Oral Progress Report on ATRs’ Task Force Young-Woo Yun Leader of the ATRs’ Task Force World Intellectual Property Organization.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Guy Duchossois, Work Plan Manager Report on 2006 Work Plan.
Advertisements

Work Plan Development Guidelines and Schedule.
Work Plan Development Guidelines and Schedule.
1 Geneva, October 2008 YUN Young-Woo IP INFORMATION & WIPO STANDARDS.
XML4IP Project- ST.96 Preparation
World Meteorological Organization Working together in weather, climate and water WMO OMM WMO GFCS Governance proposal Process of development.
Bangladesh European Union Capacity Building for Effective Response Management System Through e-Learning Options A SDC supported project Comprehensive Disaster.
Revision of WIPO Standard ST.14 Committee on WIPO Standards, third session Geneva 15 – 19 April 2013 Anna Graschenkova Standards Section.
1 (6) Subgroup SGTERN CEDR Executive Board 9 June 2005 Activities of the subgroup SGTERN Background and Objectives Members and meetings of SG TERN Achievements.
SAU #53 Serving the School Districts of Allenstown, Chichester, Deerfield, Epsom, and Pembroke Action Plan
Getting SMARTer: The evolution of Project Management within Victoria Police Doug Witschi.
WIPO’s Strategies on Intellectual Property and Economic Development WIPO’s Strategies on Intellectual Property and Economic Development United Nations.
Development of WIPOSTAD Progress report by the International Bureau Committee on WIPO Standards Geneva May Anna Graschenkova Industrial Property.
Proceedings and Report of the Expert Meeting: Arrangements Proceedings and Report of the Expert Meeting: Arrangements.
NESCC Meeting March 28, Topics Accomplishments Since Last Meeting Program Management for NESCC Support to the NESCC Sponsor Committee Review and.
Social Inclusion by Proactive Design InclusiveByDesign Second project meeting June 2001 Florence, Italy.
CSO engagement in policy process Hille Hinsberg State Chancellery Government Communication Officer
The 16 th Session of WIPO Standing Committee of the Law of Patents Catherine Eunkyeong Lee APAA Patent Committee Meeting November 13, 2011, Manila.
Evitherm MTR 07 Sept 04 Phill Giles Thermal Technology Consulting (TTC) Evitherm project mid-term review Work Package 2 Phill Giles Thermal Technology.
EARTO – working group on quality issues – 2 nd session Anneli Karttunen, Quality Manager VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland This presentation.
IT 499 Bachelor Capstone Week 8. Adgenda Administrative Review UNIT Seven UNIT Eight Project UNIT Nine Preview Project Status Summary.
LeBaron Woodyard Dean, Academic Affairs October 30, 2013 CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES CHIEF INSTRUCTIONAL OFFICERS FALL 2013 CONFERENCE.
BPR PHASE IV IMPLEMENTATION NOAA Business Process Re-Engineering Current Status: June 21, 2006 NESDIS Cooperative Institute Directors and Administrators.
ICT, Integration, Culture and Tolerance Education and Culture Lifelong Learning Programme GRUNDTVIG
BLACA - IPI seminar 5 October th anniversary of the Rome Convention Bird & Bird.
APEC EWG 23 Bangkok, Thailand Earthquake Response Cooperation Program for Energy Supply Systems Phase 2 Progress Report By Chinese Taipei May 16, 2002.
Progress update on developing Health Sector Strategic Plan (HSSP IV) Joint Annual Health Sector Review Technical Review Meeting Wednesday 5 th.
Nadi, Fiji, September 2009 An Implementation Approach to Action Plans on BSG Dinh Van Dzung, Ph.D. Deputy Director, Research Institute of Post and.
Ninth Annual Meeting of the WG: Objectives and Agenda Jennifer H. Madans U.S.A.
Legal Status Data Legal status project and relating developments in CWS Patentscope Users Forum June 18, 2013 Angel López Solanas.
Projects spanning over two programming periods Department for Programme and Project Preparation Beatrix Horváth, Deputy Head of Department Budapest, 5.
Mandate and Governance Structure of the London Group.
Hungarian Central Statistical Office Handbook on Seasonal Adjustment STES WP June 2007 Methods and Practices on Seasonal Adjustment in the European.
Future of EUPAN in the point of view of the Czech Presidency Ministry of Interior of the Czech Republic náměstí Hrdinů 1643/ Prague 4.
List of Decisions #Decision for the Board 1 Does the Board agree to its composition? The Board requested that its composition be considered “proposed”
Orientation and Summer Institutes Implementer’s Forum October 2005 Susan Barrett PBIS Maryland.
SWG-ARD / Vientiane / July 11, 2013 SWG-ARD Meeting July 11, 2013 Secretariat’s presentation.
PROGRESS OF 5 YEAR HEALTH SECTOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN Department of Planning and Finance, Ministry of Health.
Application procedure From theory to practice Dieter H. Henzler, Steinbeis-Transfercenter Cultural Resources Management, Berlin.
Islamic Republic of Iran Country Report of the Islamic Republic of Iran STATISTICAL CENTRE OF IRAN By: Dr. Adel Azar Head, Statistical Centre of Iran
U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program eDeployment Kickoff August 26, 2003.
Progress Report Performance Audit Subcommittee - PAS INTOSAI Governing Board meeting Mexico City, November 2 and 3, 2006.
Public health, innovation and intellectual property 1 |1 | The Global Strategy on Public Health, Innovation and Intellectual Property Technical Briefing.
Short-Term Economic Statistics Working PartyJune Short Term Economic Statistics Timeliness Framework Richard McKenzie OECD.
GEOSS Common Infrastructure Initial Operating Capability Directions and Discussion Presented to GEO ADC Geneva May
1 IMO Goal-based Standards A shipbuilders ’ opinion September 20, 2007 The Shipbuilders ’ Association of Japan NISHIYAMA, goro.
Page 1Wireless World Research Forum (WWRF) September 18, 2001.
Vilnius, Lithuania June 10, It is the WGPD’s 20th Anniversary and our goal is: " to publish guidelines and other informational materials to be used.
Legal Status Task Force Report CWS/4/8, CWS/4 BIS/5 Geneva, Switzerland March 2016 Young-Woo YUN Head, Standards Section.
WP6 – Monitoring and Evaluation 17th November 2014 Rome.
1MIL client logo to be positioned at the mark minimum height maximum size navigator Text Lines MIL Agenda.
2013 China-CEEC Business Council – proposed role and structure Michal Polański, Ph.D. Polish Agency for Enterprise Development Katowice, April 20th 2015.
8 th Address Policy SIG Report Takashi Arano Yong Wan Ju Kenny Huang Chair/co-Chairs of APNIC Address Policy SIG.
【New Draft】 France -Japan International Co-funding Joint call Schedule (revised version) APR. 11, 2017 Bpifrance / NEDO final meeting (week of 18/9) Announcement.
Implementation Review Team Meeting
19th GRI Coordination Group meeting
REWG activities in LILIIA MALON REWG Chair Prague
Terms and Conditions Review 2011
The Research Agenda of the 2008 SNA
EQAVET Annual Network Meeting
Chapter 19 Speaking in and as a Group
Passenger Mobility Statistics 28 April 2016
The IRES process in Vladimir Markhonko
Revision 1 to Document CWG-SFP-2/7-E 12 September 2017 Original: English Process and timetable for The elaboration of the ITU STRATEGIC and financial.
Informal document GRVA nd GRVA, 28 Jan Feb. 2019
Jessica Sully, Secretariat
Inputs Regard to “Test Phase” to TFCS
Roles and Responsibilities
Africa Centers of Excellence (ACE II) Project Financial & Disbursement Management NAIROBI, May 13 14,2019.
Working Party on Noise (GRB) General information and WP.29 highlights
Presentation transcript:

Oral Progress Report on ATRs’ Task Force Young-Woo Yun Leader of the ATRs’ Task Force World Intellectual Property Organization

Background of the task force Establishment of the ATRs’ task force Strategic Approach Preparation of survey on the ATRs Future activities

Background of the task force

On the basis of decisions by PCPI and PCIPI/EXEC in 1978, 1990 and 1996, the Secretariat has collected and prepared the ATRs/PI, ATRs/TM and ATRs/ID The recommended structure and contents of the ATRs/PI, ATRs/TM and ATRs/ID might have become outdated. At 6th session, the SDWG agreed to create a new Task Force to clarify the objectives of the ATRs and the target users, to prepare a proposal to revise and update the current recommended contents of the ATRs. to undertake a detailed analysis of the ATR website’s settings and usage with the aim of understanding current access patterns and improving the delivery of the information provided

Establishment of the ATRs’ task force

The Secretariat invited member states to participate in the ATRs’ task force by Nov. 16, 2005 Currently, 27 experts, who are representative of 19 member states, participate in the task force The IB leads the task force

Strategic Approach

In order to accomplish the instruction given by the SDWG, our task force agreed on the two-phase approach Clarify the objectives and target users of the ATRs clarification of target users survey on requirements of target users definition of the objectives of the ATRs

Strategic Approach Prepare a proposal to revise and update of the current recommended contents and user guidelines for preparing the ATRs undertaking a detailed analysis of the ATR website’s settings and usage with the aim of understanding current access patterns and improving the delivery of the information provided preparation of a proposal on the new ATR Management System which should be adequate, flexible and useful for the target users

Strategic Approach Provisional target user groups IP Office governmental authority or organization non-governmental authority or organization; commercial IP information provider professional IP information user educational institution general public

Preparation of survey on the ATRs

A survey to clarify the objectives and target users Prepared questionnaires and implemented the web survey on WIPO website Available through WIPO website at For three months from June 1 to August 31, The survey is composed of 13 questions classified by 4 groups who are the ATRs’ users what are the objectives of the ATRs how to improve the ATRs any suggestion on the interested current ATRs  Take about 7 minutes

Preparation of survey on the ATRs Through the survey to clarify the objectives and target users of the ATRs to get an idea to revise and update of the current recommended contents and user guidelines for preparing the ATRs. Make the survey more visible to anyone worldwide member states to announce the ATR’s web survey the Secretariat to promote the survey through SCIT website or more visible WIPO website the Secretariat to inform the SCIT members of the URL

Future activities

Schedule of Phase I Activities 31. Aug. 2006: conclude the ATR Survey submissions 30. Sep. 2006: prepare initial analysis of survey results 31. Oct. 2006: make final analysis of survey results and recommendation for Phase II activities Schedule of Phase II Activities (to be discussed) Prepare a proposal to revise and update of the current recommended contents Undertake a detailed analysis of the ATR website’s settings and usage

Thank you