P-20 Statewide Longitudinal Data System (SLDS) Update Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Whats a P20, and why would I want one? Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Margaret Merlyn Ropp, Ph.D. Director.
Advertisements

Michigan’s Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) P-20 Data Connection Projects.
Maine Statewide Longitudinal Data System June 2010.
Criteria for High Quality Career and Technical Education Programs National Career Pathways Network Orlando, FL November 14, 2014.
SMS Vendor Meeting January 19, 2010 (revised February 19, 2010) New York State Education Department.
The ADE-Post- Secondary SLDS Project Presented to: CTE Administrators Meeting February 7, 2013 Mark T. Masterson Chief Information Officer.
GEAR UP COMPETITIVE PRIORITY #3 DATA COLLECTION Kate Mahar, Ed.D. Charlotte Curtis, Ed.D.
South Carolina Longitudinal Information Center for Education SLICE Update September 11, 2012.
1 Taking Charge of Our Professions ED 39 November 14, 2009 Maria Neira, Vice President.
Facilitator: Kathy Gosa (KS) Panel: Troy Wheeler (ID) Rodney Packard (WI) Lisa Bradley (CO) SLDS Program Conference November 17, 2010 MEETING THE SFSF.
State Student Achievement Longitudinal Files: Where We’ve Come From and Where We’re Going Laura LoGerfo Tate Gould February 8, 2008.
A Systemic Approach February, Two important changes in the Perkins Act of 2006 A requirement for the establishment of Programs of Study A new approach.
Improving Educational Outcomes Jackie Dowd Special Assistant to the Governor for Career Innovation Indiana Association of Public School Superintendents.
April 2010 Minnesota’s P-20 Statewide Longitudinal Education Data System (SLEDS) Minnesota Office of Higher Education.
CATE UPDATE Susan Flanagan, Director Office of Career and Technology Education March 12, 2013.
Using Data to Improve Student Achievement: November 17 th, 2011 A Conversation with members of the Montana Education and Local Government Interim Committee.
P-20 Longitudinal Data Systems What is the information we need, how do we get it, what do we do with it? Elizabeth Laird & Helene Stebbins.
Center for Educational Performance and Information The Tortured Path of Data Through Policy and Politics January 22, 2007 Margaret Merlyn Ropp, Ph.D. Director.
S tudent T eacher A ccountability R eporting S ystem 11/05/09.
Working Toward a Statewide Information System to Track the Effectiveness of Student Aid Financial Programs in Maryland Michael J. Keller Director of Policy.
Maine Statewide Longitudinal Data System NEBHE October 2008.
Incentivizing College- and Career-Readiness: Building Indicators into State Reporting and Accountability Systems Wes Bruce, Indiana Dept. of Education.
April 2, 2013 Longitudinal Data system Governance: Status Report Alan Phillips Deputy Director, Fiscal Affairs, Budgeting and IT Illinois Board of Higher.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Enhancing Education through Technology Grant: Improving Instruction Through Regional Data Initiatives.
KBOR Conference June 13, 2012 Kansas Postsecondary Data with Business Intelligence Reporting.
Kit Goodner Assistant Deputy Commissioner for Data Systems Division of Accountability, Research & Measurement June 2011.
CEDS Standard Update.
Leveraging Race to the Top to Maximize the Use of Data To Ensure College & Career Readiness Aimee R. Guidera Achieve ADP September 10, 2009.
WORKFORCE LONGITUDINAL DATA SYSTEM Community College Services Group
Data Infrastructure for Low-Income Adults.  Which workforce programs are most effectively channeling adults towards further education and higher earnings?
Using Data to Improve Student Achievement Aimee R. Guidera Director, Data Quality Campaign National Center for Education Accountability April 23, 2007.
October 2009 ARRA and State Initiatives: User Perspectives Bethann Canada Director of Educational Information Management Virginia Department of Education.
Obama Administration Prenatal to Five Child Development Commitments Robert H. Dugger Managing Director Tudor Investment Corporation Invest in Kids Working.
GSC – Saginaw County Update P-20 Efforts: “Metrics, Dashboards and Accountability” March 17, 2011.
