TCPS 2 Guidance: Interpretations R Us Laura-Lee Balkwill, PhD, Policy Analyst Secretariat on Responsible Conduct of Research CAREB Atlantic - Fredericton.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

The Tri-council Framework On Responsible Conduct In Research A Panel Member And Researchers Perspective Marc F. Joanisse, Ph.D. U. Western Ontario Karen.
Action Research Not traditional educational research often research tests theory not practical Teacher research in classrooms and/or schools/districts.
PRESENTATION ON MONDAY 7 TH AUGUST, 2006 BY SUDHIR VARMA FCA; CIA(USA) FOR THE INSTITUTE OF INTERNAL AUDITORS – INDIA, DELHI CHAPTER.
Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the PCT Audit Procedure Background: The Act was passed in November The Act will be fully in force by January.
Participation Requirements for a Patient Representative.
Use of Career Assessment Processes, Models, and Tools in Career Development Services CDSWG Report: 2009.
Research Policy Practice National Dialogue: Phase III The Journey Ahead February 28, 2013.
+ Developing Codes of Practice for Indigenous Research Suzanne Urbanczyk, HREB Member, Assoc Prof, Linguistics Eugenie Lam, Ethics Coordinator Wanda Boyer,
WHAT IS A RESEARCH ETHICS BOARD?
Evaluating Tobacco Law Enforcement Roundtables Partial Results (events still ongoing) Partial Results from two Regional Roundtables High stakeholder participation.
Historical Research.
PQIs The New PQI Process When is PQI research? To REB or not to REB? These are some of the questions Donna Manca Charmaine Kabatoff.
HRB Webinar Health Research Awards Content Objective of the call Scope and Panels Principal Investigator Response to peer-reviewers (rebuttal) Some.
CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting IRB Frequently Asked Questions October 11, 2005.
Research Ethics Western University Health Sciences Research Ethics Board Tri-Council Policy Statement 2 Grace Kelly Ethics Officer
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
How to Develop the Right Research Questions for Program Evaluation
Who’s the Boss? Faculty Advisor or Principal Investigator Supervision versus Student Investigator or Study Coordinator Responsibilities Gwenn Snow, MS,
Lisa Denney, MPH HRPP Assistant Director Melanie Mace, MA HRPP Education and Training Coordinator Bill Woods, PhD CAPS Policy and Ethics Core November.
Needs Analysis Session Scottish Community Development Centre November 2007.
McGraw-Hill © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. The Nature of Research Chapter One.
Pierre Boulos PhD CAREB 2015 Pre-Conference Workshop 1 Conducting research using our own children, ahem, I mean our own students, as participants.
CAREB ATLANTIC 2013 St. Thomas University and University of New Brunswick November 21st-22nd, 2013 Fredericton, NB Fredericton, NB.
Chapter 9: Research with Inuit, Métis and First Nations Peoples – Balancing Academic and Community Values Dr. Lynn Lavallée, Ryerson University Canadian.
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
Research !!.  Philosophy The foundation of human knowledge A search for a general understanding of values and reality by chiefly speculative rather thanobservational.
Educational Products and Services Offered Abroad by Canadian Universities: An AUCC Survey Robert White International Relations AUCC.
Ethics in Quality Improvement Quality Academy Cohort 6 Melanie Rathgeber MERGE Consulting.
Research at the Standards Boards AAA-Government & Nonprofit Midyear Meeting Speakers: Dean Mead, Kim Petrone, and Cullen Walsh Moderator: Terry Patton.
Research PHE 498. Define Research Research can be considered as systematic inquiry: A process that needs to be followed systematically to derive conclusions.
Questions: AAHRPP Evaluation Instrument for Use with Final Revised Accreditation Standards Presented by: C. Karen Jeans, MSN, CCRN, CIP COACH Program Analyst,
RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH MARGARITA M. CARDONA DIRECTOR OF SPONSORED RESEARCH Institutional Review Board.
Research Ethics Research Methods Grace Kelly Ethics Officer Health Sciences Research Ethics Board.
How to Successfully Apply to the IRB Richard Gordin, IRB Chair True Rubal, Administrator / Director For the Protection of Human Participants in Research.
IWK Research Ethics - Workshop Series Session #2 REB Review Procedures How to submit … October 24, 2013 Bev White, Manager, Research Ethics Research Services,
Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)
SUNY Oswego Human Subjects Committee Last Revised 10/28/2011.
Cognitive Level of Analysis
John Russell Chair, Langara College Research Ethics Board Chair, Langara Department of Philosophy Talk for Langara PD Days April 24, 2013 (Revised May.
Corporate Social Responsibility LECTURE 25: Corporate Social Responsibility MGT
Research Seminars in IT in Education (MIT6003) The use of computers in educational research Dr Jacky Pow.
Research Ethics Western University & University of Windsor Grace Kelly Ethics Officer
Human Subjects Review: Policies and Procedures. Why A Human Subjects Review? It is the policy of this University that all researchers undertaking studies.
Evaluation of the Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program 2010 NSF Noyce Conference Abt Associates Inc. July 9, 2010.
TCPS 2 (2014) Updates to guidance re: Privacy, Secondary Use of Data/Biological Materials and Alterations to Consent Requirements Laura-Lee Balkwill,
11 The CPCRN, DCPC, NCI, and the Community Guide: Areas for Collaboration and Supportive Work Shawna L. Mercer, MSc, PhD Director The Guide to Community.
TCPS 2 Consultation: Revisions Relevant to Clinical Trials Laura-Lee Balkwill, PhD, Policy Analyst Secretariat on Responsible Conduct of Research CAREB.
Understanding your Community Needs and Resource Assessments Primary Prevention Institute 2015.
What Institutional Researchers Should Know about the IRB Susan Thompson Senior Research Analyst Office of Institutional Research Presented at the Texas.
Update from Secretariat on Responsible Conduct of Research Susan Zimmerman, Executive Director CAREB National Conference Vancouver, B.C. May 1, 2015.
Developing SEA Change’s Evaluation Plan
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Building a Culture of Research Ethics in the Ontario Colleges OTTE ROSENKRANTZ PHD.
Erik Augustson, PhD, National Cancer Institute Susan Zbikowski, PhD, Alere Wellbeing Evaluation.
Human Subjects Research at Mines Colorado School of Mines New Faculty Orientation November 20, 2015.
Does My Project Require HRPP/IRB Review? Research Human Subject Engagement HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM (HRPP) OFFICE.
CSWE Overview This resource highlights key aspects of the mission of the Commission on Research and its goals for the next 5 years. It will then.
Procedure for the resolution of grievances in the ILO
Course Review 2017.
COCE Institutional Review Board Academic Spotlight
MAINTAINING THE INVESTIGATOR’S SITE FILE
MUHC Innovation Model.
Internal and Governmental Financial Auditing and Operational Auditing
© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Making an Application for Ethics Review
Multi-Jurisdictional Research: The Need For New Approaches & Educational Initiatives Farid Pesteh, Danielle Christie, Zakiya Atcha, Patrizia Albanese.
Multijurisdictional FAQs (Workshop Stream 3)
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

