Log 2 (expression) H3K4me2 score A SLAMF6 log 2 (expression) Supplementary Fig. 1. H3K4me2 profiles vary significantly between loci of genes expressed.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Supplemental Figure 1. Relationship between peaksize and signal values in the NCOR1 data set. Peaks with a signal value lower than 2 (red line) were discarded.
Advertisements

Supplementary Material Epigenetic histone modifications of human transposable elements: genome defense versus exaptation Ahsan Huda, Leonardo Mariño-Ramírez.
Controls for TTS identification using PET A series of controls were implemented in order to evaluate the potential contamination by internal priming in.
Proliferation cluster (G12) Figure S1 A The proliferation cluster is a stable one. A dendrogram depicting results of cluster analysis of all varying genes.
Supplementary Figure S1 Percentage of peaks from Trf1 +/+ p53 -/- -Cre vs Trf1  /  p53 -/- -Cre comparison that are located in non subtelomeric and subtelomeric.
Supplementary Table 2. a The #CpG indicates the number of CpG in the sequence region. b The plus(+) and minus(-) indicate the presence and absence of CpG.
Supplementary Figure 1 Gene A1 st Gene B1 st Gene C1 st ~ Gene G1 st 2 nd ~ 19 th Gene H1 st 2 nd ~ 19 th Gene I1 st 2 nd ~ 19 th ~ 1 st 2 nd 19 th Gene.
A B IL-4(+) IL-4(-) IL-4(+) IL-4(-) ChIP-Seq (STAT6) Ramos IL-4 (+) P-value Ramos IL-4 (-) P-value BEAS2B IL-4 (+) P-value BEASB IL-4 (-) P-value fold.
Ishida et al. Supplementary Figures 1-3 Page 1 Supplementary Fig. 1. Stepwise determination of genomic aberrations on chr-13 in medulloblastomas from Ptch1.
Figure 1. Annotation and characterization of genomic target of p63 in mouse keratinocytes (MK) based on ChIP-Seq. (A) Scatterplot representing high degree.
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
DNase‐HS sites are main independent determinants of DNA replication timing Simulations based on genome sequence features (GC content, CpG islands), or.
Dynamic epigenetic enhancer signatures reveal key transcription factors associated with monocytic differentiation states by Thu-Hang Pham, Christopher.
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages (May 2010)
Disentangling the Effects of Colocalizing Genomic Annotations to Functionally Prioritize Non-coding Variants within Complex-Trait Loci  Gosia Trynka,
High-Resolution Profiling of Histone Methylations in the Human Genome
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (August 2012)
by Holger Weishaupt, Mikael Sigvardsson, and Joanne L. Attema
Roger B. Deal, Steven Henikoff  Developmental Cell 
Figure 4. (A) Scatterplot of RPC4 T statistic (between TP0 and TP36) for the indicated groups of isolated tRNA genes (RPC4 peak only, n = 35; RPC4 + H3K4me3.
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (May 2018)
Volume 146, Issue 6, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (September 2017)
Ying-Ying Yu, Ph. D. , Cui-Xiang Sun, Ph. D. , Yin-Kun Liu, Ph. D
Volume 44, Issue 1, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (April 2011)
Adrien Le Thomas, Georgi K. Marinov, Alexei A. Aravin  Cell Reports 
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
Mapping Global Histone Acetylation Patterns to Gene Expression
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
High-Resolution Profiling of Histone Methylations in the Human Genome
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 9-22 (January 2013)
A Broadly Conserved Pathway Generates 3′UTR-Directed Primary piRNAs
Michal Levin, Tamar Hashimshony, Florian Wagner, Itai Yanai 
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 128, Issue 6, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 46, Issue 1, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (April 2015)
Molecular Convergence of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages (September 2007)
Evolution of Alu Elements toward Enhancers
Volume 132, Issue 2, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 122, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e4 (May 2017)
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
DNA Looping Facilitates Targeting of a Chromatin Remodeling Enzyme
Gene Density, Transcription, and Insulators Contribute to the Partition of the Drosophila Genome into Physical Domains  Chunhui Hou, Li Li, Zhaohui S.
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 32, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Doxorubicin Enhances Nucleosome Turnover around Promoters
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (March 2017)
Divergent Transcription from Active Promoters
Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (April 2006)
Increased signal intensity and significant enrichment of transcription factor motifs is observed with DSG in breast tissue. Increased signal intensity.
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (September 2009)
STAT4 facilitates a permissive epigenetic landscape (H3K4me3) in activated NK cells. STAT4 facilitates a permissive epigenetic landscape (H3K4me3) in activated.
CD4-CTL precursor cells in the TEMRA subset.
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages e7 (August 2018)
Genetic and Epigenetic Regulation of Human lincRNA Gene Expression
The CREBBP-modulated network is enriched in signaling pathways upregulated in the light zone (LZ). The CREBBP-modulated network is enriched in signaling.
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages (May 2015)
Mutant TERT promoter displays active histone marks and distinct long-range interactions: A, cell lines that were used in the study with their origin and.
Presentation transcript:

