FVTX Trigger Toru Nagashima, Yomei Fukushima (Rikkyo University) Shoichi Hasegwa (J-Parc) Itaru Nakagawa RIKEN and FVTX Group 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Heavy Flavor and Charged Hadron Flow measurement using Silicon Vertex Detector at PHENIX Hiroshi Nakagomi for the SVX Group and the PHENIX Collaboration.
Advertisements

PHENIX local RUN9 RHIC meeting Manabu Togawa for the PHENIX 1.
1 Run 9 PHENIX Goals and Performance John Haggerty Brookhaven National Laboratory June 4, 2009.
MuTRG for Run12 RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa 1. Run12 Schedule 14 Cryoweeks -> Mid Jan. ~ End of April GeV pp (2+3 weeks) GeV pp (1+6 weeks)?
Maki Kurosawa for the PHENIX Collaboration RIKEN Nishina Center 5/11/2015RHIC/AGS User's Meeting Maki Kurosawa 1 Recent Open Heavy Flavor Results from.
Measurements of long-range angular correlation and identified particle v 2 in 200 GeV d+Au collisions from PHENIX Shengli Huang Vanderbilt University for.
Julia VelkovskaMoriond QCD, March 27, 2015 Geometry and Collective Behavior in Small Systems from PHENIX Julia Velkovska for the PHENIX Collaboration Moriond.
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook PHENIX Measurements of Anisotropic Flow in Heavy-Ion Collisions at RHIC Energies 1 Nuclear Chemistry Group, SUNY Stony Brook,
ICPAQGP, Kolkata, February 2-6, 2015 Itzhak Tserruya PHENIX highlights.
ALICE EMCal Physics and Functional Requirements Overview.
Highlight of PHENIX Results Shengli Huang Vanderbilt University Initial Stages 2014.
The Physics Potential of the PHENIX VTX and FVTX Detectors Eric J. Mannel WWND 13-Apr-2012.
Sourav Tarafdar Banaras Hindu University For the PHENIX Collaboration Hard Probes 2012 Measurement of electrons from Heavy Quarks at PHENIX.
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook The PHENIX Flow Data: Current Status Justin Frantz (for T.Todoroki) Ohio University WWND 15 Keystone, CO 1 (Filling in For Takahito.
Performance of the PHENIX Muon Tracking System in Run-2 Ming X. Liu Los Alamos National Lab (for the PHENIX Collaboration) –Detector Commissioning –Detector.
Time Meeting 3/17/2015 PHENIX Run-15 Status Douglas Fields PHENIX Run-15 Run Coordinator University of New Mexico.
Time Meeting PHENIX Run-15 Status Douglas Fields PHENIX Run-15 Run Coordinator University of New Mexico.
High Multiplicity FVTX Trigger for Run15 Toru Nagashima, Yomei Fukushima (Rikkyo University) Shoichi Hasegwa (J-Parc) Itaru Nakagawa RIKEN and FVTX Group.
Run11 MuTrig-FEE Summary RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa 1.
Performance of PHENIX High Momentum Muon Trigger 1.
November 18, 2008 John Haggerty 1 PHENIX In Run 9 John Haggerty Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Time Meeting PHENIX Run-15 Status Douglas Fields PHENIX Run-15 Run Coordinator University of New Mexico.
1 Identified Particle Dependence of Nuclear Modification Factors in d+Au Collisions at RHIC. Lee Barnby - University of Birmingham For the STAR Collaboration.
Centrality Categorization and its Application to Physics Effects in High-Energy d+A Collisions Javier Orjuela-Koop University of Colorado Boulder For the.
Run15 pp Achievement and pAu status Itaru Nakagawa RIKEN/RBRC.
Time Meeting 3/17/2015 PHENIX Run-15 Status Douglas Fields PHENIX Run-15 Run Coordinator University of New Mexico.
Introduction to High Momentum Trigger in PHENIX Muon Arms RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa 中川格 1.
A proposal for a Low mass electron pair trigger. Richard Seto University of CA, Riverside Trigger Working Group Meeting May 11, 2001.
Higher harmonics flow measurement of charged hadrons and electrons in wide kinematic range with PHENIX VTX tracker Maki KUROSAWA for PHENIX collaboration.
Time Meeting 3/10/2015 PHENIX Run-15 Status Douglas Fields PHENIX Run-15 Run Coordinator University of New Mexico.
