1 Component reliability Jørn Vatn. 2 The state of a component is either “up” or “down” T 1, T 2 and T 3 are ”Uptimes” D 1 and D 2 are “Downtimes”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COE 444 – Internetwork Design & Management Dr. Marwan Abu-Amara Computer Engineering Department King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals.
Advertisements

1 Non-observable failure progression. 2 Age based maintenance policies We consider a situation where we are not able to observe failure progression, or.
Fault Tree Analysis Part 12 – Redundant Structure and Standby Units.
Chapter 8 Continuous Time Markov Chains. Markov Availability Model.
6. Reliability Modeling Reliable System Design 2010 by: Amir M. Rahmani.
1 The 4 standard failure models -to be used in maintenance optimization, with focus on state modelling Professor Jørn Vatn.
Reliability Block Diagrams A reliability block diagram is a success-oriented network describing the function of the system. If the system has more than.
Markov Analysis Jørn Vatn NTNU.
RELIABILITY IN A HIERARCHICAL MANAGEMENT. 1 LITERATURE REVIEW & METHODS THE RESULTS OF THE PRESENTATION CONTENT 2 3 INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE.
Reliable System Design 2011 by: Amir M. Rahmani
Reliability Engineering and Maintenance The growth in unit sizes of equipment in most industries with the result that the consequence of failure has become.
Reliability of Systems
Failure Patterns Many failure-causing mechanisms give rise to measured distributions of times-to-failure which approximate quite closely to probability.
1/55 EF 507 QUANTITATIVE METHODS FOR ECONOMICS AND FINANCE FALL 2008 Chapter 10 Hypothesis Testing.
Dependability Evaluation. Techniques for Dependability Evaluation The dependability evaluation of a system can be carried out either:  experimentally.
Basic Business Statistics, 10e © 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 9-1 Chapter 9 Fundamentals of Hypothesis Testing: One-Sample Tests Basic Business Statistics.
Reliability A. A. Elimam. Reliability: Definition The ability of a product to perform its intended function over a period of time and under prescribed.
Chapter 11 Multiple Regression.
Copyright 2007 Koren & Krishna, Morgan-Kaufman Part.2.1 FAULT TOLERANT SYSTEMS Part 2 – Canonical.
1 Fundamentals of Reliability Engineering and Applications Dr. E. A. Elsayed Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering Rutgers University
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Statistics for Business and Economics 7 th Edition Chapter 9 Hypothesis Testing: Single.
Reliability Chapter 4S.
1 Software Testing and Quality Assurance Lecture 35 – Software Quality Assurance.
1 Spare part modelling – An introduction Jørn Vatn.
System Reliability. Random State Variables System Reliability/Availability.
1 Reliability Application Dr. Jerrell T. Stracener, SAE Fellow Leadership in Engineering EMIS 7370/5370 STAT 5340 : PROBABILITY AND STATISTICS FOR SCIENTISTS.
-Exponential Distribution -Weibull Distribution
Chapter 10 Hypothesis Testing
Business Statistics, A First Course (4e) © 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 9-1 Chapter 9 Fundamentals of Hypothesis Testing: One-Sample Tests Business Statistics,
Fundamentals of Hypothesis Testing: One-Sample Tests
Section 9.1 Introduction to Statistical Tests 9.1 / 1 Hypothesis testing is used to make decisions concerning the value of a parameter.
Review of Statistical Inference Prepared by Vera Tabakova, East Carolina University ECON 4550 Econometrics Memorial University of Newfoundland.
On Model Validation Techniques Alex Karagrigoriou University of Cyprus "Quality - Theory and Practice”, ORT Braude College of Engineering, Karmiel, May.
Background on Reliability and Availability Slides prepared by Wayne D. Grover and Matthieu Clouqueur TRLabs & University of Alberta © Wayne D. Grover 2002,
Software Reliability SEG3202 N. El Kadri.
ERT 322 SAFETY AND LOSS PREVENTION RISK ASSESSMENT
A. BobbioBertinoro, March 10-14, Dependability Theory and Methods 2. Reliability Block Diagrams Andrea Bobbio Dipartimento di Informatica Università.
1 Basic probability theory Professor Jørn Vatn. 2 Event Probability relates to events Let as an example A be the event that there is an operator error.
The Examination of Residuals. Examination of Residuals The fitting of models to data is done using an iterative approach. The first step is to fit a simple.
Lecture 2: Combinatorial Modeling CS 7040 Trustworthy System Design, Implementation, and Analysis Spring 2015, Dr. Rozier Adapted from slides by WHS at.
1 Failures and fault classification Jørn Vatn NTNU
Maintenance Policies Corrective maintenance: It is usually referred to as repair. Its purpose is to bring the component back to functioning state as soon.
1 Chapter 9 Hypothesis Testing. 2 Chapter Outline  Developing Null and Alternative Hypothesis  Type I and Type II Errors  Population Mean: Known 
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-1 Chapter 8 Fundamentals of Hypothesis Testing: One-Sample Tests Statistics.
An Application of Probability to
L Berkley Davis Copyright 2009 MER035: Engineering Reliability Lecture 6 1 MER301: Engineering Reliability LECTURE 6: Chapter 3: 3.9, 3.11 and Reliability.
Chap 8-1 Fundamentals of Hypothesis Testing: One-Sample Tests.
1 EXAKT SKF Phase 1, Session 2 Principles. 2 The CBM Decision supported by EXAKT Given the condition today, the asset mgr. takes one of three decisions:
Reliability Failure rates Reliability
Statistics Chapter 6 / 7 Review. Random Variables and Their Probability Distributions Discrete random variables – can take on only a countable or finite.
Stracener_EMIS 7305/5305_Spr08_ Systems Reliability Modeling & Analysis Series and Active Parallel Configurations Dr. Jerrell T. Stracener, SAE.
Chapter 8: Simple Linear Regression Yang Zhenlin.
Fault Tree Analysis Part 11 – Markov Model. State Space Method Example: parallel structure of two components Possible System States: 0 (both components.
Part.2.1 In The Name of GOD FAULT TOLERANT SYSTEMS Part 2 – Canonical Structures Chapter 2 – Hardware Fault Tolerance.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Statistics for Business and Economics 8 th Edition Chapter 9 Hypothesis Testing: Single.
Reliability Engineering
O PTIMAL R EPLACEMENT AND P ROTECTION S TRATEGY FOR P ARALLEL S YSTEMS R UI P ENG, G REGORY L EVITIN, M IN X IE AND S ZU H UI N G Adviser: Frank, Yeong-Sung.
Fundamentals of Data Analysis Lecture 11 Methods of parametric estimation.
Prof. Enrico Zio Availability of Systems Prof. Enrico Zio Politecnico di Milano Dipartimento di Energia.
EMIS 7300 SYSTEMS ANALYSIS METHODS FALL 2005
More on Exponential Distribution, Hypo exponential distribution
Expectations of Random Variables, Functions of Random Variables
CORRELATION.
Non-observable failure progression
TIME TO FAILURE AND ITS PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS
Chapter 9 Hypothesis Testing.
Reliability Failure rates Reliability
T305: Digital Communications
Continuous distributions
Reliability.
Presentation transcript:

1 Component reliability Jørn Vatn

2 The state of a component is either “up” or “down” T 1, T 2 and T 3 are ”Uptimes” D 1 and D 2 are “Downtimes”

3 Time to failure - TTF The term ‘time to failure’ (TTF) denotes the time from a unit is put into service, until it fails That is TTF is equivalent to T 1 In some situations we also use the term time to failure to denote T 2, T 3 It should however be denoted that the distribution of subsequent uptimes are not necessarily identical A range of quantities relates to TTF Distribution function, F(t) = Pr(T  t) Survivor function R(t) = 1 - F(t) = Pr(T > t) Hazard rate z(t) Mean Time To Failure (without maintenance), MTTF = MTTF WO

4 Availability (A) and unavailability (U) Availability is the probability that the component is able to perform its designated function Availability is thus the probability that the component is functioning well when we consider an arbitrary point of time Availability may also be seen as the average “uptime” Unavailability is the probability that the component is not able to perform its designated function Unavailability is thus the probability that the component is not functioning well when we consider an arbitrary point of time Unavailability may also be seen as the average “downtime” A+U = 1 = 100%

5 Evident and hidden function An evident function means that the a failure of the component immediately will be detected, i.e. when we go from “Up” to “Down will be known to the operator under normal operation procedures A hidden function means that we do not continuously monitor the unit, thus we will not detect a failure before the unit is demanded, or we perform a functional test

6 Unavailability for evident functions The uptimes and downtimes are characterized by: Mean Time To Failure = MTTF = E(T 1 ) = E(T 2 ) = … Mean Down Time = MDT = E(D 1 ) = E(D 2 ) = … Graphically we observe that the average “downtime” is given by where = 1/MTTF = failure rate (assume constant failure rate)  = 1/MDT = repair rate (assume constant repair rate)

7 Hidden functions A hidden function means that a component failure is not immediately detected, i.e. We do not know when we are going from “Up” to “Down” In this situation D 1,D 2,… represent the ”non detected” downtime + the time of repair In order to reduce the non-detected downtime, the component is tested (function test) periodically Time between testing is denoted  (test interval) If a failure occurs in a test period we will in average be down half of the interval, i.e.  /2

8 Unavailability (probability of failure on demand)

9 Reliability block diagram (RBD) Reliability block diagrams are valuable when we want to visualise the performance of a system comprised of several (binary) components The interpretation of the diagram is The system is functioning if it is a connection between a and b, i.e. it is a path of functioning components from a to b. The system is in a fault state (is not functioning) if it does not exist a path of functioning components between a and b

10 Exercise Define all combination of component states in the example RBD List those combination that represent a system fault state 123System Up DownUp Down Etc.

