Gamma-induced positron lifetime and age-momentum

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
POLARIMETRY of MeV Photons and Positrons Overview Beam Characterization – undulator photons – positrons Basics of the Transmission Method – for photon.
Advertisements

Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
Advanced GAmma Tracking Array
Geant4 Low Energy Polarized Compton Processes Gerardo Depaola * Francesco Longo + Francesco Longo + * National University of Córdoba (Argentina) + University.
17-May-15FCAL collaboration workshop, Status of sensor R&D in Minsk K. Afanaciev, M. Baturitsky, I. Emeliantchik, A. Ignatenko, A. Litomin, V. Shevtsov.
RHESSI 2003 October 28 Time Histories Falling fluxes following the peak Nuclear/511 keV line flux delayed relative to bremsstrahlung Fit to 511 keV line.
Geant4 simulations for the calorimeter prototypes D. Di Julio, J. Cederkäll, P. Golubev, B. Jakobsson Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Setup for large area low-fluence irradiations with quasi-monoenergetic 0.1−5 MeV light ions M. Laitinen 1, T. Sajavaara 1, M. Santala 2 and Harry J. Whitlow.
Geant4 simulations for the calorimeter prototypes D. Di Julio, J. Cederkäll, P. Golubev, B. Jakobsson Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
J. Tinslay 1, B. Faddegon 2, J. Perl 1 and M. Asai 1 (1) Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Menlo Park, CA, (2) UC San Francisco, San Francisco, CA Verification.
Gamma Spectroscopy HPT TVAN Technical Training
experimental platform
Design on Target and Moderator of X- band Compact Electron Linac Neutron Source for Short Pulsed Neutrons Kazuhiro Tagi.
RF background, analysis of MTA data & implications for MICE Rikard Sandström, Geneva University MICE Collaboration Meeting – Analysis session, October.
Bremsstrahlung Temperature Scaling in Ultra-Intense Laser- Plasma Interactions C. Zulick, B. Hou, J. Nees, A. Maksimchuk, A. Thomas, K. Krushelnick Center.
Institute for Safety Research Dávid Légrády IP-EUROTRANS ITC2 Development of a Neutron Time-of-Flight Source at the ELBE Accelerator ELBE Neutron source.
M. Woods (SLAC) Beam Diagnostics for test facilities of i)  ii) polarized e+ source January 9 –11, 2002.
Workshop on Physics on Nuclei at Extremes, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy Bulgarian Academy.
Radiation Detection and Measurement, JU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Spectrum if all energy is captured in detector. Allows identification.
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
Measurement of gas gain fluctuations M. Chefdeville, LAPP, Annecy TPC Jamboree, Orsay, 12/05/2009.
SOI detector Geant4-based studies to characterise the tissue-equivalence of SOI and diamond microdosimeteric detectors, under development at CMRP S. Dowdell,
Decay Data in View of Complex Applications Octavian Sima Physics Department, University of Bucharest Decay Data Evaluation Project Workshop May 12 – 14,
St. Petersburg State University. Department of Physics. Division of Computational Physics. COMPUTER SIMULATION OF CURRENT PRODUCED BY PULSE OF HARD RADIATION.
1 Dr. Sandro Sandri (President of Italian Association of Radiation Protection, AIRP) Head, Radiation Protection Laboratory, IRP FUAC Frascati ENEA – Radiation.
DDEP 2012 | C. Bisch – Study of beta shape spectra 1 Study of the shape of  spectra Development of a Si spectrometer for measurement of  spectra 
Measurement of Gas Bremsstrahlung at the Pohang Light Source Hyosang Lee Seoul National University, Q2C Pusan National University, HANUL HNP2011.
Status of Møller Polarimeter Peter-Bernd Otte September 23, th Collaboration Meeting, Mainz.
Charmonium feasibility study F. Guber, E. Karpechev, A.Kurepin, A. Maevskaia Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow CBM collaboration meeting 11 February.
High Dose Irradiation of Possible FCAL Sensors at the S-DALINAC Ch.Grah Physics and Detector Meeting DESY HH,
V.L. Kashevarov. Crystal Collaboration Meeting, Mainz, September 2008 Photoproduction of    on protons ► Introduction ► Data analysis.
Performance limits of a 55  m pixel CdTe detector G.Pellegrini, M. Lozano, R. Martinez, M. Ullan Centro Nacional de Microelectronica, Barcelona, 08193,