1 EMC Trigger Summery from RunII and discussion for RunIII H.Torii, Kyoto Univ. ERT Lvl-1 meeting.
Performance of PHENIX High Momentum Muon Trigger.
High Multiplicity Trigger Operation Status RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa On behalf of Toru Nagashima, Aaron Key, SeYoung Han, Shoichi Hasegawa 1.
STAR J/  Trigger in dA Manuel Calderon for the Heavy-Flavor Group Trigger Workshop at BNL October 21, 2002.
PERFORMANCE OF THE PHENIX SOUTH MUON ARM Kenneth F. Read Oak Ridge National Lab & University of Tennessee for the PHENIX Collaboration Quark Matter 2002.
PM Meeting PHENIX Run-15 Status Douglas Fields PHENIX Run-15 Run Coordinator University of New Mexico.
1/27/2016 R.Seidl: status of simulation1 W muon analysis in PHENIX Status of the background understanding, signal, smearing and asymmetries R.Seidl (RBRC)
Study of J/  ->e + e - in d-Au Collision with Electron Triggers in PHENIX W. Xie (UC. Riverside) PHENIX Collaboration April APS in 2003.
Performance of PHENIX High Momentum Muon Trigger.
PHENIX results on centrality dependence of yields and correlations in d+Au collisions at √s NN =200GeV Takao Sakaguchi Brookhaven National Laboratory for.
HBD Report Craig Woody BNL DC Meeting January 7, 2009.
PHENIX results on collectivity tests in high-multiplicity p+p and p+Au collisions at √s NN =200 GeV RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa Quark Matter 2015, Kobe,
18 Sep 2008Paul Dauncey 1 DECAL: Motivation Hence, number of charged particles is an intrinsically better measure than the energy deposited Clearest with.
BNL, Jan 7-9, 2013 Wei Li First two-particle correlation results in proton-lead collisions from CMS Wei Li (Rice University) for the CMS collaboration.
Low Mass Vector Mesons Nuclear Modification Factors in d+Au 200GeV Lei Guo Los Alamos National Laboratory PHENIX Collaboration.
Jamaica 11 Jan.8, 2009 Muon Trigger Upgrade at PHENIX RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa.
Effects of Endcap Staging/Descoping D.Acosta University of Florida.
SPHENIX Mid-rapidity extensions: Additional Tracking system and pre-shower Y. Akiba (RIKEN/RBRC) sPHENIX workfest July 29,
Possible Improvement of MUID Performance Itaru Nakagawa, Seyoung Han (RIKEN, Ewha/RIKEN)
DAQ 1000 Tonko Ljubicic, Mike LeVine, Bob Scheetz, John Hammond, Danny Padrazo, Fred Bieser, Jeff Landgraf.
PHENIX Plan for Run13 Kieran Boyle RSC 01/11/20131.
PHENIX J/  Measurements at  s = 200A GeV Wei Xie UC. RiverSide For PHENIX Collaboration.
A 2 nd proposal for a Low mass electron pair trigger. Richard Seto University of CA, Riverside Trigger Working Group Meeting 6/7/2001.
Analysis Meeting, November 9-11, 2003 Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez Heavy Flavor Working Group Heavy Flavor in ‘04: Prospects for J/ . Heavy.
Quark Matter 2002, July 18-24, Nantes, France Dimuon Production from Au-Au Collisions at Ming Xiong Liu Los Alamos National Laboratory (for the PHENIX.
David Lange Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
FVTX Trigger Toru Nagashima, Yomei Fukushima (Rikkyo University) Shoichi Hasegwa (J-Parc) Itaru Nakagawa RIKEN and FVTX Group 1.
Muon Trigger Performance Run12 PP510GeV Sanghwa Park (SNU/RIKEN)
High Multiplicity FVTX Trigger Toru Nagashima, Yomei Fukushima (Rikkyo University) Shoichi Hasegwa (J-Parc) Itaru Nakagawa RIKEN and FVTX Group 1.
High Energy Physics in the LHC Era th International Workshop Vicki Greene for the PHENIX Collaboration Vanderbilt University 7 January 2016 Measurements.
PHENIX Measurements of Azimuthal Anisotropy at RHIC
FVTX High Multiplicity Trigger for Run15
Richard Petti For the PHENIX Collaboration
RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa
RadLab PHENIX Meeting Feb
Pixel-strip-EMC tracker and DC option
Maki KUROSAWA VTX Group 2014 Feb 20
Heavy Ion Physics in RUN14-16
Y. Akiba (RIKEN/RBRC) 2016/04/21 Radiation lab meeting
Y. Akiba (RIKEN/RBRC) Radiation Lab meeting 2016/06/30
Presentation transcript:

