1. E.D. Soulis, J.R. Craig, and G. Liu Progress in Closing the Water Balance with Land Surface Schemes WATERLOO UNIVERSITY OF IP3, 7-10September, 2011, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

2. Lateral flow is an important process for part of the water cycle, yet it is the most poorly parameterised.  It is often completely ignored, all flow is vertical and lateral flow is from the saturated zone or;  assumed to be some simple decay function of storage with no explicit reference to resistance or;  modelled using expensive numerical solutions to Richard’s Equation Process ParameterisationPrediction

3. Find analytical approximation to bridge gap between Richard’s Equation and Q=Q 0 S eff D, where Q 0 is maximum interflow, S eff is effective saturation given by (S-S R )/(S C -S R ) Q 0 is predictable from Darcy’s equation for saturated flow S eff is based on retained soil moisture (field capacity) D is an exponent >1 ProcessParameterisationPrediction Approach

4. Needed to establish configuration of subsurface system Started with 3 layer FlatCLASS system (circa 1990), currently using 6 layer, sloped WATDRAIN2 WATDRAIN3 being tested Parameterisation ProcessParameterisationPrediction

5. Classic, Flat CLASS    Drainage Surface Excess ProcessParameterisationPrediction

6. Simple Good for vertical fluxes over large areas Features Problems Poor timing of run-off Local distribution of soil moisture is not represented ProcessParameterisationPrediction

7. Slope CLASS/WATDRAIN- 0    Surface Runoff Drainage Interflow slope Manning’s Equation Richard’s Equation Darcy’s Law ProcessParameterisationPrediction

8. “Groovy” CLASS    Surface Runoff Drainage Interflow slope ProcessParameterisationPrediction

9. Physically based Sensitive to soil moisture Features Dried soil completely under drought conditions Too flashy and recession curves too steep Difficult to calibrate Problems Souils and Snelgrove, 2000 ProcessParameterisationPrediction

10. Subgrid Representation ProcessParameterisationPrediction

11. WATDRAIN1    Surface Runoff Drainage slope Interflow ProcessParameterisationPrediction

12. Easier to calibrate and more realistic hydrographs Uses same horizontal and vertical flow layers Features Problems No soil suction (still allows soil to dry out completely) ProcessParameterisationPrediction

13. Bulk Saturation sand silt ProcessParameterisationPrediction

14. WATDRAIN1 had worked for MAGS, but was inadequate for IP3 Could not avoid addressing soil suction Used finite difference numeric solution to Richard’s Equation guided search for analytic solution Process Round 2 (Back to the Drawing Board) ProcessParameterisationPrediction

15. Numerical Solution to Richard’s Equation Saturation (S) vs. Downhill Distance (x) x (m) “Field Capacity” S time (4 day timesteps) ProcessParameterisationPrediction Soil Moisture Deficit

16. ProcessParameterisationPrediction

17. Predicted Saturation at Field Capacity Retained soil moisture (depth of 50 cm) WATDRAIN vs. HYDROTEL ProcessParameterisationPrediction

18. Field Capacity Comparison A simple expression for the bulk field capacity of a sloping soil horizon, 2010 E. D. Soulis, J. R. Craig, V. Fortin, G. Liu ProcessParameterisationPrediction

19.          CLASS CCC GEM Model RPN Stand Alone MESH NHRI ProcessParameterisationPrediction

20. Suction,ψ vs. Downhill Distance,x X(m) Ψ (cm) time (4 day timesteps) ProcessParameterisationPrediction Ψ?Ψ? f

21. It can be argued that the hydraulic resistance is proportional to the square of suction. Therefore, using a parallel electric circuit analog: w is a weighting factor, where: w a reflects the left boundary condition w Q reflects right boundary condition And w x is a spatial interpolator Combined Flow ProcessParameterisationPrediction

22. Testing Parameterisation ProcessParameterisationPrediction Numerical Solution Analytical Approximation S D (cm) Saturation, S vs. Distance, d for Loam

23. Soil moisture profile can be used to identify saturated area, recharge and interflow Prediction ProcessParameterisationPrediction

24. Target Characteristic Curve ProcessParameterisationPrediction

25. Characteristic Curve Normalized Flow Retained Soil Moisture End of Saturated Flow Solution at 20 specified timesteps Best fit curve: q/q 0 =5.65*(B-0.049) 7.09 ProcessParameterisationPrediction Bulk Saturation

26. ProcessParameterisationPrediction SCS Triangle

27. Characteristic Curve Overview Slope %Slope LengthSand (%)Clay (%) Sand6%1000m74.67.17 Silt6%1000m54.826.5 Loam6%1000m30.215.6 Q 0 (m/sec)SRSR SCSC D Sand1.05x10 -5 0.2850.9225.74 Silt3.77x10 -7 0.5490.9494.94 Loam4.16x10 -7 0.4940.9324.14 ProcessParameterisationPrediction

28. WATDRAIN3    Surface Runoff Baseflow=k slope Interflow ProcessParameterisationPrediction

29. Proposed Characteristic Curve Sand Interflow Bulk Saturation Normalized Interflow Normalized Recharge Solution Points ProcessParameterisationPrediction

30. Silt Normalized Interflow Normalized Recharge Solution Points ProcessParameterisationPrediction

31. Loam Normalized Interflow Normalized Recharge Solution Points ProcessParameterisationPrediction

32. Whitegull Hydrograph

33. SSRB Hydrograph