Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System Introduction to Peer Observations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 1/11/2014pbevan 1.
Advertisements

Professional Growth and
Workshop 2 Day 2 Classroom Observation Certification Assessor Training Program.
Overarching Question Who does the thinking? Therefore, who does the learning and growing?
Integration: LDC/MDC Strategies & the Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES) SREB August 26, 2013 KDE Effectiveness Coaches, Rebecca.
Professional Growth and
The Framework for Teaching: Digging Deeper August 27, 2012 Bernie Cleland & Duffy Miller
August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 2: Overview of the Evaluation Process Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality.
Using Data as a Catalyst for Collegial Conversations Changing Instruction and Reflecting on Practice through Peer Observation CCSSO Educational Leaders.
Pause for Discussion Multiple pauses are included for discussion opportunities.
Matrix 101: The Oregon Matrix and Summative Evaluations Spring 2015 Technical Assistance Webinar.
ComprehensiveFocused  Evidence needs to be collected for all 27 components found in all 8 Criteria  Evidence needs to be collected in one of the 8 Criteria.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEPS 3-4-5
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Evaluation Toolkit. Strategies and Tools to Assist You.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
1 Confidential to Shelby County Schools and Memphis City Schools Reflective Practice Theory of Action.
What Is Evidence? PRESENTED BY SCHAUNA FINDLAY, PH.D.
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements 9/9/2015PBevan, D.ED.
Citywide Instructional Expectations, Teacher Teams and the QR—Implications for Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 May 17, 2013.
TEACHER DEVELOPMENT, EVALUATION, AND PEER SUPPORT Overview Session for MPS Staff March 10, 2014.
 Teachers will be able to identify how their everyday tasks relate to Domain 4.  Teachers will identify artifacts that relate to Domain 4.
Reflection on Practice Process Series.aspx Step 1: Highlight or circle the descriptors.
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 10/12/2015pbevan 1.
To copy or adapt this material, see OpportunityCulture.org/terms-of-use Multi-Classroom Leadership Reviewing Instructional Practices.
TPGES & PPGES Training Modules TOOLS FOR SUPPORTING PGES IMPLEMENTATION.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for Teachers.
Welcome Instructional Support Leadership Network Meeting November 14, 2013.
Mid-Course Check In, Data Tracking and Preparation for Summative Cycle T-PGES Daviess County Public Schools February 2015.
Introduction to Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System and Framework for Teaching.
From Mad River Schools Waiver Day Presentation May 15, 2013.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
Peer Observation & Connecting to the Kentucky Framework for Teaching.
 I can examine the benefits of peer observation.  I can demonstrate understanding of the PGES protocols for the peer observation process.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness B. Examining the Framework
Introduction to... Teacher Evaluation System Teacher Effectiveness 12/6/
Candidate Assessment of Performance Conducting Observations and Providing Meaningful Feedback Workshop for Program Supervisors and Supervising Practitioners.
Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements: Evidence.
Teacher Talk Based on what you know now about LDC... What would you expect to see if you walked into a classroom that was implementing LDC at what you.
Have you created your PBS account yet? If not, go to account.pbs.org/accounts/openid/register/ 1.
TPGES Overview Part II Jenny C. Ray PGES Consultant.
Self Reflection and Professional Growth Synergy of Two Measures of Effectiveness.
Educator Effectiveness: The Danielson Framework Collecting Evidence.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Calibrating Feedback A Model for Establishing Consistent Expectations of Educator Practice Adapted from the MA Candidate Assessment of Performance.
Focused Evaluation. Who?  Teachers who completed the Comprehensive cycle  Proficient or distinguished.
Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)
Teacher Evaluation & CEL 5 D
Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Pulaski County Schools June
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
EISD Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System T-TESS
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 7/8/2016pbevan 1.
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Last Updated: 5/12/2016 Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS) Teacher Overview.
MOVING TO T-TESS Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System Copyright 2016.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Framework For Teaching (FFT)
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Educator Effectiveness
CLASS KeysSM Module 2: Overview of the Evaluation Process Spring 2010
State Board of Education Progress Update
Learning Intentions We are learning to (W.A.L.T.):
T-TESS Goal-Setting.
Why do we have to change? Every student is taught by an effective teacher and every school is led by an effective principal. Fair and equitable statewide.
Presentation transcript:

Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System Introduction to Peer Observations

Framework for Teaching Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Domain 2: Classroom Environment Domain 3: Instruction Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities

Framework for Teaching Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Domain 2: Classroom Environment Domain 3: Instruction Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities

Framework for Teaching Components 3B and 3C Questioning and Discussion Techniques (3B) Engaging Students in Learning (3C) Domain 3: Instruction Component 3B Elements Indicators for each Performance Level Take 5 minutes to review each component, including its elements and indicators.

Introduction to Peer Observation

Collegiality and Trust

Scripting What the teacher says…What students say Collecting data that becomes evidence…

Practice Self-Reflecting on Evidence 1.Trade evidence with someone at your table. 2.Now pretend that you were the teacher being observed 3.Find where the evidence matches the rubric.

Framework for Teaching Components 3B and 3C Questioning and Discussion Techniques (3B) Engaging Students in Learning (3C) Indicators Use the indicators in each of the performance levels to determine where the evidence fits best.

As the teacher being observed, think about what your next steps would be.

Peer Observation Cycle Pre-conference to talk about self-reflection and PGP goals Observer supplies evidence to the teacher Teacher looks at evidence and applies it to the Framework for Teaching Post-conference conversation for additional self- reflection and possible additional collaboration

Peer Observation Cycle Pre-conference to talk about self-reflection and PGP goals Observer supplies evidence to the teacher Teacher looks at evidence and applies it to the Framework for Teaching Post-conference conversation for additional self- reflection and possible additional collaboration

What questions/comments do you have? Professional Learning tab