Evaluation of modeled surface ozone biases as a function of cloud cover fraction Hyun Cheol Kim 1,2, Pius Lee 1, Fong Ngan 1,2, Youhua Tang 1,2, Hye Lim.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Enhancement of Satellite-based Precipitation Estimates using the Information from the Proposed Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) Part II: Drizzle Detection.
Advertisements

Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Changes in U.S. Regional-Scale Air.
Xiaolei Niu and R. T. Pinker Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland Radiative Flux Estimates from.
Global Particulate Matter (PM 10 and PM 2.5 ) Emissions from Agricultural Tilling and Harvesting 1 Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese.
Satellite Rainfall Estimation Robert J. Kuligowski NOAA/NESDIS/STAR 3 October 2011 Workshop on Regional Flash Flood Guidance System—South America Santiago.
Climate Signal Detection from Multiple Satellite Measurements Yibo Jiang, Hartmut H. Aumann Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Californian Institute of Technology,
Transpacific transport of pollution as seen from space Funding: NASA, EPA, EPRI Daniel J. Jacob, Rokjin J. Park, Becky Alexander, T. Duncan Fairlie, Arlene.
Effects of Siberian forest fires on regional air quality and meteorology in May 2003 Rokjin J. Park with Daeok Youn, Jaein Jeong, Byung-Kwon Moon Seoul.
Effects of climate change on future wildfire and its impact on regional air quality Hyun Cheol Kim, Dae-Gyun Lee, and Daewon Byun 1 Institute for Multidimensional.
Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies University of Wisconsin - Madison Steve Ackerman Director, Cooperative Institute for Meteorological.
Numerical Weather Prediction Division The usage of the ATOVS data in the Korea Meteorological Administration (KMA) Sang-Won Joo Korea Meteorological Administration.
Motivation Many GOES products are not directly used in NWP but may help in diagnosing problems in forecasted fields. One example is the GOES cloud classification.
Air Resources Laboratory Yunsoo Choi 12, Daewon Byun 1, Pius Lee 1, Rick Saylor 1, Ariel Stein 12, Daniel Tong 12, Hyun-Cheol Kim 12, Fantine Ngan 13,
Performance of the National Air Quality Forecast Capability, Urban vs. Rural and Other Comparisons Jerry Gorline and Jeff McQueen  Jerry Gorline, NWS/OST/MDL.
OMI HCHO columns Jan 2006Jul 2006 Policy-relevant background (PRB) ozone calculations for the EPA ISA and REA Zhang, L., D.J. Jacob, N.V. Smith-Downey,
Comparison of three photochemical mechanisms (CB4, CB05, SAPRC99) for the Eta-CMAQ air quality forecast model for O 3 during the 2004 ICARTT study Shaocai.
Drivers of multidecadal variability in JJA ozone concentrations in the eastern United States Lu Shen, Loretta J. Mickley School of Engineering and Applied.
Orbit Characteristics and View Angle Effects on the Global Cloud Field
A Comparison of the Northern American Regional Reanalysis (NARR) to an Ensemble of Analyses Including CFSR Wesley Ebisuzaki 1, Fedor Mesinger 2, Li Zhang.
IAAR Seminar 21 May 2013 AOD trends over megacities based on space monitoring using MODIS and MISR Pinhas Alpert 1,2, Olga Shvainshtein 1 and Pavel Kishcha.
New Products from combined MODIS/AIRS Jun Li, Chian-Yi Liu, Allen Huang, Xuebao Wu, and Liam Gumley Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite.