log 2 (expression) H3K4me2 score A SLAMF6 log 2 (expression) Supplementary Fig. 1. H3K4me2 profiles vary significantly between loci of genes expressed at the same level in CD4 + T cells. (A) Genes with a medium level of expression in CD4 + T cells show enrichment of H3K4me2 either in regions covering the entire gene body (LCP2, CD28; indicated by curly brackets) or only in regions immediately surrounding TSS (UBR4). (B) The same differences in the patterns of enrichment of H3K4me2 are shown for highly expressed genes. Gene structure and transcription orientation (arrow) are indicated at the bottom of each panel. Expression levels in CD4 + T cells are shown as a bar plot inset. RPS10 IL7R 50 kb B LCP2CD28 UBR IL7R RPS10 SLAMF6 log 2 (expression)

Cluster 1 Control genes log 2 (expression) Control genes Cluster 1 AB Average tag count Distance from TSS (base pair) Supplementary Fig. 2. Average profiles of H3K4me2 in the function of gene expression. (A) Average profiles of H3K4me2 for cluster 1 (dotted red line) in comparison to mean profiles for genes in distinct deciles (dec.) of expression. Genes within cluster 1 show a substantially higher level of H3K4me2 in the gene body. (B) Comparison of the average H3K4me2 profile of cluster 1 with the average H3K4me2 profile of genes within the same range of expression as genes from cluster 1 (Box plot inset), further indicating the independence of the observed pattern of enrichment on the level of expression. Notably, no substantial difference in the level of H3K4me2 immediately before the TSS was observed (arrow).

Supplementary Fig. 3. Box plots showing the expression level of all genes (All g.; grey color) and genes from cluster 1 (Cl 1; red color) in four defined ranges of expression as measured by transcriptome study. Ranges of expression log 2 (expression) A gC1AgC1AgC1AgC1 1234

Average tag count Distance from TSS (kb) Supplementary Fig. 4. Average profiles of all analyzed epigenetic features for genes within distinct H3K4me2 clusters. H3K4me1H3K4me3H4K20me1Pol IIH4K20me3 H3K79me2H3K79me3H3K36me1H3K79me1H3K36me3 H3K27me2H3K27me3H3R2me1H3K27me1H3R2me2 H3K9me2H3K9me3H2BK5me1H3K9me1H2AZ H2BK12acH2BK5acH2BK120acH2AK5acH2BK20ac H3K9acH3K14acH3K18acH3K4acH3K23ac H3K36acH4K5acH4K16acH3K27acH4K8ac

