REMOTE SENSING AND SUBSURFACE IMAGING OF NEAR SURFACE ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS Student Researcher: Oluomachukwu Agwai Faculty Mentor: Reginald Eze, PhD and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Radially Polarized Spherical Piezoelectric Acoustic Transducer.
Advertisements

Basic Ground Penetrating Radar Theory
Study of propagative and radiative behavior of printed dielectric structures using the finite difference time domain method (FDTD) Università “La Sapienza”,
PH0101 Unit 2 Lecture 4 Wave guide Basic features
Microwave Doppler Speed Measurement System Guo Jianghuai Supervisor: Roland G Clarke Assessor: Chris Trayner Introduction A Doppler radar is a special.
Chapter Fifteen: Radio-Wave Propagation
A Short Note on Selecting a Microwave Scattering or Emission Model A.K. Fung 1 and K. S. Chen 2 1 Professor Emeritus University of Texas at Arlington Arlington,
Hydrologic Connectivity of Isolated Wetlands Todd C. Rasmussen, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Hydrology Warnell School of Forest Resources University of.
Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) GPR technology can be used to determine depth to bedrock and or water table, locate buried ordinance at gunnery ranges,
electromagnetic method
9. Radiation & Antennas Applied EM by Ulaby, Michielssen and Ravaioli.
A Comparison of Numerical Methods and Analytical Methods in Determination of Tunnel Walls Displacement Behdeen Oraee-Mirzamani Imperial College London,
The detection, analysis, and characterization of subsurface objects have been an active area of research of the scientific community in recent years. Current.
Objective To study the effect of sub surface defects in surface roughness monitoring through ultrasonic flaw detector. To study the sizing of defects.
Submitted by: Guided by: Naveen Jain Er. Mayanka Vats
SHARATH. INTRODUCTION HARDWARE DESCRIPTION OVERVIEW OF THE SYSTEM TESTING AND EVALUATION CONCLUSION.
E-M Spectrum and Waves Prentice Hall Chapter 18.
Chapter 9 Electromagnetic Waves. 9.2 ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics This Week: No new lab assignment… But we’ll go over the previous labs 06 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 For Fri 07 Feb:
1 ECE 480 Wireless Systems Lecture 3 Propagation and Modulation of RF Waves.
Numerical Investigation of Internal Wave-Vortex Interactions Tyler D. Blackhurst and J.C. Vanderhoff Department of Mechanical Engineering Brigham Young.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 26 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 For Fri 28 Feb: Burger (§8.4–8.5) Last Time: Industry Seismic Interpretation.
GEOG Fall 2003 Overview of Microwave Remote Sensing (Chapter 9 in Jensen) from Prof. Kasischke’s lecture October 6,2003.
INVASIVE MICROWAVE MEASUREMENT OF SOIL ELECTROMAGNETIC PROPERTIES AND CORRELATION WITH PHYSICAL QUANTITIES K. Clay, M. Farid, A. N. Alshawabkeh, C. M.
Electromagnetic Radiation Most remotely sensed data is derived from Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR). This includes: Visible light Infrared light (heat)
Periodic Boundary Conditions in Comsol
Analysis and Design of Multi-Wave Dilectrometer (MWD) for Characterization of Planetary Subsurface Using Finite Element Method Manohar D. Deshpande and.
Istanbul Technical University Electromagnetic Research Group
Destructive interference is common when measuring the reflection from a sample. When the microwave radiation encounters the dielectric sample under test,
Electromagnetic Waves and Their Propagation Through the Atmosphere
Remote Sensing Microwave Image. 1. Penetration of Radar Signal ► ► Radar signals are able to penetrate some solid features, e.g. soil surface and vegetative.
GG 450 Feb 27, 2008 Resistivity 2. Resistivity: Quantitative Interpretation - Flat interface Recall the angles that the current will take as it hits an.
So far, we have considered plane waves in an infinite homogeneous medium. A natural question would arise: what happens if a plane wave hits some object?
Lai-Ching Ma & Raj Mittra Electromagnetic Communication Laboratory
The minispectrometer is attached to the polarimeter with a fiber optic cable. It measures the intensity at a much wider range of wavelengths—from 350nm.
Hirophysics.com Simulation of the Electromagnetic Fields and its Properties With Free-space and Dielectrics Using the FDTD Method Mark E. Eckman.
