National Geospatial Advisory Committee NGAC Address Subcommittee Report Tony Spicci NGAC Meeting September 22, 2014

National Geospatial Advisory Committee NAD Session Overview 11/18/2015 Review Intro piece Recap of Address Use Case papers Update on NAD development – Tim Trainor CFPB Home Mortgage Disclosure Act Update – Michael Byrne Summary & next steps

National Geospatial Advisory Committee National Address Database Subcommittee Committee Members: Tony Spicci (chair), Dan Cotter (co-chair), Molly Vogt, Gene Trobia, Jack Maguire, Jason Warzinik, Harvey Thorleifson, Talbot Brooks, Bert Granberg, John Mahoney, Tricia Gibbons 11/18/2015

National Geospatial Advisory Committee Guidance Identify compelling use cases demonstrating the value and utility of a National Address Database. Describe the potential relationship between a National Address Database and National Parcel Data and identify possible opportunities to coordinate and leverage the two efforts. 11/18/2015

National Geospatial Advisory Committee A Little History…. 11/18/2015 The Need for a National Address Database A Report Submitted by the National Geospatial Advisory Committee December 2012 The FGDC is requesting that NGAC develop a white paper addressing the following points: 1.The need for a National Address Database and the benefits and potential savings and efficiencies that will be realized 2.Potential concerns about a National Address Database, including privacy issues 3.Possible approaches for development of a National Address Database, including the roles of Federal, State, local, and Tribal governments, commercial partners, as well as other stakeholders

National Geospatial Advisory Committee Current Plans Position paper that builds a business case for the NSDI by identifying compelling use cases demonstrating the value and utility of a National Address Database. Examine the potential relationship between a National Address Database and National Parcel Data and identify possible opportunities to coordinate and leverage the two efforts. 11/18/2015

National Geospatial Advisory Committee NAD Position Paper Introduction Brief summary of case studies Appendix – Case Studies 11/18/2015

National Geospatial Advisory Committee Current Use Cases National Address Database Projected Saving Within the Federal Government Consumer Finance Protection Bureau – Home Mortgage Disclosure Act Use Case for a National Address Database Address and the Emergency Response Community National Address Database Use Case State of Arizona National Address Database Business Case Tribal National Address Database Use Case Lexington County, SC National Address Database Use Case Boone County Missouri Master Address Database Voter Registration Integration 11/18/2015 Potential to add additional papers and create a ‘living’ document.

National Geospatial Advisory Committee Immediate Actions Add addresses as a theme or dataset under an existing theme in the NGDA and identify theme lead/dataset manager. Produce a business requirements document to support the development and maintenance of a NAD. 11/18/2015

National Geospatial Advisory Committee NAD Business Plan Establish governance Determine funding strategies Leverage existing investments Identify best practices at state and local level Identify short-term actions to quickly establish an NAD 11/18/2015

National Geospatial Advisory Committee NAD Business Plan (con’t) Identify long-term strategies for improvement and maintenance Assure that the NAD aligns with local public safety and other programmatic drivers Identify schedule, milestone and metrics to develop, produce and maintain an NAD 11/18/2015

National Geospatial Advisory Committee Moving Forward Solicit further input on the paper Finalize; receive NGAC approval Examine the potential relationship between a National Address Database and National Parcel Data and identify possible opportunities to coordinate and leverage the two efforts. 11/18/2015

National Geospatial Advisory Committee Questions / Comments? 11/18/2015