Council of Great City Schools, October 28, 2011 Dr. David Lussier Austin Independent School District 1 Redesigning the Teacher Appraisal System in Austin.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

In August, the historic CORE district waiver was approved allowing these districts to pursue a new robust and holistic accountability model for schools.

Advertisements

Overview of the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System KY Council of Administrators of Special Education Summer Conference July 9th, 2013.

ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.

Developing Principals One State’s Initiative Dr. Sharon Brittingham RTTT Project Director, Development Coaches Dr. Jacquelyn Wilson Director, Delaware.

ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER RENEWAL Overview of Proposed Renewal March 6, 2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.

Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System Monica Osborne, presenter KDE Effectiveness Coach 1.

Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.

A Team Effort To Develop A Successful Program For English Language Learners Irene Jiménez Director of Bilingual/ESL Programs Hays CISD

Debbie C. Hester Austin ISD July 9 & 11, 2012 Texas Turnaround Center.

1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.

Accountability Assessment Parents & Community Preparing College, Career, & Culturally Ready Graduates Standards Support 1.

REGIONAL PEER REVIEW PANELS (PRP) August Peer Review Panel: Background  As a requirement of the ESEA waiver, ODE must establish a process to ensure.

March, What does the new law require?  20% State student growth data (increases to 25% upon implementation of value0added growth model)  20%

Common Core State Standards & Assessment Update The Next Step in Preparing Michigan’s Students for Career and College MERA Spring Conference May 17, 2011.

Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.

March 28, What does the new law require?  20% State student growth data (increases to 25% upon implementation of value0added growth model)  20%

Interim Joint Committee on Education June 11, 2012.

1 Executive Limitation 12: Curriculum and Instruction Darlene Westbrook Chief Academic Officer Denise Collier Executive Director for Curriculum Monitoring.

Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (PGES) Webcast July 24, 2013.

Effective Teachers Core Initiative of the Houston Independent School District Council for the Great City Schools Fall Conference October 21, 2010 Presenters:

© 2012 Providence Public School District 1 Raising the Achievement of English Language Learners in the Providence Schools: Report of the Strategic Support.

Reviewed by Kim Davis EDLD 5362 Final Project May 15, 2011.

Austin ISD Students with Disabilities in Secondary Settings Council of Great City Schools, October 21, 2010 Janna Lilly, Director of Special Education.

DIY!!! EE4NJ A Homegrown Teacher Evaluation System Bruce ‘B.C.’ Preston Director of Curriculum & Instruction for Shore Regional High School, Monmouth Beach,

Turnaround Schools: The Austin Way Council of Great City Schools, October 21, 2010 Meria Joel Carstarphen, Ed.D., Superintendent Paul Cruz, Ph.D., Chief.

PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.

Alicia Currin-Moore Executive Director, TLE Oklahoma State Department of Education.

Georgia Association of School Personnel Administrators May 30,

Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.

Overview of the Texas Teacher and Principal Evaluation Systems.

EVALUATIONS, STUDENT GROWTH MEASURES & KEEP AUG 25, 2014 BILL BAGSHAW, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR.

Report on the Evaluation Function Evaluation Office.

WW Why Evaluation?. Evaluation formalizes the shared responsibility of state and LEAs to improve student achievement and close the achievement gap in.

Results of Survey on Level Organization June 2012.

The Portfolio ProcessThe Portfolio Process. Why do we think portfolios are the right choice?  Teacher developed and driven  Embedded professional development.

Council for Exceptional Children/Division of Early Childhood Conference October 2010 Kim Carlson, Asst. Director/619 Coordinator Ohio Department of Education.

Measuring Educator Effectiveness: Implications for Improving Teacher Preparation Programs Lynn Holdheide, Deputy Director Office of Special Education Program’s.

Evidence-Based Observations Training for Observers of Teachers Module 5 Dr. Marijo Pearson Dr. Mike Doughty Mr. John Schiess Spring 2012.

Toolkit #3: Effectively Teaching and Leading Implementation of the Oklahoma C 3 Standards, Including the Common Core.

10/22/2015Center on Innovation & Improvement State System of Support Alabama: The Roundtable Dr. Susan Hanes Dr. Tom Kerins Dr. Carole Perlman.

Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.

Educator Growth & Evaluation Marshall Public Schools.

Overview of the Texas Teacher and Principal Evaluation Systems.