Remcom Inc. 315 S. Allen St., Suite 416  State College, PA  USA Tel:  Fax:   ©
Physically-based Illumination Model
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 29 Feb 2016 © A.R. Lowry 2016 Last Time: Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) Radar = electromagnetic radiation (light)
GROUND PENETRATING RADAR
1 Introduction to Applied Geophysics & Geophysical Exploration Prof Jeannot Trampert (coordinator) Dr Fred Beekman
Remote sensing: the collection of information about an object without being in direct physical contact with the object. the collection of information about.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 26 Feb 2016 © A.R. Lowry 2016 For Mon 29 Feb: Burger (§8.4) Last Time: Industry Seismic Interpretation Seismic.
Under The Guidance Of Ms. SWETHA.G.N ( Dept of Mechanical Engg) RAMESH MARATHI 1GV09ME407 BY.
Project presentation - Significant parameters for satellite communication.
Electromagnetic Radiation
S Fernando Quivira, Jose Martinez Lorenzo and Carey Rappaport Gordon Center for Subsurface Sensing & Imaging Systems Northeastern University, Boston, MA.
A SEMINAR TOPIC ON LANDMINE DETECTION USING IMPULSE GROUND PENETRATING RADAR A SEMINAR TOPIC ON LANDMINE DETECTION USING IMPULSE GROUND PENETRATING RADAR.
HSAF Soil Moisture Training
Active Microwave Remote Sensing
Basic Science in Remote Sensing
GPR Simulations for pipeline oil drainage
Ground-Penetrating Radar
Multisensor Landmine Detection System
Chapter 11. The uniform plane wave
Ground Penetrating Radar using Electromagnetic Models
Waves of the Electromagnetic Spectrum
INTRODUCTION TO OPTICAL COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY
Reflectivity Measurements on Non-ideal Surfaces
Electrical Engineering Department, SGSITS, Indore, INDIA
Ground Penetrating Radar
The radar band is loosely taken to extend from approximately 0
Small Humans Project Chad Waddington Mathematics PhD Student, RPI
Reza Firoozabadi, Eric L. Miller, Carey M. Rappaport and Ann W
Wireless Communications Chapter 4
Rajdeep Ojha1, Vimal Chander1, Devakumar2
REMOTE SENSING.
Wave interactions EQ: How is energy transferred in waves?
Ground-Penetrating Radar
Antenna Theory Chapter.4.7.4~4.8.1 Antennas
Presentation transcript:

REMOTE SENSING AND SUBSURFACE IMAGING OF NEAR SURFACE ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS Student Researcher: Oluomachukwu Agwai Faculty Mentor: Reginald Eze, PhD and Yasser Hassebo, PhD LaGuardia Community College: Thomson Avenue, Long Island City, New York Background and Introduction Result Conclusion and Future Work Methodology Objective Acknowledgements The objective of this project is towards creating a comprehensive template for the development of a computational model for sensing and analyzing subsurface imaging of environmental hazardous objects buried under the soil using the Finite Element Method software, COMSOL Multiphysics. NYC Research Initiative NASA GISS Center 1298 Broadway, NY Professors Reginald Eze and Yasser Hassebo LaGuardia Community College, CUNY Long Island City, NY Subsurface sensing and imaging is the non-invasive recovery of shape and topological characteristics of an object buried underneath or embedded within a dielectric region. The imaging technique involves propagating electromagnetic waves of known frequency and amplitude on the computational geometry, measuring the fields scattered by the dielectric surface and the object, and quantifying the electromagnetic parameters of the scatterer. The present study investigates the use of radiation boundary condition in infinite space, different geometric shapes of the environmental hazard, and material properties to model the propagation of electromagnetic wave introduced into the computational domain non-invasively. Two quantities of interest are investigated and are analyzed numerically.; the depth and structure of the buried environmental hazard.The depth can be used to quantify whether a buried hazardous object, for example a land mine, can be safely defused without the risk of causing collateral damage on explosion. The structure or material content of the subsurface object can readily be used for identifying the object type prior to being defused or removed. The problem of detection, characterization and classification of harmful environmental hazardous objects [mines, IED’s, pollutants, tunnels, unexploded military hardware] buried in the soil is a worldwide problem that needs urgent attention and solution. Electromagnetic sensor technologies such as GPR (Ground Penetrating Radar shown below) have been applied to identify these underground hazards. However, the increasing sophistication in the manufacture of landmines acts as major impediment s when indentifying these hazardous items. Also, low dielectric contrast of buried objects, masking effect of clutter from rough ground surfaces, and soil geometric in-homogeneities acts as additional impediments. The image to the left shows the basic functionality of how a GPR, a subsurface sensing device, operates. The GPR generates a radiowave which propagates through the soil (at frequencies raging between 0.5 GHz and 3 GHz) and comes in contact with the target. When in contact with the object, the radiowave can either be absorbed and reflected back as infrared heat wave, or transmitted and reflected back at the same frequency at which it was absorbed. The reflected signal is picked up by the receivers (as indicated by the image to the right) and stored for later reading by the user. The Subsurface Sensing Dilemma Since harmful environmentally hazardous objects such as anti-personnel and anti-tank mines vary widely in material properties, thus returning different imaging signals to the receiver, it is necessary that in order to identify the structure of the hazardous objects buried in the soil, an analyses relating the operating frequency of the sensing device to various microphysical parameters (shape and composition i.e relative permittivity, relative permeability, and electrical conductivity) of the desired targets and to the characteristics of the soil be performed. Using COMSOL Multiphysics, a simulation of an interaction between the radiowave and shape of the object was constructed. To visualize only the feedback from the scattered signal with respect to the shape of the object, the composition parameters of the object were kept constant throughout the simulation. The relative permittivity, permeability, and electrical conductivity of the object (anti-personnel mine) were 2.9, 1, and 4.8e -4 S/m respectively. The soil is selected to be moist clay loam with properties of 0.82, 1, and 0.1 S/m respectively. Likewise the properties of the air were 1, 1, and 0 S/m. The simulation was performed using the radio frequency module available in COMSOL. The 2D geometry (shown above) were enclosed by rectangular boundaries of a Perfectly Matched Layer (PML). The PML layer was implemented to attenuate reflections due to the interaction of the wave with the medium from escaping the region of interest. The internal boundaries in the geometry were assigned continuity boundary condition while all other boundaries outside the PML were assigned the scattering boundary condition. The wave was incident upon the plane at a 45 degree angle and the frequency of the wave was varied from 0.5GHz to 3GHz. The geometry of three potential surfaces of a mine: Square, Ellipse, and Circle. 0.5 GHz Frequency Circular Object Square Object Off-centered ellipse Object 3.0 GHz Frequency Circular Object Square Object Off-centered ellipse Object The images above reflect the variation in amplitude of the feedback signal for the various shapes and frequencies implemented during the simulation. It is clear from the graphs that at a frequency of 2.0 GHz (indicated by the blue curve), the amplitude of the signal is comparatively higher than the amplitude at other frequencies. The graphs also show that at every frequency other than 2.0 GHz, the peak of the curve is approximately the same value for the centered circular and square objects but at 2.0 GHz, there’s a noticeable difference of 0.2 in amplitude. Multiple objects at 0.5 GHz Multiple objects at 2.0 GHz The images above show the plot of the absolute scattered field generated by all three objects at varying frequencies. The figure to the left shows that at 0.5 GHz, the circular object is barely detected by the EM wave, apparent by the completely blue color around it (~0.01 V/m). The plot on the right however shows that all three objects are detected by the EM wave operating at 2.0 GHz though it appears that the off-centered square and circle scatter more than the ellipse. The use of COMSOL Multiphysics to simulate the outcome of a radiowave incident upon a medium of desirable interest is a great way of creating a comprehensive template which can be used as a standard for detecting environmentally hazardous objects buried beneath the subsurface. In the case of mine detection, the varying composition properties of the soil, the endless possibility of the shape and composition of the mine, and the depth in which the mine is buried, all affect the behavior of the incoming radiowave. As the results from the simulations show, the frequency of the radiowave and position of the mine, whether centered or off-centered, is also important in the identification of the buried object of interest. Radiowave with frequencies of 2.0 GHz and greater, appear to have greater amplitude and scattering than radiowaves of less frequency. Images of the various plots of known parameters can be used in comparison to actual GPR readings that are performed on the field, in which all of the parameters are not easily identified. Future objectives are to perform simulations for changing parameters of soil properties, material sizes, depth, and other microphysical parameters to develop a complete template for sensing and analyzing environmentally hazardous objects buried underneath the soil.