Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 1 Update for VTrans2025 Technical Committee April 12, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
KEEP MOVING TO KEEP AHEAD MAY MnDOT Vision and Mission Vision: Transportation leader, committed to upholding public needs and collaboration with.
Advertisements

Oregon Freight Plan July 28, Linking Freight Improvements to Economic Growth Travel Time Freight Transportation Improvements Productivity Competitiveness.
21 st Century Task Force Recommendation Go OHIO Transportation Futures Plan will deliver a detailed blueprint for transforming Ohios vast road, rail,
1 ODOTs Complete Streets Initiative. 2 Tipping Point for Complete Streets.
Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet Orange Grove Boulevard Pasadena, CA Aaron Elias Engineering Associate Kittelson & Associates Bill Cisco Senior.
Traffic Analysis Toolbox & Highway Capacity Manual Transition
Statewide Mobility Performance Measures Team Meeting Webinar June 17, 2013.
Twinbrook Sector Plan A New Community in the Technology Corridor
Ohio Department of Transportation Leadership Meeting#1 Jun 12, 2012 Steering Committee Meeting #1 WELCOME Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel Pike and Wok Travel.
Public Information Sessions November 30, 2010: City Center at Oyster Point December 1, 2010: HRT Norfolk.
Growth Focus Areas. Roadway Corridor Strategies Link and Serve the Growth Focus Centers Plan for Fiscally Sustainable Transportation “Livability” Focus:
Transportation leadership you can trust. FDOT Systems Planning White Paper A Recommended Approach to Delineating Traffic Analysis Zones in Florida.
November 24, 2014 Claudia Adriazola Director, Health and Road Safety EMBARQ, World Resources Institute Road Safety and the Urban Environment.
 City of Mesa Council Presentation October 23, 2014.
Accessible Mt. Baker Integrated Multimodal Plan Seattle Planning Commission Michael James, SDOT January 8, 2015.
Plan Purpose:  To provide pedestrian environments that are safe, attractive, and accessible to community institutions, employment and retail services.
Town Core Streetscape and Accessibility Design Study  Elabd Architectural Illustration  Kathleen Ryan, Landscape Architect, ASLA Questions for Milton.
® ® Contributor Session on Smart Mobility Performance Measures.
1. 2 VIA Long Range Plan  Vision for High-Capacity Transit across VIA service area by 2035  From extensive public and stakeholder input  Prioritization.
Walking and Biking the Busiest Roads Around Atlanta: a Bike/Ped Plan that establishes non-motorized transportation among regional-scale priorities Regan.
2030 Long-Range Transportation Plan Ithaca-Tompkins County Transportation Council Public MeetingFernando de Aragón TCPL October 15, 2008Staff Director.
Module 3 SMART PARKING 1. Module 3 Smart Parking Goals for Smart Parking Balance parking supply and demand Consider innovative parking management policies.
SB 360 and Multi-Modal Impact Fees & Efficiently Managing a Street Lightning System.
Improving Your World. RS&H tradition began in 1941 Employee-owned company Six programs of client-focused services Multi-disciplined team of planners,
Linda K. McCarthy, Executive Director Missoula Downtown Association Missoula, Montana
1 Elevating Health & Equity into the Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) process Tuesday, December 13, 2011 Celia Harris, M.P.H. Project Director Human.
Intersection & Interchange Geometrics (IIG) Innovative Design Considerations for All Users Module 8 Intersection- Interchange Evaluation Process.
What is the role of the transportation planner? Reference: Institute of Transportation Engineers.
Short Range Transit Improvement Plan CITY OF HIGHPOINT Sounding Board Meeting Educational Session 101 May 29, 2014.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 1 Multimodal Maturity of Virginia’s Transportation Corridors April 19, 2006 presented.
Transit-Oriented Design: China Jake Holden. What is TOD? Definition: A mixed-use commercial and residential area, designed to provide maximum access to.