Dataset Development within the Surface Processes Group David I. Berry and Elizabeth C. Kent.
Modeling volcanic and marine emissions for Hawaii Air Quality Forecast 10/24/2015Air Resources Laboratory1 Daniel Tong*, Pius Lee, Rick Saylor, Mo Dan,
Estimating instability indices from MODIS infrared measurements over the Korean Peninsula B. J. Sohn 1, Sung-Hee Park 1, Eui-Seok Chung 1, and Marianne.
Estimation of Cloud and Precipitation From Warm Clouds in Support of the ABI: A Pre-launch Study with A-Train Zhanqing Li, R. Chen, R. Kuligowski, R. Ferraro,
MELANIE FOLLETTE-COOK KEN PICKERING, PIUS LEE, RON COHEN, ALAN FRIED, ANDREW WEINHEIMER, JIM CRAWFORD, YUNHEE KIM, RICK SAYLOR IWAQFR NOVEMBER 30, 2011.
Evaluating ammonia (NH 3 ) predictions in the NOAA National Air Quality Forecast Capability (NAQFC) using in situ aircraft measurements William Battye,
Rick Saylor 1, Barry Baker 1, Pius Lee 2, Daniel Tong 2,3, Li Pan 2 and Youhua Tang 2 1 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Air Resources Laboratory.
Estimating the radiative impacts of aerosol using GERB and SEVIRI H. Brindley Imperial College.
USE OF AIRS/AMSU DATA FOR WEATHER AND CLIMATE RESEARCH Joel Susskind University of Maryland May 12, 2005.
Andrew Heidinger and Michael Pavolonis
Hyperspectral Infrared Alone Cloudy Sounding Algorithm Development Objective and Summary To prepare for the synergistic use of data from the high-temporal.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Using Dynamical Downscaling to Project.
Comparison of CMAQ Lightning NOx Schemes and Their Impacts Youhua Tang 1,2, Li Pan 1,2, Pius Lee 1, Jeffery T. McQueen 4, Jianping Huang 4,5, Daniel Tong.
Methods for Incorporating Lightning NO x Emissions in CMAQ Ken Pickering – NASA GSFC, Greenbelt, MD Dale Allen – University of Maryland, College Park,
Development of ATOVS Data Assimilation for Regional Forecast System Eunjoo Lee NWPD, KMA.
Jinlong Li 1, Jun Li 1, Christopher C. Schmidt 1, Timothy J. Schmit 2, and W. Paul Menzel 2 1 Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies.
Evaluation of sulfate simulations using CMAQ version 4.6: The role of cloud Chao Luo 1, Yuhang Wang 1, Stephen Mueller 2, and Eladio Knipping 3 1 Georgia.
Continued improvements of air quality forecasting through emission adjustments using surface and satellite data & Estimating fire emissions: satellite.
Impact of Meteorological Inputs on Surface O 3 Prediction Jianping Huang 9 th CMAS Annual Conference Oct. 12, 2010, Chapel, NC.
Photo image area measures 2” H x 6.93” W and can be masked by a collage strip of one, two or three images. The photo image area is located 3.19” from left.
Evaluation of radiance data assimilation impact on Rapid Refresh forecast skill for retrospective and real-time experiments Haidao Lin Steve Weygandt Stan.
R. T. Pinker, H. Wang, R. Hollmann, and H. Gadhavi Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland Use of.
Transpacific transport of anthropogenic aerosols: Integrating ground and satellite observations with models AAAR, Austin, Texas October 18, 2005 Colette.
Satellite based instability indices for very short range forecasting of convection Estelle de Coning South African Weather Service Contributions from Marianne.
Global high-resolution marine isoprene emission derived from VIIRS-SNPP and MODIS-Aqua ocean color observations 1/25/2016Air Resources Laboratory1 Daniel.
Air Resources Laboratory 1 Comprehensive comparisons of NAQFC surface and column NO 2 with satellites, surface, and field campaign measurements during.
Tianfeng Chai 1,2, Hyun-Cheol Kim 1,2, Daniel Tong 1,2, Pius Lee 2, Daewon W. Byun 2 1, Earth Resources Technology, Laurel, MD 2, NOAA OAR/ARL, Silver.
1 RAQMS-CMAQ Atmospheric Chemistry Model Data for the TexAQS-II Period : Focus on BCs impacts on air quality simulations Daewon Byun 1, Daegyun Lee 1,
Validation of Satellite-derived Clear-sky Atmospheric Temperature Inversions in the Arctic Yinghui Liu 1, Jeffrey R. Key 2, Axel Schweiger 3, Jennifer.
Cloud property retrieval from hyperspectral IR measurements Jun Li, Peng Zhang, Chian-Yi Liu, Xuebao Wu and CIMSS colleagues Cooperative Institute for.
Infrared and Microwave Remote Sensing of Sea Surface Temperature Gary A. Wick NOAA Environmental Technology Laboratory January 14, 2004.
Meteorological Development Laboratory / OST / National Weather Service  1200 and 0600 UTC OZONE 48-h experimental, 8-h (daily max) 48-h experimental,
3 YEARS’ OPERATION OF AIR QUALITY FORECAST SYSTEM Hyun Cheol Kim, Daewon Byun, DaeGyun Lee, Soontae Kim, and Fong Ngan University of Houston The Institute.
MODIS Atmosphere Products: The Importance of Record Quality and Length in Quantifying Trends and Correlations S. Platnick 1, N. Amarasinghe 1,2, P. Hubanks.
On the Verification of Particulate Matter Simulated by the NOAA-EPA Air Quality Forecast System Ho-Chun Huang 1, Pius Lee 1, Binbin Zhou 1, Jian Zeng 6,
NASA, CGMS-44, 7 June 2016 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS LIMB CORRECTION OF POLAR- ORBITING IMAGERY FOR THE IMPROVED INTERPRETATION.
Daniel Tong NOAA Air Resources Lab & George Mason University
Potential use of TEMPO AOD & NO2 retrievals to support wild fire plume & O3 & PM2.5 forecast in National Air Quality Forecasting Capability (NAQFC) Pius.
Use of Satellite Data for Georgia’s Air Quality Planning Activities Tao Zeng and James Boylan Georgia EPD – Air Protection Branch TEMPO Applications.
Adverse Effects of Drought on Air Quality in the US
Assessment of impact of fire emissions during the Second Texas Air Quality Study in summer 2006 with satellite fire observations Hyun Cheol Kim 1,2,3,
Chemical histories of pollutant plumes in East Asia:
17th Annual CMAS Conference
A Novel Approach for Identifying Dust Storms with Hourly Surface Air Monitors in the Western United States Barry Baker1,2 and Daniel Tong1,2 1National.
Predicting Future-Year Ozone Concentrations: Integrated Observational-Modeling Approach for Probabilistic Evaluation of the Efficacy of Emission Control.
University of Maryland, AOSC Brown Bag Seminar
Hyun Cheol Kim 1,2, Fantine Ngan 1,2, Pius Lee 1, and Rick Saylor 3
Adaption of an entity based verification
Andrew Heidinger and Michael Pavolonis
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation of modeled surface ozone biases as a function of cloud cover fraction Hyun Cheol Kim 1,2, Pius Lee 1, Fong Ngan 1,2, Youhua Tang 1,2, Hye Lim Yoo 1,2, Li Pan 1,2 and Ivanka Stajner 3 1 NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, College Park, MD 2 University of Maryland, Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites, College Park, MD 3 NOAA National Weather Service, Silver Spring, MD 1 Air Resources Laboratory

