Coastal Hazard Analyses and DFIRM Update For Maryland Robin Danforth – FEMA Region III Jeff Gangai – RAMPP Heather Zhao– RAMPP Jeff Hanson – USACE/ERDC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Modeling to Revise Coastal Inundation and Flooding Estimates in Georgia and Northeast Florida Association of State Flood Plain Managers Conference May.
Advertisements

US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Great Lakes Flood Hazard Mapping Project - Data Development (Lake Michigan) Bruce Ebersole USACE Engineer.
1 Demonstration of Methodology Expert Panel Open Meeting Austin, Texas November 12, 2014.
Lonnie G. Harper & Associates, Inc. Lonnie G. Harper, PE & PLS (LGH) David Minton, PE (LGH) Dr. Joseph Suhayda (Coastal Oceanographic Consultant) Dr. Roy.
May 17, 2011 FEMA Mapping Requirements for Beach Nourishment Chris Mack.
Coastal Flood Mapping Using Customized GIS Layers by Jeff Zanotti.
An Initial Assessment of the Impacts of Sea Level Rise to the California Coast Dr. David Revell and Bob Battalio, P.E. Matt Heberger, P.E., Dr. Peter Gleick,
The Effects of Starting Wave Conditions on Coastal Flood Hazards: A Sensitivity Analysis for the Texas Coast Katrina Myers, PE, CFM Guillermo Simón, PE,
Career and Technology Student Organizations An integral part of CTE success William Nottage, State Director DECA/FBLA Division of Career and College Readiness.
1 Changes to Alabama Flood Maps Impacts to Flood Insurance Presented By: Leslie A. Durham, P.E. ADECA Office of Water Resources January 23, 2014.
A Roadmap for a Seamless Elevation Surface: Benefits to Storm Surge Forecasting Lindy Dingerson NOAA Coastal Services Center.
Floodplain Boundary Standard A Coastal Perspective May 23, 2012 Mark Zito, GISP, CFM CDM Smith Alex Sirotek, CFM CDM Smith RSC 1 Lead.
Comparison of Wave Climate Analysis Techniques in Sheltered Waters May 19, 2011 Tim Hillier, P.E., CFM Associate Lauren Klonsky Water Resources Engineer.
South Carolina Department of Natural Resources Flood Mitigation Section South Carolina Map Modernization Initiative Update Pee Dee GIS Users Group Meeting.
Company Confidential/Proprietary A Regional Prototype System for a National Problem Chesapeake Inundation Prediction System Bridging the Gap from Forecast.
Model Simulation Studies of Hurricane Isabel in Chesapeake Bay Jian Shen Virginia Institute of Marine Sciences College of William and Mary.
HAZUS ®MH Coastal Flood Hazard Analysis FATIH C. DOGAN ABS CONSULTING.
FEMA Region III Coastal Hazard Analyses and DFIRMs Update
North Carolina Neuse River Basin Plan Final Scoping Meetings April 23, 24, and 25, 2001.
Preliminary Flood Insurance Rate Maps. What is a Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) and how do I use it?* A FIRM is a map created by the NFIP for floodplain.
Transforming Health and Health Care: Focus on Maryland The Hilltop Institute University of Maryland, Baltimore County Catonsville, MD June 21, 2013 Margo.
An Instrumented Coastal Process Modeling Test Bed US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Jeff Hanson U. S. Army Engineer Research and Development.
Creating Depth Grid from a DFIRM FEMA Region VIII Mitigation GIS Team Wednesday, February 13, 2013.
Flooding in New York City 30 October Current Conditions.
Changes to FEMA Mapping John Grace, CFM Coastal Engineer - FEMA Region 1 - Boston March 14, 2014 – The Soil and Water Conservation Society – Winter Conference.
Advisory Base Flood Elevations: What Your Community Needs to Know Information for Floodplain Managers and Local Officials.
FLOOD STUDY Oswego County, NY FEMA REGION II February 7, 2011.
Georgia Flood M.A.P. Program
FEMA Region III Coastal Hazard Analyses and DFIRMs Update Jeff Gangai – Dewberry Robin Danforth – FEMA Region III.
1 US Army Engineer Research and Development Center FEMA REGION III COASTAL MAPPING PROJECT May 19, 2011 Coastal Analyses and Outreach Robin Danforth, FEMA.
FEMA’s Coastal Mapping and Management Process. 2 2 Welcome  Background and Coastal study methodologies  Technical Opportunities  Management Opportunities.
Demonstration Study to Evaluate Coastal Flood Hazards on Lake Erie ASFPM, San Antonio, TX May 22, 2012.
Using Partnerships to Meet NOAA’s Needs for its Next Generation Storm Surge System NOS/OCS/CSDL J. Feyen F. Aikman M. Erickson NWS/NCEP/EMC H. Tolman NWS/OST/MDL.
