SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES Public Involvement EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
Advertisements

Joint Aarhus Convention/Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety workshop on public awareness, access to information and public participation regarding living modified.
SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE Screening.
INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE. 2 Implemented in 12 countries of Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, through IUCN regional.
SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE Scoping.
The Building Blocks of Public Involvement Presented By Kevin E. Davis Environmental Supervisor ODOT Office Of Environmental Services The Ohio Planning.
Scoping in the EIA process Proposal Identification Screening
Public Consultation/Participation in an EIA Process EIA requires that, as much as possible, both technical / scientific and value issues be dealt with.
SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE Monitoring.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SEA Jamie Byfield SEA Technical Officer HRA & EIA Cara Davidson Policy Manager.
Making Aarhus work in international forums A workshop on promoting the application of the principles of the Aarhus Convention in international forums Geneva,
OPTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ENGAGEMENT OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN GEF PROJECTS AND PROGRAMMES presented by Faizal Parish Regional/Central Focal Point GEF NGO.
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Overview
Jerzy Jendrośka Introduction to the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and the Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Directives INTERACTION BETWEEN.
Implementing the Second Pillar of the Aarhus Convention: Problems Identified in the National Implementation Reports Magda Tóth Nagy, Senior Expert Geneva,
Designing Public Participation in Environmental Impact Assessment Presentation & Exercise.
UNECE and OSCE joint event, Almaty, May 2012
Compliance with the WTO Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement and Steps Toward Developing Good Regulatory Practices Bryan O’Byrne Trade Compliance Center.
The Aarhus & Espoo Conventions Making implementation work for stakeholders.
Partnership as a tool to green regional development programmes Gottfried Lamers Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management.
Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture Key principles and effectiveness of EIA.
UNEP Training Resource ManualTopic 1 Slide 1 Aims and objectives of EIA F modify and improve design F ensure efficient resource use F enhance social aspects.
Module 23 Environmental Safeguards Accreditation Training, January 21 – 25, 2013 Public Consultation.
EIApublic4(Gajaseni, 2007) 1 Public Participation (Public involvement)
Espoo Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context Workshop on “Making Aarhus work in international forums” Geneva, 23 February.
Stakeholder consultations Kyiv May 13, Why stakeholder consultations? To help improve project design and implementation To inform people about changes.
1 Workshop on the Directive 96/61/EC concerning (IPPC) Integrated pollution prevention and control INFRA Public participation & access to environmental.
Jerzy Jendrośka Implementing the Aarhus Convention’s provisions in national legislation and practice: experience of countries of the UNECE region in the.
Joana Mendes Amsterdam Centre for European Law and Governance, University of Amsterdam Jean Monnet Seminar, University of Macau 27 October 2011 Participation.
State of implementation of the decision III/6f regarding Ukraine (MOP 2, June, , 2008, Riga, Latvia)
Training Resource Manual on Integrated Assessment Session UNEP-UNCTAD CBTF Process of an Integrated Assessment Session 2.
EIAReview11.07(Gajaseni, 2007)1 Reviewing. 2 Reviewing is the process of EIA report assessment produced during EIA process is concerned with assessing.
European Public Health Alliance Lobbying, the role of NGOs and communication strategies Tamsin Rose Sofia, 29 October 2005.
OPTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ENGAGEMENT OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN GEF PROJECTS presented by Ermath Harrington GEF Regional Focal Point.
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
Mitigation and Impact management
The partnership principle and the European Code of Conduct on Partnership.
The European SEA Directive Simon Marsden School of International Business, University of South Australia Module 1: Basics of SEA.
Environmental Dialogue between of Ministry of Natural Resources of Russia and the European Commission, DG Environment Workshop on The Espoo Convention.
A project implemented by the HTSPE consortium This project is funded by the European Union SECURITY AND CITIZENSHIP RIGHT AND CITIZENSHIP
1 The Protocol on Water and Health TASK FORCE ON PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN DECISION-MAKING October 2010, Geneva, Switzerland Tomasz Juszczak, UNECE.
Overview of Environmental Impact Assessment. Overview of EIA The Basics Who Sets the standards? Why do an E(SH)IA? Where does it fit in development planning?
Update on work of IUCN Council Private Sector Task Force Diana Shand Regional Councillor and Chair of Private Sector Task Force The International Union.
DEVELOPING THE WORK PLAN
Participation in the Process of Brownfield Regeneration Dagmar Petríková, Matej Jaššo „This project has been funded with support from the European Commission.
UNEP EIA Training Resource ManualTopic 14Slide 1 What is SEA? F systematic, transparent process F instrument for decision-making F addresses environmental.
SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE Reporting in the EIA process.
IAIA Conference on international experience & perspectives in SEA, Prague, September 2005 IAIA Conference on international experience & perspectives.
Pilot Project on implementation of SEA for regional planning in Ukraine Prof. Dr. Michael Schmidt Dmitry Palekhov Brandenburg University of Technology.
Evaluating Engagement Judging the outcome above the noise of squeaky wheels Heather Shaw, Department of Sustainability & Environment Jessica Dart, Clear.
DG ENV Environmental assessment procedures for energy infrastructure projects of common interest (PCIs)
Better regulation in the Commission Jonathon Stoodley Head of Unit C.1 Evaluation, Regulatory Fitness and Performance Secretariat General of the European.
SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE The role of EIA and decision-making.
Early public participation In Decision-Making Process Nana Aghlemashvili Chief Specialist of the Legal Department.
EROL MERTCAN RAPPORTEUR, SMALL GROUP OF LEGAL EXPERTS Revision of Article 9 by the Small Group of Legal Experts following WGD-6.
1 Legal Frameworks for Public and Stakeholder Engagement by Carl Bruch Asia Regional Workshop on Stakeholder Engagement in International Waters Management.
CNVOS Centre for information service, co-operation and development of NGOs Tina Michieli EU Policy.
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
Stakeholder consultations
Public Participation Presented By: Saman Sana Lecturer
Overview of public participation in strategic decision-making in the UNECE area David Aspinwall.
Business environment in the EU Prepared by Dr. Endre Domonkos (PhD)
Module 2 Key Principles of the Peer Review Programme
EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE
Reporting in the EIA process
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA)
The Aarhus Convention and Biosafety
Meeting of PAP/RAC Focal Points, Split, Croatia, 8-9 May 2019
Purpose and objectives of public involvement
Presentation transcript:

SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES Public Involvement EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE

2 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE

3 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE Key objectives of public involvement  Take account of views and concerns of key stakeholders.  Ensure that important impacts are not overlooked.  Reduce conflicts through the early identification of contentious issues.   Improve transparency and increase public confidence in the EIA process.   Obtain local input into the design of alternatives and mitigation measures.

4 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE Levels of public involvement One way communication with those affected by a proposal. A two-way exchange of information designed to canvass the views of stakeholders on a proposal and its impacts. A more interactive process of engaging the public in addressing the issues, establishing areas of agreement and disagreement, and trying to reach common positions. An alternative dispute-resolution mechanism based on joint fact-finding, consensus building and mutual accommodation of different interests. Informing Consulting Participating Negotiating

5 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE Who are the participants?   proponents and project beneficiaries   government agencies with responsibilities or policy interests relating to the proposal   those directly or indirectly affected by the proposal   those interested in the proposal (e.g. NGOs, the private sector, academics, etc.)

6 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE Principles of public involvement  The process should be: fair – (conducted impartially and without bias towards any stakeholder) responsive to stakeholder requirements and input credible – (capable of inspiring confidence and trust inclusive – (covers all stakeholders) open and transparent – (steps and activities are understood) relevant – (focused on the issues that matter)

7 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE To ensure that significant issues are identified; project related information is gathered, alternatives are considered. To avoid biases/inaccuracies in analysis; identify local values/preferences; assist in consideration of mitigation measures; select best alternative. To consider and comment on EIA Report To monitor the implementation of EIA Report’s recommendations and decision’s conditions. To consult people likely to be affected by proposal. Public Involvement in the main EIA Stages

8 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE Developing a public involvement programme  Determine the key issues to be discussed.  Identify the affected and interested public.  Select appropriate techniques (take into account budgets and timelines into account).   Analyse input.   Provide feedback to build confidence and trust.

9 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE Principles for successful application of public involvement techniques  Provide the right information at the right time.  Allow sufficient time for review and response.   Provide appropriate opportunities and means for stakeholder involvement.   Select appropriate venues, and schedule events to suit stakeholders.

10 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE Common excuses given for avoiding public involvement  It’s too early in the process.  It will take too long and cost too much.  It will stir up opposition.   The debate will be one-sided.   We will raise too many expectations.   People won’t understand.

11 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE Public involvement in EIA: key provisions of the Aarhus Convention  Provisions of the Aarhus Convention are now fully reflected in the EC EIA Directive (following amendments introduced by Directive 2003/35/EC)

12 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE Aarhus Convention: defining the public and public concerned  “The public” (Art 2.4) means: one or more natural or legal persons; and, in accordance with national legislation or practice, their associations, organisations or group.  “The public concerned” (Art. 2.5) means: those affected or likely to be affected by environmental decision-making; those having an interest in environmental decision-making; and Those non-governmental organisations promoting environmental protection and meeting any requirements under national law, which shall be deemed to have an interest.

13 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE Aarhus Convention: key requirements for public participation  early notification in a timely and effective manner, plus elements of the notification document (Art. 6.2.)  reasonable timeframes for effective participation (Art. 6.3)  early public participation, when all options are open and effective participation can take place (Art. 6.4)  free access to information as soon as it becomes available (Art. 6.6)  public participation procedures allowing the public to submit comments in writing, or at public hearing or inquiry (Art. 6.8)