Clusters Cluster 1 Cluster 2 Cluster 3 Cluster 4 Cluster 5 Distance from TSS (kb) Average tag count Tissue specificity index Cluster 1 Cluster 5 Cluster 4 Cluster 3 Cluster 2 H3K9me1 H3K9me1 Cluster 1 H3K4me2 Cluster A BC D Supplementary Fig. 5. Independent clustering of H3K9me1 ChIP-Seq signals. Average profiles of five H3K9me1 clusters (A). (B) Box plots showing per gene calculations of the net number of tissues per gene (i.e. T cell specificity index), for which, a difference of expression (between a given tissue and CD4+ T cells) was statistically significant (Benjamini Hochberg adjusted p-val. < 0.05; moderated T-test). (C) Pie plot showing the distribution of CD4+ T-cell specific genes within the five H3K9me1 clusters. (D) Venn diagram showing the overlap between genes found within H3K4me2 cluster 1 and H3K9me1 cluster 1.

Supplementary Fig. 6. Box plots showing the length of first intron (A), gene length (B), the number of conserved transcription factor binding sites (TFBS) (C) and the number of putative cis-regulatory elements (D) found for analyzed intragenic regions of genes in different H3K4me2 clusters. Genes within cluster 1 have a significantly longer first intron without showing an overall significant difference in the gene length (two sided t.test), a statistically higher number of intragenic (TSS to + 8 kb) and conserved TFBS, and are associated with high numbers of intragenic (TSS to + 8 kb) putative cis-regulatory elements (* p val. < 0.05, ** p val. <0.001, *** p val.< ). A 1 st intron length (bp) ****** D putative cis-regulatory elements/gene *** C conserved TFBS/gene *** Clusters gene length (bp) * Clusters B

Number of DHSS/gene (n=63) (n=17) (n=16) (n=17) (n=19) Supplementary Fig. 7. Box plots showing the number of DHSS found in regions from -2 kb to +8 kb around TSS for highly T cell specific genes in the function of their distribution to distinct H3K4me2 clusters. Gene numbers are shown in parentheses.

Cluster 1 (704 genes) Cluster 2 (1130 genes) Cluster 3 (1417 genes) Cluster 4 (2025 genes) Cluster 5 (3153 genes) Cluster 1 Cluster 2 Cluster 3 Cluster 4 Cluster 5 Average tag count Distance from TSS (kb) log 2 (expression) Clusters AB C -2+8 Distance from TSS (kb) Genes < Supplementary Fig. 8. For description see next page.

WBother WBotherWBotherWBother WBother Clusters log 2 (expression) E Cluster 1 Cluster 5 Cluster 4 Cluster 3 Cluster 2 F Clusters D Tissue specificity index ******** Supplementary Fig. 8. Clustering of H3K4me2 ChIP-Seq profiles for mouse whole brain. (A) K-means clustering of H3K4me2 profiles in whole brain tissue in regions from -2 to +8 kb around the TSS. (B) Average profiles of H3K4me2 for genes within the five identified clusters. (C) Box plots showing the level of expression of genes identified in the different H3K4me2 clusters in brain tissues. (D) Genes within cluster 1 are preferentially expressed in brain. Box plots showing the comparison between levels of gene expression of genes from different H3K4me2 clusters in brain tissues cells and the mean level of expression calculated across all other tissues (** p-val < 0.005, *** p-val < ; Man Whitney test; other: other tissues). (E) Box plots showing per gene calculations of the tissue specificity index, (F) Pie plot showing the distribution of brain specific genes within the five H3K4me2 clusters

Frequency CpG Observed vs. expected Cluster 1Complete set Supplementary Fig. 9. Histograms showing the distribution of CpG observed versus expected ratios for genes within cluster 1 (red colour) and all genes included in the study (Complete set; blue colour).

*** # of DHSS Cluster 1Cluster 2Cluster3Cluster 4 Cluster 5 Supplementary Fig. 10. Box plot showing the number of distal intergenic DHSS associated to genes within distinct H3K4me2 clusters. DHSS found around 50 kb of each gene, but excluding the gene body, were selected (*** p val.< ).