FLOOD STUDY Cumberland County, NJ FEMA REGION II February 22, 2011.
North Carolina White Oak River Basin Plan December 19, 2000.
DFIRM Subcommittee Update 1. Challenges Remain Climate Change and Sea Level Rise: Identify sea level rise timeframe and associated critical issues Data.
FEMA Region II Essex County, NJ Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) FEMA Region 2 Mitigation Division July 14th, :00-11:00.
US Army Engineer Research and Development Center COASTAL OUTREACH ADVISORY TEAM Kick-off Meeting November 19, 2010 FEMA Region III Coastal Mapping Project.
Wave Height Estimate for Multi- Frequency Flooding Events Elena Drei-Horgan, PhD, CFM Darryl Hatheway, CFM Paul Carroll, PE May 24, 2012.
ASFPM May 19, 2011 by Darryl Hatheway, CFM, AECOM San Diego and Vince Geronimo, CFM, PE, AECOM Oakland.
Mid-Course Adjustment Overview. Flood Map Modernization The Question “The committee understands that the 5-year, $1,000,000,000 program will not update.
Maryland STEM Portfolio Project (MSPP) Problem Based Learning Geospatial Technologies ePortfolio & Web 2.0 Tools.
Maryland STEM Portfolio Project (MSPP) Problem Based Learning Geospatial Technologies ePortfolio & Web 2.0 Tools.
North Carolina Tar-Pamlico River Basin Plan Final Scoping Meetings January 30 and 31, 2001.
Evaluation of Analytical Techniques for Production of a Sea Level Rise Advisory Mapping Layer for the NFIP Jerry W. Sparks, P.E., CFM ASFPM Annual National.
FEMA’s Risk MAP Coastal Updates – An Overview Jonathan E. Westcott, P.E. ASFPM 2012 National Conference San Antonio, TX Session D.8.
North Carolina Pasquotank River Basin Plan Final Scoping Meetings May 17 and 18, 2001.
Great Lakes Flood Hazard Mapping Program The initiative is a system-wide solution that provides a comprehensive analysis of storm and high water events.
05C112011B Template Master – Update Tracking Number and Date Information Here Update tracking number and date on this slide Template Master – Update Tracking.
A Great L-EAP Forward: Successes and Challenges in Implementing FEMA’s Expanded Appeals Process Todd Steiner FEMA Maggie Mathis, CFM RAMPP.
Regional Planning for Sea-Level Rise in Hampton Roads Benjamin McFarlane, AICP Regional Planner NOAA Hydrographic Services Review Panel October 26, 2011.
Coastal Process Modeling US Army Corps of Engineers Jeff Hanson Research Oceanographer MORPHOS Program Manager US Army Engineer Research and Development.
Mitigation Directorate FEMA’s Mitigation Directorate and Hurricane Emergency Management The Mitigation Directorate supports Hurricane risk assessment and.
Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage Rebecca Haney Coastal Geologist Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management.
Evaluation of Preliminary DFIRMs Phase I Findings Terrebonne Parish June 22, 2009.
Maryland How the Eastern Shore is different from the rest of the state. By Mr. Warner September, 2012 "Flag of." Image. CultureGrams Online Edition. ProQuest,
FEMA Terms (Last updated July 25, 2006) The Acronyms  NFIP – National Flood Insurance Program  FIRM – Flood Insurance Rate Map  SFHA – Special Flood.
US Army Engineer Research and Development Center U.S. IOOS MODEL VALIDATION CAPABILITY SURA SUPER-REGIONAL TEST BED Working across agencies to bring observations.
Harrisburg Flood Inundation Mapping Project – Many Agencies Working Together USACE Flood Risk Management and Silver Jackets Workshop 23 August 2012 Presented.
FLOOD STUDY Salem County, NJ FEMA REGION II February 22, 2011.
Cape May County, NJ Initial Coordination Meeting FEMA Region II Mitigation Division September 29th, :00-11:00.
Middlesex County, NJ Initial Coordination Meeting FEMA Region II Mitigation Division October 13th, :00-15:00.
Prince George’s County Flood Forum March 23, 2017
North Carolina Lumber River Basin Plan
Regional Law Enforcement Liaison Program
Risk MAP & the Little River Basin
Landuse Attributes for Overland Wave Modeling
<<County Name>> <<Date>>
Update on Great Lakes Coastal Methodology
Union County, NJ Initial Coordination Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Coastal Hazard Analyses and DFIRM Update For Maryland Robin Danforth – FEMA Region III Jeff Gangai – RAMPP Heather Zhao– RAMPP Jeff Hanson – USACE/ERDC FEMA Region III