Outline Motivation Photolysis rate Cloud fractions in observations, models and satellites Data & Methodology Comparison with model NAQFC (N. America) IMAQS-K (East Asia) Summary

Photolysis rate

Adjustment of photolysis rate Photolysis rate adjustment is proportional to the cloud fraction

Defining “Cloud Fraction” In model: relative humidity (w/ critical RH) In satellite: radiance (BT & BTD) In surface site : visual inspection, sky imager TSI-880 AUTOMATIC TOTAL SKY IMAGER Aqua satellite

MODIS Cloud Mask (MOD35) 6 Air Resources Laboratory

CF calculation in MCIP DO k = 1, metlay ! Define RH and critical RH of all layers. rh = xwvapor(c,r,k) / & qsat( e_aerk( xtempm(c,r,k)-stdtemp ), xpresm(c,r,k) ) rh = MIN(rh,1.0) ! Set RHC to at least 98% in PBL - JEP 5/91 IF ( x3htf(c,r,k-1) rhc ) THEN ! CBL mixing induced clouds should not exceed the frac area of ! the updrafts at top of cbl, les estimates are ~34% ! (Schumann 89, and Wyngaard and Brost 84) ccov(k) = 0.34 * ( rh - rhc ) / ( rhc ) ELSE ccov(k) = 0.0 ENDIF ELSE sg1 = xpresm(c,r,k) / xpresm(c,r,kmx) rhc = ( 2.0 * sg1 * (1.0-sg1) * ( *(sg1-0.5)) ) IF ( rh > rhc ) THEN ccov(k) = ( (rh - rhc)/(1.0 - rhc) )**2 ! Geleyn et al., 1982 ELSE ccov(k) = 0.0 ENDIF ENDIF ccov(k) = MAX( MIN( ccov(k), 1.0 ), 0.0 ) ENDDO Cloud cover is estimated based on the relative humidity using critical relative humidity threshold

Problems may happen due to … 1) Wrong displacement of cloud fields in space and/or time 2) Model’s capability to produce appropriate amount of cloud field

Data & Methodology National Air Quality Forecast Capability (NOAA) WRF-NMMB / CMAQ IMAQS-K (Ajou. University) WRF-ARW/CMAQ MODIS cloud product (MOD06) KMA observations & synoptic weather chart (Georeferencing)

Model CF (snapshot) MODIS CF (snapshot) Model CF (monthly mean) MODIS CF (monthly mean) 10 Air Resources Laboratory

Cloud Fraction distribution (land only) 11 Air Resources Laboratory

Cloud Fraction & Surface Ozone EPA AQS MDA8 ozone (daily max 8h moving average ozone, 1024 sites) 12 Air Resources Laboratory

13 Air Resources Laboratory

Slope = ppb/100% Mean AQS O3 = ppb Mean NAQFC O3 = ppb Mean CF (MODIS) = 0.56 Mean CF (NAQFC) = CF means 2.1 ppb (36% of O 3 overestimation, 5.79 ppb) CF difference & ozone bias 14 Air Resources Laboratory

Cloud fraction comparison ( , 103 military sites, monthly mean) 15 Air Resources Laboratory

MODIS cloud fraction & weather chart (East Asia) Georeferencing & Alpha channel blending 16 Air Resources Laboratory

Cloud Fraction & Surface Ozone (May 2014)

Cloud fraction comparison (May 2014, KMA) MODIS CF is slightly higher than KMA CF while CMAQ CF shows considerable underestimation. OBS MODISModel 18 Air Resources Laboratory

723910: US Point Mugu NAS latitude: , longitude: CFSR_18Z monthly mean ECMWF_18Z monthly meanMERRA_18Z monthly mean JRA-55 monthly mean Long-term cloud fraction comparison (Observation & Global Models) (Courtesy by Hye-Lim Yoo) 19 Air Resources Laboratory

Who cares cloud fraction….? Climate model doesn’t care cloud fraction …. Weather model doesn’t care cloud fraction …. Air quality model doesn’t care… If radiation is OK If precipitation is OK and blame emission

Future works Radiation-based photolysis adjustment Correlation of cloud fraction & radiation Cloud type (Low-, Middle-, High- cloud types) More satellite cloud products GOES (temporal resolution) MODIS (cloud type) VIIRS (spatial resolution)

Take Home Messages The photolysis rate is crucial in photochemistry. It can be calculated using RTM, and is adjusted using the cloud coverage (e.g. cloud fraction). The definition of cloud fraction is ambiguous, and not physically consistent in model, in satellite, and in situ observation. Cloud fraction differences are associated with surface ozone biases. Current modeled cloud fields are too bright (less cloud fraction), having a possibility to cause overestimation of surface ozone production.