2009 Closing the Expectation Gap Fourth Annual 50-State Progress Report on the Alignment of High School Policies with the Demands of College and Careers.
Msix.ed.gov. 9. How do I get access to MSIX? School and MEP personnel can request an MSIX account using the "How Do I Get an Account?" link at the bottom.
Statewide Longitudinal Data Systems SLDS Grant Program Nancy Smith, Director Tate Gould, Program Officer Emily Anthony, Program Officer.
Hans P. L’Orange State Higher Education Executive Officers October 20, 2009.
@EdDataCampaign Mining the Data: What States Have and Where to Find It February 7, 2012 Elizabeth Laird Director, Communications and External Affairs Data.
The Next Generation of Educational Data Systems SHEEO 2011 Jack Buckley, Ph.D. Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics
July 31, 2015 STARR, MI School Data, and CEPI P-20 Update.
Higher Education Policy Conference Common Data Standards: tsup? Higher Education Policy Conference August 12, 2010 John Blegen, State Higher Education.
The University of North Carolina Office of the President State Higher Education Executive Officers The University of North Carolina Office of the President.
Moving Beyond Compliance: Four Ways States Can Support Districts and Local Data Use 2012 MIS Conference Dan Domagala, Colorado Department of Education.
Connecting Financial Data to EDFacts 25th Annual Management Information Systems Conference San Diego, CA February 15, 2012 Ross Santy and Matthew Case.
Longitudinal Data Systems: What Can They Do for Me? Nancy J. Smith, Ph.D. Deputy Director Data Quality Campaign November 30, 2007.
Statewide Unit Record Databases in Higher Education: Growth and Application Peter Ewell National Center for Higher Education Management Systems (NCHEMS)
5/13/10 National Expectations for Learning in Arts Education A brief look at what has come before and how educational context shapes the work ahead.
Vision for Education in Tennessee Our Strategic Priorities ESEA Directors Institute Kathleen Airhart, Deputy Commissioner August 2014.
Key Considerations in Collecting Student Follow-up Data NACTEI May 15, 2012 Portland, OR Promoting Rigorous Career and Technical Education Programs of.
AASBO September 9,  Governor Brewer is responsible for all ARRA funds ◦ 1607 Certification.
Title I, IDEA Part B and IDEA Part C September 2, 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Use of Funds Guidance 1.
CEDS Update What is CEDS? Who and How? Version 2 Update and Scope Public Comments Version 3.
Lance C. Kennedy-Phillips, Ph.D. Associate Vice Provost for Institutional Research University of Illinois at Chicago Collecting Data in Higher Education.
P-20 in Action – Michigan’s Focus on Career and College Ready Students: Success through Cross- Agency Collaboration 2012 MIS Conference February 16, 2012.
Expanding Opportunities Advanced Coursework Network Information.
California Basic Educational Data System (CBEDS) and California School Information Services (CSIS ) EADM 732 Fiscal Planning and Facilities Management.
Montana Office of Public Instruction Linda McCulloch Superintendent OPI Student Information System Madalyn QuinlanDonna O’Neill Charlie.
How can ARRA Funds Be Wisely Applied? How Researchers Can Help Lou Cicchinelli, Ph.D. Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning Fourth Annual IES.
Informational Webinar Troy Grant Assistant Executive Director for P-16 Initiatives Tennessee Higher Education Commission.
Kansas Education Longitudinal Data System Update to Kansas Commission on Graduation and Dropout Prevention and Recovery December 2010 Kathy Gosa Director,
Development of Statewide Community College Value- Added Accountability Measures Michael J. Keller Director of Policy Analysis and Research Maryland Higher.
Betty McGrath North Carolina North Carolina Department of Commerce
Tennessee Longitudinal Data system (TLDS)
Tennessee Longitudinal Data system (TLDS)
Matt Dawson Director, REL Midwest August 2009
Using Data to Improve Student Achievement Aimee R. Guidera
Leveraging the Power of Geographic Information System
National Center for Higher Education Management Systems (NCHEMS)
Hans P. L’Orange State Higher Education Executive Officers
Presentation transcript:

P-20 Statewide Longitudinal Data System (SLDS) Update Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI)

Primary Functions of CEPI Collect, manage and report on educational data about Michigan’s public schools Current State School Aid Act suggests that “The Center shall… (a) Coordinate the collection of all data required by state and federal law from all entities receiving funds under this act. (b) Collect data in the most efficient manner possible in order to reduce the administrative burden on reporting entities.”

Why expand focus to P-20? Public and private sources of funding are now beginning to require recipients to track longitudinal “results.” That is, accountability and impact on student outcomes. Private foundations Re-authorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Most sources are now using the Data Quality Campaign’s “Ten Essential Elements of Longitudinal Data Systems” as a measuring stick for gauging state progress

Driving Forces - Public The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 is the primary driving force behind K-12 longitudinal data collection and reporting. US ED Longitudinal Data Systems Grant (2006) requires us to build the capacity to connect to P-12 to postsecondary – upgraded student data system; future modifications could include higher education if needed US ED Longitudinal Data System Grant #2 (2009) moves the state beyond capacity building to proto-typing data analysis and reporting using a functional SLDS (data marts, OLAP cubes, analysis tools)

Driving Forces - Public (Cont.) In Michigan, Lt. Governor Cherry’s Commission on Higher Education and Economic Growth is driving the extension on both ends from pre-K to higher education and workforce development. The Michigan College Access Network (MCAN) and the College Access Portal Project requires automation and integration of the transcript exchange process as a part of a focused effort to double the number of Michigan students who attend college and obtain a degree.

Driving Forces - Public (Cont.) American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) $1.3 billion from State Fiscal Stabilization Fund to support education (P-20) The Four Assurances, CEPI’s focus on “Improving Collection and Use of Data” America Competes Act – primary focus on systems containing elements of data and system-wide exchange processes from the Data Quality Campaign All ARRA sub-grants require continued focus on data interoperability, P-20 connections, and SLDS

Driving Forces - Private Data Quality Campaign (DQC) 10 Essential Elements of an SLDS include: electronic transcript exchange including course completion and grades student-level college readiness scores ability to link K-12 and higher-education student data State Higher Education Executive Officers (SHEEO) 15 Essential Characteristics and Functionality of a State Postsecondary Data System State issued unique identifier Enrollment and completion data, student demographics, transfer data, persistence and graduation data Remediation data, developmental education participation data Student-level course and transcript data

DQC Ten Essential Elements – Where is Michigan? 1. A unique statewide student identifier that connects student data across key databases across years (CEPI’s Unique Identification Code UIC) 2. Student-level enrollment, demographic and program participation information 3. The ability to match individual students’ test records from year to year to measure academic growth 4. Information on untested students and the reasons they were not tested 5. A teacher identifier system with the ability to match teachers to students

DQC Ten Essential Elements – Where is Michigan? 6. Student-level transcript information, including information on courses completed and grades earned 7. Student-level college readiness test scores 8. Student-level graduation and dropout data 9. The ability to match student records between the P–12 and higher education systems 10. A state data audit system assessing data quality, validity and reliability

America Competes Elements Successful student transition to higher education; including enrollment in remedial coursework Other information necessary to address alignment and adequate preparation for success in higher education

What is an SLDS? Generally, a system made up of many variables that allow for data connectivity, analysis and reporting over time. Applications designed in ways that facilitate links for connecting data Interoperable framework for data exchange (common definitions, structures, timing, etc.) Tools: hardware and software Query capability for analyzing data, predicting impacts of variables, and providing decision support models

At the state level, what will it take to meet the challenge? Develop the foundations of the P-20 longitudinal data system Extend the Unique Identification Code (UIC) to postsecondary institutions Implement the Michigan e-transcript system Ready systems for potential data mandates related to ARRA…guidance is still coming Lead a P-20 Data Council that ensures FERPA compliance and protects education partners

At the K-12 level, what will it take to meet the challenge? Focus on data quality Build capacity internally for principals and teachers to analyze and use assessment data and other student information to inform policy and improve academic progress Leverage e-transcript services to free up counselors to focus on student academic needs Assist in connecting teacher and student data efficiently and accurately Participate in a P-20 data council

At the postsecondary level, what will it take to meet the challenge? Use the UIC – add it to postsecondary student information systems as it is made available Assign staff members to work with state staff to obtain UICs for new students and to maintain existing UICs. Processes to be determined, seeking lowest impact Participate in a P-20 data council, improve analysis *Future – work with CEPI to use the MSDS to collect data on important outcomes in alignment with mandates, if issued *Future – work with CEPI to analyze and/or obtain longitudinal analyses and reporting on students and other educational data

Thomas Howell, Director Center for Educational Performance and Information 517/