Comparisons of independent schools across time: QCEA 2005, 2006, and 2007 Key assumptions Summary of Results Arabic: All students, and independent school.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Algebra 1 Andrea Austin. Course Goals Improve/extend mathematical abilities and understanding Prepare students for math classes beyond Algebra 1 Build.
Advertisements

Presented to: Oklahoma State Board of Education August 20, 2013 Oklahoma Interruption Investigation Arthur Thacker.
School Report Cards 2004– The Bottom Line More schools are making Adequate Yearly Progress. Fewer students show serious academic problems (Level.
Maryland School Assessment (MSA) 2012 Science Results Carolyn M. Wood, Ph.D. Assistant Superintendent, Accountability, Assessment, and Data Systems August.
1 Academic Performance of English Language Learners on Grades 3-8 ELA Tests (2007 to 2009) David Abrams Assistant Commissioner Office of Standards, Assessment.
STAR 2010 September 10, Agenda New in 2010 Interpreting reports Comparing results Appendixes A-G 2.
Communicating through Data Displays October 10, 2006 © 2006 Public Consulting Group, Inc.
Grade 3-8 Mathematics Test Results. 2 The Bottom Line This is the first year in which students took State tests in Grades 3,4,5,6,7, and 8. With.
Friday, February 7 th 8:30am. Conversation 8:30-9:30 1. Welcome 2. Where is Georgia in comparison to other states? 3. What is making the difference? 4.
M.Greenaway. Analysing Data.
New England Common Assessment Program (NECAP) Summary of October 2011 Results Developed for the Providence School Board February 27, 2012 Presented by:
CCSS-Aligned K-6 Report Card Training for SCUSD Parents/Guardians
KCCT Kentucky’s Commonwealth Accountability Testing System Overview of 2008 Regional KPR.
Average National Arabic Scale Scores for Grade 1 By Gender MalesFemales Grade Level Scale Score 550.
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST API and AYP Elementary Presentation Version: Elementary.
Elementary Assessment Data Update Edmonds School District January 2013.
Comparability of NSC mathematics scores and former SC HG mathematics scores: How consistent is the signal across time? AMERU African Micro Economic Research.
BOARD ENDS POLICY REVIEW E-2 Students will demonstrate a strong foundation in academic skills by working toward the Kansas Standards of Excellence in reading,
Fall Testing Update David Abrams Assistant Commissioner for Standards, Assessment, & Reporting Middle Level Liaisons & Support Schools Network November.
Qatar Comprehensive Educational Assessment (QCEA) 2007: Summary of Results.
Jasmine Carey CDE Psychometrician Interpreting Science and Social Studies Assessment Results September 2014.
 Closing the loop: Providing test developers with performance level descriptors so standard setters can do their job Amanda A. Wolkowitz Alpine Testing.
1 Results for Students with Disabilities and School Year Data Report for the RSE-TASC Statewide Meeting May 2010.
Understanding The PLAN. What Do My Scores Mean?  Your scores range between 1 and 32.  The PLAN takes the number of correct responses on each test and.
End of Year Report_ DataSet 1 Lodi Unified School District Year-End Benchmark Assessment Results (Student Achievement Monitoring)
ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Accountability Services.
HARDING TOWNSHIP SCHOOL Alex Anemone, Ed.D. October 6, 2014 NJ Testing Report Spring 2014.
SIMS Performance Suite Supporting School Improvement, Meeting Parental Engagement.
Average National Arabic Scale Scores for Grades 1, 2 and 3 by School Type Grade Level Scale Score Grade Level Scale.
EPotential ICT Capabilities Resource. The ePotential ICT Capabilities Resource (ePotential) is designed to: Assist teachers to develop their own ICT Professional.
British Educational System Rousková, Barančicová, Prchlík.
Attainment Peter Gorrie, QIO September 2014.
Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST Enter School Name Version: Intermediate.
Attainment Peter Gorrie, QIO September 2014.
Iowa Assessment Results and Annual Goals.
Beginning in the school year, the high school Washington Assessment of Student Learning (WASL)
DAVIS JUNIOR HIGH Academic Achievement Meeting November 9, 2010.
KAREN CONROY RESULTS OF NYSTP : ELA AND MATH PROFICIENCY 2015.
State Test Results MSP/HSPE/EOC Presentation to the Shelton School District Board of Directors September 11, 2012.
Qatar Comprehensive Educational Assessment (QCEA) 2008: Discussion Session For QCEA Support.
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST High School.
Percentage of Students at each Performance Category in Arabic, English, Science and Math for Grade Level 4 by Gender Percentage of Students English Science.
Using the Grade 9 Applied Mathematics Assessment IIR Looking at the Item Information Report: Student Roster Files.
State Test Results MSP/HSPE/EOC Presentation to the Shelton School District Board of Directors September 9, 2014.
Evaluation Institute Qatar Comprehensive Educational Assessment (QCEA) 2008 Summary of Results.
SIP Reading Goal Our Reality: An average of 78% of the students met standard on the state reading assessment in Our SMART Goal: The average.
Annual Progress Report Summary September 12, 2011.
2009 Grade 3-8 Math Additional Slides 1. Math Percentage of Students Statewide Scoring at Levels 3 and 4, Grades The percentage of students.
HALL HIGH SCHOOL Academic Indicators Students meeting or exceeding the Illinois Learning Standards (reading, math, science) 2002………………………………..43%2003………………………………..58%2004………………………………..42%2005………………………………..45%2006………………………………..48%2007…………………………
Summary of Examinations May/June CAPE Entries
State Test Results MSP/HSPE/EOC Presentation to the Shelton School District Board of Directors September 10, 2013.
NDE State of the Schools Adequate Yearly Progress Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools Nebraska Performance Accountability System Board of Education.
Measuring Student Growth Using the Ohio ACT Profile Report Graduating Class 2016 Diana Rogers, Regional Coordinator HSTW NE Ohio Region September 21, 2016.
Goal Orientation Theory
Attainment, progress and context by disadvantage / pupil premium
Analysing the Primary RAISE
State Test Results MSP/HSPE/EOC
2015 End of Course Examinations
State Test Results MSP/HSPE/EOC
Assistant Commissioner Office of Standards, Assessment and Reporting
Embargoed Official 2018 MCAS Results
Understanding Learning Gains
Student Mobility and Achievement Growth In State Assessment Mohamed Dirir Connecticut Department of Education Paper presented at National Conference.
School Improvement Ratings Rule 6A , F.A.C.
A Research Companion to Principles and Standards
PARCC Results Spring 2018 Administration
Barling Report to the public 2017
Secondary Data Presentation
Mayra Perez, Ed. D. October 10, 2016
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Presentation transcript:

Comparisons of independent schools across time: QCEA 2005, 2006, and 2007 Key assumptions Summary of Results Arabic: All students, and independent school cohort English: All students, and independent school cohort Mathematics: All students, and independent school cohort Science: All students, and independent school cohort

2 Key Assumptions All students and independent school cohort Performance level results, QCEA 2005, 2006, 2007 Results for “All students” includes any student with: – a valid score – attending any Independent school that year – all cohorts aggregated – “All Students” includes approximately 4,000 students in ,000 students in ,000 students in 2007 Results for independent school cohort analyses includes only students who: – were promoted one grade each academic year, from grades 4 to 11 – attended a school, within the same school cohort, across all possible years for all years from the opening year of the cohort to the present for all years the student was in grades 4 to 11

3 Summary of Results: QCEA 2005, 2006, 2007 Performance level results: all students and independent school cohort All students For 2005, 2006, and 2007, and for every grade, it has to be kept in mind that the “All students” group includes a large number of students who did not attend an independent school in the previous academic year A trend of decreasing performance across years is seen in Arabic, mathematics, and science for the “All students” group for most grades While a trend of decreasing performance is seen across years in English from 2005 to 2006 in each grade, some improvement is evident from 2006 to 2007 Comparison across independent school cohorts Across most grades and subject-matters: – In 2006, Cohort 1 tended to perform better than Cohort 2 across all subject-matters except science, where the trend was not consistent across grades. – In 2007, as reported in the prior section, Cohort 1 tended to perform better than Cohort 2; and both Cohorts 1 and Cohort 2 tended to perform better than Cohort 3, with a few exceptions

