FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts1March 2009FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts1March 2009 Charlotte South Corridor LRT Bill.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Parsons Brinckerhoff Chicago, Illinois GIS Estimation of Transit Access Parameters for Mode Choice Models GIS in Transit Conference October 16-17, 2013.
Advertisements

In Portland, Oregon TRB Planning Applications Conference Reno, Nevada Mark Bradley Research & Consulting.
This is my “focus” slide, used to make sure that I’m getting the sharpest possible picture on the projection screen. It is the 1954 Freeway Plan for the.
FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts1March 2009 Before-and-After Studies – Examples Session 12 Interstate MAX LRT in Portland Joe Recker,
Regional Bicycle Demand Model: In Use Today in Portland Bill Stein, Metro TRB Transportation Applications Conference Reno, Nevada – May 9, 2011.
April 10, 2007 Travel Forecasting Methodology for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia 13th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Reno, Nevada.
On-board Survey of Bus and Light Rail Customers May 8, 2006 Transit Marketing, LLC CJI Research Corporation.
SR 50/UCF Connector Alternatives Analysis Orange County Board of County Commissioners January 13, 2015.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Regional Transportation Plan Guidelines Work Group Meeting presented by Christopher Wornum Cambridge.
Smith Myung, Cambridge Systematics Sean McAtee, Cambridge Systematics Cambridge Systematics.
October 4-5, 2010 TCRP H-37: Characteristics of Premium Transit Services that Affect Choice of Mode Prepared for: AMPO Modeling Subcommittee Prepared by:
Justifying Rail Bias Factor for Houston METRO’s Transit Model Presentation by Vijay Mahal, HDR Inc Vincent Sanders, Houston METRO May 18, 2009 TRB Applications.
An Approach for Base Transit Trip Matrix Development: Sound Transit EMME/2 Model Experience Sujay Davuluri Parsons Brinckerhoff Inc., Seattle October,
Status of the SEMCOG E6 Travel Model SEMCOG TMIP Peer Review Panel Meeting December 12, 2011 presented by Liyang Feng, SEMCOG Thomas Rossi, Cambridge Systematics.
METRO Rail Intercept Survey Findings, Data Uses AMPO Travel Modeling Work Group October 1, 2009.
Transportation Planning Modeling with EMME/2. Interconnectedness.
Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks
About this presentation Target audience: Prepared for Dr. Mitsuru Saito’s BYU graduate level class. Feb Please contact Mike Brown at
FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts1March 2009FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts1March 2009 Newark-Elizabeth Rail Link Bill.
Presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Estimating Commuter Rail Station- Level Ridership Using American Community Survey Journey to Work.
1 AASHTO: SCOPT/MTAP Winter Meeting METRO Update: Light Rail Operations and the Status of Future Corridors Wulf Grote, P.E. Director, Project Development.
Implementing a Blended Model System to Forecast Transportation and Land Use Changes at Bob Hope Airport 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
Bill Davidson | PB | | Dawn McKinstry | PB | | Marie-Elsie Dowell | PB |
Incorporating utility-based bike- to-transit paths in a tour-based model for Portland, Oregon 6 May 2013 Prepared for: TRB Planning Applications Conference.
Program Update Baltimore MPO November 25, Internal Draft AGENDA  Program Overview  Alternatives Development  Stakeholder and Public Outreach.
Travel Demand Modeling At NCTCOG Presentation For IOWA TMIP Peer Review March 30 – April 1, 2004.
1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.
BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL MODEL ENHANCEMENTS FOR THE RED LINE PROJECT AMPO TRAVEL MODEL WORK GROUP March 20, 2006.
Calculating Transportation System User Benefits: Interface Challenges between EMME/2 and Summit Principle Author: Jennifer John Senior Transportation Planner.
 Focus Model Application to Colfax Ave  Initial Contact with FTA  Evaluation Process and Results  Next Steps.
Sketch Model to Forecast Heavy-Rail Ridership Len Usvyat 1, Linda Meckel 1, Mary DiCarlantonio 2, Clayton Lane 1 – PB Americas, Inc. 2 – Jeffrey Parker.
Presented to MTF Transit Committee presented by Scott Seeburger, Myung Sung, Dave Schmitt & Peter Haliburton November 20, Tri-Rail On-Board Survey.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Vamsee Modugula Cambridge Systematics, Inc. May.