11 Structure function For components we have For structures (systems) we have  denotes the structure function, and depends on the x i ’s (x is a vector of all the x i ’s).

12 Structure function for simple structures For a serial structure we have  (x) = x 1  x 2 ...  x n For a parallel structure (redundancy) we have  (x) = 1-(1-x 1 )(1- x 2 ) …(1- x n ) For structures composed of serial- and parallel structures we may combine the formulas above

13 Example  (x) =  I  II because I and II are in serial  I = x 1  II = 1-(1-x 2 )(1- x 3 ) because 2 and 3 are in paralell   (x) = x 1 (1-(1-x 2 )(1- x 3 ))

14 Pivotal decomposition Some structure are more complex than just a collection of serial and parallel structures We may then often use the rule of pivotal decomposition to establish the structure function Consider component number i in the structure The rule of pivotal decomposition now states:  (x) = x i  (x | x i =1) + (1-x i )  (x | x i =0) where  (x | x i =1) is the structure function if component i is functioning (all the time), and  (x | x i =0) is the structure function if component i is not functioning (is not there)

15 Example Component 5 is causing “problems” for us If component 5 is always functioning we have  (x | x 5 =1) = [1-(1-x 1 ) (1-x 3 )] [1-(1-x 2 ) (1-x 4 )] If component 5 is never functioning we have  (x | x 5 =0) = [1-(1-x 1 x 2 ) (1-x 3 x 4 )] In total  (x) = x 5  (x | x 5 =1) + (1-x 5 )  (x | x 5 =0) = x 1 x 2 +x 3 x 4 -x 1 x 2 x 3 x 4 +x 1 x 4 x 5 -x 1 x 2 x 4 x 5 - x 1 x 3 x 4 x 5 +2x 1 x 2 x 3 x 4 x 5 +x 2 x 3 x 5 -x 1 x 2 x 3 x 5 -x 2 x 3 x 4 x 5

16 k-out-of-n structures A k-out-of-n system is a system that functions if and only if at least k out of the n components in the system is functioning We often write k oo n to denote a k out of n system, for example 2 oo 3 Example 1: We have three pumps which each has a 50% of the total required capacity Thus, it is sufficient that only two pumps is functioning to achieve sufficient pump capacity  2 oo 3 system. Example 2: We have mounted 3 fire detectors in a process area To avoid shut-down due to false alarms, we vote the detectors, and require 2 fire indications to shut-down and start fire fighting  2 oo 3 system

17 Structure function for k oo n Example: 2 oo 3   (x) = x 1 x 2 +x 1 x 3 +x 2 x 3 -2x 1 x 2 x 3

18 Binary state variables Note that the state variables are binary, and takes the values one or zero. We note that 1 n = 1 for n > 1 0 n = 0 for n > 1 Thus we could replace x i n with x i for n > 1 This simplifies the expansion of the terms in the structure function, and is also a prerequisite for system reliability assessments to come later in the course

19 Exercise Find the structure function for the following RBD

20 Solution  I (x) = 1-(1-x 3 )(1-x 4 ) = x 3 +x 4 -x 3 x 4  II (x) = x 5  I (x) = x 3 x 5 +x 4 x 5 -x 3 x 4 x 5  III (x) = 1-(1-x 2 )(1-  II (x)) = x 2 +x 3 x 5 +x 4 x 5 -x 3 x 4 x 5 -x 2 x 3 x 5 -x 2 x 4 x 5 +x 2 x 3 x 4 x 5  (x) = x 1  III (x) = x 1 x 2 +x 1 x 3 x 5 +x 1 x 4 x 5 -x 1 x 3 x 4 x 5 -x 1 x 2 x 3 x 5 - x 1 x 2 x 4 x 5 +x 1 x 2 x 3 x 4 x 5

21 Component reliability

22 System reliability (h(p) = p S )

23 1.Obtain the structure function  (x) 2.Multiply out all terms in  (x) (to get a sum of products) 3.Remove all exponents in powers of x, i.e. replace x i n with x i for n > 1. Denote the result  M (x) 4.The system reliability is found by replacing the x i ’s in  M (x) with the corresponding p i ’s, i.e., 5.h(p) = p S =  M (x  x = p) Note 1: All the X i ’s must be independent Note 2: Step 2 could be extremely time consuming

24 Exercise Find the system reliability for the RBD: When the following reliability parameters are given: ComponentMTTFMDT

25 Solution h(p) = p S =  M (x  x = p) = p 1 p 2 +p 1 p 3 p 5 +p 1 p 4 p 5 -p 1 p 3 p 4 p 5 -p 1 p 2 p 3 p 5 -p 1 p 2 p 4 p 5 +p 1 p 2 p 3 p 4 p 5 = Component MTTFMDT