Using Missouri’s Annual Performance Report for Continuous Improvement in Educator Preparation Gale “Hap” Hairston Director – Educator Preparation David.

We worry about what a child will be tomorrow, yet we forget that he is someone today. --Stacia Tauscher.

Title I Alvarado ISD. What is Title I ? Title I is a Federal program that provides money to schools that have many students who receive free or reduced.

EVALUATIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL GROWTH Ohio TIF and OTES.

TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.

Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Stronge and Associates Educational Consulting, LLC  Uniform evaluation system for teachers, educational.

PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.

TEACHER EVALUATION After S.B. 290 The Hungerford Law Firm June, 2012.

Texas Educator Evaluation & Support System Systems US Department of Education NCLB Waiver-Fall 2013 Condition of Waiver to develop new Texas evaluation.

ESEA, TAP, and Charter handouts-- 3 per page with notes and cover of one page.

Update on the MA Task Force on Evaluation of Teachers and Administrators Presented to the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education Associate Commissioner.

Using Technology to Engage Stakeholders in Shared Ownership and Accountability for Austin ISD’s Strategic Direction Council of Great City Schools, October.

Teacher Incentive Fund U.S. Department of Education.

Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.

Getting Ready for the Professional Growth & Effectiveness System AISD Getting Ready for the Professional Growth & Effectiveness System AISD.

Input Opportunity Commissioner Morath, TEA NET3 PROVIDED BY R3 LEADERSHIP SERVICES MARCH 2, 2016.

Overview of the Texas Teacher and Principal Evaluation Systems.

NYSED Network Team and Teacher and Principal Evaluator Training Kate Gerson -Senior Fellow Ken Slentz -Associate Commissioner June 2,

Overview: Every Student Succeeds Act April ESEA in Ohio In 2012, our state applied for and received a waiver from provisions of No Child Left Behind.

New Haven, A City of Great Schools MOVING FROM COMPLIANCE TO COHERENCE IN EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT: THE IMPACT OF THE E3 PROGRAM NEW HAVEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.

Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Update Kentucky Board of Education August 8,

Michele Winship, Ph.D.  Compliance with HB 153/SB 316 requirements?  Seek out and get rid of “bad” teachers? OR  Improve teaching.

Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update

The Portfolio Process.

ACTION PLAN Texas Association for Bilingual Education

Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions

Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update

Presentation transcript:

Council of Great City Schools, October 28, 2011 Dr. David Lussier Austin Independent School District 1 Redesigning the Teacher Appraisal System in Austin ISD

Context of AISD 87,000 students 64 % Economically Disadvantaged 30 % English Language Learners 124 schools (including special campuses) 6,100 teachers 2 Austin ISD CGCS (512)

Context of Appraisal in AISD Using statewide PDAS evaluation system 1 out of 5 teachers receives a perfect evaluation 0 out of 8 Domains tied to teacher-level student performance In the past, approximately one-third of teachers evaluated each year because of waivers General agreement that the PDAS system was not tied to district definition of best practice and not directly tied to improvement efforts 3 Austin ISD CGCS (512)

Key Areas of Interest in Redesign Develop an AISD definition of high-quality practice Provide more comprehensive feedback to teachers about their practice Measure student growth using multiple measures (including value-added) Measure performance at the individual, team, and campus levels Consider peer review 4 Austin ISD CGCS (512)

Redesign Process Teacher Incentive Fund served as a catalyst Design team  Met throughout SY  Team comprised of teachers, administrators, and teacher’s association president Reviewed plans throughout the nation Draft plan posted for public comment School Board approval Identified three schools to pilot in SY Austin ISD CGCS (512)

Key Considerations Measuring performance in non-tested subjects/grade levels Timing of state accountability/VAM reports Appropriate scale of rollout Managing communications Workload of principals Technology solution for data collection Use in termination decisions Inter-rater reliability / training 6 Austin ISD CGCS (512)

AISD Pilot Evaluation 7 Austin ISD CGCS (512)

Next Steps/Challenges Linking evaluation results to targeted professional development The use of student perception surveys (i.e., Tripod) Future of peer observation Separating measures for improvement vs. measures for accountability? 8 Austin ISD CGCS (512)

Contact Information Dr. David Lussier Executive Director, Educator Quality Visit the AISD Evalution Website: atives/compensation/evaluation 9 Austin ISD CGCS (512)