Multimodal Transportation Districts and Areawide Multimodal Planning Martin Guttenplan, AICP - FDOT Cherie Horne, AICP –Tallahassee / Leon Co. Planning.
Quality Region Principles The New Visions Plan addresses the region’s quality of life in a number of important ways and provides a framework for improving.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Richmond Highway Transit Center Feasibility Study Briefing with the Fairfax County Transportation.
Greenwood Transit and Sidewalk Project N 90th St to N 105th St Community Open House Sarah Butler, Project Manager September 14, 2015 Presentation begins.
BPAC. “Congestion management is the application of strategies to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts.
Green Transport Dr Lina Shbeeb Minister of Transport. Jordan.
Jennifer Murray Traffic Forecasting Section Chief, WisDOT Metropolitan Planning Organization Quarterly Meeting July 28 th, 2015.
Capturing the Effects of Smart Growth on Travel and Climate Change Jerry Walters, Fehr & Peers Modeling for Regional and Interregional Planning Caltrans.
Transportation Concurrency The provision of “adequate transportation facilities” Integrating land use and transportation.
How Would a Transportation – Land Use Grant Program Work in the Washington Region? Presentation to the Transportation Planning Board Technical Committee.
David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Transportation leadership you can trust. TRB Planning Applications Conference May 18, 2009 Houston, TX A Recommended Approach to Delineating Traffic Analysis.
On the Road to a New Metropolitan Transportation Plan Spokane Regional Health District Board of Health April 25, 2013.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 1 Update for VTrans2025 Technical Committee February 24, 2006 Dr. James H. Lambert.
Comprehensive Plan Update Kevin O’Neill Seattle Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015.
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION Saint John. ATSJ VISION A City that supports a high quality of life where calm and friendly streets encourage the connection between.
Smart Growth Land Use and Transportation Infrastructure Paul Beyer – Director of Smart Growth, NYS Department of State.
Palm Beach MPO Draft Complete Streets Policy Palm Beach MPO Draft Complete Streets Policy Advisory Committees September
Transit-Oriented Development in Los Angeles County By Jennifer Tolentino Fall 2010.
Analyzing the Mobility Impacts of TOD Level of Service in Transit Oriented Districts Service for Who?
200/768_K 0 Sustainable Growth & Development Subcommittee Report Committee for a Sustainable Emerald Coast May 17, 2007.
Lakes Region Transportation Workshop November 15, 2013.
Complete Streets Plan Philadelphia Vision Zero Presented by Raj Mohabeer PLA, ASLA, AICP, LEED®AP December 3, 2015 Detroit’s.
Why a Bus Transit to Workplace Study? COST TO OWN A VEHICLE.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 1 Update for VTrans2025 Multimodal Advisory Committee August 8, 2006.
Shaping our Future Transportation Transportation trends Influencing trends through land use decisions Alternative futures: Base Case and Scenario Complementary.
Complete Streets Training
Minnesota State Planning Conference September 28, 2011.
EASTSIDE ACTIVITY CENTER MASTER PLAN PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA Board of County Commissioners Hearing May 13, 2008.
TRB Update AASHTO SCOHTS Annual Meeting April 2016.
City of Redmond: Northwest Redmond & U.S. Highway 97 Plan - October 11, 2006 What Makes a Great Neighborhood.
District VI, Florida Department of Transportation SE 2 nd Avenue and SE 4 th Street/Biscayne Boulevard Way March 25 th, 2014 Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory.
Complete Streets Training Module 4a – Understanding Context.
Dr. Roger Roess UPDATE January 11, 2015 Mode Definitions in the HCM.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia Update for VTrans2025 Technical Committee June 14, 2006 Dr. James H. Lambert Alexander.
Regional Pedestrian and Cycling Masterplan (PCMP)
MPO Board Presentation
Creating Streetscapes With Conventional Zoning
Presentation transcript:

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 1 Update for VTrans2025 Technical Committee April 12, 2006

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 2 Introduction Multimodal Corridor Maturity Model Presentation Review: “Multimodal Transportation Districts: A Creative Planning Tool in Florida” presented by Jared Ulmer Renaissance Planning Group 04/07/06

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 3 Multimodal Corridor Maturity Model Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute developed the Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) A maturity model provides –a place to start –the benefit of a community’s prior experiences –a common language and a shared vision –a framework for prioritizing actions –a way to define improvement A maturity model can be used as a benchmark for assessing different organizations for equivalent comparison CMMI Overview presentation,

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 4 Multimodal Corridor Maturity Model CMMI Overview presentation,

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 5 MaturityPotential Multimodal Corridor Maturity Model Instead of software design capability of organizations, we focus on ability of statewide transportation corridors to provide robust and varied service The Multimodal Corridor Maturity Model borrows from the CMMI framework, viewing each corridor in terms of its –Potential for multimodal investment –Existing multimodal maturity

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 6 Multimodal Corridor Maturity Model Metrics used to identify levels of multimodal maturity –Density (population, housing, jobs, attractions) –Accessibility to attractions by mode within time radius –Percent/amount of mixed use zoning –Mode split –Presence / Quality of intermodal facilities –Multimodal LOS –Accidents/injuries/fatalities by mode, normalized by person- mile traveled

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 7 Multimodal Corridor Maturity Model Density example –Census 2000 blockgroup density maps –Transit requires density Gray, George Systems and service planning in Gray & Hoel, eds. Public Transportation, 2nd edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, pg

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 8

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 9

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 10

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 11

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 12

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 13

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 14

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 15

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 16

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 17

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 18

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 19 Multimodal Corridor Maturity Model Future steps –Define the maturity levels of the MCMM based on metrics –Integrate further data into our research Accessibility Investigate multimodal “LOS” Intermodal facilities Global Insight freight data

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 20 Multimodal Corridor Maturity Model Measuring accessibility –Number of opportunities (jobs, households, etc.) within a specific amount of time from a given location by automobile, transit, or some other mode of transportation

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 21 Multimodal Corridor Maturity Model provided by Wendy Klancher, MWCOG

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 22 “Multimodal Transportation Districts: A Creative Planning Tool in Florida” 1999 Florida Growth Management Act authorizes local governments to establish multimodal transportation districts –Areas in which priority is placed on safe, comfortable, attractive pedestrian environments, with convenient interconnection to transit –Supports walking, bicycling and transit use –Enables advance of transportation concurrency Transportation facilities be available concurrent with the impacts of development Presented by Jared Ulmer, Renaissance Planning Group, 04/07/06

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 23 Presented by Jared Ulmer, Renaissance Planning Group, 04/07/06

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 24 Multimodal Transportation Districts –Density bonuses –Mixed-use zoning –Maximum block lengths –Access management; entrances to stores on minor, rather than major roads –On-site multimodal transportation infrastructure –Off-site shared parking –On-site parking behind rather than in front of buildings –Maximum front setbacks –Buildings oriented to the sidewalk –Ground floor transparency –Streetscaping and on-site amenities “Multimodal Transportation Districts: A Creative Planning Tool in Florida” Presented by Jared Ulmer, Renaissance Planning Group, 04/07/06

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 25 Multimodal Level of Service –Bicycle LOS (BLOS), Sprinkle Consulting, Inc. Presence of bike lane Proximity to motorized vehicle Motorized vehicle volume Motorized vehicle speed Percentage large trucks or heavy vehicles Pavement condition Percent on-street parking –Pedestrian LOS (PLOS), Sprinkle Consulting, Inc. Presence of a sidewalk Lateral separation of pedestrian and motorized vehicles Presence of physical barriers and buffers Motorized vehicle volume Motorized vehicle speed “Multimodal Transportation Districts: A Creative Planning Tool in Florida” Presented by Jared Ulmer, Renaissance Planning Group, 04/07/06

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 26 Multimodal Level of Service –Transit LOS (TLOS) Service frequency Pedestrian LOS Span of service Pedestrian crossing difficulty Obstacle to bus stop –Highway LOS (LOS) FDOT’s primary planning software (ARTPLAN) calculates PLOS, BLOS, TLOS, and LOS simultaneously “Multimodal Transportation Districts: A Creative Planning Tool in Florida” Presented by Jared Ulmer, Renaissance Planning Group, 04/07/06

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 27 Concepts of value –Multimodal Transportation Districts –Transportation concurrency –Multimodal LOS MLOScm.pdfhttp:// MLOScm.pdf “Multimodal Transportation Districts: A Creative Planning Tool in Florida”