TCPS 2 Guidance: Interpretations R Us Laura-Lee Balkwill, PhD, Policy Analyst Secretariat on Responsible Conduct of Research CAREB Atlantic - Fredericton November, 2013

Agenda TCPS 2 interpretation service Hot topics Q & A

TCPS 2 Interpretation Service SRCR responds to individual interpretation questions  135 so far in 2013  144 in 2012 Questions that raise new issues or suggest policy revisions are discussed by PRE Responses to questions of general interest vetted by PRE and published on PRE website  35 entries and growing Note: PRE/SRCR cannot serve as an appeal body for specific REB decisions

Objectives of Interpretation Service To enhance understanding and consistency in applying TCPS 2 To inform the need for revisions to TCPS 2  interpretation requests help identify recurrent issues or gaps in guidance To better direct TCPS 2 educational initiatives to issues of relevance to the research community

What is multi-jurisdictional research? –Involves multiple REBs and/or institutions with jurisdiction over the research Question 5 posted under Governance If a researcher obtains REB approval at his/her own institution to gather data from participants who are members of other institutions, is it necessary to obtain REB approval at each of the other institutions that employ the participating members? Hot Topic: Multi-jurisdictional Research

Considerations for each institution: 1 or more researchers affiliated with the institution Institution resources needed for recruitment Institution resources needed for data collection The research is within the jurisdiction of the institution = REB Review Research approved by an REB covered by a reciprocal or delegated review agreement Delegated or reciprocal review is possible (but consider local participant issues)

Is it research? –an undertaking intended to extend knowledge through a disciplined inquiry or systematic investigation Does it involve human participants? –individuals whose data, or responses to interventions, stimuli … are relevant to answering the research question Research and non-research activities confusion: –When activities and research employ similar methods and techniques –When participants are recruited for a dual purpose Hot Topic: Research vs Non-research activities

Is it research? –an undertaking intended to extend knowledge through a disciplined inquiry or systematic investigation Does it involve human participants? –individuals whose data, or responses to interventions, stimuli … are relevant to answering the research question Research and non-research activities confusion: –When activities and research employ similar methods and techniques –When participants are recruited for a dual purpose Hot Topic: Research vs Non-research activities Key determining factor: Intended purpose of the undertaking

Posted interpretations – under ‘Scope’ 7.Does publishing the results of a quality assurance study in a journal determine whether it is research, and whether it requires REB review? Example: An evaluation of an administrative approach to improving hospital staff morale following a series of challenging events. –The hospital administration publishes the results in a quality assurance journal to show how the approach helped improve staff morale Hot Topic: Research vs Non-research activities

Posted interpretations – under ‘Scope’ 8.Is it ethically acceptable to recruit participants for a dual purpose: a quality improvement study and research? Example An independent survey company asks post-secondary institutions to administer a student well-being questionnaire to their student population. –The institutions intend to use the results for quality assurance and evaluation of their student outreach programs. –The company intends to pool the data from all of the institutions to answer specific research questions about factors that affect student well-being. Hot Topic: Research vs Non-research activities

Hot Topic: Community Engagement Most frequent question: Why does the guidance in chapter 9 (particularly the guidance on community engagement) apply only to First Nations, Inuit, and M étis communities? 2 nd most frequent question: When is community engagement required and to what extent?

Question 1 posted under Research Involving FNIM 1.Can guidance in Chapter 9 for research involving FNIM peoples also apply to other communities? (March 2012) Chapter 9: -acknowledges the unique status of the Aboriginal peoples of Canada -was designed to guide research involving those communities -may also be an important source of guidance for research involving other distinct communities. Therefore: Research ethics boards and researchers can apply the articles of Chapter 9 that are relevant to the particular community involved in the research. Hot Topic: Community Engagement

Questions & Answers

Education resources On-line tutorial Webinars Interpretation service

Please get in touch PANEL ON RESEARCH ETHICS 350 Albert Street Ottawa, ON K1A 1H5 Tel.: