Small Agency Meeting June 24, 2008 Sunflower Project Statewide Financial Management System
2 Agenda Project Purpose, Scope and Timeline Update on Project Activities
33 Outreach to Agencies Recognize the need to reach out to small agencies, boards and commissions
4 A&R and Most Programmatic Agencies Have a Collection of Disparate Systems A/P Asset Mgmt Cash Mgmt Purchasing STARS & Other Central Systems Receipting Revenue Agency 1’s Systems A/P Asset Mgmt Cash Mgmt Purchasing Receipting Revenue Grants/ Projects/ Cost Cntrs Agency 2’s Systems A/P Asset Mgmt Cash Mgmt Purchasing Receipting Revenue Grants/ Projects/ Cost Cntrs Agency 4’s Systems A/P Asset Mgmt Cash Mgmt Purchasing Agency 4’s Systems A/P Asset Mgmt Cash Mgmt Purchasing Grants/ Projects/ Cost Cntrs
5 Financial Management System (FMS) Definition: “A comprehensive suite of integrated modules delivered by a single software vendor that provides end-to-end support for statewide administrative services” The FMS will not include the extensive materials management and manufacturing elements found in many Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems.
6 FMS Will Consolidate Administrative Systems, Integrate Agency Business Functions and Interface w/ Programmatic Systems Agency 2 Agency 1 Agency 4 Agency 3 GL Reporting Asset Mgmt Cash Mgmt Purchasing Receipting Revenue A/P FMS Data Archiving A/R
7 Project Scope “Big Bang” implementation Software modules include: General ledger Purchasing Accounts payable Asset management Project and grant accounting Data warehouse and reporting Accounts receivables and billing (optional for pilot)
8 Planning Design Configuration/Development/Testing Integration Acceptance Testing Testing Kick-off 10/08 01/09 03/09 01/10 03/10 07/10 Go-Live 07/01/10 Project Timeline Project kick-off Oct 2008 Go-live July 2010 Twenty-one month duration
9 Planning Design Configuration/Development/Testing Integration Acceptance Testing Testing Kick-off Complete design of chart of accounts & publish interface standards to agencies Agency interface development, modifications to existing systems and initial data conversion/loading complete 8-10 month timeframe for agencies to: 1.Set-up development & test environments 2.Attend technical training 3.Modify systems 4.Develop interfaces (as required) 5.Extract and clean-up data and validate data loading 6.Develop agency-specific reports (75% of reports through central reporting portal) 7.Develop testing plans and prepare for integration testing 8-10 month timeframe for agencies to: 1.Set-up development & test environments 2.Attend technical training 3.Modify systems 4.Develop interfaces (as required) 5.Extract and clean-up data and validate data loading 6.Develop agency-specific reports (75% of reports through central reporting portal) 7.Develop testing plans and prepare for integration testing 10/08 01/09 03/09 01/10 03/10 07/10 Expected critical path Go-Live 07/01/10 Project Timelines and Agency Planning
10 Update of Project Pre-Implementation Activities Systems Integrator Presentations & Software Demonstrations - complete Review of current Chart of Accounts & Preliminary Design of new Chart – complete Sources of vendor information and clean-up issues – complete Key Project Team Positions
11 Creation of Evaluation Team 16 members from various State Agencies
12 Software demonstrations (Oracle) held during week of May System Integrator presentations held May 23 agencies attended the meetings 93 individuals attended the demonstrations
13 “Prototype” Chart of Accounts A prototype chart of accounts with a crosswalk from STARS is provided below. (SHARP uses the PS Department chartfield.) STARSPeopleSoft Agency => Business Unit Division => Department Fund => Fund Budget Unit=> TBD Object => Account PCA => Program Budget Fiscal Year=> Budget Reference n/a=> Project n/a=> Activity Two additional optional (agency-specific) chartfields will probably be included.
14 Vendor File Consolidation Description of STARS and PMP vendor files (common and dissimilar data elements), issues and concerns; Identification of agencies which may have their own purchasing systems and vendor files which are used in STARS Satellite which bypasses system edits (see STA’s Analysis of Agency Systems deliverable); Assessment of what type of data clean-up will be required as part of conversion. Description of the “as-is” processes (in narrative form and flowcharts, if appropriate) currently used to update both STARS and PMP vendor files; and Recommendations for the approach to any data cleansing where identified. Completed document can be found at:
15 Project Staffing
16 Project Staffing
17 Project Staffing
18 Project Staffing
19 Update of Project Pre-Implementation Activities – In Process Outreach to Small Agencies and State Hospitals – May/June Agency Readiness and Impact Assessment – May/June Review of Objects Codes and Commodity Codes – May/June Business Process Mapping – June thru September Building the Project Team – on-going
20 Small Agencies Need Special Attention Small Agency Survey STARS – direct data entry, upload Use of SOKI – direct data entry, upload Other systems containing financial information Identify “points of pain” Would establishing a Small Agency Advisory Group be helpful ??? Critical mass in problem resolution Enable common solutions to common problems Identify IT challenges and provide assistance Gain a level of influence Who would be interested in participating?
21 Discussion/Questions For additional information on the project, please see the project website: Questions can be submitted to