Introduction State of MD Effective Coastal Studies Why a coastal restudy is needed? Elements of a Coastal Flood Insurance Study Ongoing FEMA Region III Storm Surge Modeling Effort Overland Wave Analysis Components Preliminary DFIRM schedules Outreach Efforts

State of Effective Coastal Study Topographic data used for modeling and mapping date back to the Mid-1970’s and mid-1980’s from USGS maps SWELs go back to a 1978 VIMS study for the Chesapeake Bay and Tidal Gage Analysis on the Atlantic Coast. Coastal studies date back to late 1970’s and early 1980’s Wave height determined with NAS method. Erosion analysis not performed Wave setup not accounted for Limited WHAFIS and/or wave runup modeling performed

Why a coastal restudy is needed? New Guidelines need to be implemented Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico Guidelines Update (2007) Sheltered Water Report (2008) PM 50 Limit of Moderate Wave Action (LiMWA) (2008) To update base data such as topographic dataset and aerial imagery to high resolution products and seamless Digital Elevation Model (DEM) To utilize newer coastal hazard methodologies developed during the FEMA Mississippi Coastal Restudy To take advantage of higher performance numerical modeling To take advantage of improvement in GIS technologies to allow for more accurate FIRMs

Hurricane Isabel Sept 19, 2003 – MD CHWMs 7.5 ft Surge

Elements of a Coastal Flood Insurance Study BFE on a FIRM includes 4 components: 1. Storm surge stillwater elevation (SWEL) 2. Wave setup (from 2D wave modeling) 3. Wave height above total stillwater elevation 4. Wave runup above storm surge elevation All applied to an eroded beach profile The above components are computed through: 1. Terrain processing and profile erosion 2. Storm surge study for SWELs determination 3. Coastal Hazard Analyses Floodplain boundaries, flood hazard zones and LiMWA are then mapped on FIRMs

Scope of Coastal Surge Analysis Study All of Region III coastal counties/cities (Atlantic Ocean Chesapeake Bay, Delaware Bay and their tributaries)

Ongoing FEMA Region III Storm Surge Modeling Effort Current stillwater elevations (SWELs) on FIRMs date back to (few updates made in early-1990s) and were computed using a tidal gage analysis or the VIMS model SWELs will be updated for 50 coastal counties covering approx miles of shoreline State-of-the art modeling setup by using ADCIRC soft coupled with the 2D wave model SWAN Obtain updated 10%, 2%, 1% and 0.2% annual chance stillwater elevations, wave setup and wave conditions for nearshore open-coast and back-bay shorelines

Storm Surge Project Project Status – October 2010 Jeff Hanson Region III Storm Surge Project Manager USACE-FRF Submittal 1 comments received; replies in preparation - Study area description - DEM, Mesh - Modeling approach - Storm selection Submittal 2 target 29 October - Modeling system validation - Hurricanes Ernesto and Isabel - Extratropical Storm Ida Production target November 2010 – February 2011 US Army Engineer Research and Development Center

Modeling System Validation Hurricane Isabel September 2003 Validation Storms Validation Parameters Hurricane Isabel (SEP 03) Hurricane Ernesto (AUG 06) Extratropical Storm Ida (Nov 09) Tides Wind speed and direction Wave height, period and direction Water levels High water marks US Army Engineer Research and Development Center

US Army Engineer Research and Development Center Hurricane Isabel Wind Speeds: OWI Reconstruction vs. Observations Observation Model Peak Stats Bias (m/s) -3.3 RMS Error (m/s) 4.2 Performance 85%

US Army Engineer Research and Development Center Hurricane Isabel Wind Directions: OWI Reconstruction vs. Observations Observation Model Station Stats Performance 99% Observation Model