4 Summary of Results: QCEA 2005, 2006, 2007 Performance level results: all students and independent school cohort (continued) Independent school cohorts across time Trends can be examined across all three years for School Cohort 1 Trends can be examined across two years (2006 to 2007) for School Cohort 2 No trends can be examined for School Cohort 3, which only has one year of existence and consequently data only for 2007 The trends examined across years are compared across the same grade levels – e.g., Compare: Grade 4 in 2005 to Grade 4 in 2006; Grade 5 in 2005 to Grade 5 in 2006, and so on School Cohort 1: – Trends from 2005 to 2006 across the same grade levels: Performance mostly decreased in science No consistent trend was evident in English, Arabic, or mathematics. – Trends from 2006 to 2007 across the same grade levels: Performance mostly increased in English Performance mostly decreased in science No consistent trend was evident in Arabic or mathematics School Cohort 2 – Trends from 2006 to 2007 across the same grade levels: Performance mostly increased in English Performance mostly decreased in mathematics No consistent trend was evident in Arabic or science

5 Summary of Results: QCEA 2005, 2006, 2007 Performance level results: all students and independent school cohort (continued) Trends within independent school cohorts These results highlight student cohorts (students who remain together at each grade level) who appear to perform better than the student cohort just prior to them, across multiple subject-matters Independent school cohort 1 – In Arabic and English, two student cohorts consistently performed better than the student cohort just prior to them The 2005 Grade 6 student cohort, as it moved to Grade 7 in 2006 and to Grade 8 in 2007, demonstrated higher performance than the student cohort that attended Grade 7 in 2005 and Grade 8 in 2006 The 2005 Grade 9 student cohort, as it moved to Grade 10 in 2006 and to Grade 11 in 2007, demonstrated higher performance than the student cohort that attended Grade 10 in 2005 and Grade 11 in 2006 – Better performance by this 2005 Grade 9 cohort was also demonstrated in mathematics Independent school cohort 2 – In Arabic, English, mathematics, and science, one student cohort consistently performed better than the student cohort just prior to them The 2006 Grade 6 student cohort, as it moved to Grade 7 in 2007, demonstrated higher performance than the student cohort that attended Grade 7 in 2006

6 Arabic : all students, and independent school cohort Performance level results, QCEA 2005, 2006, 2007, grades 4 to 7

7 Arabic : all students, and independent school cohort (cont.) Performance level results, QCEA 2005, 2006, 2007, grades 8 to 11

8 Arabic : all students in independent schools Average scale score results, QCEA 2005, 2006, 2007

9 Arabic : students in independent schools Cohort 1 Average scale score results, QCEA 2005, 2006, 2007

10 English : all students, and independent school cohort Performance level results, QCEA 2005, 2006, 2007, grades 4 to 7

11 English : all students, and independent school cohort (cont.) Performance level results, QCEA 2005, 2006, 2007, grades 8 to 11

12 English : all students in independent schools Average scale score results, QCEA 2005, 2006, 2007

13 English : students in independent schools Cohort 1 Average scale score results, QCEA 2005, 2006, 2007

14 Mathematics : all students, and independent school cohort Performance level results, QCEA 2005, 2006, 2007, grades 4 to 7

15 Mathematics : all students, and independent school cohort Performance level results, QCEA 2005, 2006, 2007, grades 8 to 11

16 Math : all students in independent schools Average scale score results, QCEA 2005, 2006, 2007

17 Math : students in independent schools Cohort 1 Average scale score results, QCEA 2005, 2006, 2007

18 Science : all students, and independent school cohort Performance level results, QCEA 2005, 2006, 2007, grades 4 to 7

19 Science : all students, and independent school cohort Performance level results, QCEA 2005, 2006, 2007, grades 8 to 11

20 Science : all students in independent schools Average scale score results, QCEA 2005, 2006, 2007

21 Science : students in independent schools Cohort 1 Average scale score results, QCEA 2005, 2006, 2007