F-91405 ORSAY cedex FRANCE J. SAINT MARTIN, V. AUBRY-FORTUNA, A. BOURNEL, P. DOLLFUS, S. GALDIN, C. CHASSAT Influence Of Ballistic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lecture Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor (MOS) Field-Effect Transistors (FET) MOSFET Introduction 1.
Advertisements

Goals Investigate circuits that bias transistors into different operating regions. Two Supplies Biasing Four Resistor Biasing Two Resistor Biasing Biasing.
MOS – AK Montreux 18/09/06 Institut dÉlectronique du Sud Advances in 1/f noise modeling: 1/f gate tunneling current noise model of ultrathin Oxide MOSFETs.
by Alexander Glavtchev
Introduction to MOSFETs
R. van Langevelde, A.J. Scholten Philips Research, The Netherlands
Influence of gate capacitance on CNTFET performance using Monte Carlo simulation H. Cazin d'Honincthun, S. Retailleau, A. Bournel, P. Dollfus, J.P. Bourgoin*
Multisubband Monte Carlo simulations for p-MOSFETs David Esseni DIEGM, University of Udine (Italy) Many thanks to: M.De Michielis, P.Palestri, L.Lucci,
Nanostructures Research Group Center for Solid State Electronics Research Quantum corrected full-band Cellular Monte Carlo simulation of AlGaN/GaN HEMTs.
International Workshop on Computational Electronics - 10 Oct 26, Comparison of full-band Monte Carlo and Non-equilibrium Green’s function simulations.
(Neil weste p: ).  A MOS transistor is a majority-carrier device, in which the current in a conducting channel between the source and the drain.
Simulations of sub-100nm strained Si MOSFETs with high- gate stacks
1 Analysis of Strained-Si Device including Quantum Effect Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd. Ryo Tanabe Takahiro Yamasaki Yoshio Ashizawa Hideki Oka
Comparison of Non-Equilibrium Green’s Function and Quantum-Corrected Monte Carlo Approaches in Nano MOS Simulation H. Tsuchiya A. Svizhenko M. P. Anantram.
International Workshop of Computational Electronics Purdue University, 26 th of October 2004 Treatment of Point Defects in Nanowire MOSFETs Using the Nonequilibrium.
© Digital Integrated Circuits 2nd Devices Digital Integrated Circuits A Design Perspective The Devices Jan M. Rabaey Anantha Chandrakasan Borivoje Nikolic.
EE415 VLSI Design The Devices: MOS Transistor [Adapted from Rabaey’s Digital Integrated Circuits, ©2002, J. Rabaey et al.]
Outline Introduction – “Is there a limit?”
The metal-oxide field-effect transistor (MOSFET)
Digital Integrated Circuits A Design Perspective
Reading: Finish Chapter 6
1 Ballisticity of the Linear response Transport in Nanometric Silicon Devices C. Jungemann Institute for Electronics Bundeswehr University Neubiberg, Germany.
EE4800 CMOS Digital IC Design & Analysis
Week 8b OUTLINE Using pn-diodes to isolate transistors in an IC
Spring 2007EE130 Lecture 36, Slide 1 Lecture #36 ANNOUNCEMENTS Updated information for Term Project was posted on 4/14 Reminder: Coffee Hour today at ~4PM!
Spring 2007EE130 Lecture 40, Slide 1 Lecture #40 OUTLINE The MOSFET: Velocity saturation Reading: Chapter 19.1.
© Digital Integrated Circuits 2nd Devices VLSI Devices  Intuitive understanding of device operation  Fundamental analytic models  Manual Models  Spice.
IEEE Central NC EDS/MTT/SSC Society Friday, Nov. 5th, 2010 The Nanoscale MOSFET: Physics and Limits Mark Lundstrom 1 Electrical and Computer Engineering.
Lecture 19 OUTLINE The MOSFET: Structure and operation
ECE 431 Digital Circuit Design Chapter 3 MOS Transistor (MOSFET) (slides 2: key Notes) Lecture given by Qiliang Li 1.
Modern VLSI Design 3e: Chapter 2 Copyright  1998, 2002 Prentice Hall PTR Topics n Derivation of transistor characteristics.
© 2012 Eric Pop, UIUCECE 340: Semiconductor Electronics ECE 340 Lecture 35 MOS Field-Effect Transistor (MOSFET) The MOSFET is an MOS capacitor with Source/Drain.
ECE 342 Electronic Circuits 2. MOS Transistors
NOTICES Project proposal due now Format is on schedule page