Welcome to the TSIP Project Webinar Planning Technical Working Group 28 July – 3:30 pm.
1 The Aggregate Rail Ridership Forecasting Model: Overview Dave Schmitt, AICP Southeast Florida Users Group November 14 th 2008.
Characteristics of Weekend Travel in the City of Calgary: Towards a Model of Weekend Travel Demand JD Hunt, University of Calgary DM Atkins, City of Calgary.
On-Board Transit Survey Presentation to TCC Dec. 13, 2002 Heather Alhadeff, AICP
Portland North Small Starts Alternatives Analysis Coordination Meeting June 16, 2009.
Is Transit Part of the Equation? Is Transit Part of the Equation? Travel Data Users Forum: How Will the Changing Cost of Energy Affect Personal Travel?
From Survey to Model Capturing Relative Perceptions of Transit Time in the Emme Strategy Transit Assignment Aaron Breakstone, Scott Higgins, Richard Walker.
Sampling Rates for Transit Rider Surveys An Initial Analysis 1.
Mary Ross, P.E./Myung Sung. 2 3 Lower Atlantic Regular Gas Price HIGH: $4.03- July 2008 LOW: $1.60- Dec 2008.
Travel Demand Modeling Experience Bellevue-Kirkland-Redmond Travel Demand Modeling Experience Jin Ren, P.E. City of Bellevue, Washington, USA October 19,
1 Predicted-versus-Actual Studies: Why/how to do them and Lessons Learned Ken Cervenka Federal Transit Administration TRB Transportation Planning Applications.
Presented to: Presented by: Transportation leadership you can trust. Authored by: Development of a Regional Special Events Model and Forecasting Special.
Cal y Mayor y Asociados, S.C. Atizapan – El Rosario Light Rail Transit Demand Study October th International EMME/2 UGM.
Portland North Small Starts Alternatives Analysis Coordination Meeting June 15, 2009.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to 12 th Annual TRB Transportation Planning Application Conference presented by Dan Goldfarb, P.E. Cambridge.
Travel Forecasting for New Starts A Workshop Sponsored by The Federal Transit Administration March 23-25, 2009 Tampa.
Best Practices in Transit Rider Survey Data Collection Chris Tatham Sr. Vice President, CEO, ETC Institute 725 W. Frontier Circle Olathe, KS
Joint Development of Land Use and Light Rail Stations The Case of Tel Aviv Regional Science Association International -The Israeli Section Daniel Shefer,
Purpose To develop and evaluate a range of transit and transportation alternatives throughout the MPO area, considering: u Regional Goals and Objectives.
Presented to MTF Transit Committee presented by David Schmitt, AICP November 20, 2008 FSUTMS Transit Survey Applied Research.
FDOT Transit Office Modeling Initiatives The Transit Office has undertaken a number of initiatives in collaboration with the Systems Planning Office and.
Regional Transit Study Project Update. Four open houses held between November , 2009 Informed and engaged the public in the study process Provided.
How Does Your Model Measure Up Presented at TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference by Phil Shapiro Frank Spielberg VHB May, 2007.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to 12th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference presented by Arun Kuppam, Cambridge.
Summit in the Wasatch John Britting Wasatch Front Regional Council.
1 FSUTMS-Voyager: Transit Standards within Evolving FSUTMS Summary Presentation Florida Model Task Force Tampa, Florida December 13 th, slides.
Presented to MTF Transit Committee presented by David Schmitt, AICP November 20, 2008 FSUTMS Transit Model Application.
May 2009TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference 1 PATHBUILDER TESTS USING 2007 DALLAS ON-BOARD SURVEY Hua Yang, Arash Mirzaei, Kathleen.
Prepared by: May Metro Transit Train and Bus Rider Surveys COMPARATIVE RESULTS Bruce Howard Director of Marketing.
Incorporating Time of Day Modeling into FSUTMS – Phase II Time of Day (Peak Spreading) Model Presentation to FDOT SPO 23 March 2011 Heinrich McBean.
Transit Choices BaltimoreLink Ad-hoc Committee Meeting January 12, 2016.
May 9, th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference – Session 18 1 IMPROVING CONSISTENCY BETWEEN TRANSIT PATH- BUILDING AND MODE.
Proposed Interim Guidance – Small Starts. 2 Purpose Before Final Rule, evaluate and rate projects to: Advance projects into project development Provide.
Use Survey to Improve the DFX Transit Model
Using Linked Non-Home-Based Trips in Virginia
Improved treatment of special attractors
Transit Survey White Paper
Presentation transcript:

FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts1March 2009FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts1March 2009 Charlotte South Corridor LRT Bill Woodford AECOM

FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts2March 2009 Charlotte South Corridor LRT The Big Picture Important markets / modeling approach Traditional walk-access market / traditional model calibrated to existing bus system New park-ride access market / park-ride nests and constants imported from Houston Park-and-Ride model Special event ridership / off-model procedures based on event data What was forecasted to happen in opening year: Walk access: 4,400 trips/day Drive access: 3,100 trips/day Special events: 1,700 trips/day Total: 9,200 trips/day What actually happened: Walk access:10,800 trips/day Drive access: 4,000 trips/day Special events: Very significant Total:14,800 trips/day Conclusion: LRT attracted more choice-based walk-access (and feeder bus) trips than forecasted

FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts3March 2009 Charlotte South Corridor LRT The Project New 9.6 mile light rail line along South Boulevard serving: Uptown Charlotte (CBD) 4 stations Walk egress / bus transfer Southend 4 stations Walk access / bus transfer Inner PNR Stations 6 stations PNR / walk access / bus transfer I-485 PNR PNR / walk access / bus transfer

FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts4March 2009 Charlotte South Corridor LRT Before

FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts5March 2009 Charlotte South Corridor Forecasting Model Four step model calibrated to 1999/2000 on-board survey Separate nests for walk and drive access for Local Bus Express Bus Premium (LRT) Calibrated to match existing CATS bus volumes Premium Park-and-Ride – to – CBD constants: Based on Houston model (Bus PNR) Largely eliminated calibrated negative constants for PNR LRT forecasts compared to aggregate model (developed by Phoenix MPO) to confirm reasonableness

FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts6March 2009 Charlotte South Corridor LRT Transit Markets 60% Home-Based Work purpose 65% Attracted to non-CBD locations CBD: Even income distribution, more work trips, more drive access Non-CBD: Lower income distribution, more non-work, few drive access

FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts7March 2009 Charlotte South Corridor LRT Opening Day Forecast

FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts8March 2009 Charlotte South Corridor LRT 2007 CATS System “Before” Survey

FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts9March 2009 Charlotte South Corridor LRT 2007 CATS System “Before” Survey Characteristics of transit market: Evenly split between work and non-work purposes 75% of customers travel to attractions outside CBD

FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts10March 2009 Charlotte South Corridor LRT 2007 CATS System Before Survey 50% Home-Based Work purpose Peak travel to CBD: Higher income distribution, more work trips, more drive access Other travel: Lower income distribution, more non-work, few drive access

FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts11March 2009 Charlotte South Corridor LRT After

FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts12March 2009 Charlotte South Corridor LRT Implementation Progress South Corridor LRT opened 11/2007 LRT and bus operations generally implemented as modeled Average weekday ridership April 2008 of 14,800 per day (16,500 in June 2008) Strong PNR market at southern stations Strong special event and non-work markets

FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts13March 2009 Charlotte South Corridor LRT Interim Before/After Analysis Goal: Understand project success and update model to reflect current bus and LRT market acceptance Approach: Collect data on LRT usage, incorporate LRT and “before” bus survey into model, and test procedures for capturing customer response to LRT

FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts14March 2009 Charlotte South Corridor LRT April 2008 Rail Intercept Survey Intercept interview survey conducted on April 29 th, 30 th 2008 between 3:30 PM and 6:30 PM Survey conducted for southbound trains Conducted at 7 th Street, CTC, and 3 rd Street stations 903 usable survey records

FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts15March 2009 Charlotte South Corridor LRT April 2008 Rail Intercept Survey

FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts16March 2009 Charlotte South Corridor LRT Intercept Survey Results Key findings (2008 LRT as compared to 2007 System survey): Much higher non-work trip making to CBD One LRT line attracts more off-peak CBD trips than entire bus system (and nearly as many peak CBD trips)

FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts17March 2009 Charlotte South Corridor LRT Peak HBW Trips to CBD Key findings LRT customers have higher average incomes LRT customers more likely to PNR

FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts18March 2009 Charlotte South Corridor LRT LRT Forecasts Based on Before-Survey Model Calibration Model previously scrubbed for trip table and travel time skim problems – generally replicates observed ridership patterns but with large negative transit constants Calibrated model underestimates ridership across the board by 50% or more without inclusion of special guideway effects Very heavy LRT preference factors/constants required to match observed ridership

FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts19March 2009 Charlotte South Corridor LRT LRT Forecasts Based on Before-Survey Model Calibration Large constants appear to attract too many short trips and too few long PNR trips at Sharon West and South I-485

FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts20March 2009 Charlotte South Corridor LRT Alternate “Choice Set” Approach The conventional approach requires implausibly large constants Alternative hypothesis: LRT has increased population of travelers who consider transit to be an option Awareness of transit Social acceptability Other Approach: Feed mode choice model with person trip containing only those trips where travelers are willing to choose transit Test Implementation: Limit rail guideway effects to 30% time discount + 12 minutes Limit transit income constants to gradual decline in high income travelers willingness to ride transit Find proportion of trip table willing to consider transit to match pre- and post-rail ridership results

FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts21March 2009 Charlotte South Corridor LRT Limited Income Constants

FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts22March 2009 Charlotte South Corridor LRT Calibrated Fraction of Trips Considering Bus Transit Note: Calibrated Fraction of Trips Considering Rail=100% for all cells

FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts23March 2009 Charlotte South Corridor LRT Modeled Station Volumes for Alternative Methods Choice set approach also improves model performance for short trips and long PNR trips (at South I-485)

FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts24March 2009 Charlotte South Corridor LRT Conclusions Introduction of LRT had impact on selected markets not fully explained by time and cost changes Alternative approaches for capturing fixed guideway preferences may yield better forecasts and a more plausible explanation than mode specific constants TCRP H-37 will research values of unmeasured attributes in fixed guideway transit including possible impacts on choice sets