilities September 2008.
Update on Data Reporting September Repository System Goal To consolidate the Department’s collection of individual student data in the repository.
Rebecca H. Cort, Deputy Commissioner NYSED VESID Presentation to NYS Staff / Curriculum Development Network Targeted Activities to Improve Results for.
BOCES Advisory Council for Curriculum & Instruction NYS Board of Regents Adjustment Options to Common Core Implementation Teresa Prendergast, Ed.D. Garden.
2007 Grade 3-8 English Test Results. 2 Raising Achievement Over past several years, Board of Regents has voted measures to raise standards and require.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2000, 2001, and 2002.
End of Year Report_ DataSet 1 Lodi Unified School District Year-End Benchmark Assessment Results (Student Achievement Monitoring)
Grade 3-8 English Language Arts English Language Arts Grades 3, 4, and 5 Total Public.
English Language Arts (ELA) & 2007 English Language Arts (ELA) Total Public In grades 5-8, the percentage of students meeting the ELA Learning.
Students with Disabilities in the P-16 Framework: Outcomes and Improvement Strategies Rebecca H. Cort VESID October 2007 Statewide Meeting.
B ALTIMORE C ITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Ready to Lead: Raising the Bar for Every Student 2014 Leadership Institute Linda Chen Chief Academic Officer 1.
School Report Card A Focus on Academic Performance West Hempstead UFSD Board of Education Presentation June 17, 2014.
Grade 3-8 Math. 2 Regents: Raising Standards, with Extra Help to Achieve Them The Regents approved new, higher math standards in March A.
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
Cambrian School District September 17, 2015
Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004.
Understanding AzMERIT Results and Score Reporting An Overview.
Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 Supplemental Packet.
Elementary [166] K-8 [36] Middle [37] Secondary [1] High School [52] K-12 [1] Manhattan [53] Brooklyn [40] Bronx [18] Queens [176] Staten Island [6] 293.
1 Grade 3-8 English Language Arts Results Student Growth Tracked Over Time: 2006 – 2009 Grade-by-grade testing began in The tests and data.
Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004 Supplemental Packet.
2009 Grade 3-8 Math Additional Slides 1. Math Percentage of Students Statewide Scoring at Levels 3 and 4, Grades The percentage of students.
1 School Report Cards 2002–2003 An Overview. 2 School Report Card: Overall Trends Elementary school achievement is up in English and math over Middle.
APR 2014 Report: Data, Analysis and Action Plan for Full Accreditation.
Aim: Does the US need to reform the educational system? Do Now: Make a list of the best aspects of the education you receive and make a list of the worst.
1 Leading the Next Generation of Education Reform in New York State New York State Education Department James A. Kadamus September 22, 2005.
Understanding the Common Core Standards Adopted by Nevada in 2010 Our State. Our Students. Our Success.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007.
Student Achievement, Data Trends, and Next Steps David Abrams Assistant Commissioner for Standards, Assessment and Reporting Staff/Curriculum Development.
Professional Learning – October 12, 2015
Mesa Union School District “A Day in the Life of Data”
Assistant Commissioner Office of Standards, Assessment and Reporting
Language Arts Assessment Update
2017 State Assessment Highlights
2015 PARCC Results for R.I: Work to do, focus on teaching and learning
NCLB “No Child Left Behind”.
Russell Elementary School By: Bridget Purdy April 2014
Presentation transcript:

Grade 3-8 English Language Arts and Math Results

2 Meeting Regents Goals Regents set 2 major goals: Raise achievement overall, and Close the achievement gap. Results being announced today show progress in meeting these goals.

3 Why Did Performance Go Up? State invested an additional $3.4B in support for schools over 2 years. Regents adopted reforms in teaching: More teachers than ever before are highly qualified under NCLB. Regents adopted a grade-by-grade curriculum that sets clear expectations. Schools are embracing changes in the curriculum, focusing on professional development.

4 Bottom Line Grades 3-8 Overall Performance is up in Math and ELA. More students are meeting the standards. Math: 81% of students are at Levels 3 & 4. English: 68.5% of students are at Levels 3 & 4. Decline in performance after 5 th grade appears to be changing. Fewer students are at Level 1 in both subjects.

5 The Gap is Narrowing Performance of Black and Hispanic students continues to improve. Students with Disabilities are doing better - a large decrease in the number at Level 1. ELL students’ performance in English continues to improve. There were significant improvements in the Big 5 Cities.

6 Percentage of Students Statewide Scoring at Levels 3 and 4 on Grades 3-8 English and Math

English Language Arts

8 Achievement is up in English statewide, except in Grade 8. Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4 Grade 3 185, ,457195,777 Grade 4190, ,499197,016 Grade 5201, ,133198,022 Grade 6204, ,463200,505 Grade 7210, ,839207,278 Grade 8212, ,971209,180 Grades 3-81,205,1201,228,3621,207,778 Number Tested ELA results

9 Fewer students showed serious academic difficulties in English in all grades, including Grade 8. Percentage of Students Scoring at Level ELA results

10 More Students with Disabilities are meeting the English standards at every grade level, except Grade 8. Percentage of Students with Disabilities Scoring at Levels 3 and 4 Grade 323,811 26,69227,285 Grade 426,474 28,28129,983 Grade 528,987 29,98530,661 Grade 628,883 29,05531,195 Grade 729,237 29,84231,180 Grade 829,119 29,51431,077 Grades , ,369181,381 Number Tested ELA results

11 The achievement gap in English is narrowing for Black and Hispanic students. Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and ELA results

12 Overall, the percentage of Black students at levels 3 and 4 has increased. Percentage of Black Students Scoring at Levels 3 and ELA results

13 Overall, the percentage of Hispanic students at levels 3 and 4 has increased. Percentage of Hispanic Students Scoring at Levels 3 and ELA results

