Doc.: IEEE 802.11-05/1138r1 Submission November 2005 Cheng Hong, PanasonicSlide 1 Authorization Information in interworking Notice: This document has been.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0032r1 Submission January 2007 Donghee Shim et al, LG Electronics, Inc.Slide 1 Comments resolutions: Emergency call support in 11u.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0256r0 Submission February 2007 A. Centonza, D. StephensonSlide 1 Limitations on the Use of EBR Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0866r1 Submission September 2005 Michael Montemurro, Chantry NetworksSlide 1 Mobility Domain Definition and Description Notice: This.
Doc.: IEEE /90r0 Submission Nov., 2012 NICTSlide b NICT Proposal IEEE P Wireless RANs Date: Authors: Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /0930r0 Submission July 2006 Nancy Cam-Winget, Cisco Slide 1 Editor Updates since Jacksonville Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0094r0 Submission November 2009 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 Comments on PAR Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /1138r0 Submission November 2005 Cheng Hong, PanasonicSlide 1 Authorization Information in interworking Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /0644r2 Submission May 2006 Päivi Ruuska, NokiaSlide 1 Measurement Pilot Transmission Information as optional information in Probe.
Doc.: IEEE /0025r1 Submission January 2007 Peng Mo, Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.Slide 1 MAPID for User Plane Support Notice: This document has.
Doc.: IEEE /2237r0 Submission July 2007 Emily Qi, Intel CorporationSlide 1 TGv Redline D1.0 Insert and Deletion Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /1212r0 Submission TGT and MEF Liaison Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for.
Doc.: IEEE /86r2 Submission March, 2010 Gabor BajkoSlide 1 Location Proxy Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is.
Doc.: IEEE /0667r0 Submission July 2005 Mike Moreton, STMicroelectronicsSlide 1 Multiple Networks Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Doc.: IEEE /0028r0 Submission January 2005 Eleanor Hepworth, Siemens Roke ManorSlide 1 Definitions and Terminology Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /0197r0 Submission March 2005 Nancy Cam-Winget et alSlide 1 TAP & JIT Merge Process Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Doc.: IEEE /1006r0 Submission September 2005 Andrew McDonald, Siemens Roke ManorSlide 1 Initial Network Selection Concept Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /0652r1 Submission May 2007 Emily Qi, Intel CorporationSlide 1 TGv Redline D0.12 Insert and Deletion Notice: This document has been.
LB84 General AdHoc Group Sept. Closing TGn Motions
[ Interim Meetings 2006] Date: Authors: July 2005
TGu/TGv Joint Session Date: Authors: July 2005 July 2005
London TGu Motions Authors: January 2007 Date: Month Year
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
Waveform Generator Source Code
TGu Closing Report Date: Authors: November 2005
Attendance and Documentation for the March 2007 Plenary
3GPP Extended Date: Authors: July 2005 July 2005
3GPP liaison report May 2006 May 2006 Date: Authors:
Motion to accept Draft p 2.0
Protected SSIDs Date: Authors: March 2005 March 2005
3GPP liaison report July 2006
[place presentation subject title text here]
On Coexistence Mechanisms
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
On Coexistence Mechanisms
Reflector Tutorial Date: Authors: July 2006 Month Year
TGv Redline D0.07 Insert and Deletion
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: January 2005 January 2005
TGv Redline D0.06 Insert and Deletion
Proposal for User Plane Support for QoS Mapping
TGu Closing Report Date: Authors: September 2005
802.11u Proposal Date: Authors: September, 2005 July 2005
Authentication Cluster
TGu-changes-from-d0-01-to-d0-02
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
QoS in WLAN Interworking
Authentication Cluster
TGy draft 2.0 with changebars from draft 1.0
TGv Redline D0.10 Insert and Deletion
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
Redline of draft P802.11w D2.2 Date: Authors:
Document Motions Date: Authors: November 2005 November 2005
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
3GPP2 Liaison Report Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
TGu Motions Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
Beamforming and Link Adaptation Motions
Motion to go to Letter Ballot
TGu-changes-from-d0-04-to-d0-05
Location Capability Negotiation
Transition Nowhere Date: Authors: Sept 2005 Sept 2005
TGu-changes-from-d0-03-to-d0-04
TGu Motions Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
TGu Requirements Check
Multiple Networks Date: Authors: July 2005 July 2005
MAC Anonymity Requirements Motion
New User Plane Requirement
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
TGr Proposed Draft Revision Notice
Proposal for User Plane Support for QoS Mapping
TGu Motions Date: Authors: March 2006 March 2006
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /1138r1 Submission November 2005 Cheng Hong, PanasonicSlide 1 Authorization Information in interworking Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at. Date: Authors:

doc.: IEEE /1138r1 Submission November 2005 Cheng Hong, PanasonicSlide 2 Abstract This presentation is a contribution to the u pre- proposal presentation. The intension is to trigger discussion regarding some extra requirements.

doc.: IEEE /1138r1 Submission November 2005 Cheng Hong, PanasonicSlide 3 The AN architecture DSM AP Gateway DS AS Wn Wa STA Ww

doc.: IEEE /1138r1 Submission November 2005 Cheng Hong, PanasonicSlide 4 The elements involved in access control Issues, questions, problems: –R3S1 & R3S2 covers A.I.-1, i.e. concerning over the air part However, would A.I-2 would also impact the service? –e.g. if Gateway cannot support the A.I.-2 requested, how should this be made known to AP/AS, and how should this be reflected in access control? –A.I. may not be supported by the AP due to its dynamic resources allocation Should this be made known to the STA? –e.g. if A.I. of a STA includes VoIP, but AP ACU decided not to admit any more VoIP, how should this made known to STA. –Should the whole authentication fail? (but STA can still use other services specified in the AI) Should wait for the STA to request through 11e and fail? –Is it possible for STA to know what QoS is supported before (11i) authentication? An AP would support multiple SSPNs (R3N3), and therefore, resources availability may depends on SSPN AP does not know about the SSPN an STA want to use at association time (esp. when SSPNs are not differentiated by the SSID) Upper Layer 11 MAC STA 11 MAC AP DSM Integration/Portal Gateway AS Application Req. (QoS Mapping R3U3) 11e TOE SSPN AAA (A.I.) ? (A.I.-1) ?? (A.I.-2)

doc.: IEEE /1138r1 Submission November 2005 Cheng Hong, PanasonicSlide 5 Potential requirements It should allow the AI enforcement result made known to the STA –Is it related to R3S2 It should allow the STA to query the AP based on the SSPN it is going to access –The SSPN is not necessary able to be indicated with SSID

doc.: IEEE /1138r1 Submission November 2005 Cheng Hong, PanasonicSlide 6 Motions Accept the following text as a TGu requirement for proposals, and include it in the requirements document, with requirement status set to “Optional”. –Define functionality by which the use of information defined in R3S1 at AP can be made known to the STA. –Informative Notes: Information defined in R3S1, originated from the SSPN, may need to be coupled with the AP local policy or status to decide the actual service to be offered to the STA. The result of this adaptation should be made known to STA, so that it would not resort to try and fail to find out what are the actual authorisation information in use by the AP. Proposed: Hong Cheng Seconded: Eleanor Hepworth Result (for/against/abstain):3,2,9

doc.: IEEE /1138r1 Submission November 2005 Cheng Hong, PanasonicSlide 7 motions Accept the following text as a TGu requirement for proposals, and include it in the requirements document, with requirement status set to “Optional”. –Define the functionality to allow a STA to retrieve information from an AP before authentication in a network where R3N2 or R3N3 is supported.. –Informative Notes: When a AP is shared by multiple SSPNs, or a STA has multiple credentials, the query results may depend on the SSPN or credential it associated with. This requirement addresses the case when STA is not yet authenticated, and thus the SSPN and the credential it intended to use is not known to the AP in advance. Proposed: Seconded: Result (for/against/abstain):

doc.: IEEE /1138r1 Submission November 2005 Cheng Hong, PanasonicSlide 8 References u-suggested-tgu-requirements