Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality WRAP Technical Analysis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Uinta Basin Air Quality Study Kathleen Sgamma. Topics Covered  Background  Purpose  Timelines  Project Details  WRAP Phase III Oil & Gas Emissions.
Advertisements

An Update on the Activities of the Western Regional Air Partnership ‘WRAP v2.0’ Robert Kotchenruther, Ph.D. NW-AIRQUEST June, 2011.
Status of 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS Program in Clark County Presentation to Air Quality Forum May 10, 2005.
EPA PM2.5 Modeling Guidance for Attainment Demonstrations Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS February 20, 2007.
Technical Support System Review Board Meeting March 8, 2007.
Department of the Environment The State Implementation Plan Process – Our Next Steps Brian Hug Division Chief, Air Quality Planning and Policy Division.
1 An Update on EPA Attainment Modeling Guidance for the 8- Hour Ozone NAAQS Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS/EMAD/AQMG November 16, 2005.
Issues on Ozone Planning in the Western United States Prepared by the WESTAR Planning Committee for the Fall Business Meeting, Tempe, AZ October 31, 2011.
WRAP Status + Fire Emissions Inventory Protocol for Regional Air Quality Analysis and Planning Support in the WRAP regionWRAP Tom Moore WRAP/Western Governors’
West-wide Jumpstart Air Quality Modeling Study Modeling Results November 7, 2013 Technical Project Team ENVIRON, Alpine Geophysics, Univ. of North Carolina.
Update on EPA Oil and Gas Activities Greg Green, Outreach and Information Division, OAQPS.
1 WRAP Fire Tracking Systems Draft Intent of WRAP FTS Policy – Assist states/tribes to address emissions inventory and tracking associated with fire in.
WRAP Strategic Plan WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT February 20, 2008.
Developing a Workplan for Implementing the Strategic Plan for the WRAP Board October 1, 2008.
2004 Technical Summit Overview January 26-27, 2004 Tempe, AZ.
Oil and Gas Workgroup Summary October 21-23, 2009 Denver.
Modeling Studies of Air Quality in the Four Corners Region National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Cooperative Institute for Research in.
PM2.5 Model Performance Evaluation- Purpose and Goals PM Model Evaluation Workshop February 10, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS.
Regional Issues Facing Colorado and Other Western States WESTAR Spring Business Meeting Denver, Colorado March 30, 2010 Paul Tourangeau Director Colorado.
November 7, 2013 WRAP Membership Meeting Denver, CO Tom Moore WRAP Air Quality Program Manager WESTAR Council.
WRAP Committee and Forum Updates WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT October 15, 2003.
October 29, 2012 Tom Moore Air Quality Program Manager Western Governors’ Association WESTAR Council Meeting.
1 CCOS Update November 3, 2006 PC Meeting Project Status –Completed Projects Results –On-Going Projects Status Plan for CCOS Final Phase –Guiding Principles.
Chemical transport modeling in support of NPS-CIRA activities Mike Barna 1 Marco Rodriguez 2 Kristi Gebhart 1 Bret Schichtel 1 Bill Malm 1 Jenny Hand 2.
Preparation of Control Strategies October 18, 2007 NAAQS RIA Workshop Darryl Weatherhead, Kevin Culligan, Serpil Kayin, David Misenheimer, Larry Sorrels.
WRAP Regional Modeling Center April 25-26, 2006 AoH Work Group Meeting Regional Modeling Center Status Report AoH Workgroup Meeting Seattle, WA April 25-26,
WRAP Update WESTAR Meeting San Francisco April 25, 2011.
Colorado Perspective on Nitrogen Oxides Paul Tourangeau Director Colorado APCD November 11, 2009.
Response to WRAP Air Managers Committee Memo “Request for Cost Estimates” April 6, 2009 WESTAR Council.
0 DRAFT WRAP Offroad Retrofit Program : Overview & Status Update February
Resources and needs for technical information to support a Strategic Plan Technical Analysis Forum May 22-23, 2007.
Fugitive Dust Project Phase One The WRAP Emissions Forum contracted with a team of contractors lead by ENVIRON to produce regional PM 10 and PM 2.5 emissions.
