Student Engagement and Academic Performance: Identifying Effective Practices to Improve Student Success Shuqi Wu Leeward Community College Hawaii Strategy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Maximizing Your NSSE & CCSSE Results
Advertisements

Gary Whisenand Director, Institutional Research August 26, 2011.
2003 Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) SVC Office of Institutional Research Dr. Maureen Pettitt, Director Leslie Croot, M.S., Analyst.
DATA UPDATES FACULTY PRESENTATION September 2009.
October 17,  Review of CCSSE  Descriptions of HCC Students  Discussion of Benchmark Results  Item Results  Critical Thinking analysis.
Gallaudet University Results on National Survey of Student Engagement Office of Institutional Research August, 2007.
Student Engagement In Good Educational Practices Findings From the 2004 and 2007 National Surveys of Student Engagement Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.
2012 National Survey of Student Engagement Jeremy D. Penn & John D. Hathcoat.
Engagement By Design: Focus on Developmental Education Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2004 Findings.
The Faculty Said… (pt.3) Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Findings Presenter: LaSylvia Pugh – September 14, 2006.
LFCC SENSE 09 Data Dave Urso John Milam March 23, 2010.
GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 32%  First Year: 30%  Seniors: 33%  GGC  Overall: 28%  First Year: 26% (381)  Seniors: 38% (120)
Presentation to Student Affairs Directors November, 2010 Marcia Belcheir, Ph.D. Institutional Analysis, Assessment, & Reporting.
Executive Summary 2009 Findings November 16, 2009.
Benchmarking Effective Educational Practice Community Colleges of the State University of New York April, 2005.
BENCHMARKING EFFECTIVE EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE IN COMMUNITY COLLEGES What We’re Learning. What Lies Ahead.
Faculty Said/Students Said Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Findings Presenters: LaSylvia Pugh & Pamela G. Senegal – February 17, 2006.
CCSSE Houston Community College System Presented by Margaret Drain June 19, 2007.
1 This CCSSE Drop-In Overview Presentation Template can be customized using your college’s CCSSE results. Please review the “Notes” section accompanying.
San Luis Obispo Community College District SENSE 2012 Findings for Cuesta College.
St. Petersburg College CCSSE 2011 Findings Board of Trustees Meeting.
SENSE 2013 Findings for College of Southern Idaho.
Results of AUC’s NSSE Administration in 2011 Office of Institutional Research February 9, 2012.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE 2014.
The Students Said… (pt.2) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Findings Presenter: LaSylvia Pugh – August 29, 2006.
Faculty Said/Student Said 2008 Update (First Look) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings LaSylvia Pugh – February 16, 2009.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
MARTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE ACHIEVING THE DREAM COMMUNITY COLLEGES COUNT IIPS Conference Charlotte, North Carolina July 24-26, 2006 Session: AtD – Use of.
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
CCSSE 2013 Findings for Cuesta College San Luis Obispo County Community College District.
Note: CCSSE survey items included in benchmarks are listed at the end of this presentation 1. Active and Collaborative Learning Students learn more when.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
APSU 2009 National Survey of Student Engagement Patricia Mulkeen Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
March 3, TAIR, Waco, TX Now You See Them, Now You Don’t! The Role of Part-Time Students and Faculty in Student Engagement.
ENHANCING STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AT IWU DR. MARY ANN SEARLE VICE PRESIDENT FOR ENROLLMENT & STUDENT AFFAIRS.
Assessing SAGES with NSSE data Office of Institutional Research September 25 th, 2007.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2009 Missouri Valley College January 6, 2010.
CCSSE 2010: SVC Benchmark Data Note: Benchmark survey items are listed in the Appendix (slides 9-14)
BEAMS – Using NSSE Data: Understanding the Benchmark Reports.
1 This CCFSSE Drop-In Overview Presentation Template can be customized using your college’s CCFSSE/CCSSE results. Please review the “Notes” section accompanying.
2009 Pitt Community College CCSSE Results September 21, 2009 Report to the Campus College CCSSE Results Pitt Community College Dr. Brian Miller, Assistant.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice Summary Report Background: The Community College Survey.
Committing to Student Engagement AVC 2008 Findings.
David Torres Dean, Institutional Research Riverside Community College District.
NSSE 2005 CSUMB Report California State University at Monterey Bay Office of Institutional Effectiveness Office of Assessment and Research.
Office of Institutional Research CCSSE & Active and Collaborative Learning.
Looking Inside The “Oakland Experience” Another way to look at NSSE Data April 20, 2009.
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate February 28, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
ENGAGING STUDENTS, CHALLENGING THE ODDS 2006 SFCC Findings
Jennifer Ballard George Kuh September 19, Overview  NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement  Select Linfield results:  NSSE 2011  Brief explanation.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate January 10, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
1 NSSE Results Fort Lewis College (2010) Richard A. Miller Exec. Dir – OIRPA.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, April 2010.
CCSSE 2015 Findings for Merced College Spring 2016 Flex Thursday, 14 January 2016 Presented by the Office of Student Services, Office of Student Equity.
Today’s Topic Student Satisfaction and Engagement Hosted by IEPR.
CCSSE 2014 Findings Southern Crescent Technical College.
CCSSE 2012 Findings for Southern Crescent Technical College.
© 2011 Center for Community College Student Engagement Wyoming Community Colleges Statewide Workshop October 29, 2013.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, September 2009.
Del Mar College Utilizing the Results of the 2007 Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
Learning Communities at Ventura College. What are learning communities? Interdisciplinary learning Importance of sense of community for learning Student.
Jackson College CCSSE & CCFSSE Findings Community College Survey of Student Engagement Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement Administered:
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
North Seattle College All College Meeting
Closing the Loop on Student Feedback
Director, Institutional Research
The Heart of Student Success
Faculty In-Service Week
CCSSE 2015 Findings for OSU Institute of Technology
Presentation transcript:

Student Engagement and Academic Performance: Identifying Effective Practices to Improve Student Success Shuqi Wu Leeward Community College Hawaii Strategy Institute March 7 & 8, 2014

What is Student Engagement? Student engagement is the time and energy students devote to educationally purposeful activities.

What Do We Know about Student Success and Engagement? When students are engaged academically and socially, the likelihood for them to learn and to persist increases. Institutions need information about students’ experiences to design programs

What Does the Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Measure? Active and Collaborative Learning Academic Challenge Student Effort Student-Faculty Interaction Support for Learners

Understanding CCSSE Benchmarks in Terms of Selected Survey Items Active and Collaborative Learning o Asked questions in class or contributed to class discussion o Made a class presentation o Tutored or taught other students o Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with others outside of class

Understanding CCSSE Benchmarks, cont’d Academic Challenge o Analyzing the basic elements of an idea, experience, or theory o Synthesizing and organizing ideas, information, or experiences in new ways o Making judgments about the value or soundness of information, arguments, or methods o Using information you have read or heard to perform a new skill o Number of assigned textbooks, manuals, or books o Number of written papers or reports of any length

Understanding CCSSE Benchmarks, cont’d Student Effort o Came to class without completing reading or assignments o Number of books read on your own for personal enjoyment or academic enrichment o Preparing for class o Using peer or other tutoring o Using skills labs (Writing, Math, etc.)

Understanding CCSSE Benchmarks, cont’d Student-Faculty Interaction o Talked about career plans with an instructor or advisor o Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with instructors outside of class o Received prompt feedback from instructors on your performance

Understanding CCSSE Benchmarks, cont’d Support for Learners o Using academic advising/planning o Using career counseling

Rationale for using CCSSE data Enables institutions to benchmark against similar and aspirational groups Offers longitudinal evidence Helps pinpoint areas of strength and need for improvement

Purpose of this Study To identify areas where the college could increase student engagement and improve student success. o To what degree were CCSSE benchmark scores associated with Student’s GPA?

Student Engagement Benchmarks and Academic Performance Correlations (Sample Size: n = 455)GPA (Semester) Active and collaborative learning0.22*** Academic challenge0.20*** Student effort0.23*** Student-faculty interaction0.18*** Support for learners0.10 * * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 *** p < 0.001

Student Engagement Benchmarks and Academic Performance, cont’d Regression Analysis EstimateSEt Intercept Demographic variables Female Hawaiian * Full-Time Mother with an Associate Degree Father with an Associate Degree First Year Student *** Age * Student Perceived Engagement Active & Collaborative Learning * Student Effort Academic Challenge Student-Faculty Interaction Support for Learners Interaction Student Effort * First Year Student * * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 ***p < 0.001

Student Engagement Benchmarks and Academic Performance, cont’d Once we controlled for demographic information (gender, ethnicity, enrollment status, parents’ education, age)... The level of active and collaborative learning was associated with GPA. The level of student effort had a significant impact on GPA for the first year students.

Student Engagement Benchmarks and Academic Performance, cont’d Correlations for Items Related to Active and Collaborative Learning GPA Asked questions in class or contributed to class discussion 0.19 *** Made a class presentation0.12 * Worked with classmates outside of class to prepare class assignments 0.15 ** Tutored or taught other students0.19 *** Discussed ideas from your reading or classes with others outside of class 0.21 *** * P <0.05, ** P <0.01, *** P <0.001

Student Engagement Benchmarks and Academic Performance, cont’d Correlations for Items Related to Student Effort GPA Worked on a paper or project that required integrating ideas or information from various sources 0.13 ** Came to class without completing reading or assignments *** Preparing for class0.28 *** Using peer or other tutoring0.17 *** Using skills labs (writing, math, etc.)0.09 * * P <0.05 ** P <0.01 *** P <0.001

Discussion and Implications Student engagement is positively related to academic outcome as represented by students’ GPA. o Institutions can influence student behaviors with well-designed teaching practices and interventions. o First year students benefit more from early interventions.

Discussion and Implications, cont’d For first-year students o Create a supportive and challenging classroom environment that motivates students to participate in discussions o Create a campus culture that encourages spending more time outside the classroom in academic preparation o Help students get tutoring

Discussion and Implications CorrelationsAcademic Challenge Active and Collaborative Learning Student Effort Student- Faculty Interaction Active and Collaborative Learning 0.53 *** Student Effort0.55 ***0.48 *** Student-Faculty Interaction 0.58 ***0.65 ***0.46 *** Support for Learners0.43 ***0.34 ***0.35 ***0.49 *** * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 *** p < 0.001

Discussion and Implications Different forms of engagement interact to contribute to student academic performance