Page 1 Hannes Luyken CPR ND N e v e r s t o p t h i n k i n g. ULIS 2003 Ultimate Integration of Silicon T. Schulz, C. Pacha, R. J. Luyken, M. Städele,
© Digital Integrated Circuits 2nd Devices Digital Integrated Circuits A Design Perspective The Devices Jan M. Rabaey Anantha Chandrakasan Borivoje Nikolic.
The Devices Digital Integrated Circuit Design Andrea Bonfanti DEIB
© Digital Integrated Circuits 2nd Devices Digital Integrated Circuits A Design Perspective The Devices Jan M. Rabaey Anantha Chandrakasan Borivoje Nikolic.
Three-dimensional quantum transport simulation of ultra-small FinFETs H. Takeda and N. Mori Osaka University.
Penn ESE370 Fall DeHon 1 ESE370: Circuit-Level Modeling, Design, and Optimization for Digital Systems Day 10: September 28, 2011 MOS Transistor.
1 Metal-Oxide-Semicondutor FET (MOSFET) Copyright  2004 by Oxford University Press, Inc. 2 Figure 4.1 Physical structure of the enhancement-type NMOS.
EXAMPLE 6.1 OBJECTIVE Fp = 0.288 V
1 Numerical Simulation of Electronic Noise in Si MOSFETs C. Jungemann Institute for Electronics Bundeswehr University Munich, Germany Acknowledgments:
20/03/2003 Impact of Carbon on short channel behavior in deep submicronic N MOSFET’s 4 th European Workshop on Ultimate Integration of Silicon Impact of.
指導教授:劉致為 博士 學生:魏潔瑩 台灣大學電子工程學研究所
EE141 © Digital Integrated Circuits 2nd Devices 1 Digital Integrated Circuits A Design Perspective The Devices Jan M. Rabaey Anantha Chandrakasan Borivoje.
Influence of carrier mobility and interface trap states on the transfer characteristics of organic thin film transistors. INFM A. Bolognesi, A. Di Carlo.
Vanderbilt MURI meeting, June 14 th &15 th 2007 Band-To-Band Tunneling (BBT) Induced Leakage Current Enhancement in Irradiated Fully Depleted SOI Devices.
ECE442: Digital ElectronicsCSUN, Spring-2010-Zahid MOS Transistor ECE442: Digital Electronics.
VLSI System Design Lect. 2.2 CMOS Transistor Theory2 Engr. Anees ul Husnain ( Department of Electronics.
Development of an analytical mobility model for the simulation of ultra thin SOI MOSFETs. M.Alessandrini, *D.Esseni, C.Fiegna Department of Engineering.
EE141 © Digital Integrated Circuits 2nd Devices 1 Lecture 5. CMOS Device (cont.) ECE 407/507.
IEE5328 Nanodevice Transport Theory
Novel Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Device
MOS Transistor Other handouts Project Description Other “assignments”
The MOS Transistor Polysilicon Aluminum. The NMOS Transistor Cross Section n areas have been doped with donor ions (arsenic) of concentration N D - electrons.
Suppression of Random Dopant-Induced Threshold Voltage Fluctuations in Sub-0.1μm MOSFET’s with Epitaxial and δ-Doped Channels A. Asenov and S. Saini, IEEE.
MOSFET Current Voltage Characteristics Consider the cross-sectional view of an n-channel MOSFET operating in linear mode (picture below) We assume the.
EE141 © Digital Integrated Circuits 2nd Devices 1 Digital Integrated Circuits A Design Perspective The Devices Jan M. Rabaey Anantha Chandrakasan Borivoje.
Penn ESE370 Fall DeHon 1 ESE370: Circuit-Level Modeling, Design, and Optimization for Digital Systems Day 11: September 22, 2014 MOS Transistor.
Field Effect Transistor (FET)
林永昌 2011.Dec.04. Experiment Hall-bar geometry was fabricated using oxygen plasma. Electrodes were made of Ti/Pd/Au. Gate length 2 to 4 μm, Hall-bar width.
EE 466/586 VLSI Design Partha Pande School of EECS Washington State University
The MOS capacitor. (a) Physical structure of an n+-Si/SiO2/p-Si MOS capacitor, and (b) cross section (c) The energy band diagram under charge neutrality.
ECE 333 Linear Electronics
EE130/230A Discussion 10 Peng Zheng.
MOSFET #5 OUTLINE The MOSFET: Sub-threshold leakage current
Damu, 2008EGE535 Fall 08, Lecture 21 EGE535 Low Power VLSI Design Lecture #2 MOSFET Basics.
CMOS VLSI Design 4th Ed. EEL 6167: VLSI Design Wujie Wen, Assistant Professor Department of ECE Lecture 3A: CMOs Transistor Theory Slides adapted from.
Introduction to Nanoheat; Aspel group
Presentation transcript:

F ORSAY cedex FRANCE J. SAINT MARTIN, V. AUBRY-FORTUNA, A. BOURNEL, P. DOLLFUS, S. GALDIN, C. CHASSAT Influence Of Ballistic Effects In Ultra-Small MOSFETs INSTITUT D'ÉLECTRONIQUE FONDAMENTALE IEF, UMR CNRS 8622, Université Paris Sud, Centre scientifique d'Orsay - Bât. 220

Contents  Introduction  Channel length and ballistic transport  Bias dependence on ballisticity  Ballisticity and long-channel effective mobility

Contents  Introduction  Channel length and ballistic transport  Bias dependence on ballisticity  Ballisticity and long-channel effective mobility

Transport in decanano MOSFET B int = % of ballistic electrons at the drain-end B eff = EntranceExit y 0 Scattering counting region SourceDrain Front gate Back gate Monte Carlo simulation Quasi-ballistic transport: electron mean free path is similar to L ch

Contents  Introduction  Channel length and ballistic transport  Bias dependence on ballisticity  Ballisticity and long-channel effective mobility

Studied devices  m = 4.46 eV V DD = 0.7 V T ox = 1.2 nm T Si = 5 nm L ch LGLG T ox = 1.2 nm T spacer = 5 nm SiO 2 Undoped 5×10 19 cm -3 T overlap = 5 nm y x 0

From quasi-stationary to quasi-ballistic Transition for L ch ≈ 50 nm in undoped channels

Ballisticity and channel length B int strongly increases for L ch < 100 nm

Ballisticity and current Gap between B int and B eff no more constant for L ch < 30 nm

B eff (B int ) in undoped channels Strong impact of B int on B eff for B int < 20 % Decreasing impact of B int on B eff B eff (B int ): quasi linear correlation for B int > 20%

Contents  Introduction  Channel length and ballistic transport  Bias dependence on ballisticity  Ballisticity and long-channel effective mobility

B int as a function of V DS for different V GS B int decreases when V DS increases B int decreases when V GS increases

‘Sta-bal’ and ‘bal-sta’ architectures sta or bal sta or bal sta ‘’ ‘sta-bal’ ‘’ ‘bal-sta’

B int (V DS ): ‘sta-bal’ vs. ‘bal-sta’ B int decrease is due to scatterings in the 2 nd half of the channel Higher phonon scattering rate > driving field

Contents  Introduction  Channel length and ballistic transport  Bias dependence on ballisticity  Ballisticity and long-channel effective mobility

Studied strained SGMOS 1.2×10 19 cm -3 T ox = 0.7 nm T Si = 10 nm L G = 25 nm SiO 2 Strained Si 1.2×10 19 cm -3 2×10 20 cm -3 2×10 20 cm -3 Si 1-x Ge x (P) Pseudo substrate L G = 18 nm V. Aubry-Fortuna et al.,to be published ‘x’ increase  Strain increase  m t population increase   eff enhancement  eff saturation for x > 0.15 I on and B int increase similarly

I on (B int ) vs. I on (  eff ) B int more relevant than µ eff to account for I on (B int (I on ) linear for B int  [ 15%, 30%])

Conclusions  Connections between B int and: channel length strain bias  High quasi ballistic influence for B int < ≈ 20 %  B int more relevant than µ eff to account for I on Role of MOS architecture (cf. paper)