Pat Harrison Jack Cummings Susan Gorin Ron Palomares Shane Jimerson Beth Doll APA Annual Convention Toronto, ON August 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Integrating the NASP Practice Model Into Presentations: Resource Slides Referencing the NASP Practice Model in professional development presentations helps.
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
PORTFOLIO.
Family Interventions: Will What We Know Now Change What We Do in the Future? Susan M. Sheridan University of Nebraska-Lincoln Discussant.
School Psychology – Division 16 of APA. “School psychology is a general practice and health service provider specialty of professional psychology that.
School Social Work: Ensuring Student Success Connecting Schools, Families & Community Removing Barriers to Education Slide show based on documents from.
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS Helping children achieve their best. In school. At home. In life. National Association of School Psychologists.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
Role of RAS in the Agricultural Innovation System Rasheed Sulaiman V
Social, Emotional & Mental Health in Schools Practice Group 2009.
Albany Unified School District Strategic Plan Board Study Session June 21, 2011.
Bridging Research, Practice, and Policy in the Field of Early Childhood Education Wingspread Recommendations and Next Steps.
Web-based Transdisciplinary Training: Problem Solving and Response to Intervention Presented to Nebraska RtI Consortium February 23, 2007 Kathy L. Bradley-Klug,
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
By: Andrew Ball. What do school psychologists do? School psychologists work to find the best solution for each child and situation. They use many different.
“ Every Student Deserves to Hold the World in their Hands” DEVELOPING HIGH SCHOOL COUNSELING PROGRAMS… IMPROVING STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT… SCHOOL COUNSELOR’S.
Revised Illinois Professional Teaching Standards Rori R. Carson Western Illinois University.
Improving Secondary Education and Transition Using Research-Based Standards and Indicators An initiative of the National Alliance on Secondary Education.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
STUDENT ASSISTANCE AND THE 7 SCHOOL TURNAROUND PRINCIPLES Dale Gasparovic, MSed., Administrator Student Assistance Center at Prevention First
Administrator Checklist Research and Training Center on Service Coordination.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
EMU Strategic Planning Strategic Planning Material Mission/Vision/Values Goals and Objectives January 10, 2014.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Conceptual Framework for the College of Education Created by: Dr. Joe P. Brasher.
Triarchic Conceptualization of Advocacy: The Confluence of Science, Practice, and Policy Shane R. Jimerson, PhD University of California, Santa Barbara.
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
KENTUCKY YOUTH FIRST Grant Period August July
Skills Online: Building Practitioner Competence in an Inter-professional, Virtual Classroom Canadian Public Health Association 2008 Annual Conference.
Bethany Geldmaker RN, PNP, PhD
Recovery to Practice: Recovery to Practice: Achieving the Vision ALTERNATIVES ALTERNATIVES Honoring our History, Building our Future October 11, 2012.
High School Inc. Academies at Valley High School April 26, 2011 Jane A. Russo, Superintendent Dawn Miller, Assistant Superintendent, Secondary Division.
Toolkit for Mainstreaming HIV and AIDS in the Education Sector Guidelines for Development Cooperation Agencies.
Organizational Conditions for Effective School Mental Health
The Future of School Psychology: Online Learning Modules MODULE VI SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY TODAY AND TOMORROW: NEXT STEPS?
National Consortium On Deaf-Blindness Families Technical Assistance Information Services and Dissemination Personnel Training State Projects.
Katie A. Learning Collaborative For Audio, please call: Participant code: Please mute your phone Building Child Welfare and Mental.
Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.
MERRELL, K.W., ERVIN, R. A., & PEACOCK, G. G. (2006). SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY FOR THE 21ST CENTURY: FOUNDATIONS AND PRACTICES. Chapters 10 and 11.
Your Presenters Melissa Connelly, Director, Regional Training Academy Coordination Project, CalSWEC Sylvia Deporto, Deputy Director, Family & Children’s.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
Standard 1: Teachers demonstrate leadership s. Element a: Teachers lead in their classrooms. What does Globally Competitive mean in your classroom? How.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
The Comprehensive Literacy Plan Pennsylvania KeystonestoOpportunity Tom Corbett Governor Ron Tomalis Secretary.
A WORK IN PROGRESS Kansas Department of Health and Environment Kansas State Department of Education Kansas Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services.
CEC’s NEW “RED BOOK”: What Every Special Educator Must Know
Positive School Climate Dr. Shanda C. Crowder Clinical Assistant Professor and Director The Positive Schools Center University of Maryland, School of Social.
Helping children achieve their best. In school. At home. In life.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Laura Spenceley, Ph.D. State University of New York at Oswego Presented at the 7 th International Conference on Excellence in School Education Improving.
Part I Educational Technology1 INTRODUCING THE STANDARDS TOOLKIT (Educational Technology) Performance Indicator Progression Scope and Sequence Instructional.
Outcome On completion of this unit the student should be able to describe and evaluate programs implemented by international and Australian government.
Florida Charter School Conference Orlando, Florida November, 2009 Clark Dorman Project Leader Florida Statewide Problem-Solving/RtI Project University.
Common Core Parenting: Best Practice Strategies to Support Student Success Core Components: Successful Models Patty Bunker National Director Parenting.
The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.
Maryland’s School Mental Health Initiatives and Progress.
Unit 6. Effective Communication and Collaboration This unit focuses on efforts to reduce juvenile delinquency through a collaborative process of community-based,
Excellence for Each Student Utah State Board of Education Strategic Plan.
SEA Strategies for Promoting Equity: SEA/IHE Collaboration on Teacher Preparation Lynn Holdheide, Center on Great Teachers and Leaders & Collaboration.
Working With Parents as Partners To Improve Student Achievement Taylor County Schools August 2013.
1 Copyright © 2012 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Copyright © 2008 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 40 The Nurse Leader in.
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
What is the role of a school psychologist?
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
Blueprint Outlines practical, consumer-focused, state and local strategies for improving eating and physical activity that will lead to healthier lives.
Model of Comprehensive and Integrated School Psychological Services (NASP, 2010) The NASP Practice Model 4340 East West Highway, Suite 402 Bethesda, Maryland.
Presentation transcript:

Pat Harrison Jack Cummings Susan Gorin Ron Palomares Shane Jimerson Beth Doll APA Annual Convention Toronto, ON August 2003

School Psychology Futures Conference Brief Background Next Steps FYI and Involvement—You Are Cordially Invited

Basic Principles to Guide Our Future Currently, and for the foreseeable future, we are faced with a shortage of school psychologists that threatens our capacity to meet the needs of children in schools. While the profession must increase efforts to recruit and retain professionals in our field, such strategies alone will be insufficient and inadequate to increase our capacity to meet the imminent needs of children, families, and schools.

Principles (cont) As a result, changes in school psychology practices and service delivery will be required to use the resources we have to maximize the benefits to the children and schools that we serve. Prevention and early intervention will be necessary to achieve positive outcomes for children, families, and schools.

Principles (cont.) Evidence-based practices will be necessary to achieve positive outcomes for children, families, and schools. In order to be effective, school psychological services must demonstrate respect for and understanding of diversity factors for children, families and schools, including factors related to cultural, individual, and role differences.

Principles (cont.) Change will be facilitated by using electronic tools for communication. High quality resources may be collaboratively developed and disseminated.

Problem-Solving Model At the core of Futures planning during 2002 conference as well as in follow-up activities

Problem-Solving Model (cont.) Define critical issues and desired outcomes Identify threats/opportunities Brainstorm solutions/strategies

Problem-Solving Model (cont.) Develop action plans Implement action plans Evaluate outcomes

Fifteen Priority Goals Form a National Agenda for School Psychology Ron Palomares

Priority Goal: Improved academic competence and school success for all children Advocacy and Public Policy: Advocate for universal early prevention and intervention programs that emphasize language, cognitive, and social-emotional development and are placed in the context of ethnicity, gender, SES, gender, and language.

Improved academic competence (cont.) Practice: Ensure that assessment practices of school psychologists are empirically linked to strategies to improve academic performance, and that those assessment practices account for the influence of ethnicity, SES, gender, and language on learning outcomes. In-service Training: Develop and implement in- service training for school psychologists related to universal early prevention and intervention programs.

Priority Goal: Improved social-emotional functioning for all children Advocacy and Public Policy: Promote the availability of a comprehensive range of services, from supportive and inclusive placements through interim alternative placements for students with severe emotional and behavioral disorders

Improved social-emotional functioning (cont.) Collaboration and Communication: Educate all stakeholders about the importance of social-emotional competence for children. Practice: Ensure that school psychologists develop a systematic plan in all schools to reduce social-emotional barriers to learning.

Priority Goal: Enhanced family school partnerships and parental involvement in schools Research and Knowledge Base: Identify evidence-based models of effective family- school partnerships.

Family school partnerships (cont.) Practice: Ensure that school psychologists engage in activities to change the culture of schooling to ensure that families are integral partners in the educational process of children. Pre-service Training: Change pre-service education and training of school psychologist candidates to infuse a focus on families as integral partners in the educational process.

Priority Goal : More effective education and instruction for all learners Priority Goal : More effective education and instruction for all learners Research and Knowledge Base: Identify key components of effective instruction of all learners, including evidence-based approaches to prevention and early intervention for learning problems. In-service Training: Provide in-service training for school psychologists in the use of a data- based problem solving model to implement evidence-based instruction and interventions.

More effective education (cont.) Pre-service/Inservice Training: Implement a national pre-service and in-service training initiative for school psychologists regarding effective instruction.

Priority Goal: Increased child and family services in schools that promote health and mental health and are integrated with community services Practice: Define and promote population-based service delivery in schools and school psychology. In-service Training: Prepare current practitioners to implement a public health model of school psychology. Pre-service Training: Prepare future practitioners to implement a public health model of school psychology.