FVTX Trigger Toru Nagashima, Yomei Fukushima (Rikkyo University) Shoichi Hasegwa (J-Parc) Itaru Nakagawa RIKEN and FVTX Group 1

MOTIVATION 2

CMS Reported “Ridge” feature in pp,pA Slide from Wei Lei, Rice University 3

High Multiplicity Events is the key! 4 I High multiplicity trigger in FVTX is to be developed for Run15! Slide from Wei Lei, Rice University

ExperimentpA, dApp CMS ✔✔ ATLAS ✔ PHENIX ✔ 5

PPG161 PPG Chair: Shengli Huang (Vanderbilt) PPG Members: PPG Members: John Chin-Hao Chen(RBRC), ShinIchi Esumi(Tsukuba), Jiangyong Jia(Stony), Anne Sickles(BNL), Julia Velkovska(Vanderbilt), Paul Stankus (ORNL) In preparation for PRL 6

Observed v2 in dAu Minimum bias : pp 7 Elementary process (not flow)

He3-Au V 2 MPC South MPC North RIDGE is observed for centrality < 20% in MPC 8

Key Features to observe Ridge 0 ~ 5% centrality => 20 ~ 40 tracks / rapidity unit 80 Mevents Cental dA Events in Run8 9

BBC High Multiplicity Trigger for HeAu 10

Why not BBC High Multiplicity Trigger works on pp? 11 Number of Tracks in PC BBC Charge Ridge Doesn’t show strong correlation between BBC and central arm activities HeAu200 GeV pp Clear correlation btwn central arm activities and BBC multiplicity -> Works as trigger -> Doesn’t Works as trigger

Trigger sensitive to high multiplicity Central arm : trigger on the number of 2x2 fired cells in the EMCal -> interfere with other electron trigger. FVTX Trigger (in preparation) 12 FVTX trigger is the best if (mini-QGP) is seen in FVTX rapidity region. So far the best trigger for central arm high multiplicity in pp. (Need correlation study between FVTX and Central arm.)

Required Rejection Power # of Tracks / arm > 0> 10 > 20> 30> 40 Fraction in MB 100%10%0.7%0.04%0.008% Rates in MB 1MHz100kHz7kHz400Hz80Hz Required Rejection Power ,50012, # of Tracks in FVTX / 510GeV pp Run13 Data Possible band width for FVTX Trigger

Key Features to observe Ridge 0 ~ 5% centrality => 20 ~ 40 tracks / rapidity unit 80 Mevents Cental dA Events in Run8 14 FVTX North and South separate trigger bits 100Hz per arm (Total 200Hz) 200Hz x 3600s x 24h x 7days x 9 weeks x 30% DAQ time ~ 300M high multiplicity events Goal of Run 15 - > Purity of the trigger is the issue

FVTX TERMINOLOGY AND FVTX TRIGGER 15

Debugging BNL Test Bench September,

FVTX Wedge 17

18 At least one hit in 3 out of 4 stations is required within a half sector ((  =7.5 o ). -> TrackFlag. If there are more than two tracks within a given sector (  =15 o ), the second one won’t be counted. We Request Two Trigger bits (one per arm) for FVTX trigger. AND Limited to 1bit

FEM -> FEM-IB Cable 19 About 30 cm long.