WRAP Workshop July 29-30, 2008 Potential Future Regional Modeling Center Cumulative Analysis Ralph Morris ENVIRON International Corporation Novato, California.
Source Attribution Modeling to Identify Sources of Regional Haze in Western U.S. Class I Areas Gail Tonnesen, EPA Region 8 Pat Brewer, National Park Service.
1 Modeling Under PSD Air quality models (screening and refined) are used in various ways under the PSD program. Step 1: Significant Impact Analysis –Use.
1 Impact on Ozone Prediction at a Fine Grid Resolution: An Examination of Nudging Analysis and PBL Schemes in Meteorological Model Yunhee Kim, Joshua S.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 3SAQS/3SDW Progress Review to the 3SAQS Technical Committee University of North.
WRAP 2003 Work Plan: Overview and IOC Elements WRAP 2003 Work Plan: Overview and IOC Elements WRAP Board Meeting November 12, 2003 Tempe, AZ Rick Sprott.
The West is different August 14, 2013 OAQPS. Aerosols causing Worst Visibility Days – East vs. West 2.
WRAP Stationary Sources Joint Forum Meeting August 16, 2006 The CMAQ Visibility Model Applied To Rural Ozone In The Intermountain West Patrick Barickman.
Resource Management Planning Air Quality Brock LeBaron Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality
Western Air Quality Issues and Photochemical Modeling - An Industrial Perspective Doug Blewitt, CCM AQRM Dana Wood, PE BP.
Western Regional Technical Air Quality Studies: support for Ozone and other Air Quality Planning in the West Tom Moore Air Quality Program Manager Western.
1 RPO Data Analysis/Monitoring Grant Guidance Review Extracted from the EPA’s 3/5/02 RPO 4 th Year Policy, Organizational & Technical Guidance.
Funding of Regional Planning Organizations May, 2006.
Strategic Plan Development Status Technical Analysis Forum meeting October 11, 2007.
Division of Air Quality Utah Department of Environmental Quality PM Hour NAAQS Modeling Issues in the State of Utah WRAP Workshop on Regional Emissions.
Technical Support System Review Board Meeting March 8, 2007.
EPA’s White Paper and Workshop on Background Ozone NASA AQAST 10 th Semiannual Meeting – 1/6/16.
WASATCH FRONT EMISSIONS ARE IMPROVING 320 tons/day Source: Utah Division of Air Quality Patrick Barickman, 35% Reduction
WRAP Overview Established in 1997 as successor to Grand Canyon Visibility Transport Commission. Develop technical and policy tools needed by western states.
Key Findings from May & July 2008 WRAP Technical Workshops September 30, 2008 Steve Arnold, Colorado DPHE & Bob Kotchenruther, EPA R10 (Co-Chairs, WRAP.
Status Report on the Role of Ammonia in the San Joaquin Valley December 11, 2003 Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency.
Fire impacts – Natural event data exclusions/ozone monitoring Colleen Delaney, Utah Division of Air Quality March 11, 2004.
Regional Haze SIP Template: Mobile Sources Edie Chang California Air Resources Board WESTAR Fall Technical Conference September 2002.
Reaching New Heights Tools and Data for air quality planning in the Intermountain West Intermountain West Data Warehouse Presenter: Agency: Contact Information:
New Ozone NAAQS Impacts: What Happens Next with a Lower O3 Standard? Nonattainment Designation and Industry’s Opportunity to Participate New Ozone NAAQS.
Revised EPA Ozone Standard – Effects in the West May 15, 2008.
Aerosol & Atmospheric Optics: Visual Air Quality and Radiation
EPA Air Policy Priorities
Western Ozone Issues WESTAR Fall Business Meeting Salt Lake City, UT
BART Overview Lee Alter Western Governors’ Association
WESTAR Planning Committee
Updated Oil & Gas Emissions Projections for 2023 and Aug. 11, 2016
Issues on Ozone Planning in the Western United States
WRAP Overview and Role of Dust Forum
Regional Haze SIP Status Report
WESTAR (State Caucus) Recommendations
EPA’s Roadmap for the Second Planning Period
Improving Regional PM2.5 Modeling along Utah’s Wasatch Front
Presentation transcript:

Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality WRAP Technical Analysis Forum Technical Support for the States and Tribes A Utah Perspective February 6, 2007 Las Vegas, NV Patrick Barickman

Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality 1.Utah air quality and modeling issues Current and future issues throughout the state 2.WRAP technical support ** Modeling and data sharing capabilities with relevance to other state/tribal air quality needs 3.Potential for collaboration ** Assume that other states will face a similar variety of issues How can WRAP adapt, or enhance, technical services to meet these needs in the future? ** One state’s perspective: These are starting points for discussion Overview

Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality Utah Technical Issues PM2.5 NAAQS challenge is the 24-hour standard Under winter inversion conditiions, > 80% PM2.5 is secondary ammonium nitrate New standard simply increases the number of counties likely to be in nonattainment May be other areas of the state as well

Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality Utah Technical Issues Ozone Currently all counties meet the 8-hr standard However, Wasatch Front counties very close to violation If new standard of 70 ppb is set, as with PM2.5, the number of counties likely to be in nonattainment increases

Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality Other Utah Technical Issues Mercury This is likely to be a long term issue that will take considerable resources because of its complexity Oil and Gas Large increase in activity Nearly all development in “Indian Country” – State has very limited role in regulation – EPA and Tribe have jurisdiction

Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality WRAP Technical Support Capabilities 36 kilometer modeling Air quality – CMAQ, CAMx and Calpuff Emissions – SMOKE Both systems highly refined after 6 years of development Fire and dust inventory refinement Multitude of tools for visibility analysis Source apportionment Glidepath projections TSS New system with good developmental base Current focus Some data access Mostly targeted analytical products for 308 SIP visibility issues

Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality Future Support From WRAP To The States and Tribes Short Term Horizon – Jan Continued support for visibility SIPS Apportionment analysis Modeling – Not visibility related Intermountain West – oil & gas/rural ozone Reprocess/analyze SMOKE and CMAQ results for ozone Create 1 st draft analysis for effects of growth in oil & gas with 2018 CMAQ results Winter inversion 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS Big problem along the Wasatch Front, Boise and possibly Reno as well Ozone, ozone precursor transport, refine biogenics estimates, etc. TSS – Begin development of support products for issues other than visibility

Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality Future Support From WRAP To The States and Tribes Long Term Horizon – 2 Years + Modeling Support for higher resolution modeling domains Air quality issues already being addressed by the states point to an increasing need for sub-regional analyses Ability to import updated and locally refined inventories Ability to export WRAP inventories to fill gaps for other modeling studies Look for opportunities to collaborate with states/tribes on individual technical analyses Inventory improvement General technical support

Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality Future Support From WRAP To The States and Tribes Long Term Horizon – 2 Years + Technical Support TSS a flexible foundation to distribute information now in place Original design goals: Discover information in response to need Link to data through description Provide direct access to remote data for analytical use Access to intermediate data sets, rather than final analytical products will become increasingly important “Intermediate” Examples: SMOKE input/output sector-specific inventory ( area, nonroad, etc.) temporal profiles CMAQ output – pollutant specific, layer specific Flexible tools to extract the data Spatial and temporal subsets

Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality Conclusions In Addition To Regional Haze, States Face A Variety Of Air Quality Problems Some will be locally oriented such as exceeding the 24-hour PM standard along the Wasatch Front Others will cross state boundaries such as oil and gas, ozone, and wind blown dust WRAP Has Built An Impressive Modeling And Technical Support Capability Modeling assistance would likely be welcomed by the Intermountain states to assess impacts from oil and gas development Investment in continued development of the TSS would be small compared to the potential savings for states and tribes if the TSS can be used as a resource for local and regional modeling efforts