Individual Education Plans 101 DEVELOPMENT OF A COMPLIANT AND INSTRUCTIONALLY RELEVANT IEP COURTNEY WARD NOVEMBER 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.
Advertisements

Special Education Referral and Evaluation Process Presented by Lexington Special Education Staff February 1, 2013.
I.E.P. on IEPs: Information Especially for Parents on Individualized Education Programs.
Understanding Special Education services SPECIAL EDUCATION REFERRAL PROCESS.
IEP Training for Kansas Schools 2013 – 2014 Kansas State Department of Education Technical Assistance System Network Services Special Factors/Considerations.
Connecticut State Department of Education
The IEP Individualized Educational Program. The IEP is the process and document that outlines what a free appropriate public education (FAPE) is for an.
Components of an IEP NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHERS.
Creating Collaborative Standards-Based IEPs: A Training for IEP Team Members Session Three.
Enforcing and Maintaining the IEP
YOUR IEP By Anita Breen. What is an IEP? I ndividualized E ducation P lan.
IEP DEVELOPMENT STAFF DEVELOPMENT OCTOBER 14, 2008 PATRICIA GRIFFIN ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION/PPS.
1 ADVOCACYDENVER Special Education 101 Pamela Bisceglia Advocate for Children and Inclusive Policy Implementation August 31, 2011.
Understanding the IEP Process
The Special Education Process 1 Connecting Research to Practice for Teacher Educators.
Top ten non compliance findings from the Office for Exceptional Children from their Special Education Onsite Reviews.
Thank you for joining us for Monitoring Progress Toward IEP Goals The presentation will begin momentarily. RIGHT REASON TECHNOLOGIES YOUR SOLUTION FOR.
Defensible IEPs Douglas County School District 1 Module V: Documentation and Timelines.
The Role of the Educator in the IEP Process. A Little History… The 70’s 1. Public Law : Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
PED 383: Adapted Physical Education Dr. Johnson.  Who needs them?  Students with Disabilities  Students with Unique needs  Individualized Education.
MN CIMP 2012 COMPLIANCE FOR PARTS OF THE IEP. Compliance Self-Check.
Getting Acquainted with the IEP Process
Response to Intervention RTI – SLD Eligibility. What is RTI? Early intervention – General Education Frequent progress measurement Increasingly intensive.
Copyright (c) 2003 Allyn & Bacon Teaching Exceptional, Diverse and At- Risk Students in the General Education Classroom Third Edition Sharon Vaughn Candace.
Legal and Ethical Issues
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2-1 Chapter 2 Planning and Providing Special Education Services.
Surrogate Parent Training Presenter: Title: District: Date: Presented by:
1 Common IEP Errors and Legal Requirements. 2 Today’s Agenda Parent Survey Results Procedural Compliance Self Assessment Results.
Special Education Adrienne Lacey-Bushell, Ed.D. Director Special Education.
7 Major Principles Under IDEA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHERS.
Laura Matson, Ph.D. Director, Special Services Puget Sound Educational Service District Navigating the School Culture September 25, 2014.
Preparing for Success: The Individualized Education Program August 2015 New Teacher Institute 1.
Special Education: The Basics Rachel J. Valleley, Ph.D. Munroe Meyer Institute.
CUI 4450 Education and Psychology of Exceptional Children
PLOP, Goals & Objectives Notes PLOP – Free of grammatical and spelling errors – Statement describing how the student is performing the annual goal currently.
 Special Education is mandated by federal law and we have to do what they say.
SPECIAL EDUCATION 101 What Do YOU Need to Know?
University of Connecticut Center for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities Families As Partners Training Steps in the Special Education Process.
Schools, Families, Communities and Disabilities Rebecca Durban and Jessica Martin.
The IEP: Individual Education Plan. The IEP Team  (1) The parents of the child;  (2) At least one regular education teacher of the child (if the child.
Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.
1 The Special Education Assessment and IEP Process EDPOWER Teacher Institute 2013.
An Overview of Special Education Teacher Cadets, D.F.H.S.
Special Education Law for the General Education Administrator Charter Schools Institute Webinar October 24, 2012.
Essential Terms and Concepts  Special education has its own unique vocabulary and terms.  Being familiar with the concepts increases your understanding.
COMPLIANT IEPs: Using Data and the IEP Process to make Appropriate Placement Decisions Cobb County School District DaVida Alston, Lisa Geiger, D’Nena Mock.
Individualized Education Plan (IEP) GOALS: Provide an understanding of your role as well as other professionals involved. Demystify the basic workings.
The IEP: Drafting the IEP (Steps 1, 2, 3, and 4) Southwest Ohio Special Education Regional Resource Center Tuesday, November 7, 2006.
Chapter 3 Assessment. Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 3-2 Highlights of the Law: IDEA-1997 Strengthens the role of parents.
Chapter 3. Assessment Highlights of the Law:IDEA 1997 Strengthens the role of parents Ensures access to the general education curriculum Increases attention.
IUSD Special Education Department October 14, 2015.
1 Division of Students with Disabilities and English Language Learners Overview of the Individualized Education Program.
The New IDEA in Special Education
IDEA 1997 P.L The Facts. IEP Must explain how the child’s disability affects their ability to participate in the general education classroom Must.
Significant Developmental Delay Annual State Superintendent’s Conference on Special Education and Pupil Services October 20-21, 2015.
 ask in writing for evaluation; keep a copy of the request  explain child’s problems and why evaluation is needed  share important information with.
1 The Development of a Compliant and Instructionally-Relevant Individualized Education Plan Solitia Wilson ADMS 625 Summer 2014.
Prince George’s County Public Schools 1 The IEP Team Process Department of Special Education Linda Gaskill and Darice Holmes March 3, 2008.
“ IT IS PROOF NOT TRUTH” THE IEP IS THE PROOF Dr. Jodi Roseman Director of Special Education School District of Springfield Township.
Department of Exceptional Student Education The School District of Palm Beach County.
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
Adapted Physical Education (APE)
INCLUSIVE PRACTICES Co-Teaching Models
Understanding the IEP Process
Department of Exceptional Student Education
Visions of Community 2012 March 10, 2012
Teaching Students with Disabilities
Downingtown Area School District Central Office April 4, 2018
Standards-based Individualized Education Program Module Seven: Determining the Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) SBIEP Module Seven: Determining the.
Presentation transcript:

Individual Education Plans 101 DEVELOPMENT OF A COMPLIANT AND INSTRUCTIONALLY RELEVANT IEP COURTNEY WARD NOVEMBER 2010

Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEIA) Guides the administration of special education Components:  Least Restrictive Environment  Free Appropriate Public Education  Child Find  Individualized education (IEP)  Nondiscriminatory evaluation  Due process

Child Find Schools are responsible for:  Identifying individuals with disabilities  Providing a quality education to individuals with disabilities Our process: 1. Referral to Child Study Intervention Team 2. Intervention implementation (appropriate timing) 3. Review of response to intervention 4. Referral to Child Study Team 5. Assessments of cognitive, processing, and language skills 6. Review of eligibility for special education services 7. Development of an IEP

Present Level of Performance Statement of the child’s present level of academic and functional abilities Description of the impact the child’s disability has on performance in the general education classroom Clear explanation of administered tests and results Includes:  strengths  the unique needs of the child  parental concerns

What is S.M.A.R.T.? S.M.A.R.T. is an acronym to describe appropriately written goals and objectives This applies to IEPs, as well as daily objectives taught by regular education teachers

Vague Goals Increase study skills for academic success Highlight 80% of key words in test questions 4 out of 5 opportunities Circle 100% of numbers and number words in math problems 4 out of 5 opportunities Writing IEP Goals S.M.A.R.T. Goals

Goals Academic and functional goals Designed to meet the child’s specific needs Address the skills that keep the child from full involvement and progress in the general education classroom Written annually S.M.A.R.T. goals  specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, timely

Objectives Benchmarks for achieving annual goals Smaller, intermittent steps to achieving broader stated goals Measurable Written annually S.M.A.R.T. objectives  Specific, measurable, achievable, reliable, timely

Related Services Additional services that would enable the child to be successful on annual goals and objectives Generally appears as:  Speech/language services  Accommodations  Modifications

Accommodations  Services that allow students to make goals  Same academic level as non- disabled peers  Same SOLs and objectives  Same ending, different route Generally appears as:  Read aloud  Math aids (calculator, 100s chart, number line)  Extended time  Multiple test session  Graphic organizers  Preferential seating  Color-coding  Tracking sheets

Modifications  Services that allow students to make goals  Different academic level as non-disabled peers  Amended SOLs and objectives  Different ending, different route Generally appears as:  Changes to curriculum  Reduced depth or breadth of what students are learning in the general education classroom

Least Restrictive Environment Explains why students are not in the general education classroom Explains when students will be in the general education classroom and to what extent Keep in mind:  We want students to be educated to the fullest extent possible with their non-disabled peers.  Inclusion and collaborative instruction are a mindset. We must believe them to be successful in order for these theories to work.  Self-containment and pull-out must be justifiably in the best interest of the child’s progress on stated goals and objectives.

Assessments Participation of state and district-wide assessments County assessments:  PALS – Phonological (Grades K-3)  DRA – Developmental Reading Assessment (Grade K-5) State assessments:  SOLs – Standards of Learning Assessments (Grades 3-5)  VGLA – Virginia (Grades 3-5)  VAP – Virginia (Grades 3-5)

Dates Statement of beginning and ending dates of services covered in the IEP  A new IEP must be developed before the ending date of the current IEP  Out of date IEP = Out of compliance Frequency, duration, and location of services provided Dates of progress reports  generated to outline child’s progress on goals and objectives within one year period

Closing Who: All instructional staff What: Must uphold provisions of IDEIA and IEP goals of all students with disabilities When: Each year Where: All instructional and functional areas of the school (including breakfast, resource, lunch, recess, transportation) Why: To provide the best-fit instructional program for the progress of students with disabilities

Discussion The presentation gives a concise but informative review of an effective IEP, especially key areas that regular education teachers must be aware of, including PLOP, goals, and objectives. Understanding effective, S.M.A.R.T. goals will help all teachers be aware of what they should expect from students with and without disabilities. A message of compliance resonates throughout the presentation. Teachers are made to understand what is expected under the laws as well as for the best of student performance. Upholding the provisions of IDEIA is the responsibility of all instructional staff. This collective responsibility is necessary to ensure students with disabilities are appropriately served.