14 The performance of ELL students on the English test improved overall. Percentage of ELL Students Scoring at Levels 3 and Grade 3 3,68417,09317,433 Grade 4 4,37914,20014,683 Grade 5 6,686 11,48011,916 Grade 6 5,585 9,93410,323 Grade 7 6,234 9,299 9,798 Grade 8 5,85210,076 9,046 Grades ,42072,08273,199 Number of ELL Students Tested ELA results

15 A much smaller percentage of ELL students showed serious academic difficulties in English ELA results Percentage of ELL Students Scoring at Level 1

16 Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4 The Big 5 districts showed substantial performance improvements in English ELA results

Math

18 Achievement in math is up statewide. Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4 Number of Students Tested Grade 3201,956200,217197,500 Grade 4202,791199,391198,730 Grade 5209,242203,956199,746 Grade 6211,428206,220202,058 Grade 7217,308213,436209,039 Grade 8219,414215,415210,716 Grades 3-81,262,1391,238,6351,217, math results

19 Fewer students showed serious academic difficulties in math in all grades, including Grade 8. Percentage of Students Scoring at Level math results

20 More Students with Disabilities met the math standards at every grade level. Percentage of Students with Disabilities Scoring at Levels 3 and 4 Grade 327,045 26,78027,325 Grade 429,043 28,32730,072 Grade 530,290 29,96030,662 Grade 630,077 29,04031,119 Grade 729,791 29,65931,037 Grade 829,539 29,30530,899 Grades , ,071181,114 Number Tested math results

21 The achievement gap in math is narrowing for Black and Hispanic students. Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and math results

22 The percentage of Black students meeting the math standards increased significantly at every grade level. Percentage of Black Students Scoring at Levels 3 and math results

23 The percentage of Hispanic students meeting the math standards increased significantly at every grade level. Percentage of Hispanic Students Scoring at Levels 3 and math results

24 Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4 The Big 5 districts showed substantial performance improvements in math math results

25 Ensuring These Results are Accurate New York’s testing system passed rigorous peer review by U.S. Dept. of Education. Technical Advisory Group – a panel of national testing experts - reviews all aspects of our testing program. SED conducts expert independent analysis of vendor work.

26 Why Did Performance Go Up? State invested an additional $3.4B in support for schools over 2 years. New grade by grade curriculum sets clear expectations. Schools are embracing changes in State curriculum. This is the third year of 3-8 testing. The system is responding.

27 What Have the Regents and SED Done to Raise Achievement? Approved new, higher math standards, developed by educators statewide. Eliminated uncertified teachers statewide. Worked closely with schools to produce a well- defined, grade-by-grade math core curriculum based on those standards. Worked with Big 5 math directors, BOCES, other math experts to reach a common understanding of the new curriculum and the best ways to implement it in the schools.

28 What did Schools do to Improve Student Performance? Developed a three-year plan to improve student performance. Made changes to curriculum and instruction especially for students receiving extra help. Extra help changes as students’ needs change. Weekly assessments – using the results to modify and tailor instruction weekly.

29 What did Schools do to Improve Student Performance? Staff development in math for all teachers. Adopted a new math program more closely aligned to State standards. Evidence indicates that strong educational leadership works. Schools improved where principals set the tone and provided needed guidance. Support from BOCES, including SETRC, in curriculum mapping and individualized instruction.

30 What did Schools do to Improve Student Performance? Expect good results for all students and provide the supports the students need to succeed. Increasing emphasis on reading and writing has also improved math scores.

31 Bottom Line Grades 3-8 Overall Performance is up in Math and ELA. More students are meeting the standards. Math: 81% of students are at Levels 3 & 4. English: 68.5% of students are at Levels 3 & 4. Decline in performance after 5 th grade appears to be changing. Fewer students are at Level 1 in both subjects.

32 The Gap is Narrowing Performance of Black and Hispanic students continues to improve. Students with Disabilities are doing better - a large decrease in the number at Level 1. ELL students’ performance in English continues to improve. There were significant improvements in the Big 5 Cities.

33 Additional Details

English Language Arts

35 At all grade levels, the mean scale score was above 650, the score that denotes meeting the ELA standards ELA results 650

English Language Arts Total Public Grades 3, 4, and 5

English Language Arts Total Public Grades 6, 7, and 8

38 Percentage of Students Scoring at Level 3 and Grades 3-8 ELA BY NRC LEVELS 3 & 4

39 The percentage of students with serious academic difficulties decreased for all racial/ethnic groups. Percentage of Students Scoring at Level ELA results

40 In every grade, the percentage of Students with Disabilities showing serious academic difficulties decreased. Percentage of Students with Disabilities Students Scoring at Level ELA results

41 Percentage of Students with Disabilities Scoring at Levels 3 and 4 Results for Student with Disabilities increased among all NRC categories ELA results

Math

43 At all grade levels, the mean scale score was above 650, the score that denotes meeting the math standard math results

Math Total Public Grades 3, 4, and 5

Math Total Public Grades 6, 7, and 8

46 The percent of Black and Hispanic students scoring at level 1 has decreased significantly. Percentage of Students Scoring at Level math results

47 In every grade level, fewer Students with Disabilities showed serious academic difficulties. Percentage of Students with Disabilities Scoring at Level math results

48 Percentage of Student with Disabilities Scoring at Levels 3 and 4 Student with Disabilities results increased among all NRC categories math results

49 Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4 Across all NRC categories, a larger percentage of students are meeting the math standard math results

50 Fewer students showed serious academic difficulties this year in each of the Big 5 districts. Buffalo, Rochester and Syracuse show strong three year declines in students scoring at level one math results Percentage of Big 5 Districts Students Scoring at Level 1