DRAINMOD APPLICATION ABE 527 Computer Models in Environmental and Natural Resources.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
S A L T M O D A computer program for the prediction of the salinity of soil moisture, ground water and drainage water, the depth of the water table, and.
Advertisements

Find the solutions. Find the Vertex and Max (-1, 0) (5, 0) (2, 10)
Genesee County Farmland & Soils George Squires Genesee County Soil & Water Conservation District Manager.
Investigation of Consolidation Promoting Effect by Field and Model Test for Vacuum Consolidation Method Nagasaki University H.Mihara Y.Tanabasi Y.Jiang.
z = -50 cm, ψ = -100 cm, h = z + ψ = -50cm cm = -150 cm Which direction will water flow? 25 cm define z = 0 at soil surface h = z + ψ = cm.
Development of DRAIN-WARMF Model to Simulate Water Flow & Nitrogen Transport From an Agricultural Watershed: “ Subsurface Flow Component” Shadi Dayyani.
DRAINAGE WATER MANAGEMENT FOR MIDWESTERN ROW CROP AGRICULTURE DWM PARTNER FORUM II JUNE 15, 2011 WAYNE HONEYCUTT USDA-NRCS.
Bruno Basso Dept. Crop, Forest and Environmental Sciences University of Basilicata, Italy Contacts Joe T Ritchie: Bruno Basso :
Additional Questions, Resources, and Moving Forward Science questions raised in the development of a science assessment Effect of Conservation Tillage.
SCOPE & EFFECT EQUATIONS Chapter 7
Infiltration Infiltration is the process by which water penetrates from ground surface into the soil. Infiltration rate is governed by: rainfall rate hydraulic.
Green-Ampt Parameterization for Rainfall Excess Determination
ESTIMATING THE 100-YEAR FLOOD FORDECORAH USING THE RAINFALL EVENTS OF THE RIVER'S CATCHMENT By Kai TsurutaFaculty Advisor: Richard Bernatz Abstract:This.
By Saleh A. Al-Hassoun Associate Professor Department of Civil Engineering College of Engineering King Saud University Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Nidal Salim, Walter Wildi Institute F.-A. Forel, University of Geneva, Switzerland Impact of global climate change on water resources in the Israeli, Jordanian.
A FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING THE PERFORMANCE OF DWM AT LARGE SCALE MOHAMED A. YOUSSEF and R. WAYNE SKAGGS 1 By.
Vegetative Treatment Area Performance and Design Recommendations Joshua W. Faulkner Biological and Environmental Engineering Cornell University.
Predicting a suitable period trafficability using DRAINMOD Mohammed Salahat Guillermo Carrillo Supervised by: Dr. Mohtar, R.
The Calibration Process
The Effect of Soil Hydraulic Properties and Deep Seepage Losses on Drainage Flow using DRAINMOD Debjani Deb 26 th April, 2004.
A Process-Based Transfer Function Approach to Model Tile Drain Hydrographs Mazdak Arabi, Jennifer Schmidt and Rao S. Govindaraju World Water & Environmental.
Groundwater Hydraulics Daene C. McKinney
SWAT – Land Phase of the Hydrologic Cycle Kristina Schneider Kristi Shaw.
Kristie J. Franz Department of Geological & Atmospheric Sciences Iowa State University
Math – Getting Information from the Graph of a Function 1.
WaterSmart, Reston, VA, August 1-2, 2011 Steve Markstrom and Lauren Hay National Research Program Denver, CO Jacob LaFontaine GA Water.
The University of MississippiNational Center for Computational Hydroscience and Engineering Rainfall runoff modeling in agricultural watershed using 2D.
PALMS: Precision Agricultural-Landscape Modeling System Precision modeling to provide decision support for farmers PALMS is software designed to provide.
Subsurface drainage – Investigations
Master’s Degree Thesis Seminar Agricultural and Biological Engineering Sarah Rutkowski May 11 th, 2012 Role of Climate Variability on Subsurface Drainage.
Formetta et al., CAHMDA IV Lhasa July GEOtop/OMS3 - Model Integration and Case Study. Formetta G. et al., University of Trento (Italy) OR:
Using Ground-Water Model Predictions and the ppr and opr Statistics to Guide Data Collection.
Assessment of Hydrology of Bhutan What would be the impacts of changes in agriculture (including irrigation) and forestry practices on local and regional.
“Soil Wetness Modeling Rules for Sewage Treatment and Disposal Systems in North Carolina” by Barrett L. Kays, Ph.D., NCCHS Steven Berkowitz, P.E., NCDENR.
Lecture Notes Applied Hydrogeology
Dr. Larry C. Brown Professor, Extension Agricultural Engineer Department of Food, Agricultural, and Biological Engineering The Ohio State University.
William Crosson, Ashutosh Limaye, Charles Laymon National Space Science and Technology Center Huntsville, Alabama, USA Soil Moisture Retrievals Using C-
Surface Water Hydrology: Infiltration – Green and Ampt Method
Institute of Hydrology Slovak Academy of Sciences Katarína Stehlová 6 th ALPS-ADRIA SCIENTIFIC WORKSHOP 30 April - 5 May, 2007 Obervellach, Austria Assessment.
Surface hydrology The primary purpose of the WEPP surface hydrology component is to provide the erosion component with the duration of rainfall excess,
Introduction Conservation of water is essential to successful dryland farming in the Palouse region. The Palouse is under the combined stresses of scarcity.
September 16, 2008 R. Edward Beighley Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering San Diego State University SWOT Hydrology Workshop The Ohio State.
Drainage Management for Water Quality and Crop Production Benefits Don Pitts Agricultural Engineer NRCS USDA Champaign, IL.
Homework I will be ed It is also posted on the website.
Introduction to the TOPMODEL
CE 3354 Engineering Hydrology Lecture 21: Groundwater Hydrology Concepts – Part 1 1.
Deep Percolation and Groundwater Level Response Following Surface Irrigation Carlos Ochoa, Sam Fernald, Steve Guldan, Manoj Shukla Funding sources: USDA.
6. Drainage basins and runoff mechanisms Drainage basins Drainage basins The vegetation factor The vegetation factor Sources of runoff Sources of runoff.
Maximum Liquid Manure Spreading Rates on Sloping Land Ron Fleming and Malcolm MacAlpine University of Guelph Ridgetown Campus CSBE
Corn Yield Comparison Between EPIC-View Simulated Yield And Observed Yield Monitor Data by Chad M. Boshart Oklahoma State University.
4.6 INTRODUCING ‘SWAM’ (SOIL WATER ACCOUNTING MODEL)
E.D. Soulis, J.R. Craig, and G. Liu Progress in Closing the Water Balance with Land Surface Schemes WATERLOO UNIVERSITY OF IP3, 7-10September, 2011, Saskatoon,
Subsurface Drainage (Tile) Design Thomas F. Scherer NDSU Extension Agricultural Engineer (701)
Soil Water Balance Reading: Applied Hydrology Sections 4.3 and 4.4
1. CHAPTER 3 SUB-SURFACE DRAINAGE THEORY ERNST EQUATION 2.
The impacts of information and biotechnologies on corn nutrient management Jae-hoon Sung and John A. Miranowski Department of Economics Iowa State University.
Evaluating Hydrological Output of DRAINMOD from Measured and Estimated Soil Properties Advisor: Dr. Christopher Hay Presenter: Govinda Karki Graduate Research.
Excess Rainfall and Direct Runoff
AIM AIM point-scale plot-scale hillslope-scale
Simulation of stream flow using WetSpa Model
Infiltration and unsaturated flow (Mays p )
Looking for universality...
Infiltration and unsaturated flow (Mays p )
Presented by Robert Raley
Infiltration and unsaturated flow
Watersheds in Austin Area
Anisotropy – Key ideas Effective conductivity that represents aggregate effect of flow through a layered system Effective conductivity is different parallel.
Problem: Interpolation of soil properties
Modeling nitrogen gas emission under free and controlled drained at St Emmanuel using Root Zone Water Quality Model Qianjing Jiang & Zhiming Qi Department.
Variability in Corn Response to N Fertilizer along a 1000-ft Hillslope
Presentation transcript:

DRAINMOD APPLICATION ABE 527 Computer Models in Environmental and Natural Resources

Review drainage design… soil water characteristic… hourly rainfall, daily max & min temperature relative yield input data set Note: A DRAINMOD hydrology simulation can be run without specifying a relative yield input data set.

Objectives After this lecture, you should get familiar with DRAINMOD application as for: How to input your own data to DRAINMOD required format; What to consider for calibration purpose; and How to use the model to predict subsurface drain flow, water table depth, and crop yield. for different drain spacings.

Soil:Clermont silt loam soil Slope:<1%; and land- leveled after drain installation Area:6.2 ha Southeast Purdue Agriculture Center Drainage Field (SEPAC) Monitoring : Subsurface drain flow Water quality samples

- Hourly rainfall - Daily maximum and minimum temperatures (measured on site or from nearby stations) Model Inputs

- Hourly rainfall - Daily maximum and minimum temperatures Model Inputs

- Drainage design parameters Model Inputs Drain spacing, L5 m10 m20 m40 m Drain depth, b75 cm Effective radius, r e 1.1 cm Distance from surface to restricting layer, h 120 cm Maximum surface storage, S m 1.0 cm Note: parameter to be calibrated— Surface micro storage S 1

- Soil properties: soil water characteristic, saturated hydraulic conductivity Model Inputs cont. Note: parameters to be calibrated— lateral Ksat; volumetric moisture at 0 cm tension; and the vertical hydraulic conductivity of the restrictive layer

- Crop parameters Model Inputs cont. MonthDayRoot depth (cm) Time distributions of effective rooting depths

Calibration Procedure 1. Choose most uncertain parameters to be calibrated Range of parameter needed to be calibrated Volumetric soil moisture at 0 m tension (cm 3 /cm 3 ) LayerRange Layer 1 (0-25 cm) Layer 2 (25-30 cm) Layer 3 ( cm) Horizontal Ksat (cm/hr) Layer 1 (0-25 cm) Layer 2 (25-30 cm) Layer 3 ( cm) Vertical Ksat of restrictive layer (cm/hr) Surface Micro storage S 1 (cm)0.3-1

Calibration Procedure cont. 2. Choose plot and year to be calibrated Year Drain flow ratio W20/E20W10/E10W5/E West block and east block need to be calibrated separately. --W20 and E20 in were chosen.

Range of parameter needed to be calibrated Volumetric soil moisture at 0 m tension (cm 3 /cm 3 ) LayerRange Layer 1 (0-25 cm) Layer 2 (25-30 cm) Layer 3 ( cm) Horizontal Ksat (cm/hr) Layer 1 (0-25 cm) Layer 2 (25-30 cm) Layer 3 ( cm) Vertical Ksat of restrictive layer (cm/hr) Surface Micro storage (cm)0.3-1

Calibration Objective Functions (1) Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency: (2) Absolute percent error: Aggregated function, combining (1) and (2):

Automatic Calibration Parameter values against model Nash-Sutcliffe efficiencies

Identify Optimum Parameter Set

Representative observed and predicted drain flow graph

Observed and predicted water table graph

Predicted and observed relative yields

SUMMARY  Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (EF) for daily drain flow ranging from to 0.81;  EF for water table depth from to 0.9;  Statistical tests of EF indicating insignificant difference among the three drain spacings;  Both observed and predicted relative yields indicating yields decreasing with the increase of drain spacing;  Average percent errors ranging from 1.3 to 9.7% for corn yield and from -0.8 to 10.3% for soybean yield.