Division of Technology, Industry, and Economics Economics and Trade Branch SESSION 7 - How to do Integrated Assessment Stage D: Issuing policy recommendations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WCDR Thematic Panel Governance: Institutional and Policy Frameworks for Risk Reduction Annotated Outline UNDP – UNV – ProVention Consortium – UN-Habitat.
Advertisements

Armand Racine Consultant Chemicals Branch
EuropeAid Pre-Assessment and Assessment for Parliamentary Development Promoting domestic accountability: engaging with parliaments EC support to governance.
Risk The chance of something happening that will have an impact on objectives. A risk is often specified in terms of an event or circumstance and the consequences.
Module 4 Planning SP. What’s in Module 4  Opportunities for SP  Different SP models  Communication plan  Monitoring and evaluating  Working session.
Action Plan Skills Building: Module 2 Defining Action Plan Purpose and Scope January 2013.
Department of Tourism Department of Tourism NTSS DRAFT REVIEW FRAMEWORK NTSF MEETING 17 SEPTEMBER 2014.
Workshops for implementing the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity through the National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans Module 2 The Biodiversity.
Indicators to measure the effectiveness of the implementation of the Strategy State of the art Karin Sollart Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.
Knowledge Translation Curriculum Module 3: Priority Setting Lesson 2 - Interpretive Priority Setting Processes.
Training Resource Manual on Integrated Assessment Session UNEP-UNCTAD CBTF Introduction to Integrated Assessment Session 1.
Capacity Enhancement for Air Quality Management John E. Hay Senior Advisor UNEP ROAP & IETC.
COMP8130 and COMP4130 Adrian Marshall Verification and Validation Risk Management Adrian Marshall.
BRAZIL – THE SOYBEAN SECTOR IN THE BR-163 ROAD INFLUENCE AREA Integrated Assessment and Planning for Sustainable Development Integrated Assessment and.
By Saurabh Sardesai October 2014.
Quality evaluation and improvement for Internal Audit
Training Resource Manual on Integrated Assessment Session UNEP-UNCTAD CBTF Policy Responses and Follow-up Session 4.
Trade and Environment Capacity-Building WTO Symposium on Trade and Sustainable Development October 2005 Division of Technology, Industry, and Economics.
Session 3 - Plenary on implementing Principle 1 on an Explicit Policy on Regulatory Quality, Principle 3 on Regulatory Oversight, and Principle 6 on Reviewing.
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Overview
«Проект по экономической реабилитации и построению мер доверия» Integrating interests and institutions in water resource management 25 th June, 2013 Eng.
Engaging with stakeholders: Adding value to the energy system 32nd Annual Conference of the International Association for Impact Assessment Porto Pedro.
Professional Certificate – Managing Public Accounts Committees Ian “Ren” Rennie.
Developing a Socio-Economic Dataframe AIM: Construct, test and refine a framework for the collection and management of socio- economic fisheries data Make.
Tracking of GEF Portfolio: Monitoring and Evaluation of Results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Aaron Zazueta March 2010 Hanoi, Vietnam.
Alaska Staff Development Network – Follow-Up Webinar Emerging Trends and issues in Teacher Evaluation: Implications for Alaska April 17, :45 – 5:15.
Country Presentation- GEF Operational Focal Point, Sri Lanka GEF Sub-Regional Workshop 2-3 December 2007, Bali, Indonesia Anura Jayatilake Director, Environmental.
Second International Review Meeting Integrated Assessment of Trade-Related Policies and Biological Diversity in the Agricultural Sector Geneva, 1-3 July.
UNEP Training Resource Manual Topic 10 Slide 1. UNEP Training Resource Manual Topic 10 Slide 2 EIA is a process to: F gather information necessary for.
Integrated Assessment of Trade-Related Policies and Biological Diversity in the Agriculture Sector Introdution to Integrated Assessment Session 6 Geneva,
Division of Technology, Industry, and Economics Economics and Trade Branch SESSION 9 – Project Implementation and Organisational Aspects Capacity Building.
UNDP Handbook for conducting technology needs assessments and Preliminary analysis of countries’ TNAs UNFCCC Seminar on the development and transfer on.
UNEP Training Resource ManualTopic 2 Slide 1 The EIA process The EIA process comprises:  screening - to decide if and at what level EIA should be applied.
STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES.
Recommendation 2001/331/EC: Review and relation to sectoral inspection requirements Miroslav Angelov European Commission DG Environment, Unit A 1 Enforcement,
PP 4.1: IWRM Planning Framework. 2 Module Objective and Scope Participants acquire knowledge of the Principles of Good Basin Planning and can apply the.
Training Resource Manual on Integrated Assessment Session UNEP-UNCTAD CBTF Process of an Integrated Assessment Session 2.
THE REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER for Central and Eastern Europe Integrated planning and Assessment of National Development Plan of the Czech Republic.
SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES Public Involvement EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE.
The new EC impact assessment: what for? EUROPEAN TRADE UNION CONFEDERATION Sophie Dupressoir.
Division of Technology, Industry, and Economics Economics and Trade Branch SESSION 8 INTRODUCTION TO STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION Capacity Building Workshop.
Environment and Disaster Planning Hari Srinivas, GDRC Rajib Shaw, Kyoto University Contents of the presentation: -What is the problem? -Precautionary Principles.
A practical methodology for technology needs assessment: Introduction and overview of preliminary issues Imperial College Centre for Energy Policy and.
Division of Technology, Industry, and Economics Economics and Trade Branch Objectives and Programme of Workshop Integrated Assessment of Trade-Related.
Division of Technology, Industry, and Economics Economics and Trade Branch Incorporating Biodiversity into Trade-Related Integrated Assessments Presentation.
Economics in support of biodiversity conservation policy The EC experience Expert Workshop on Biodiversity and Economics, EEA 5 October 2006 Alexandra.
1 Governance and creating an enabling environment for a Green Economy 6-7 Oct 2011 The OECS Model Green Growth Investment Forum.
07/02/2011Rural Development in the CAP post RURAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE CAP POST 2013 Attila JAMBOR Assistant Professor Corvinus University of Budapest.
Evaluating Engagement Judging the outcome above the noise of squeaky wheels Heather Shaw, Department of Sustainability & Environment Jessica Dart, Clear.
Division of Technology, Industry, and Economics Economics and Trade Branch Integrated Assessment of Trade- Related Policies and Biological Diversity in.
Proposed/agreed actions/commitments to partner/contribute towards the proposed EvalYear 2015 SOUTH-SOUTH SOLUTIONS SUPPLY - DEMAND MATCHING.
URBACT IMPLEMENTATION NETWORKS. URBACT in a nutshell  European Territorial Cooperation programme (ETC) co- financed by ERDF  All 28 Member States as.
(I)WRM indicators A GWP PERSPECTIVE Water Country Briefs Project Diagnostic Workshop, Geneva, December 2010 Mike Muller : GWP-TEC.
5. Presentación general de la iniciativa REDD+ SES 5. Presentation of the REDD+ SES Initiative.
Determinations / verifications under JI – Experience to date UNFCCC Technical Workshop on Joint Implementation Bonn, February 13 th, 2007 For the benefit.
WORKSHOP ON ACCREDITATION OF BODIES CERTIFYING MEDICAL DEVICES INT MARKET TOPIC 6 CH 5 ISO MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY Philippe Bauwin Medical.
Твининг пројекат Европске Уније Успостављање механизма за спровођење ММR *** Twinning project Establishment of a mechanism for implementation of MMR Пројекат.
Convention of the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes Developing a guidance on water and climate adaptation for the.
Development Account: 6th Tranche Strengthening the capacity of National Statistical Offices (NSOs) in the Caribbean Small Island Developing States to fulfill.
Module 2 National IEA Process Design and Organization Stakeholder’s consultative workshop/ Training on Integrated assessments methodology ECONOMIC VALUATION.
Dr. Vladimir Mamaev UNDP Regional Technical Advisor Integrated Natural Resource Management in the Baikal Basin Transboundary Ecosystem Russian Federation.
Access to Information, Participation in Decision-Making and Justice in the OECS: some thoughts Peter A. Murray OECS Secretariat.
Overview of Initiative
Gender mainstreaming in environmental
How to do an Integrated Assessment
An Integrated Governance Approach towards Inclusive Development
Commission proposal for a new LIFE Regulation CGBN meeting
European Commission, DG Environment, Marine Unit
Recommendations from HIPSSA Forum on UAS
© Fresh Thoughts Consulting
Presentation transcript:

Division of Technology, Industry, and Economics Economics and Trade Branch SESSION 7 - How to do Integrated Assessment Stage D: Issuing policy recommendations Stage E: Implementing policy recommendations Stage F: Monitoring and evaluation Capacity Building Workshop on Integrated Assessment of Trade- related Policies and Biological Diversity in the Agricultural Sector October 2006,Geneva, Switzerland

2 Process of an integrated assessment 2 STAGE D: Develop policy responses STAGE C: Assess the impacts STAGE B: Determine the focus STAGE A: Understand the policy context We are here!!

Structure of the presentation Developing policy responses entails... Stage D – Issuing policy recommendations Stage E – Implementing policy recommendations Stage F – Monitoring and evaluation => It is important to incorporate biodiversity perspective in all of these actions

Stage D – Issuing Policy Recommendations Objective: to interpret outcomes of IA and to prioritise options, choices and decisions What do we need for this? Stakeholder consultation and participation

Stage D – Issuing Policy Recommendations Action D1: Finalise conclusions of IA and balance outcomes based on criteria and indicators  Need to draw conclusions based on results of analysis  Who are the ‘winners’ and ‘losers’? Biodiversity perspective Involves quantitative and qualitative assessment/judgement Stakeholder consultation is key when analysing trade-offs

Stage D – Issuing Policy Recommendations Action D2: Develop policy recommendations that Promote capacity-building Are trade-related Are non trade-related Biodiversity perspective Use best available information on ecosystems and biodiversity resources Ensure sustainability of policy responses

Stage D – Issuing Policy Recommendations Action D3: Communicate set of final policy recommendations => Policies should be practical and enforceable Biodiversity perspective Address uncertainty Make clear trade-off analyses and choices Address enabling conditions Cross-sectoral coordination

Stage E – Implementing Policy Recommendations Objective: to translate policy recommendations into action What do we need for this? A number of policy decisions – institutional/legal financial, organisational - to ensure an effective implementation framework

Stage E – Implementing Policy Recommendations Action E1: Identify actions to be taken (institutional, legal, organisational, financial) => Decisions must be made regarding budget, planning, institutional and organisational settings, etc. Biodiversity perspective Budgetary and regulatory issues Cross-departmental and inter-ministerial coordination

Stage E – Implementing Policy Recommendations Action E2: Establish mechanism for monitoring and ex-post evaluation Monitoring and evaluation should be part of final policy proposal Include feedback mechanism State responsibilities, timeframe, resources and reporting Biodiversity perspective Involve stakeholders and make findings public Establish schedule and budget for implementing and managing biodiversity monitoring and follow-up Specify conditions that would trigger a need for further assessment or policy responses to ensure biodiversity is maintained

Stage F – Monitoring and Evaluation Objective: to monitor effects and effectiveness of policy responses Why is it important? It is central to the long-term effectiveness of IA; however, it is often neglected

Stage F – Monitoring and Evaluation Action F1: Conduct monitoring Consider: Issues/areas where risks and uncertainty are high Likely significant effect identified during the assessment Mitigation measures Biodiversity perspective Check if policies have been implemented Assess if any unexpected significant impacts have occurred Recommend if policy implementation needs to be strengthened or amended

Stage F – Monitoring and Evaluation Action F2: Revise policy recommendations and review effectiveness of mitigation measures It may be necessary to: Modify complementary social and environmental policies implemented following the assessment Introduce a set of new policies Biodiversity perspective Suggest a mechanism for results of monitoring to provide baseline information for future policy decisions Implement contingencies in the event of market failures with implications for biodiversity

THANK YOU! UNEP Economics and Trade Branch