Action Plans from the Conference Are Being Refined and Implemented Nationally.

Examples of action plans are: Develop resources (e.g., conferences, books, etc) that provide inservice and preservice training for school psychologists to increase skills in problem-solving assessment and intervention. Identify key components of effective interventions for improving social-emotional- behavioral competence of all students, and promote the use of evidence-based approaches among school psychologists and interdisciplinary professionals to prevent social- emotional-behavioral difficulties and to intervene effectively.

Identify outcome-based literature that describes processes and procedures related to family-school partnership models. Identify models of “best practice” related to family- school partnerships for use in training programs and practice settings. Create a comprehensive model of problem-solving- based assessment and intervention practices that takes into account the diverse array of ecological variables that influence students’ likelihood of school success Articulate a public health model in school psychology, including basic tenets and a framework Identify school psychologists and school psychology practice sites that are applying public health principles; analyze and identify common themes, barriers, facilitator

Technology as a tool Jack Cummings Supporting attainment of priority goals COMMUNICATION

COMMUNICATION –Internal School Psychologist – School Psychologist –External ParentsStudentsTeachersAdministrators

Internal Communication - Information

Internal Communication - Dynamic

E-Forum – electronic discussion forum

Internal Communication - Dynamic Live Webcasts – with interaction via Online classes – USF Collaborative classes - IU

External Communication How do we enhance parent communication and family school partnerships? –School District Homepage

Miami-Dade Psych Services

Traditional Barriers  Hardware  Software  Technical Skills  Fear of Unknown

WHAT NEXT? Susan Gorin Continued collaborative activities among associations to implement a national agenda and national action plans

Future Publications School Psychology Review and School Psychology Quarterly, joint issue links to archived CQ articles that relate to Priority Goals Special Issue on Psychologist Shortage– Psychology in the Schools Special Issue on Futures and Consultation – Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation

Integration of the Future’s Priority Goals with Other Associations: Each Can Contribute to the Future’s Agenda NASP President, Dan Miller, will include a Futures Conference activity at each of the 5 regional meetings NASP holds throughout the country in the fall. The priority goals relate well to the organization of NASP’s new strategic plan and the NASP Blueprint.

Peg Dawson led a session with state association presidents at NASP. John DeRoschers will coordinate state planning. –New Hampshire –Maryland – etc. Division 16 – earlier this week devoted an entire session to discussion of the Priority Goals

School Psychology Leadership Roundtable Organizations will continue to work together to monitor progress on action plans generated as a result of the Futures Conference monitor progress on action plans generated as a result of the Futures Conference communication about association activities communication about association activities possible collaboration on some projects. possible collaboration on some projects.

 It appears that each of the elements of the Action Plans are dependent upon quality research and scholarship.  The future scholarship of participants of the 2003 School Psychology Research Collaboration Conference will be related to each of the 5 priority goals that emerged from the Futures Conference.  The SPRCC is an important mechanism to facilitate collaborative scholarship to complete the necessary research and establish the knowledge base for advocacy, public policy and practice. Research, Scholarship, and the Future of School Psychology Shane Jimerson University of California – Santa Barbara

School Psychology Research Collaboration Conference April 7, Toronto, Canada Sponsored by: Society for the Study of School Psychology (SSSP) National Association of School Psychologists (NASP) American Psychological Association (APA) - Division 16 School Psychology American Psychological Association (APA) - Education Directorate Elsevier Science, Inc. - ScienceDirect

SPRCC Importance & Background  Promoting professional relationships and collaborative research in the field of school psychology is valuable for the future of the profession  The SPRCC is envisioned as a mechanism to facilitate the efforts of early career scholars and general scholarship in the field of school psychology

Goals of the 2003 SPRCC To enhance the research efforts and skills of early career researchers To encourage collaboration among scholars To facilitate multi-site research To address complex and important problems relevant to education and the practice of school psychology

SPRCC Participants Early Career Scholars Catalyst Scholars School District Colleagues Graduate Student Affiliates

 Aggression/ Violence/ Crisis  Assessment/ Cognitive/ Diversity  Reading Assessment/ Intervention / Literacy  Social/ Emotional/ Behavioral  School Systems/ Teachers/ Climate 2003 SPRCC Breakout Groups

2005 School Psychology Research Collaboration Conference Co-Chaired by Shane Jimerson and Amanda VanDerHeyden Sponsored by: Society for the Study of School Psychology (SSSP) National Association of School Psychologists (NASP) American Psychological Association (APA) - Division 16 School Psychology American Psychological Association (APA) - Education Directorate Elsevier Science, Inc. - ScienceDirect

Beth Doll – University of Nebraska A personal response to the future  Why is the Future’s Conference like an elephant?  What happened to the shortage?  Does technology tap at our door or seep around it?  Is our’s a Rocketeer vision of our future?

WHAT NEXT? Pat Harrison What can national associations do next? What can state associations and local groups do next? What can school psychology training programs do next? What can individual school psychologists do next?