FEM Board 20 Test Pin OUT Serial Wire To FEM-IB Test-Pin

21

FEM -> FEM-IB Installation 22 November 5 th, 2014

FVTX Terminology 23 Station-0 Station-1 Station-2 Station-3 Wedge Sector Wedge FEM Cage

FVTX Trigger Parameters 24 Station-0 Station-1 Station-2 Station-3 Wedge Sector Wedge FEM Cage # of hits/wedge # of active wedges out of 4 stations Active Sector (AND/OR) # of active FEMs Arm Active Cage (AND/OR)

Trigger Concept Multi Track Multi Hit How well we can trigger multi track events by multi hit algorithm? 25 Trigger used in CMS

Multi-Track and Multi-Hit Triggers 26

Parameter Conditions for this study 27 OR

Run Information Run GeV pp Run# DAQ Time48 minutes Raw BBC Rate1.2MHz Scaled BBC Rate51 Hz Total MB Samples147k events

MULTI-TRACK TRIGGER ALGORITHM #of Active FEMs = 6,9,12 / cage

Multi-Track Mode (South) Number of Tracks/arm Number of Hits/arm Number of active FEMs >=6 / cage

MULTI-HIT ALGORITHM

MultiHit (South) # of Active Cage > =6

Multi-Track vs. Multi-Hit Algorithm MultiTrack MultiHit Low track events are more suppressed in Multi-Track than Multi-Hit Mode

# of Active Cage >= 9

FVTX Trigger Performance

Conclusion Turn on is good against the hit multiplicity, but cannot avoid low #track leak for the track multiplicity. So far, satisfactory rejection power and efficiency is not achieved in data analysis. Further study to be made to seek for better performance. If RP isn’t sufficient, the trigger needs to be prescaled. However, the FVTX trigger still provides orders of magnitudes more high multiplicity samples than MB. 40

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ONLINE AND OFFLINE TRACK 41

Difference in Track Criteria This track will be recognized as track in both online and offline. A FEM track frag Offline track FEM i B C B This category won’t be picked up by the trigger -> cause of survival tracks

Difference in Track Criteria This track leaves only 2 hits in FVTX and won’t satisfy ¾ station criteria in the trigger A FEM track frag Offline track FEM i B C C

Difference in Track Criteria This differences can cause small fraction survives FEM track frag> x trigger condition A FEM track frag Offline track FEM i FEM i+1 B C A C C -> B This category won’t be picked up by the trigger -> cause of survival tracks Possibly remove the border within FEM FPGA

FVTX Alignment y-axis x-axis FVTX Event Display track

St-0 St-1 St-2St-3 Wedges are slightly staggered in phi direction to gain phi resolution on purpose This mismatch of phi angle between stations enhances “category C”

Low # Track Leak Cause Summary 1.Online trigger won’t recognize track which crosses boarder between sectors 2.Online trigger won’t have VTX hit information. 3.FVTX stations are staggered by a little bit in phi direction 47 No trivial solutions without significant revise in hardware configuration

BACKUP 48

He3-Au: BBC Charge vs. #Track in PC Number of Tracks in PC BBC Charge Ridge 49 - > About 20 tracks in PC in the centrality < 20% in HeAu

Multiplicity vs. rapidity 50 PHOBOS Phys. Rev. C72, d-going Au-going v2v2 smaller Larger

Multiplicity vs. rapidity 51 He3-going Au-going v2v2 smaller Larger He3Au ~ 60 ~ 25 On average ~40 tracks is a guideline to observe v 2

Run15 pp Goal FVTX North and South separate trigger bits 100Hz per arm (Total 200Hz) 200Hz x 3600s x 24h x 7days x 9 weeks x 30% DAQ time ~ 300M high multiplicity events (80 Mevents Cental dA Events in Run8) 52