Determination of the 3  fraction in positron annihilation Bożena Jasińska Institute of Physics, Maria Curie Sklodowska University Lublin, Poland.
Octavian Sima Physics Department Bucharest University
Geant4 Simulation of Neutrons interaction with GEM-foil and gas Gabriele Croci, Matteo Alfonsi, Serge Duarte Pinto, Leszek Ropelewski, Marco Villa (CERN)
Status of Moeller Polarimeter Peter Otte April 7, th Collaboration Meeting, Dubrovnik.
Walid DRIDI, CEA/Saclay n_TOF Collaboration Meeting, Paris December 4-5, 2006 DAPNIA Neutron capture cross section of 234 U Walid DRIDI CEA/Saclay for.
Baudrand SylvestrePhysics Research Commitee1 Status of the Longitudinal and Transverse Polarimeters Working polarimeters HERA polarization status 2005.
The physics of electron backscatter diffraction Maarten Vos AMPL, RSPHYSSE, Australian National University, Acton 0200, Canberra Aimo Winkelmann Max Planck.
Monte Carlo methods in ADS experiments Study for state exam 2008 Mitja Majerle “Phasotron” and “Energy Plus Transmutation” setups (schematic drawings)
Digital primary electron counting: W, Fano Factor, Polya vs Exponential M. Chefdeville, NIKHEF, Amsterdam RD51, Paris, October 2008.
SEM- Schematic Overview. Electron Detection Tungsten Filament Electron Source.
Experimental Studies of Spatial Distributions of Neutrons Produced by Set-ups with Thick Lead Target Irradiated by Relativistic Protons Vladimír Wagner.
Tests of spectrometer screens Introduction Layout Procedure Results Conclusions L. Deacon, B. Biskup, S. Mazzoni, M.Wing et. al. AWAKE collaboration meeting,
3rd NoRDHia 1 TITLE INVESTIGATION OF DIAMOND SAMPLES UNDER HIGH DOSES OF ELECTROMAGNETIC IRRADIATION (at S-DALINAC) Wolfgang Lange, DESY Zeuthen.
Accelerator Physics, JU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 In the figure: Photoelectric suppressed. Single Compton (effect of crystal dimensions).
Improvement of the Monte Carlo Simulation Efficiency of a Proton Therapy Treatment Head Based on Proton Tracking Analysis and Geometry Simplifications.
00 Cooler CSB Direct or Extra Photons in d+d  0 Andrew Bacher for the CSB Cooler Collaboration ECT Trento, June 2005.
B. Azadegan, S. A. Mahdipour Hakim Sabzevari University
Measurement of photons via conversion pairs with the PHENIX experiment at RHIC - Torsten Dahms - Master of Arts – Thesis Defense Stony Brook University.
ArgonneResult_ ppt1 Comparison of data and simulation of Argonne Beam Test July 10, 2004 Tsunefumi Mizuno
Seoul National University Han-wool Ju CUNPA Kick-off Meeting Aug.22-23, 2013.
Proposed Laboratory Simulation of Galactic Positron In-Flight Annihilation in Atomic Hydrogen Benjamin Brown, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe Erice, 7th July th International School for Cosmic Rays Astrophysics Motivation Energy Reconstruction Air Fluorescence.
Design and Simulations of the Source of Polarized Slow Positrons at ELI-NP Nikolay Djourelov ELI-NP, IFIN-HH, 30 Reactorului Str, MG-6 Bucharest-Magurele,
Validation of GEANT4 versus EGSnrc Yann PERROT LPC, CNRS/IN2P3
Radiation-Resistant Scintillators Zachary H. Thomas, Science, Discovery and the Universe Physics and Government and Politics High Energy.
Monte Carlo methods in spallation experiments Defense of the phD thesis Mitja Majerle “Phasotron” and “Energy Plus Transmutation” setups (schematic drawings)
ICARUS T600: low energy electrons
Polarization of final electrons/positrons during multiple Compton
Radiation hardness tests of GaAs and Si sensors at JINR S. M
A.P. Potylitsyn, I.S. Tropin Tomsk Polytechnic University,
Cross-section Measurements of (n,xn) Threshold Reactions
Effect of water and ethanol on the size distribution
n_TOF annual meeting December 2011, Lisbon
Development and characterization of the Detectorized Phantom for research in the field of spatial fractionated radiation therapy. D. Ramazanov, V. Pugatch,
CHEM 312: Lecture 6 Part 2 Gamma Decay
A New Measurement of |Vus| from KTeV
GEANT Simulations and Track Reconstruction
PbWO4 Cherenkov light contribution to Hamamatsu S8148 and Zinc Sulfide–Silicon avalanche photodiodes signals F. KOCAK, I. TAPAN Department of Physics,
Presentation transcript:

Gamma-induced positron lifetime and age-momentum correlation measurements of water at temperatures between 20 °C and 90 °C

Gamma-induced positron lifetime and age-momentum correlation measurements of water at temperatures between 20 °C and 90 °C Content: Gamma-induced Positron Spectroscopy – GiPS Simulations using GEANT4 Positron lifetime spectroscopy at GiPS Time dependent S parameter – S(t) Conclusions

Gamma-induced Positron Spectroscopy – GiPS Detector setup ~ 300 cps 12 hours for 106 counts in AMOC spectrum of water up to 16 MeV, 0.7 mA 5 ps bunch width 38 ns between each bunch pulsed beam of brems strahlung from superconducting electron LINAC ELBE 4 coincident setups for Age-MOmentum Correlation (AMOC )

Gamma-induced Positron Spectroscopy (GiPS) Positron lifetime measurement time structure of e- beam maintained for photon beam accelerator pulse serves as start signal gate on 511 keV at HPGe and BaF2 t = 5 ps Start Lifetime Stop

Gamma-induced Positron Spectroscopy – GiPS Age-MOmentum Correlation – AMOC projection on energy axis projection on time axis energy and timing information of the same annihilation event

GEANT4 simulations GEometry ANd Tracking – GEANT4 Distribution of positron generation by pair production and annihilation Simulation of particle transport and interaction with matter using Monte Carlo methods beam direction → smearing up to ~ 10 mm in z direction GEANT4: S. Agostinelli et al. Nucl. Instr. Meth. A 506 (2003), 250-303

GEANT 4.0 simulations “Source contribution“ and dose rate Place Generated positrons Annihilated Positrons Water 99.0 % 99.7 % Kapton tube 1.00 % 0.30 % Yield 6 MeV 16 MeV 0.06 % 0.26 % 0.05 % 0.15 % no influence of Al caps or temperature sensor; Kapton tube can be neglected dose rate for water at GiPS: ~ 1 mGy / s positron generation within 20 cm³ → effect of radiolysis can be neglected

Positron lifetime spectroscopy at GiPS Fixing second lifetime component three components fit using PALSfit analysis by fixing 1 and 2 , and looking for minimum of chi2 → 2 = 400 ps

Positron lifetime spectroscopy at GiPS Results no source correction necessary for fit good agreement to published data, just intensity of free annihilation is lower Duplâtre – Phys. Status Solidi A, Vol. 6, Issue 11, 2476-2481 (2009) Kotera et al. – Phys. Lett. A, Vol. 345, 184-190 (2005)

Positron lifetime spectroscopy at GiPS Influence of oxygen on positron lifetimes oxygen acts as scavenger for radicals and e-aq Effect on annihilation components: → Ie+ decreases → IPs increases This explains the lower intensity of the free e+ annihilation component

Time dependent S parameter – S(t) extracting Doppler curves calculating S parameter for each curve

Time dependent S parameter – S(t) Motivation – “quantum beats“ in water T. Hirade (Chemical Physics Letters 480 (2009) 132–135): spin conversion of ortho-positronium can possibly be detected using AMOC periodic changes in S(t) parameter = quantum beats Our motivation: AMOC spectra are part of GiPS measurements for T = 21 … 90 °C Can we confirm quantum beats?

Time dependent S parameter – S(t) Dependence on temperature no periodic behaviour of S parameter changes (increases) for temperatures between 50 and 90 °C

Time dependent S parameter – S(t) Dependence on statistics differences in curves for different statistics of the S(t) curves no reproducable results of periodic changes in S parameter no quantum beats were found for T = 21… 90 °C using the GiPS setup.

Conclusion GiPS is suitable for the investigation of liquids radiolysis effects due to the use of bremsstrahlung can be neglected temperature stabilized sample holder does not influence positron lifetime measurement → no source correction necessary positron lifetime results fit well to published data AMOC spectra can be measured within a fraction of usual time (days instead of weeks) quantum beats could not be verified for temperatures between 20 … 90 °C

Many thanks to my collaborators … Wolfgang Anwand, Thomas E. Cowan, Andreas Hartmann, Andreas Wagner and the ELBE crew for always stable beams Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf Jörg Haeberle, Marco Jungmann, Reinhard Krause-Rehberg, Arnold Krille Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg … and to you for your attention !

GiPS – Gamma-induced Positron Spectroscopy up to 16 MeV, 0.7 mA 5 ps bunch width 38 ns between each bunch temperature stability ± 0.5 °C bulky samples, liquids, disperspion, gases, powders, activated samples Lifetime & Doppler broadening Spectroscopy, Age-Momentum Correlation user dedicated facility, application for beam time twice a year (14.11.2011)

Is there any effect on the positron lifetime components? GEANT 4.0 simulations Radiolysis of water Is there any effect on the positron lifetime components?

GEANT 4.0 simulations Photon beam hitting the Kapton tube direction bremsstrahlung up to 6 and 16 MeV calculated with beam diameter = 41 mm

GEANT 4.0 simulations Distribution of positron generation by pair production and annihilation beam direction → smearing up to ~ 10 mm in z direction

Positron lifetime spectroscopy at GiPS Local variance minimum for 2 = 400 ps for all temperatures

Time dependent S parameter – S(t) Peak differences 21 °C 50 °C 60 °C 70 °C 80 °C 90 °C 1 0.75 0.45,0.575 0.4 0.55 0.92 0.41 0.82 0.7 2 1.2 1.45, 1.64 1.15 1.34 0.8 1.25 1.65 0.95

Time dependent S parameter – S(t) Comparison with recently published data comparable to recently reported data Hirade – Chem. Phys. Lett., Vol. 480, 132–135 (2009 )