Hurricane Isabel Wave Heights: PadSWAN vs. Observations US Army Engineer Research and Development Center

High Water Marks: Hurricanes Isabel and Ernesto Hurricane Isabel September 2003 Extra-tropical Storm Ida November 2009 Circles depict observed high water marks to same color scale as background surge predictions US Army Engineer Research and Development Center

MD Coastal Counties Worcester County Somerset County Wicomico County Dorchester County Talbot County Caroline County Queen Anne’s County Kent County Cecil County Harford County Baltimore County Baltimore City Anne Arundel County Calvert County Prince George’s County Saint Mary’s County Charles County

Coastal Hazard Analyses Components Transect layout Field Reconnaissance (land use, obstructions, shoreline conditions, structures) Starting wave conditions (wave height and period) from 2D wave modeling eliminating the need for limited fetch analysis Wave setup from 2D wave modeling Primary Frontal Dune (PFD) Dune erosion: 540 sqft rule Bluffs erosion WHAFIS modeling for overland wave height computation 2% Wave Runup All above analyses will be performed with the Coastal GeoRAMPP tool

Transect Placement Harford County, Proposed Transect Layout for the Havre de Grace area

Field Reconnaissance

Development of a Seamless Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Topo and Bathy data collected from USACE Shoreline extracted from LiDAR data Topo, Bathy and shoreline data are merge to create a seamless DEM USACE DEM for surge was generated at a 10 m resolution DEMs for DFIRM studies are generated at 3 m resolution to allow more higher modeling and mapping detail. Example of the Baltimore area 3m (10ft) seamless DEM

Erosion Analysis Dunes: Dune erosion based on the 540 sqft rule Dune retreat Dune removal Primary Frontal Dune (PFD) delineation Bluffs, Cliffs: Non-standard erosion based on historic data 100-year stillwater elevation Is it: > 540 square feet? or < 540 square feet? Primary Frontal Dune Reservoir Dune Crest

Overland Wave Hazard Modeling WHAFIS 4.0 Profile elevation 1% SWELs Starting wave conditions Wave Setup Obstruction cards (OF, IF, BU, VE, MG)

Wave Runup FEMA G&S 2007 requires the use of the 2% runup vs. the mean runup computed prior to 2007 Mild-sloping beaches, bluffs and cliffs Coastal Structures: Will structure survive the 1% event? Is structure certified? Modeling of integral structure vs. fail structure to determine higher hazard Runup on structures limited to 3 ft on top of the structure’s crest w/overtopping possible AO Zone Methods: Runup 2.0, TAW, ACES, SPM

MD Coastal Overland Wave Height Analysis Status Modeling set-up Transect Layout – all 17 studies completed Field Reconnaissance – 12 studies completed, 5 to be performed 11/2010 Obstruction carding – 12 studies completed, 5 in progress Topo/bathy /shoreline development – 12 studies in progress Wave height analysis (waiting on surge results) Starting wave conditions (wave height and period) Wave setup Primary Frontal Dune (PFD) Dune/Bluff erosion WHAFIS modeling for overland wave height computation 2% Wave Runup

Mapping

Limit of Moderate Wave Action (LiMWA) FEMA Procedure Memorandum No. 50, 2008 At present not a regulatory requirement No Federal Insurance requirements tied to LiMWA CRS benefit for communities requiring VE Zone construction standards in areas defined by LiMWA or areas subject to waves greater then 1.5 ft. Potential of additional 650 points

Limit of Moderate Wave Action (LiMWA) Defined by the area subject to wave action with waves greater than 1.5 ft in height

LiMWA – mapped example From FEMA Procedure Memorandum 50

Planned MD Preliminary DFIRM Schedules Harford County– 7/29/2011 Cecil and Baltimore Counties, Baltimore City – 8/29/2011 Talbot, and Caroline Counties – 11/30/2011 Dorchester, Wicomico, Somerset Counties – 11/30/2011 Prince George’s County – 11/1/2011 Charles County – 12/1/2011 Worcester County – 1/31/2012 Saint Mary’s County – 2/15/2012 Calvert and Queen Anne’s Counties – 3/1/2012 Anne Arundel County – 4/1/2012 Kent County – 5/1/2012

Coastal Study Outreach Efforts Coastal Outreach Strategy Outreach meetings Initial outreach (scoping) meetings for each county Regional technical storm surge study meetings Flood study review meetings for some counties Final community meetings for each county Open houses for some counties Website –

Questions?